ÿWPC 5^6oÒ Þa ÞíjÆ9EF:Õ¡€¢ð¥\zä¹›q’]ø°f«ŠMè]ïw}£”pèÿØ͵º×бm<-Ç_¨/³]k[7…r›ì4!>ÆþšŽ<²ÕÖt G:—ÿK=a# ª£ÃãòÑ'n5þªÄÔuº©S…„æœÇ]IŰ“^07ÈŽ=Äå›Q‡M®;ô·¨7÷÷s3´wJ¢é§iŸ† +nË.o+óQɼ?Ëô¦R9‘HÌÍFñ^ ='ÿa¸=>jÔÞ¼ _ž§ežv¯î#÷ª­û%+OÙ[ߥMÌ.&®s5}lUw:;¥@Ò:˰î!Ö‡lúûCŸ°E»~Á(ôÊ•¥ÄU+:¨V4ÃÌT¢cöÑ¢!Ôõ.,¦ûŒBLOPeףᚼŽ\Ÿ|ö´›iÄ'Ö¨‰è*QnÅ@ÉL£)[ܲΰœijë[0`™cÁ=àD­…§‡jH_¢¹åã/-O&r–êΆ _‰Û6ˆVƒ¢Ù³Ù;‡ß—åë…Y¹]ÿK„£8…Ј¶ ãGõà$’Óý-—6Ø©pñÃK…Ú(['G!ÈûŠÈ€6Ùp?·¥ нx®ãÈžsà~ÀK•æ b#Á\ % UN# 0ˆq UNù ^ G wS zW ÒÑ 4£ · Æ mÈ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ11N÷÷÷Eùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùbûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûûû 0ë Bîî 0¤  D3¯ D-â 0K ASZÆ­ 0¤s 0D A«[˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular8 Y-s  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptüPH,|©¦3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2G¬$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Te»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôùMò»»Ô d(|3Ç$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Te»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ç$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Te»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Te»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Te»»»ÔÑ8€9XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îLtTeÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼Te»îîLt #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àNovember€28,€2001€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X9X»¼TeÔÌò òÔ#†¼Te»XX9#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€MICHAEL€Ô_ÔCAMMONÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡X9X»¼TeÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Rutherford€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€F„47877€€€€€€James€K.€Clayton,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„00592„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€25,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X9XXX9ÔThe€appellant,€Michael€Ô_ÔCammonÔ_Ô,€was€convicted€in€a€jury€trial€of€robbery,€aggravated€assault€andÐ xÈ  Ðpossession€of€over€300€grams€of€cocaine€with€the€intent€to€sell€or€deliver.€€He€was€also€convicted€ofÐ d´ Ðfelony€possession€of€a€weapon.€€For€these€offenses€the€appellant€received€sentences€of€three€years,Ð P  Ðthree€years,€twenty„two€years,€and€two€years,€respectively.€€All€sentences€were€set€to€run€concurrentlyÐ <Œ Ðwith€each€other,€but€consecutively€to€any€previous€sentences€the€appellant€might€have€to€serve.€€InÐ (x Ðthis€appeal€he€raises€three€issues€for€our€consideration.€€First,€he€claims€the€evidence€is€insufficientÐ d Ðto€corroborate€the€testimony€of€his€accomplice.€€Secondly,€he€alleges€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÐ P Ðfailing€to€instruct€the€jury€with€respect€to€the€amount€of€controlled€substance€required€for€the€offenseÐ ì< Ðcharged.€€Finally,€the€appellant€complains€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€onÐ Ø( Ðthe€lesser„included€offense€of€simple€assault.€€We€find€no€reversible€error€with€respect€to€theÐ Ä Ðnarcotics€offense€or€with€respect€to€the€conviction€for€aggravated€robbery.€€Those€convictions€areÐ ° Ðaffirmed.€€However,€we€must€reverse€the€conviction€for€aggravated€assault€and€remand€this€case€forÐ œì Ða€new€trial.Ô#†X9XXX9è#ÔÔ#†¼Te»XX9­#ÔÔ‡X9X»¼TeÔÐ ˆØ ÐÓÜÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€is€Affirmed€in€Part€andÐ `° ÐReversed€and€Remanded€in€Part.ó óÐ L œ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Te»àX9$ #ÔÔ‡X9X.¼TeÔJerry€L.€Smith,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€and€òòNormaÐ $"t! ÐMcGee€Ogle,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð #`" ÐÌMichael€J.€Ô_ÔFlanaganÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Michael€Ô_ÔCammonÔ_Ô.Ð è$8 $ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€David€H.€Ô_ÔFindleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€BillÐ À&"& ÐÔ_ÔWhitesellÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€John€W.€Price,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€theÐ ¬'ü"' Ðappellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ˜(è#( ÐÓ ÓÌÌÌÌÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ô‡Ìà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Te»XX9D #ÔÔ‡X9X»¼TeÔÐ œì ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼Te»XX9”#ÔÔ‡X9X»¼TeÔÓ  ÓòòÔ‡X9XXX9Ôà@ÈÈ!ìàFactual€BackgroundóóˆÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àOn€February€17,€1998,€Rutherford€County€Deputy€Gregory€Tillman€stopped€a€late€1980'sÐ L œ Ðmodel€Chevrolet€Caprice€on€Interstate€24€near€Murfreesboro.€€Tillman€stopped€the€car€because€it€didÐ 8 ˆ Ðnot€have€its€headlights€on€during€inclement€weather.€€The€appellant,€Michael€Cammon,€was€drivingÐ $ t Ðthe€car€while€the€owner,€Antonio€McCray,€was€a€passenger.€€Tillman€asked€the€appellant€to€sit€in€theÐ  ` Ðback€seat€of€the€patrol€cruiser€while€he€wrote€a€ticket€for€the€traffic€offense.€€McCray€remained€inÐ ü L  Ðhis€vehicle.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àAs€he€had€stopped€the€car,€Tillman€had€noticed€that€the€occupants€appeared€to€be€hidingÐ À  Ðsomething.€€In€addition,€the€appellant€had€initially€said€he€had€just€brought€the€car,€but€then€changedÐ ¬ü  Ðhis€story€and€said€the€car€belonged€to€McCray.€€As€a€result€of€this€suspicious€behavior,€Tillman€askedÐ ˜è  Ðthe€appellant€if€he€was€carrying€any€illegal€drugs€and€also€if€the€officer€could€search€the€car.€€TheÐ „Ô  Ðappellant€denied€there€were€any€drugs€in€the€car€and€he€refused€to€consent€to€a€search.€€Tillman€toldÐ pÀ Ðthe€appellant€a€drug€dog€was€in€route€to€the€scene€and€then€the€officer€exited€the€car€to€ask€if€McCrayÐ \¬ Ðwould€consent€to€a€search.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àTilliam€returned€to€his€patrol€car€with€McCray.€€As€the€deputy€opened€the€back€door€of€theÐ  p Ðpatrol€car,€the€appellant€jumped€out€and€grabbed€for€Tillmanððs€pistol.€€During€the€struggle€theÐ  \ Ðweapon€discharged.€€Eventually,€Tillman€let€go€of€the€gun,€pushed€the€appellant€away€and€ran€acrossÐ øH Ðthe€interstate.€€Looking€back,€he€saw€McCray€get€into€his€vehicle€and€flee€while€the€appellant€stoodÐ ä4 Ðon€the€side€of€the€road€with€Tillmanððs€pistol.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àAfter€fleeing€the€scene,€McCray€exited€the€interstate€a€short€distance€away.€€He€grabbed€theÐ ¨ø Ðweapons€that€both€he€and€the€appellant€had€been€carrying€along€with€a€quantity€of€cocaine€that€theÐ ”ä Ðappellant€had€purchased€in€Atlanta€and€threw€the€items€into€a€fenced€area€housing€a€trash€dumpster.€Ð €Ð ÐMcCray€then€hid€in€a€hotel€that€was€closed€for€remodeling.€€Eventually,€the€police€found€two€pistolsÐ l¼ Ðand€two€bundles€of€cocaine€near€the€dumpster€where€McCray€had€been€seen€disposing€of€theÐ X ¨ Ðcontraband.€€One€bundle€of€cocaine€weighed€250.5€grams,€and€the€second€one€weighed€250.3€grams.€Ð D!” ÐÌÌà  àUltimately,€both€the€appellant€and€McCray€were€apprehended.€€McCray€testified€for€theÐ $X" Ðprosecution€at€the€appellantððs€trial.Ð ô$D # ÐÌà@ ìàòòCorroboration€of€Accomplice€TestimonyóóˆÐ Ì&"% ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€claims€the€testimony€of€Antonio€McCray€was€insufficiently€corroborated€toÐ ¤(ô#' Ðsustain€the€appellant's€covinctions.Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àIn€Tennessee,€it€is€a€long€established€legal€principle€that€a€criminal€defendant€cannot€beÐ ° Ðâ âconvicted€on€the€uncorroborated€testimony€of€an€accomplice.€€òòState€v.€Bigbeeóó,€885€S.W.2d€797,€803Ð œì Ð(Tenn.€1994).€€However,€the€needed€ð ðcorroborative€evidence€may€be€direct€or€entirely€circumstantial,Ð ˆØ Ðand€it€need€not€be€adequate,€in€and€of€itself,€to€support€a€conviction;€it€is€sufficient€to€meet€theÐ tÄ Ðrequirements€of€the€rule€if€it€fairly€and€legitimately€tends€to€connect€the€defendant€with€theÐ `° Ðcommission€of€the€crime€charged.ðð€€òòId.óó€€The€corroboration€need€not€ð ðextend€to€every€part€of€theÐ L œ Ðaccompliceððs€testimony,ðð€and€it€need€only€be€slight€and,€when€standing€alone,€entitled€to€but€littleÐ 8 ˆ Ðconsideration.€€òòId.óó;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Griffisóó,€964€S.W.2d€577,€589€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).Ð $ t ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case€Deputy€Tillman€testified€that€the€appellant€got€control€of€the€officerððsÐ ü L  Ðpistol€and€fled€the€scene.€€A€disinterested€eyewitness€saw€a€black€man€like€McCray€dispose€ofÐ è 8  Ðsomething€at€the€same€dumpster€in€which€McCray€said€he€hid€the€weapons€and€drugs.€€Indeed,Ð Ô$  Ðweapons€and€drugs€were€found€exactly€where€McCray€said€they€would€be.€€Under€the€circumstancesÐ À  Ðit€is€clear€that€McCrayððs€testimony€was€sufficiently€corroborated.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€also€complains€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€as€to€how€toÐ „Ô  Ðconsider€accomplice€testimony.€€However,€it€appears€that€no€request€for€such€an€instruction€wasÐ pÀ Ðmade€by€the€defense.€€In€the€absence€of€such€a€request,€the€trial€court€does€not€err€by€failing€toÐ \¬ Ðinstruct€the€jury€on€accomplice€testimony,€even€if€the€proof€would€warrant€such€an€instruction.€€òòStateÐ H˜ Ðv.€Andersonóó,€985€S.W.2d€9,€17€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ð 4„ ÐÌÌòòà@**ìàFailure€to€Instruct€the€Jury€Regarding€the€Amount€of€Controlled€Substance€ˆÐ øH Ðà@nnìàRequired€for€the€Offense€Charged.óó€ˆÐ ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€also€complains€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€that€itÐ ¼  Ðmust€find€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€the€appellant€possessed€more€than€300€grams€of€cocaineÐ ¨ø Ðin€order€to€convict€of€the€offense€charged€in€the€indictment.Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àIt€is€well„settled€that€when€the€amount€of€a€controlled€substance€is€an€element€of€the€crimeÐ l¼ Ðcharged,€it€is€error€for€the€trial€judge,€even€in€the€absence€of€a€request,€to€fail€to€instruct€the€jury€withÐ X ¨ Ðrespect€to€the€amount€of€controlled€substance€necessary€to€commit€the€offense.€€òòState€v.€Walkeróó,€29Ð D!” ÐS.W.3d€885,€893€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).€€However,€such€an€error€is€subject€to€constitutionalÐ 0"€  Ðharmless€error€analysis;€that€is€to€say€that€any€such€error€must€be€found€harmless€beyond€a€reasonableÐ #l! Ðdoubt.€€òòId.óóÐ $X" ÐÌà  àThe€instant€case€is€very€similar€to€òòWalkeróó€and€it€is€clear€that€it€was€error€for€the€trial€courtÐ à%0!$ Ðto€fail€to€instruct€the€jury€as€to€the€amount€of€cocaine€that€the€appellant€must€have€possessed€to€beÐ Ì&"% Ðguilty€of€the€offense€charged.€€The€only€question€then€becomes€whether€that€error€was€harmlessÐ ¸'#& Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case€the€appellant€did€not€challenge€the€evidence€concerning€the€amounts€ofÐ |*Ì%) Ðcocaine.€€There€was€no€challenge€to€expert€testimony€concerning€the€amount€of€cocaine€or€to€theÐ h+¸&* Ðchain€of€custody.€€The€trial€court,€when€reading€the€indictment€to€the€jury,€did€state€that€the€appellantÐ ° Ðwas€charged€with€felonious€possession€of€over€300€grams.€€Under€very€similar€circumstances€thisÐ œì ÐCourt€in€òòWalkeróó€found€the€same€error€as€that€committed€here€to€be€harmless€beyond€a€reasonableÐ ˆØ Ðdoubt.€€We€do€likewise€in€the€instant€case.€€This€issue€affords€the€appellant€no€relief.Ð tÄ ÐÌà@Ò Ò ìàòòFailure€to€Instruct€the€Jury€on€the€Lesser„Included€OffenseˆÐ L œ Ðà@"ìàof€Simple€AssaultóóˆÐ 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€was€charged€and€convicted€of€aggravated€assault.€€On€appeal€he€maintains€thatÐ  ` Ðthe€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€with€respect€to€simple€assault.€€This€requires€us€toÐ ü L  Ðexamine€the€elements€of€the€offenses€of€aggravated€assault€and€simple€assault.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„102€provides€in€pertinent€part:Ð À  Ðà  àÌà  àà ` à(a)€A€person€commits€aggravated€assault€who:Ð ˜è  Ðà  àà ` à(1)€Intentionally€or€knowingly€commits€an€assault€as€defined€in€ðð€39„13„101€and:Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à(A)€Causes€serious€bodily€injury€to€another;€orÐ pÀ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à(B)€Uses€or€displays€a€deadly€weapon;€orÐ \¬ Ðà  àà ` à(2)€Recklessly€commits€an€assault€as€defined€in€ðð€39„13„101(a)(1),€and:Ð H˜ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à(A)€Causes€serious€bodily€injury€to€another;€orÐ 4„ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à(B)€Uses€or€displays€a€deadly€weapon.Ð  p ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„102(a)(1),€(2).Ð øH ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„101€provides:Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à(a)€A€person€commits€assault€who:Ð ¨ø Ðà  àà ` à(1)€Intentionally,€knowingly€or€recklessly€causes€bodily€injury€to€another;Ð ”ä Ðà  àà0 ` à(2)€òòIntentionallyóó€or€òòknowinglyóó€causes€another€to€reasonably€fear€imminent€bodilyÐ €Ð Ðinjury;€orÐl¼` (#` (# Ðà  àà0 ` à(3)€Intentionally€or€knowingly€causes€physical€contact€with€another€and€a€reasonableÐ X ¨ Ðperson€would€regard€the€contact€as€extremely€offensive€or€provocative.ÐD!”` (#` (# Ðà  àà0 ` à(b)€Assault€is€a€Class€A€misdemeanor€unless€the€offense€is€committed€underÐ 0"€  Ðsubdivision€(a)(3),€in€which€event€assault€is€a€Class€B€misdemeanor.Ð#l!` (#` (# ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„101€(emphasis€added).Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àClearly,€assault€is€a€lesser„included€offense€of€aggravated€assault.€€òòState€v.€Smileyóó,€38Ð Ì&"% ÐS.W.3d.€521,€525€(Tenn.€2001).€€However,€we€must€next€determine€whether€an€instruction€on€everyÐ ¸'#& Ðvariation€of€simple€assault€is€warranted€by€the€evidence€in€this€case.€€òòId.óó€€If€the€evidence€in€the€recordÐ ¤(ô#' Ðis€sufficient€to€sustain€a€conviction€for€any€variation€of€simple€assault,€then€the€jury€should€have€beenÐ )à$( Ðinstructed€with€respect€to€that€offense.€€òòId.óóÐ |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àThere€is€proof€in€the€record€that€Deputy€Tillman€sustained€bodily€injuries€during€the€struggleÐ ° Ðwith€the€appellant.€€He€testified€that€he€had€minor€cuts€and€abrasions,€a€chipped€tooth,€and€bite€marksÐ œì Ðon€his€hands.€€Thus,€there€is€sufficient€evidence€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€conclude€that€an€assaultÐ ˆØ Ðunder€section€39„13„101(a)(1)€occurred.€€Furthermore,€there€is€proof€in€the€record€from€which€aÐ tÄ Ðrational€trier€of€fact€could€conclude€that€Deputy€Tillman€reasonably€feared€imminent€bodily€injuryÐ `° Ðas€a€result€of€the€appellantððs€actions,€thus€constituting€an€assault€under€section€39„13„101(a)(2).€Ð L œ ÐHowever,€it€appears€that€the€appellantððs€actions€were€not€of€the€type€that€our€supreme€court€hasÐ 8 ˆ Ðcharacterized€as€ð ðoffensive€or€provocativeðð.€€These€actions€are€ones€which€offend€oneððs€sense€ofÐ $ t Ðpersonal€dignity,€but€do€not€cause€injury.€€òòSmileyóó,€38€S.W.3d€at€525.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àIn€summary€therefore€we€find€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€withÐ è 8  Ðrespect€to€the€lesser„included€offenses€of€assault€as€they€are€defined€in€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ Ô$  Ðsection€39„13„101(a)(1)€and€(2).€€However,€as€in€òòSmileyóó,€there€is€no€error€in€failing€to€instruct€theÐ À  Ðjury€on€simple€assault€as€defined€at€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„13„101(a)(3).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€next€question€is€whether€the€error€in€failing€to€give€the€instruction€on€the€two€forms€ofÐ „Ô  Ðsimple€assault€described€above€was€harmless€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Allenóó,€69Ð pÀ ÐS.W.3d€181,€189€(Tenn.€2001).€€In€making€this€determination€we€must€conduct€a€thoroughÐ \¬ Ðexamination€of€the€record,€including€the€evidence€presented€at€trial,€the€appellantððs€defense,€and€theÐ H˜ Ðverdict€returned€by€the€jury.€€òòId.óó€at€191.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àThe€appellant€did€not€testify€in€this€case,€but€his€defense,€as€gleaned€from€his€attorneyððsÐ  \ Ðclosing€argument,€appears€to€be€that€the€appellantððs€actions€did€not€measure€up€to€the€offensesÐ øH Ðalleged€in€the€indictment;€namely€that€he€did€not€use€or€display€Tillmanððs€pistol€to€assault€Tillman,Ð ä4 Ðbut€to€stop€Tillman€from€pulling€the€gun.€€Tillmanððs€own€testimony€was€that€although€he€andÐ Ð  Ðappellant€struggled€over€the€weapon,€the€appellant€never€directly€threatened€the€deputy€with€theÐ ¼  Ðweapon€once€the€appellant€got€control€of€the€pistol.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àUnder€these€circumstances€we€cannot€say€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€a€jury€would€not€Ð €Ð Ðhave€convicted€the€appellant€of€one€of€the€variations€of€simple€assault€which€should€have€beenÐ l¼ Ðcharged,€had€the€panel€been€instructed€with€respect€to€those€options.€€We€therefore€reverse€theÐ X ¨ Ðappellantððs€conviction€for€aggravated€assault€and€remand€this€case€for€a€new€trial€on€that€charge€inÐ D!” Ðaccordance€with€this€opinion.Ð 0"€  ÐÌà@$$%ìàòòConclusionóóˆÐ $X" ÐÌà  àIn€light€of€the€foregoing,€the€judgments€of€conviction€for€aggravated€robbery€and€possessionÐ à%0!$ Ðof€over€300€grams€of€cocaine€with€the€intent€to€sell€or€deliver€are€affirmed.€€The€conviction€forÐ Ì&"% Ðaggravated€assault€is€reversed€and€remanded€for€a€new€trial€in€accordance€with€this€opinion.Ô#†X9XXX9 #ÔÔ#†¼Te»XX9ò#ÔÔ€X9X»¼TeÔÐ ¸'#& Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð |*Ì%) Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGE