ÿWPCè %a©^¦O6äTÍ_)ÝßC†]$Œ…š0"å›GŒ‰<‚ü…“iŸz ‡î2º;ÚµŒVæ²µÊdÖYÌ«»£Nî>äÃ1£°®eêás>A2yET·/un Hëo¬% í£}ÿã8:»Ÿ»õ†÷ÓÖØklÐ`ðéyõKÅò»ÖµÔÏ8ŽñÒÝ€Ý,–CþPûa0•¢‘Õ¬b‡˜¹ö©•,Xßàp)|H™+Ñ7×gx{Vàu­)øgnʵàáÌ0Ÿ“6YKpÉ>ŠYF–X0Ê`\ÄçÁŸ¨€]ÚKþ›ý™›¿Å$5TáË<Ñ*óÓµw? H Þõ¾V?N¨ãÃ+ `ùª0›ÑƒI²V|ï ù,ËPÜŽU†¡ˆÑ“ÜS(™¶!¸1¬o¶´EE‘ «q~TÀP?vд 1C×®ÄÎÎþEãÓÆõIÅEMº !Tr/iZ#Y@§UUŸåPýéx:6W›^ùâÛ—³ª “…þ1 ÷zþM¢¬2Kÿ›ûD–AÒÞìËò‚âmaÒ¦§£ £h(µb#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 UN¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ UN™ Æç Æ­ ÆsÆ9ÚÿNÙÙÙEÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛbÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ 0ëåååå BÐÐ 0¤í D3‘ D-Ä 0Kññ AS<Æ 0¤U 0Dù A«=˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»\¢F1Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï.ê:i¢×+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  Cupp DUISpurrellCrumleyweavedthat that t]heg]ood Cmtsp]artAdkissonT]here- ù-(|G2ÆÕ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_A»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôù™ò»»Ô d(|3€$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_A»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3€$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_A»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_A»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼_A»»»ÔÑ8€ -XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îWx_AÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼_A»îîWx #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAugust€17,€2004€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X -X»¼_AÔÌò òÔ#†¼_A»XX -#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JONATHAN€GENE€CAMPBELLÔ‡X -X»¼_AÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Washington€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€26743€€€€€€Robert€E.€Cupp,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2003„01315„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€6,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡ X -XXX -ÔThe€defendant€was€convicted€of€driving€under€the€influence€("DUI"),€first€offense,€and€sentenced€toÐ xÈ  Ðeleven€months,€twenty-nine€days€in€the€county€jail,€with€all€but€forty„eight€hours€suspended€and€theÐ d´ Ðbalance€to€be€served€on€probation.€€In€addition,€his€driver's€license€was€suspended€for€one€year€andÐ P  Ðhe€was€ordered€to€pay€a€fine€of€$350.€€In€his€appeal,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€shouldÐ <Œ Ðnot€have€allowed€the€jury€to€compare€his€signature€from€the€morning€of€the€arrest€with€his€signatureÐ (x Ðfrom€another€day€for€the€purpose€of€inferring€impairment.€€Following€our€review,€we€affirm€theÐ d Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð P ÐÔ#†X -XX X -¿#ÔÔ#†¼_A»XX -#ÔÔ‡X -X»¼_AÔÓ³ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼_A»àX -&#ÔÔ‡X -X.¼_AÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayesóó€and€òòJamesÐ ° ÐÔ_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌDonald€E.€Spurrell,€Johnson€City,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Jonathan€Gene€Campbell.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Brent€C.€Cherry,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€JoeÐ L œ ÐC.€Crumley,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Dennis€D.€Brooks,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ 8!ˆ  ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼_A»XX -ò#ÔÔ‡X -X»¼_AԀР$"t! ÐÓÃÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼_A»XX -§ #ÔÔ‡X -X»¼_AÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌò òòòFACTSó óóóÐ Ô%$!% ÐòòóóÔ#†¼_A»XX -/ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X -X»¼_AÔÌÔ‡ X -XXX -Ôà  àBecause€the€defendantððs€misdemeanor€trial€was€not€transcribed,€the€parties€agreed€to€a€JointÐ ¬'ü"' ÐStatement€of€the€Evidence€on€March€12,€2004,€which€was€filed€by€the€defendant€with€this€appeal.€Ð ˜(è#( ÐWe€quote€the€Statement€in€its€entirety:Ð „)Ô$) ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àOn€December€30,€2000,€at€approximately€2€a.m.,€theÐ \+¬&+ Ðâ âDefendant€left€Shoeless€Joeððs€Restaurant€and€nightclub€in€JohnsonÐ H,˜',ý ÐÔ_ÔCity,€Tennessee.€€He€had€been€out€with€friends€since€earlier€in€theÐ ° Ðnight.Мì` x` x Ðâ âÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€Court€took€judicial€notice€from€the€December€30,€2000,Ð tÄ Ðpublication€of€the€Johnson€City€Press€that€the€temperature€was€steadyÐ `° Ðin€the€lower€20s€with€wind€chill€from€10€below€to€10€above€zero€andÐ L œ Ðwesterly€winds€from€10„20€miles€per€hour€and€gusty€according€to€theÐ 8 ˆ ÐNational€Weather€Service.€€The€Defendant€was€dressed€in€a€longÐ $ t Ðsleeved€shirt€and€light€fleece€jacket.€€The€Defendant€was€driving€aÐ  ` Ð1989€Jeep€Cherokee,€which€according€to€the€Defendantððs€testimonyÐ ü L  Ðtook€a€long€time€to€warm€up€as€it€had€an€inadequate€heater.Ðè 8 ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àDefendant€was€less€than€one€mile€from€Shoeless€Joeððs€whenÐ À  Ðhis€vehicle€was€stopped€by€Public€Safety€Officer€Eric€Hull€of€theÐ ¬ü  ÐJohnson€City€Bureau€of€Police.€€Hull€stated€that€he€observedÐ ˜è  ÐDefendant€execute€a€turn€from€Mockingbird€Lane€onto€Roan€StreetÐ „Ô  Ð(a€major€thoroughfare)€at€a€high€rate€of€speed.€€Hull€followedÐ pÀ ÐDefendant€at€50€mph€in€a€40€mph€zone.€€Hull€said€that€DefendantÐ \¬ Ðweaved€out€of€his€lane€three€times€jerkily.€€Hull€testified€that€the€threeÐ H˜ Ðtimes€Defendant€weaved€occurred€in€less€than€a€mile€of€travel.€€HullÐ 4„ Ðstated€that€the€Defendant€was€driving€in€Washington€County,Ð  p ÐTennessee.€€Hull€said€that€Defendant€claimed€that€he€was€cold€andÐ  \ Ðthat€he€was€bouncing€to€the€music€because€his€Jeep€took€a€while€toÐ øH Ðget€warm.à  àÐä4` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àHull€asked€Defendant€to€perform€field€sobriety€tests.€€HullÐ ¼  Ðsaid€that€Defendant€explained€that€he€recently€suffered€a€broken€legÐ ¨ø Ðand€the€cast€had€just€been€removed.€€Hull€testified€that€DefendantÐ ”ä Ðstarted€the€heel„to„toe€test€before€he€was€instructed€to€begin,€and€thatÐ €Ð Ðhe€did€not€keep€his€feet€in€a€straight€line.€€Also,€Hull€said€DefendantÐ l¼ Ðdid€not€make€a€correct€turn€as€was€instructed.€€On€the€one„leg€stand,Ð X ¨ ÐHull€said€Defendant€could€not€stand€for€the€required€30€seconds.€€TheÐ D!” Ðofficer€did€not€keep€any€written€field€sobriety€notes€of€theÐ 0"€  ÐDefendantððs€performance€except€for€those€entered€on€his€affidavit€ofÐ #l! Ðarrest.€€Hull€also€stated€that€Defendant€interrupted€the€instructionsÐ $X" Ðwith€superfluous€information€about€his€being€in€the€military.€Ð ô$D # ÐDefendant€stated€he€was€trying€to€tell€the€officer€that€he€was€in€theÐ à%0!$ Ðmilitary€and€learned€marching€and€turning€a€specific€way€and€wantedÐ Ì&"% Ðto€make€sure€that€he€understood€the€officerððs€instructions.и'#&` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àHull€testified€that€it€was€his€opinion€that€Defendant€was€underÐ )à$( Ðthe€influence€of€alcohol€and€arrested€him€for€DUI.€€Hull€also€testifiedÐ |*Ì%) Ðthat€Defendant€stated€he€had€drunk€four€beers€since€6€p.m.€€Hull€saidÐ h+¸&* Ðthe€Defendant€refused€implied€consent,€and€thus€he€charged€him€withÐ ° Ða€violation€of€that€statute€also.Мì` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€Defendant€testified€that€during€the€field€sobriety€tests,€heÐ tÄ Ðwas€freezing€cold€and€nervous€at€first,€but€that€this€gave€way€toÐ `° Ðfrustration€with€the€officerððs€attitude€toward€him.€€Defendant€testifiedÐ L œ Ðthat€he€did€very€well€on€the€field€sobriety€testing,€and€he€stated€thatÐ 8 ˆ Ðhe€had€drunk€four€beers€which€were€8€to€10€ounces€each.€€TheÐ $ t ÐDefendant€testified€that€in€refusing€a€blood€test,€he€had€offered€toÐ  ` Ðsubmit€to€a€breath€test€but€was€told€that€that€test€was€unavailable.Ðü L ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àDefendant€was€taken€to€the€Johnson€City€Jail.€€Hull€andÐ Ô$  ÐDefendant€were€en€route€approximately€10€minutes€to€the€Jail.€€UponÐ À  Ðarriving€at€the€Jail,€the€booking€process€was€preserved€on€videotapeÐ ¬ü  Ðthat€was€played€for€the€jury€and€admitted€into€evidence.€€During€theÐ ˜è  Ðbooking€process,€Defendant€made€two€phone€calls,€stood€on€one€footÐ „Ô  Ðto€loosen€his€shoe€laces€and€remove€his€boots€while€leaning€on€theÐ pÀ Ðcounter€with€his€other€hand,€and€unbuttoned€his€shirt€with€one€hand.€Ð \¬ ÐDefendantððs€actions€appeared€logical€and€coordinated.€€From€whatÐ H˜ Ðlittle€was€said€on€the€videotape,€his€speech€did€not€seem€to€be€slurred.€Ð 4„ ÐDefendant€stands€stock€still€during€all€other€times€in€what€isÐ  p Ðapproximately€15€minutes€of€video€feed.€€Nothing€on€the€videoÐ  \ Ðsuggests€impairment€of€the€Defendant,€although€no€field€sobriety€testsÐ øH Ðwere€attempted€on€the€video.Ðä4` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àOver€defense€objection,€overruled€at€a€bench€hearing,€theÐ ¼  ÐState€was€permitted€to€introduce€a€series€of€documents€bearing€theÐ ¨ø ÐDefendantððs€signature€to€wit:€a€vehicle€no„tow€request€liability€releaseÐ ”ä Ðreport,€dated€12„30„00;€appearance€property€bond,€dated€12„30„00;Ð €Ð Ðand€a€notice€to€appear€in€Criminal€Court,€not€dated.€€TestimonyÐ l¼ Ðestablished€that€the€notice€to€appear€in€Criminal€Court€was€signed€byÐ X ¨ Ðthe€Defendant€well€after€Defendantððs€release€from€jail.€€The€StateÐ D!” Ðargued€to€the€jury€that€the€signature€in€the€no„tow€request€wasÐ 0"€  Ðevidence€of€impairment€when€compared€to€the€signatures€in€the€otherÐ #l! Ðdocuments€which€were€made€when€the€Defendant,€as€stipulated,€wasÐ $X" Ðsober.Ðô$D #` x` x ÐÌThe€jury€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€driving€under€the€influence;€and€the€trial€court€sentenced€himÐ Ì&"% Ðto€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€in€the€county€jail,€with€all€but€forty„eight€hours€suspendedÐ ¸'#& Ðand€the€remainder€to€be€served€on€probation.€€Additionally,€his€driverððs€license€was€suspended€forÐ ¤(ô#' Ðone€year€and€he€was€ordered€to€pay€a€fine€of€$350.€€The€defendant€now€appeals€his€conviction.Ð )à$( ÐòòÓ  Óò òÌÐ h+¸&* ÐANALYSISó óÐ ° ÐÓ*ÓÌà  àóóThe€sole€issue€the€defendant€raises€on€appeal€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€allowing€theÐ ˆØ Ðjury,€for€the€purpose€of€inferring€impairment,€to€compare€his€ð ðsloppyðð€signature€from€the€morningÐ tÄ Ðof€the€arrest€with€a€ð ðneaterðð€signature€from€another€day.€€Ð `° ÐÌà  àIn€his€brief,€the€defendant€asserts€there€was€no€basis€for€concluding€that€a€ð ðbad€signatureððÐ 8 ˆ Ðmeant€that€he€was€impaired:Ð $ t ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[T]here€exists€not€a€single€reference€in€any€credible€legal€publication,Ð ü L  Ðreported€or€unreported€case,€professional€publication€which€provideÐ è 8  Ðany€empirical€data€on€the€correlation€between€signatures€andÐ Ô$  Ðimpairment.€€€Therefore,€the€only€conclusion€left€is€that€the€averageÐ À  Ðjuror€is€expected€through€common€knowledge,€lore€or€oral€traditionsÐ ¬ü  Ðand€experience€to€be€able€to€discern€the€obvious€connection€betweenÐ ˜è  Ða€bad€signature€and€driving€impairment.€€Tennessee€would€appear€toÐ „Ô  Ðbe€the€first€and€only€state€to€advance€this€novel€approach€to€DUIÐ pÀ Ðdetection.€Ð\¬` x` x ÐÌFurther,€the€defendant€asserts€that€ð ðpermitting€a€jury€to€examine€contrasting€signature€styles€of€theÐ 4„ Ðsame€person€for€clues€of€driving€impairment€has€no€support€logically€or€historicallyðð€and€ð ð[t]heÐ  p Ðintroduction€of€signature€analysis€cannot€possibly€be€regarded€as€harmless€error€beyond€a€reasonableÐ  \ Ðdoubt.ðð€€The€defendant€also€argues€that€any€consideration€of€his€signature€by€the€jury€should€haveÐ øH Ðbeen€done€only€after€the€evidence€was€offered€and€through€an€expert€witness€pursuant€to€Rule€702Ð ä4 Ðof€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Evidence.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€State€contends€that€the€signature€comparison€was€both€relevant€and€probative€and€thatÐ ¨ø Ðthe€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€allowing€the€evidence,€citing€òòState€v.€Lester€Boyd€Bairdóó,Ð ”ä ÐNo.€M1999„00181„CCA„R3„CD,€2000€WL€175343€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Feb.€16,€2000).€€In€òòBairdóó,€aÐ €Ð ÐDUI€case€in€which€the€defendant€challenged€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€we€noted€that€ð ð[t]he€trialÐ l¼ Ðcourt€also€found€it€significant€that€the€defendantððs€signature€on€the€implied€consent€form€could€notÐ X ¨ Ðbe€read€and€was€different€from€signatures€on€two€other€forms€that€were€signed€at€a€later€time.ðð€€òòId.óóÐ D!” Ðat€*1.€€We€affirmed€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àHowever,€in€the€case€at€bar,€we€are€unable€to€address€fully€the€defendantððs€legal€argumentÐ $X" Ðbecause€of€the€nature€of€the€record€on€appeal.€€Since€there€is€no€trial€transcript,€we€only€have€theÐ ô$D # Ðportion€of€the€Joint€Statement€of€the€Evidence€to€determine€what€happened€at€the€trial.€€RegardingÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€signature€evidence,€the€only€thing€we€are€able€to€conclude€from€the€record€is€that€the€defendantÐ Ì&"% Ðobjected€to€the€introduction€of€the€various€handwriting€samples€and€the€trial€court€overruled€theÐ ¸'#& Ðobjection.€€We€do€not€know,€however,€the€basis€of€the€objection€or€the€reason€for€overruling€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðobjection.€€Ô#†X -XX X -ß #ÔòòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€103(a)(1)€(providing€that€timely€objection€for€purposes€of€preservingÐ )à$( Ðthe€issue€for€appeal€must€state€ð ðthe€specific€ground€of€objection€if€the€specific€ground€was€notÐ |*Ì%) Ðapparent€from€the€contextðð).€€We€have€previously€held:Ô‡ X -XXX -ÔÐ h+¸&* Їà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€purpose€of€Rule€103(a)(1)€is€to€enable€meaningfulÐ ° Ðappellate€review€of€a€trial€court's€evidentiary€rulings.€€According€toÐ œì Ðthe€rule,€the€objecting€party€has€the€burden€of€placing€on€the€recordÐ ˆØ Ðthe€reasons€for€an€objection.€€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€103(a)(1)€&€(2).€€WhileÐ tÄ Ðthe€rule€provides€different€requirements€for€situations€in€which€theÐ `° Ðevidence€is€excluded€or€admitted,€in€both€instances,€òòthe€objectingÐ L œ Ðpartyóó€has€the€duty€to€state€the€specific€basis€for€the€objection.òòÐ8 ˆ` x` x ÐÌState€v.€Dale€L.€Courtneyóó,€No.€03C01„9406„CR„00195,€1995€WL€221646,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð  ` ÐApr.€11,€1995).€€Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àThis€court€has€further€held:Ð Ô$  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àGood€trial€practice€and€the€Rules€of€Evidence€demand€thatÐ ¬ü  Ðcounsel€state€the€basis€for€an€objection€when€the€objection€is€madeÐ ˜è  Ðand€that€opposing€counsel€be€given€the€opportunity€to€respond.€€NotÐ „Ô  Ðonly€does€this€ððmake€the€recordðð€for€appellate€review,€but€itÐ pÀ Ðencourages€adequate€preparation€on€the€part€of€counsel€so€thatÐ \¬ Ðmeaningful€objections€and€responses€may€be€made.€€Trial€judgesÐ H˜ Ðshould€encourage€the€practice.òòÐ4„` x` x ÐÌId.óó€at€*3.€€Although€the€defendantððs€brief€suggests€the€basis€for€his€objection€and€the€reasons€givenÐ  \ Ðby€the€trial€court€in€overruling€it,€we€can€look€only€to€the€agreed€statement€of€facts,€which€is€silentÐ øH Ðas€to€these€considerations.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àAlso,€according€to€the€Joint€Statement€of€the€Evidence,€ð ð[t]he€State€argued€to€the€jury€thatÐ ¼  Ðthe€signature€in€the€no„tow€request€was€evidence€of€impairment€when€compared€to€the€signatures€inÐ ¨ø Ðthe€other€documents€which€were€made€when€the€Defendant,€as€stipulated,€was€sober.ðð€€However,€theÐ ”ä Ðjoint€statement€does€not€say€whether€the€defendant€objected€to€this€argument,€or€let€it€pass€to€thenÐ €Ð Ðargue€on€appeal€that€the€argument€was€improper.Ð l¼ ÐÔ#†X -XX X -o9#ÔÌà  àThe€failure€to€object€contemporaneously€to€the€closing€argument€in€this€case€constitutes€aÐ D!” Ðwaiver.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a),€Advisory€Commission€Cmts.€€(ð ðThe€last€sentence€of€this€ruleÐ 0"€  Ðis€a€statement€of€the€accepted€principle€that€a€party€is€not€entitled€to€relief€if€the€party€invited€error,Ð #l! Ðwaived€an€error,€or€failed€to€take€whatever€steps€were€reasonably€available€to€cure€an€error.ðð);€òòseeÐ $X" Ðalsoóó€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€24€S.W.3d€274,€279„80€(Tenn.€2000);€òòState€v.€Littleóó,€854€S.W.2d€643,€651Ð ô$D # Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992)€(failure€to€object€to€prosecutor's€alleged€misconduct€during€closingÐ à%0!$ Ðargument€waives€any€later€complaint);€òòHill€v.€Stateóó,€513€S.W.2d€142,€143€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1974)Ð Ì&"% Ð(stating€that€to€allow€evidentiary€questions€to€be€raised€at€anytime€would€ð ðundercut€the€very€functionÐ ¸'#& Ðof€the€trial€process,€for€it€would€become€a€tactical€matter€of€defense€to€allow€a€bit€of€constitutionallyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðinadmissable€evidence€into€the€record,€in€the€hope€for€an€acquittal€but€secure€in€the€knowledge€thatÐ )à$( Ðâ âa€new€trial€would€resultðð).€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€Joint€Statement€of€the€Evidence€is€notÐ |*Ì%) Ðsufficiently€complete€for€us€to€determine€the€basis€for€the€defendantððs€objection,€if€any,€to€the€StateððsÐ ° Ðfinal€argument.€€Thus,€the€state€of€the€record€is€such€that€we€resolve€this€issue€against€the€defendant.òòóóÐ œì Ðâ âÌò òòòÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONóóó óà @¸ àÐ tÄ ÐÓyIÓÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing€authorities€and€reasoning,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð L œ ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  ` Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE