WPC& 苹,2ϽghZi$KZB,Lo ??| vSǁ_3w͌= mR= 1u 72hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhb  1e 0!!!! B   0) D5 D- 0K// ASz 0 0D7 A{HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular*GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   ᑍ1  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptJ13|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5U*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  (#$  0  *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   \  `&Times New Roman3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- -SearchTerm 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(|G2$ !.8dd8         0   d(|3!$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3!$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8ߋXXdd8@hhiINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#i #Ԉ #   AssignedonBriefsSeptember22,2004 F XߋX #XXߋ #STATEOFTENNESSEEv._DERECK_ԀC.CAMPBELLXߋX  ? @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforWilliamsonCounty  9 @@No.II1002382TimothyL.Easter,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200303074CCAR3CDFiledDecember10,_2004_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     X!XXXߋTheDefendantwasconvictedforpossessionofcocainewithintenttosell,possessionofmarijuana, V  possessionof_hydromorphone_,possessionofdiazepam,andpossessionofdrugparaphernalia.The ? possessionofcocaineconvictionwasaClassBfelonyandtheotherconvictionswereClassA (x misdemeanors.Thejuryalsorecommendedfinesrelatedtotheseconvictions.Thetotalofthefines a wasjustover$40,000.Thetrialcourtsentencedthedefendanttoeight(8)yearsforthepossession J ofcocaineoffense,andelevenmonths,twentyninedaysforeachoftheotheroffenses.These 3 sentenceswererunconcurrently.ThetrialcourtthengrantedtheDefendantsrequestforalternative  sentencingandsuspendedtheDefendantssentenceforpossessionofcocaineforallbutthirty(30)  daysandallowedhimtoservetenyearsonintensiveprobation.Thedefendantappealshissentence.  Weaffirmthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourt.  #XߋXXX!##XXߋ#XߋX Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtisAffirmed. Y    #Xߋ #XߋX.JerryL.Smith,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidG.HayesandThomasT. ,| _Woodall_,JJ.,joined. e CynthiaM.Fort,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,_Dereck_ԀC.Campbell.  7  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;Jennifer_Bledsoe_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;Ron " " Davis,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andDerekK.Smith,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,forthe ## appellee,StateofTennessee. $$    `     h #XXߋ #XߋX   -(. _s @@OO& OPINION #XXߋ #XߋX  #XXߋ\#  { @! @@!X!X {FactualBackground     `   OnJune19,2002,neighborsoftheDefendantcalledthepolicetoreportthattwomenwere ' w attemptingtobreakintotheDefendantshome.Thepolicerespondedtothecall.Uponreaching  ` theDefendantshouse,theydiscoveredtheintrudershadkickedinthefrontdoor.Theofficers  I enteredtheDefendantshomeandfoundahandmirrorwithwhitepowder,digitalscales,strawsand  2  homemadepipes,aswellasotheritemsusuallyconnectedwiththesaleanduseofillegaldrugs.    Theofficersthenobtainedasearchwarrant.Afterexecutingthesearchwarrant,theyfoundalarge   quantityofillegaldrugsandillegaldrugparaphernalia.     ThetrialcourtheldajurytrialonJuly17and18of2003.Afterhearingtheevidence,the o  juryfoundtheDefendantguiltyofpossessionofcocainewithintenttosell,possessionofmarijuana, X  possessionofhydromorphone,possessionofdiazepam,andpossessionofdrugparaphernalia.The A possessionofcocaineconvictionwasaClassBfelonyandtheotherconvictionswereClassA *z misdemeanors.Thejuryalsorecommendedfinesrelatedtotheseconvictions.Thetrialcourt c imposedfinestotalingjustover$40,000. L   Afterasentencinghearing,thetrialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttoeight(8)yearsforthe  possessionofcocaineoffense,andelevenmonths,twentyninedaysforeachoftheotheroffenses.  Thesesentenceswererunconcurrently.ThetrialcourtthengrantedtheDefendantsrequestfor  alternativesentencingandsuspendedtheDefendantssentenceforpossessionofcocaineforallbut  thirty(30)daysandallowedhimtoserveten(10)yearsonintensiveprobation. r    ANALYSIS  D   TheDefendantappealsonlyhissentence.Hearguesthatthetrialcourterredinimposing g anexcessivesentenceofeight(8)years,suspendingallbutthirty(30)days.Hearguesthat#XߋXXX!#X!XXXߋԀhe  P shouldhavebeengivenfullprobationorinthealternativesentencedunderthecommunity  9 correctionsprogram.#XߋXXX!#X!XXXߋԀ Whenreviewingsentencingissues...,theappellatecourtshallconducta !"  denovoreviewontherecordofsuchissues.Suchreviewshallbeconductedwithapresumption " ! thatthedeterminationsmadebythecourtfromwhichtheappealistakenarecorrect.Tenn.Code #" Ann.40-35-401(d). However,thepresumptionofcorrectnesswhichaccompaniesthetrialcourts $# actionisconditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthe v% $ sentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d166, _&!% 169(Tenn.1991).Inconductingourreview,wemustconsiderthedefendantspotentialfor H'"& rehabilitation,thetrialandsentencinghearingevidence,thepresentencereport,thesentencing 1(#' principles,sentencingalternativearguments,thenatureandcharacteroftheoffense,theenhancing )j$( andmitigatingfactors,andthedefendantsstatements.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-103(5),-210(b); *S%) Ashby,823S.W.2dat169.Wearetoalsorecognizethatthedefendantbears theburdenof *<&* demonstratingthatthesentenceisimproper.Ashby,823S.W.2dat169. +%'+ Ї#XߋXXX!ҝ#X!XXXߋ  Adefendant whoisanespecially#XߋXXX!҂#X!XXXߋmitigatedoffender#XߋXXX!#X!XXXߋԀor#XߋXXX!O #X!XXXߋstandardoffender#XߋXXX!Ҙ #X!XXXߋԀconvictedofa  ClassC,D,orEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidatefor% C #XߋXXX! #%Cu!X!XXXߋalternativesentencinginthe  absenceofevidencetothecontrary.#XߋXXX!Ҷ!#X!XXXߋTenn.CodeAnn.#XߋXXX!T"#X!XXXߋ#XߋXXX!Ҧ"#X!XXXߋ4035102(6)(emphasisadded)#XߋXXX!"#X!XXXߋ.#XߋXXX!L##X!XXXߋIn  choosingamongpossible#XߋXXX!ґ##X!XXXߋsentencingalternatives,thetrialcourtshouldconsider#XߋXXX!$#X!XXXߋTennesseeCode k Annotatedsection4035103(5)#XߋXXX!}$#X!XXXߋ,whichstates,inpertinentpart, Thepotentialorlackofpotential T fortherehabilitationortreatmentofadefendantshouldbeconsideredindeterminingthe#XߋXXX!%#X!XXXߋsentence =  alternativeorlengthofatermtobeimposed.#XߋXXX!%#X!XXXߋId.#XߋXXX!Ҏ&#X!XXXߋԀ#XߋXXX!&#X!XXXߋ#XߋXXX!'#X!XXXߋ4035103(5)#XߋXXX!c'#X!XXXߋ;#XߋXXX!ұ'#X!XXXߋStatev.Dowdy,#XߋXXX!'#X!XXXߋԀ894S.W.2d301, & v 305(Tenn.Crim.App.1994)#XߋXXX!L(#X!XXXߋ.Thetrialcourtmayconsideradefendantsuntruthfulnessandlackof  _ candorastheyrelatetothepotentialforrehabilitation.#XߋXXX!(#X!XXXߋԀSee#XߋXXX!ҩ)#X!XXXߋStatev.Nunley,#XߋXXX!)#X!XXXߋԀ22S.W.3d282,289  H (Tenn.Crim.App.1999)#XߋXXX!N*#X!XXXߋ;#XߋXXX!*#X!XXXߋseealso#XߋXXX!+#X!XXXߋStatev.Bunch,#XߋXXX!l+#X!XXXߋ646S.W.2d158,16061(Tenn.1983)#XߋXXX!ҽ+#X!XXXߋ;#XߋXXX!&,#X!XXXߋStatev.  1  Zeolia,#XߋXXX!m,#X!XXXߋԀ928S.W.2d457,463(Tenn.Crim.App.1996)#XߋXXX!,#X!XXXߋ;#XߋXXX!D-#X!XXXߋStatev.Williamson,#XߋXXX!ҋ-#X!XXXߋԀ919S.W.2d69,84    (Tenn.Crim.App.1995)#XߋXXX!-#X!XXXߋ;#XߋXXX!d.#X!XXXߋDowdy,#XߋXXX!ҫ.#X!XXXߋԀ894S.W.2dat30506#XߋXXX!.#X!XXXߋ.     Whenseekingfullprobation,theburdenrestswiththedefendanttoprovehissuitabilityto   thatmannerofsentence.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035303(b);Statev.Boggs,932S.W.2d467, n  477(Tenn.Crim.App.1995). Probationisaprivilegeoractofgracewhichmaybegrantedtoa W  defendantwhoiseligibleandworthyofthislargesseoflaw.Statev.Dykes,803S.W.2d250,259 @ (Tenn.Crim.App.1990).Indeterminingwhethertograntprobation,thecourtmustconsiderthe )y natureandcircumstancesoftheoffense;thedefendantscriminalrecord;hisorherbackgroundand b socialhistory;hisorherpresentcondition,includingphysicalandmentalcondition;thedeterrent K effectonthedefendant;andthelikelihoodthatprobationisinthebestinterestsofboththepublic 4 andthedefendant.SeeStillerv.State,516S.W.2d617,620(Tenn.1974);Statev.Kendrick,10  S.W.3d650,656(Tenn.Crim.App.1999).    Thetrialcourtstated:   X X ` Aspreviouslystated,thiscausecametobeheardbackinJuly,July17thon Z ajurytrial.TheDefendantstandsbeforetheCourtnowhavingbeenconvictedby C ajuryverdictofonefelonyandfourmisdemeanoroffenses. ,|  ` Obviouslythefelonyoffenseistheonethatwillcertainlycarrythemost N sentence,andwelldothisbackwards.  7  ` Thereisnoevidenceandnoproofinthisrecordtosupportconsecutive " ! sentencing,soallsentencesthattheCourtwillfashionwillrunconcurrently;one #" withtheother. $#  ` AsitrelatestotheproofandevidencethattheCourtisconsideringin ]&!% fashioningthissentence,theCourtdoes,asrequestedandrequiredbylaw,relyupon F'"& theevidencepresentedatthetrialofthiscase,aswellastheevidencepresentedhere /(#' todayatsentencing,whichissimplythepresentencereport. )h$(  ` Furthermore,theCourtreliesuponthesentencingprincipalsembodiedin40 *:&* 35103,4035101and102;conductinvolvedinthiscase,argumentsmadeabout +#'+ alternativesentencing,thenatureandcharacteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved  inthiscase,theevidenceandinformationofferedasitrelatestoenhancingand  mitigatingfactors.   ` TheDefendanthasnottestifiedheretoday,nordidhetestifyattrial,sothe T CourtreallyhasnostatementfromtheDefendantonwhichtorely.Healsogaveno =  statementinthepresentencereportotherthanhecontinuestomaintainhis & v innocence.  _  ` Furthermore,theCourtisrelyinguponinformationasitrelatestoasentence  1  involvingrehabilitationandtheDefendantspotentialforrehabilitationand    treatment.    ` Theevidenceisasitrelatestotheconvictionforpossessionwiththeintent   tosellordelivercocaineoverhalfagramthatheisarangeonestandardoffender; n  and,therefore,therangeofpunishmentforthat Bfelonyisaminimumof8and W  amaximumof12years. @  ` Pursuanttothestatute,theCourtbeginsattheminimumwithintherange, b whichiseightyears,absentanyenhancingfactors.Ifindthatinthisparticularcase K under4035114,afterpouringoverthesefactorsandreviewingthesefactors,Ifind 4 thattherearenoneinthiscasethatareapplicable.   ` Andafterreviewingthemitigatingfactorsunder4035113,includingthe  Defenserequestforsentencingasaspeciallymitigatingfactor,Ifindthatthereis  insufficientevidencetosupportasentenceasamitigating!amitigatedoffenderor q !and,furthermore,thereisnoevidenceintherecordthatwouldsupportapplication Z ofanyofthemitigatingfactorsunder4035113. C  ` Therefore,Ifindtheappropriatesentenceisthesentenceofeightyearsasa e standardrangeoneoffendertotheDepartmentofCorrectionforCountI. N  ` ForCountsII,III,IVandV,Ifindthattheappropriatesentenceis11months !   and29daysintheWilliamsonCountyJail.Eachofthesesentencesareat75 " ! percent. #"  ` AsIpreviouslystated,allsentenceswillrunconcurrently;onewiththeother. F'"&  ` Onthequestionofprobationconsideration,under4035102,hedoesnot )h$( enjoyapresumptionoffavorabilityforsometypeofalternativesentencing.Thatis *Q%) reservedfor C, Dand Efelonies;not Bfelonies.AndsoIfindthatheisnot *:&* entitledtothatpresumption. +#'+ Ї ` ButtheCourtstillconsidersthesentencingconsiderationssetoutunder40  35103indeterminingwhetherornotthisisanappropriatedefendant,givenallthe  evidencethatsbeforetheCourtforasentencethatinvolvesconfinement.   ` Iknowverylittleaboutthisdefendant.AllIknowabouthimiswhatwas T goingoninhishousethenightthatanallegedburglarytookplace,asIrecall;that =  waswhatinitiatedthis.Thepolicegotacallthattherewasaburglaryortherehad & v beenaburglary,andwhentheygottherewhattheyfoundappearedtobe,basedupon  _ theevidencethatIheard,nothingshortofsometypeofadrughousewheredrugs  H werebeingdispensed,drugsofallkinds.  1  ....    ` SowhatImleftwithissinceIdontknowanythingelseaboutMr.Campbell   otherthanwhatsinthepresentencereport,isthatitappearsthathewasrunninga n  littledrughousethere. W   ` Buttherearepositivesforhim;therearepositivesintherecordhewas!he )y doeshaveasteadyworkhistory,hedoeshavenopriorconvictions,sothatallthis b bodeswellforhim.HehasdonewellsincehisconvictionandtheCourtorderedhim K tobeginreportingimmediately,andthatsapositiveforhimintermsofhowIcan 4 forecastwhathellbelikeonprobation;hesdoingwell.   ` Sobaseduponallthat,Ifindthatthisisanappropriatecaseforsometypeof  alternativesentencing;although,notafullsuspendedsentence.   ` Ifindsomeconfinementisnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousness Z oftheoffensesforwhichhestandsconvictedbecause,asIsay,therecordisandthe C juryobviouslyfoundthathewasrunningadrugenterpriseoutofhishouse. ,|  ` Ifindthatsomesentenceshouldbeimposedand!butthatshouldnotbeany N greaterthanthatdeservedfortheoffensecommittedhere.AndthatsentenceI  7 believewouldbeasentenceof30days. !    ` Sothecourtwillsuspendalltheeightyearsentenceaftertheserviceof30 #" daysintheWilliamsonCountyJail.Illfurthersuspendallthe11monthand29 $# dayssentencesforthemisdemeanor[sic]aftertheserviceof30daysinWilliamson t% $ CountyJail.Iorderthathebeplacedonintensiveprobationforaperiodof10years. ]&!% Andasaconditionofprobation,heistoabidebyallthetermsandconditionsof F'"& probation,includingrandomdrugscreens. /(#'  ` Heisfurthermorerequiredtopayallofhisfinesrequiredtopayallofhis *Q%) finesinthiscaseonascheduletobeestablishedbyhisprobationofficer.Onereason *:&* theCourtisextendingyourprobationacoupleofyearslongerthanthesentence, +#'+ frankly,Mr.Campbell,istogiveyoutimetodothat,becauseyougotasubstantial  amountoffinestopaythatwereimposedbythejury.Thosefineswillbedesignated  totheFranklinPoliceDepartmentDrugFund.   Xj4 X\4  Asevidencedbythetrialcourtsabovequotedfindingsoffactandruling,thetrialcourt =  consideredallthefactorsrequiredwhendeterminingwhethertograntfullprobation.Inthiscase, & v thetrialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttoeight(8)years,allsuspended,exceptforthirty(30)days  _ forhisonefelonyconvictionandfullysuspendedhismisdemeanorsentences.TheDefendantwill  H alsobeplacedonintensiveprobationforten(10)yearstoenablehimtopayhisheftyfineofover  1  $40,000.      Thirty(30)daysisaverysmallportionoftheDefendantsentireeightyearsentence.The   trialcourtsreasoningforthethirty(30)dayincarcerationisthatfailingtoordersometypeof   serviceofhissentencewoulddepreciatetheseriousnessoftheDefendantsoffense.Weagreewith n  thetrialcourtthatthisisavalidreasonandsupportstheimpositionofthissentence.TheDefendant W  isnotpresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforprobationbecausehisfelonyconvictionwasfora @ Bfelony.Theburdenofprooftoshowthatheisindeedsuitableforfullprobationrestswiththe )y Defendant.TheDefendantdidproveinthesentencinghearingthathehadasteadyworkhistoryand b nopriorconvictions.Healsohadbeendiligentaboutreportingwhenaskedforanypresentence K meetings.However,thefactremainsthattheDefendantwasconvictedofaBfelony.Frankly,we 4 areofthebeliefthatbeingrequiredtoservethirty(30)daysofaneight(8)yearsentenceisalready  alenientsentenceforaconvictionforaClassBfelony.Thetrialcourtstatedthatthemainreason  forimposingasplitsentencewastoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffense.Thisisa  sentencingconsiderationclearlysetoutinTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035103(1)(B).    TheDefendantwasalsoorderedtointensiveprobationforten(10)yearsaftertheservice Z ofhisthirty(30)dayincarceration.Thetrialcourtstatedthatthiswasinparttomakeiteasierfor C theDefendanttopayhisfine.UnderTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035303(c),anindividual ,| maybeputonprobationfor aperiodoftimenolessthantheminimumsentenceallowedunderthe e classificationanduptoandincludingthestatutorymaximumtimefortheclassoftheconviction N offense.ThesentencingrangeofaClassBfelonyforaRangeIoffenderiseight(8)totwelve(12)  7 years.Clearly,thetrialcourtsimpositionoften(10)yearsofprobationfallswithinthisrange. !     TheCommunityCorrectionsProgramisaformofalternativesentencing.Asstatedabove, #" theDefendantisnotentitledtoapresumptionofalternativesentencebecausehewasconvictedof $# aClassBfelony.WhiletheDefendantdoesmeettheminimumeligibilitycriterialistedin t% $ TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4036106,thatdoesnotautomaticallyentitlehimtobe ]&!% sentencedundertheCommunityCorrectionsProgram.Thefactthatthetrialcourtfollowedthe F'"& proceduressetoutforsentencingleadstoapresumptionofcorrectnessofthetrialcourtsdecision. /(#' Thetrialcourtstatedthatthisoffenserequiredincarcerationtoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousness )h$( oftheoffense.Asstatedabove,thisisasentencingconsiderationfoundatTennesseeCode *Q%) Annotatedsection4035103(1)(B).Wefindthatthisconsiderationaloneisenoughtosupportthe *:&* trialcourtsimpositionofsplitconfinementandprobationasopposedtocommunitycorrections.#XߋXXX!M/#X!XXXߋ +#'+ Ї  Becausethetrialcourtclearlyfollowedtheguidelinessetoutforsentencing,wemust  presumethatthetrialcourtsdecisioniscorrect.Wefindampleevidenceinthiscasetosupportthe  trialcourtsdecisiontoimposeasentenceofeight(8)yearssuspendedafterservingthirty(30)days  andten(10)yearsintensiveprobation. k    #XߋXXX!d#X!XXXߋ CONCLUSION  =  f  Forthereasonsstatedabove,weaffirmthejudgmentsofthetrialcourt.#XߋXXX!g#X!XXXߋ  ` #XߋXXX!g#X!XXXߋ#XߋXXX!'h#X!XXXߋ   `     h     #XߋXXX!jh#   `     h     ___________________________________       `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE