ÿWPCÆ   D¯w[C)åw™P¹ žíNtâcX.êÖ(åw´„Tdw²[CH½î+XPã¢ÿÔâwü¤êœŠnã.ª9'aâ|p?9?؆û9¶0ÓLÏfy%¤=®G‡0· kê2;oœ{ëßr®t¶\R´Ó›ÛXCJê§ÐptfºQì‚pûdÚÂöVD ¬>õ±ŠPÕ l›BòëFŠwhØ4£±Ç•C¹Å’…n©fÜTÑ‚'zÜŠW#ÉÂU N‹ %Ù 0:ß ß ^  w% 4) = L mN be :m m m m m m m m m E§ § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § B© ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6ÒV,,,,ÒV0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô¥‘1î  J‰1ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù- 0Ñ#€ÿÿXÿÿd#ÑÑ € Ñ dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡îÎ[îXXÔÑ  Ñà@hhìàÑ€ V¼ÑIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†XiXîîÎ[=#ÔÔ‡»$D»XXiԈРÓ# Ðà@© © ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€September€22,€2004ˆÐ öF ÐÔ#†XiX»»$D#ÔÔ‡»$D»XXiÔÌà@ÉÉìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€WILLIAM€CARTWRIGHTˆÐ  f Ðó óÌÔ#†XiX»»$D´#ÔÔ‡îÎ[îXXiÔà@Î Î ìàò òÔ#†XiXîîÎ[N#ÔDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔSequatchieÔ_Ô€CountyˆÐ 7 ‡ Ðà@@ @ ìàNo.€4169€€€€€€Thomas€W.€Graham,€JudgeˆÐ ! q ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Þ` A߈Ð ß/  ÐÌà@J J ìàNo.€M2004„00268„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€December€15,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ԈРØ(  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<«` Aßó óÐ ¬ü  ÐÌÓ  ÓDefendant,€William€Cartwright,€pled€guilty€to€one€count€of€attempt€to€manufactureÐ ¤ô  Ðmethamphetamine,€a€Class€D€felony.€€Pursuant€to€the€plea€agreement,€Defendant€received€a€sentenceÐ Ý Ðof€three€years€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€with€the€manner€of€service€of€his€sentence€to€beÐ vÆ Ðdetermined€by€the€trial€court.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€Defendant€to€serveÐ _¯ Ðhis€sentence€in€confinement.€€Defendant€appeals,€arguing€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€himÐ H˜ Ðalternative€sentencing.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð 1 ÐÌà@®®ìàò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óˆÐ S ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Woodall,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayes€óóand€òòJerryÐ Ö& ÐL.€Smith,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ¿ ÐÌHoward€L.€Ô_ÔUpchurchÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔPikevilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€William€Cartwright.Ð ‘á ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€John€H.€Bledsoe,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð c³ ÐJames€Michael€Taylor,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Steven€H.€Strain,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ L œ ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€the€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 5!…  ÐÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ #W" ÐÌà  àThe€record€before€us€does€not€include€a€transcript€of€Defendantððs€guilty€plea€submissionÐ Ú$* $ Ðhearing,€and€we€are,€therefore,€precluded€from€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€nature€andÐ Ã%!% Ðcircumstances€of€the€offense€other€than€as€may€be€gleaned€from€the€pre„sentencing€report€and€theÐ ¬&ü!& Ðlimited€testimony€presented€at€the€sentencing€hearing.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(4).€Ð •'å"' ÐThis€Court€must€presume€that€the€trial€court€ruled€correctly€when€presented€with€an€inadequateÐ ~(Î#( Ðrecord€on€appeal.€€òòSee€State€v.€Ivyóó,€868€S.W.2d€724,€728€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€The€appealingÐ g)·$) Ðparty€bears€the€burden€of€preparing€a€complete€and€adequate€record€for€the€issues€presented€onÐ P* %* Ðappeal.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b).€€Nevertheless,€we€will€review€the€record€that€is€available€in€thisÐ 9+‰&+ Ðappeal.Ð ",r', Ðâ âÐ  -[(- ÐÑ V¼Ñâ  âÑ8€iXXdédÈ8ÑÑ€ Ñâ  âÑ  Ñà  àDefendantððs€daughter,€Lora€Cartwright,€testified€at€the€sentencing€hearing€that€her€father€wasÐ ° Ðâ âfirst€introduced€to€methamphetamine€about€two€or€three€years€prior€to€the€hearing€by€Gail€Stewart,Ð ™é Ða€woman€with€whom€Defendant€lived€for€a€period€of€time.€€Ms.€Cartwright€said€that€Defendant€noÐ ‚Ò Ðlonger€lived€with€Ms.€Stewart€but€admitted€that€Ms.€Stewart€would€come€by€the€house€ð ðÔ_Ôever[yÔ_Ô]€nowÐ k» Ðand€then.ðð€€Ms.€Cartwright€agreed€that€she€had€not€seen€anything€that€would€lead€her€to€believe€thatÐ T¤ ÐDefendant€was€taking€methamphetamine€any€more€than€once€every€three€or€four€weeks.Ð =  ÐÌà  àMs.€Cartwright€agreed€that€Defendantððs€bond€for€the€current€offenses€was€revoked€becauseÐ  _ Ðhe€failed€to€make€a€court€appearance€but€explained€that€Defendant€thought€he€was€supposed€toÐ ø H Ðappear€in€court€in€the€afternoon€rather€than€the€morning.€€Ms.€Cartwright€said€that€DefendantÐ á 1  Ðcurrently€cared€for€her€son€while€she€worked,€but€was€not€otherwise€employed€because€he€sufferedÐ Ê   Ðfrom€a€bad€back.€€She€stated€that€Defendant€had€never€participated€in€a€drug€rehabilitation€programÐ ³  Ðbecause€he€did€not€have€insurance.Ð œì  ÐÌà  àAccording€to€the€pre„sentencing€report€Defendant€has€four€prior€misdemeanor€convictionsÐ n¾  Ðincluding€a€conviction€in€1996€for€simple€possession€of€marijuana.€€He€was€sentenced€to€elevenÐ W§  Ðmonths,€twenty„nine€days€for€his€drug€conviction,€all€of€which€was€suspended,€and€Defendant€placedÐ @ Ðon€probation.€€In€1973,€Defendant€was€convicted€of€two€counts€of€third€degree€burglary.€€He€wasÐ )y Ðsentenced€to€four€years,€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€CorrectionÐ b Ðfor€each€conviction.Ð ûK ÐÌà  àDefendant€admitted€in€the€pre„sentencing€report€that€he€had€been€taking€methamphetamineÐ Í Ðabout€five€years€but€said€that€he€gave€the€drug€up€because€he€could€not€afford€it.€€Defendant€laterÐ ¶ Ðadmitted€that€he€had€taken€methamphetamine€about€three€weeks€prior€to€the€interview.Ð Ÿï ÐÌà  àWhen€a€defendant€appeals€the€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court,€thisÐ qÁ ÐCourt€conducts€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€the€trial€courtððsÐ Zª Ðdeterminations€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€However,€the€presumption€ofÐ C“ Ðcorrectness€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€consideredÐ ,| Ðthe€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,Ð e Ð169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€burden€is€on€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€Ð þN ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d),€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€€This€means€that€if€the€trialÐ ç 7 Ðcourt€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€made€findings€of€fact€that€are€adequatelyÐ Ð!   Ðsupported€in€the€record,€and€gave€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principlesÐ ¹" ! Ðthat€are€relevant€to€sentencing€under€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€we€may€not€disturb€the€sentence€evenÐ ¢#ò" Ðif€a€different€result€were€preferred.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð ‹$Û# ÐÌà  àBecause€Defendant€was€convicted€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€of€a€Class€D€felony,€he€isÐ ]&­!% Ðentitled€to€the€statutory€presumption€favoring€alternative€sentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„Ð F'–"& Ð102(5)€and€(6).€€When€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€should€considerÐ /(#' Ðwhether€(1)€confinement€is€needed€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendant€who€has€a€longÐ )h$( Ðhistory€of€criminal€conduct,€(2)€confinement€is€needed€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€theÐ *Q%) Ðoffense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€people€likely€toÐ ê*:&* Ðcommit€similar€offenses,€or€(3)€less€restrictive€measures€than€confinement€have€frequently€orÐ Ó+#'+ Ðrecently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€€òòÔ_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€at169€(citing€Tenn.€CodeÐ ° ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C)).€€The€trial€court€may€also€consider€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ ™é Ðfactors€set€forth€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sections€40„35„113€and€„114.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(5);Ð ‚Ò ÐòòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€In€addition,€a€trial€court€shouldÐ k» Ðconsider€a€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€when€determining€if€anÐ T¤ Ðalternative€sentence€would€be€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);€òòBostonóó,€938€S.W.2dÐ =  Ðat€438.Ð & v ÐÌà  àIn€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€must€consider€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€theÐ ø H Ðtrial€and€sentencing€hearing,€(2)€the€presentencing€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€andÐ á 1  Ðarguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct,Ð Ê   Ð(5)€any€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€(6)€any€statement€that€the€defendant€made€on€his€ownÐ ³  Ðbehalf,€and€(7)€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,Ð œì  Є210;€òòsee€Ô_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€168.€€Again,€the€failure€to€include€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€pleaÐ …Õ  Ðhearing€in€the€record€on€appeal€prohibits€this€Courtððs€conducting€a€full€òòde€novoóó€review,€and€thatÐ n¾  Ðleads€to€a€presumption€that€the€trial€courtððs€decision€is€correct.€€òòState€v.€Keenóó,€996€S.W.2d€842,€844Ð W§  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).Ð @ ÐÌà  àDefendant€argues€that€the€record€does€not€support€a€finding€that€any€of€the€factorsÐ b Ðenumerated€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C)€are€applicable,€and€aÐ ûK Ðsentence€of€confinement€was€thus€inappropriate.€€The€trial€court,€while€mentioning€the€need€to€avoidÐ ä4 Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€placed€little€weight€on€this€factor,€observing€that€allÐ Í Ðoffenses€embodied€an€element€of€seriousness.€€Although€Defendant€argues€that€he€does€not€have€aÐ ¶ Ðlong€history€of€criminal€conduct,€the€evidence€established€that€he€has€two€prior€felony€convictionsÐ Ÿï Ðand€four€misdemeanor€convictions,€and€the€misdemeanor€convictions€were€all€related€to€substanceÐ ˆØ Ðand€alcohol€abuse.€€Moreover,€Defendant€admitted€that€he€had€continued€to€use€methamphetamineÐ qÁ Ðeven€after€being€indicted€for€manufacture€of€the€drug.€€Furthermore,€the€pre„sentencing€reportÐ Zª Ðincludes€the€report€of€an€officer€who€participated€in€the€search€of€Defendantððs€residence,€which€ledÐ C“ Ðto€these€charges.€€When€the€law€enforcement€agents€arrived,€Defendant€fled€the€premises€and€ranÐ ,| Ðð ðinto€the€mountainsðð€and€eluded€the€agents.€€This€weighs€heavily€against€Defendantððs€amenabilityÐ e Ðto€rehabilitation.Ð þN ÐÌà  àDefendant€was€granted€probation€in€connection€with€his€most€recent€conviction€in€1996.€Ð Ð!   ÐAlthough€the€record€does€not€indicate€that€Defendant€had€any€problems€successfully€completing€theÐ ¹" ! Ðterms€of€his€probation,€the€trial€court€observed€that€his€probated€sentence€was€ultimatelyÐ ¢#ò" Ðunsuccessful€because€it€did€not€deter€Defendant€from€continuing€to€use€drugs€or€encourage€him€toÐ ‹$Û# Ðseek€a€drug€rehabilitation€program.€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€found€that€Defendantððs€continued€useÐ t%Ä $ Ðof€methamphetamine€demonstrated€a€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð ]&­!% Ð103(5);€òòsee€State€v.€Bottomsóó,€87€S.W.3d€95,€105€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001)(The€defendantððs€inabilityÐ F'–"& Ðto€refrain€from€illegal€use€of€drugs€was€properly€considered€by€the€trial€court€as€demonstrating€a€lackÐ /(#' Ðof€potential€for€rehabilitation.)Ð )h$( ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€that€Ð ê*:&* ÐÐ Ó+#'+ Ðà8  à[Defendant]€has€a€drug€problem€now€that€he€has€not€gotten€under€control€or€heÐ ° Ðcertainly€wouldnððt€be€using€methamphetamine€within€[the]€last€few€weeks,€so€weÐ ™é Ðknow€he€still€has€the€problem€which€means€heððs€going€to€continue€to€violate€the€lawÐ ‚Ò Ðby€getting€around€the€stuff€any€chance€he€can.€€Hopefully,€he€wouldnððt€manufacture,Ð k» Ðbut€if€he€wants€it€heððll€be€buying€it€and€possessing€it€and€all€that€sort€of€thing.€€If€heððsÐ T¤ Ðincarcerated€he€canððt€do€that€for€that€period€of€time,€which€might€be€of€benefit€toÐ =  Ðhim.€€Of€course,€he€ought€to€get€some€drug€treatment,€I€suppose,€but€they€can€do€thatÐ & v Ðalso.€€I€think€all€things€considered€in€this€case€with€the€record€that€he€has€and€thatÐ  _ Ðfact€that€he€did€get€a€probation€even€relatively€recently€in€a€drug€offense,€thatÐ ø H Ðincarceration€probably€is€the€best€thing.Ðá 1 Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àBased€on€our€review€of€the€available€record,€and€the€fact€that€the€transcript€of€the€guilty€pleaÐ ³  Ðhearing€is€not€included€in€the€record,€we€conclude€that€the€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing€wasÐ œì  Ðsufficiently€rebutted€in€this€case€and€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€by€imposing€a€sentence€ofÐ …Õ  Ðconfinement.Ð n¾  ÐÌà@GG%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ @ ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð c ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Î Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE