ÿWPCF R‰=´A?ŒÒ¨Ÿ“ìšõ¼—œðÍȬö“9€ù[EhDî dÂi¤õÏÈÇx‚ÜK>œËö×jìkc|ÖZÆ2ÙC^Ò¹ÆSéƒYUVûboGÑŽ°óB‡üØzqr£—8zvt/‰¤MBßQd>—”X¦ýæ3‚•]Rï¤wøÛ¾žÚU^Ô–o•®‚i e¿ôO rË)>±î¶<ÛÆ[kJ'm<ÓaªöWRp©À[{S=cÓ3î^ÑìSùÂsÿç,"L“ß» B Yc;ä?Ì›Î.3€gÊ”1a1™r¥„8¡°Û!&µŠŸù·cìÓ~¼çzÊi*Iÿ°Ò ª¡b/ ‘r…¾ <ïå/ mŠê ¡áTÍa(¸Ë·ôµÃ¨ºœ‚ *`ÝPaœ ò@¬…bð] pGÝ-(.I†¦Ž ìÆ•äÅa¬þF\ƒfÂ^¹D;l©8²Ûðºã Iò˜î° 2yn9£¬ hg”$†ž§†Â7´z“Ö¨ éàfŠù1ý ©Š¼ð4¦¾¡:9~’·Se²pÕ+Ó^Œ(0˜E‰f¬9:Å»KXÊ0¯¨“„+ëà(—¦±‘íô^‘ìûb#Á\ % U N# 0ˆq UNù ^ G wS zW ÒÑ 4£ · Æ mÈ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1U @÷N777E999999999999999999999999b;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 0ëCCCC B.. 0¤K D3ï D-" 0KOO ASšÆí 0¤³ 0DW A«›˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0»(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular¦pS+â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptòK+ê:i œ3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G2Úm$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@¼»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô)àò»»Ô d(|3Ž$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@¼»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ž$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@¼»»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Sä»»d dÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼á$»»»ÔÑ8€%TXXdê»»d 8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îìUá$ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼á$»îîìU #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àMay€2000€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X¶øX»¼á$ÔÌò òÔ#†¼á$»XX¶ø #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€MARION€LEE€CHAPMANòòóóÔ‡X¶øX»¼á$Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€as€of€Right€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Carroll€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€99CR„1374€€€€€€C.€Creed€Ô_ÔMcGinleyÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W1999„00410„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€16,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓA€Carroll€County€jury€convicted€the€appellant,€Marion€Lee€Chapman,€of€one€(1)€count€of€drivingÐ xÈ  Ðunder€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€to€eleven€(11)€monthsÐ d´ Ðand€twenty„nine€(29)€days,€suspended€after€serving€ten€(10)€days€in€confinement.€€On€appeal,€theÐ P  Ðappellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€motion€for€a€continuance€on€the€day€of€trial.€Ð <Œ ÐWe€hold€that€the€appellant€has€waived€this€issue€for€failing€to€prepare€an€adequate€record€for€thisÐ (x ÐCourtððs€review.€€In€addition,€we€conclude€that,€based€on€the€limited€record€before€us,€the€trial€courtÐ d Ðdid€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€denying€the€motion€for€a€continuance.€€Therefore,€we€affirm€theÐ P Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court.Ô#†¼á$»XX¶ø†#ÔÔ‡X¶øX»¼á$ÔÐ ì< ÐÓÕÓÌò òÔ€X¶øXXX¶øÔTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€of€Carroll€County€isÐ Ä ÐAffirmedó óÐ ° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼á$»àX¶øi#ÔÔ‡X¶øX.¼á$ÔJerry€Smith,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.,óó€andÐ ˆØ ÐòòRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€joined.Ð tÄ ÐÌGregory€D.€Clayton,€Nashville€Tennessee,€attorney€for€the€appellant,€Marion€Lee€Chapman.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter€and€Kim€R.€Helper,€Assistant€Attorney€General,Ð $"t! ÐRobert€Ô_ÔRadfordÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General€and€Eleanor€Cahill,€Assistant€District€Attorney,€attorneysÐ #`" Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÓb ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼á$»XX¶ø‘ #ÔÔ‡X¶øX»¼á$ÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼á$»XX¶øÎ #ÔÔ‡X¶øX»¼á$ÔÓ  Óò òÔ‡X¶øXXX¶øÔà@¬¬)ìàI.ó óˆÐ ¬'ü"' ÐÌà  àOn€January€16,€1999,€the€appellant€was€arrested€for€driving€under€the€influence.€Ð „)Ô$) ÐApproximately€four€(4)€months€later,€the€appellant€was€arraigned€in€the€Carroll€County€CircuitÐ p*À%* ÐCourt,€and€ò òó óalthough€he€had€retained€an€attorney€to€represent€him,€he€appeared€without€counsel€at€hisÐ \+¬&+ Ðarraignment.€€ò òó óDuring€the€proceeding,€the€following€colloquy€between€the€trial€court€and€the€appellantÐ H,˜', Ðoccurred:Ð 4-„(-ý Ðà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àAnd€your€attorney€didnððt€showÐ ° Ðup?МìÈÈ ÐÌà  àMR.€CHAPMAN:à8  àà h àHe€told€me€he€had€to€be€inÐ tÄ Ðcourt€today€in€Sumner€County,€that€heÐ `° Ðwould€„€„€I€was€told€to€get€a€court€dateÐ L œ Ðfrom€you€today€and€he€would€be€hereÐ 8 ˆ Ðwhen€you€said€to€be€here.Ð$ tÈÈ ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àWell,€thatððs€fair€enough.€.€.€.Ðü L ÈÈ ÐÌà  à.€.€.€.€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àAll€right,€Iððm€setting€your€caseÐ ¬ü  Ðfor€trial€on€Thursday,€May€13òòthóó.Иè ÈÈ ÐÌà  àMR.€CHAPMAN:à8  àà h àMay€the€13òòthóó.ÐpÀÈÈ ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àThatððs€this€coming€Thursday.€Ð H˜ ÐYouððll€be€given€a€copy€of€theÐ 4„ Ðindictment.€.€.€.Ð pÈÈ ÐÌà  à.€.€.€.Ð øH ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àAll€right,€sheððs€going€to€give€aÐ Ð  Ðcopy€of€a€document.€€You€understandÐ ¼  Ðwhat€you€are€charged€with?ШøÈÈ ÐÌà  àMR.€CHAPMAN:à8  àà0hÈÈàYes,€sir.ЀÐhÈhÈ ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àAll€right,€Iððm€going€to€enter€aÐ X ¨ Ðplea€of€not€guilty.€€Your€case€is€set€forÐ D!” Ðjury€trial€this€coming€Thursday,€MayÐ 0"€  Ð13òòthóó.€€Do€you€understand€that?Ð#l!ÈÈ ÐÌà  àMR.€CHAPMAN:à8  àà0hÈÈàYes,€sir.Ðô$D #hÈhÈ ÐÌà  àTHE€COURT:à8  àà h àYouððll€stay€around€and€get€aÐ Ì&"% Ðcopy€of€the€notice.€€And€you€mightÐ ¸'#& Ðjust€make€a€note€on€the€indictment€andÐ ¤(ô#' Ðtake€it€to€your€attorney,€set€9:00€a.m.Ð )à$( Ðâ âthis€coming€Thursday.€€You€haveÐ |*Ì%) Ðdiscussed€with€your€attorney€and€youÐ ° Ðdo€want€a€jury€trial.€€Is€that€correct?МìÈÈ Ðâ âÌà  àMR.€CHAPMAN:à8  àà0hÈÈàYes,€sir.ÐtÄhÈhÈ ÐÌÓÓò òó óÌÓÓà  àThe€trial€was€set€for€three€(3)€days€after€the€appellant€was€arraigned.€€When€the€appellant€andÐ $ t Ðhis€attorney€appeared€in€court€on€the€date€set€for€trial,€counsel€objected€to€the€trial€date€and€requestedÐ  ` Ða€continuance.€€ò òó óThe€trial€court€denied€the€motion,€and€after€a€trial,€the€jury€convicted€the€appellantÐ ü L  Ðof€one€(1)€count€of€driving€under€the€influence€as€charged€in€the€indictment.€€From€his€conviction,Ð è 8  Ðthe€appellant€now€brings€this€appeal€as€of€right.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà@……)ìàò òII.ó óˆÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà  àIn€his€sole€issue€on€appeal,€the€appellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€hisÐ „Ô  Ðmotion€for€a€continuance.€€Initially,€we€€note€that€the€appellant€has€failed€to€provide€this€Court€withÐ pÀ Ða€complete€record€regarding€the€motion€for€a€continuance.€€It€is€the€duty€of€the€Appellant€to€prepareÐ \¬ Ðan€adequate€record€for€appellate€review.€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b).€€ð ðWhen€a€party€seeks€appellateÐ H˜ Ðreview€there€is€a€duty€to€prepare€a€record€which€conveys€a€fair,€accurate€and€complete€account€ofÐ 4„ Ðwhat€transpired€with€respect€to€the€issues€forming€the€basis€of€the€appeal.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔBallardÔ_Ôóó,€855Ð  p ÐS.W.2d€557,€560€(Tenn.€1993).€€In€the€absence€of€an€adequate€record€on€appeal,€this€Court€mustÐ  \ Ðpresume€that€the€trial€courtððs€rulings€are€supported€by€sufficient€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔOodyÔ_Ôóó,€823Ð øH ÐS.W.2d€554,€559€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1991).Ð ä4 Ðà  àNo€verbatim€transcript€of€the€proceedings€to€obtain€a€continuance€was€available,€so€theÐ Ð  Ðappellant€attempted€to€submit€a€statement€of€the€evidence€under€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(c).€€Rule€24(c)Ð ¼  Ðrequires€that€the€statement€of€the€evidence€ð ðbe€filed€with€the€clerk€of€the€trial€court€within€90€daysÐ ¨ø Ðafter€filing€the€notice€of€appeal.ðð€€The€appellant€filed€his€notice€of€appeal€on€June€1,€1999;€however,Ð ”ä Ðhe€filed€his€statement€of€the€evidence€on€October€18,€1999.€€It€is€apparent€this€filing€was€more€thanÐ €Ð Ð90€days€after€filing€his€notice€of€appeal;€thus,€the€statement€of€the€evidence€was€not€timely€filedÐ l¼ Ðunder€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€P.€24(c).Ð X ¨ Ðà  àMoreover,€the€state€objected€to€the€appellantððs€statement€of€the€evidence€in€various€respects.€Ð D!” ÐFinally,€the€trial€court€expressly€rejected€the€statement€of€the€evidence,€finding€that€such€statementÐ 0"€  Ðwas€untimely€and€did€not€convey€a€fair,€accurate€and€complete€account€of€what€transpired€during€theÐ #l! Ðproceedings.€ò ò€ó óAs€a€result,€this€Court€may€not€consider€the€appellantððs€purported€statement€of€theÐ $X" Ðevidence.Ð ø$H # Ðà  àThe€record€contains€no€evidence€regarding€what€transpired€during€the€motion€for€aÐ ä%4!$ Ðcontinuance€or€at€the€appellantððs€trial.€€Therefore,€the€issue€is€waived.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b).Ð Ð& "% ÐÌà@^^(ìàò òIII.ó óˆÐ ¨(ø#' ÐÌà  àNevertheless,€after€considering€the€limited€record€presented€to€this€Court,€we€will€brieflyÐ €*Ð%) Ðaddress€the€appellantððs€issue€on€the€merits.€€The€appellant€alleges€that,€by€denying€the€motion€for€aÐ l+¼&* Ðcontinuance,€the€trial€court€deprived€him€of€the€opportunity€to€obtain€discovery,€to€prepare€pleadingsÐ ° Ðand/or€motions,€to€subpoena€witnesses€and/or€medical€records,€and€to€prepare€requests€for€juryÐ œì Ðinstructions.€€He€also€urges€that€he€was€denied€his€constitutional€rights€to€due€process€of€law€and€toÐ ˆØ Ðcompulsory€process.€€Therefore,€he€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€motion€for€aÐ tÄ Ðcontinuance€of€the€trial€date.Ð `° Ðà  àA€motion€for€a€continuance€is€addressed€to€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€judge,€and€hisÐ L œ Ðruling€on€the€motion€will€not€be€disturbed€in€the€absence€of€an€abuse€of€discretion€to€the€prejudiceÐ 8 ˆ Ðof€the€defendant.€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔHinesÔ_Ôóó,€919€S.W.2d€573,€579€(Tenn.€1995).€€An€abuse€of€discretion€isÐ $ t Ðdemonstrated€by€showing€that€the€failure€to€grant€a€continuance€denied€defendant€a€fair€trial€or€thatÐ  ` Ðit€could€be€reasonably€concluded€that€a€different€result€would€have€followed€had€the€continuanceÐ ü L  Ðbeen€granted.€€òòIdóó.€at€579.Ð è 8  Ðà  àThe€transcript€of€the€arraignment€clearly€demonstrates€that€the€appellant€was€instructed€toÐ Ô$  Ðappear€and€ð ðget€a€court€dateðð€and€that€counsel€ð ðwould€be€here€when€[the€court]€said€to€be€here.ðð€Ð À  Ðò òó óAlthough€the€appellant€argues€that€he€and€ð ðhis€counsel€were€informed€just€moments€before€the€trialÐ ¬ü  Ðwas€to€begin€that€the€case€was€set€for€jury€trial,ðð€a€reading€of€the€arraignment€transcript€clearlyÐ ˜è  Ðrefutes€such€an€allegation.€€ò òó óThe€trial€court€informed€the€appellant€of€the€trial€date€at€least€four€(4)Ð „Ô  Ðtimes,€and€the€appellant€expressly€affirmed€his€understanding€that€the€trial€would€be€held€on€MayÐ pÀ Ð13.€€As€a€result,€we€hold€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€denying€the€motion€toÐ \¬ Ðcontinue€the€trial€date.Ð H˜ Ðà  àThis€Court€is€concerned€that€defense€counsel€instructed€his€client€to€appear€before€the€trialÐ 4„ Ðcourt€at€his€arraignment€without€the€benefit€of€counsel.€€This€is€not€a€good€practice.€€Our€SupremeÐ  p ÐCourt€has€held€that€an€arraignment€ð ðmay€or€may€not€be€a€critical€stageðð€of€the€criminal€proceedingsÐ  \ Ðwhich€would€implicate€his€right€to€counsel€under€the€Sixth€Amendment.€€òòState€v.€Suttonóó,€761€S.W.2dÐ øH Ð763.€768€(Tenn.€1988).€€Nonetheless,€an€arraignment€which€is€limited€to€the€matters€prescribed€inÐ ä4 ÐTenn.€R.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€P.€10€is€not€a€critical€stage.€€òòId.óó€at€769.€€The€record€shows€that€the€arraignment€wasÐ Ð  Ðlimited€to€such€matters,€in€that€the€trial€court€merely€informed€the€appellant€of€the€charges€againstÐ ¼  Ðhim,€entered€a€plea€of€ð ðnot€guiltyðð€on€the€appellantððs€behalf€and€provided€the€appellant€with€a€copyÐ ¨ø Ðof€the€indictment.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€P.€10(b).€€Thus,€we€conclude€that€the€arraignment€was€not€aÐ ”ä Ðð ðcritical€stage,ðð€and€counselððs€absence€at€the€arraignment€did€not€deprive€the€appellant€of€hisÐ €Ð Ðconstitutional€right€to€counsel.Ð l¼ Ðà  àAdditionally,€we€recognize€that€the€appellant€is€statutorily€entitled€to€ð ðfourteen€(14)€full€daysÐ X ¨ Ð(Sundays€and€legal€holidays€excluded)€after€arrest€and€the€return€of€the€indictment€or€presentmentÐ D!” Ðbefore€being€tried€for€such€offense.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„14„105.€€The€appellant€was€indicted€onÐ 0"€  ÐMay€3€and€was€tried€for€this€offense€approximately€ten€(10)€days€later.€€However,€in€òòState€v.€Brownóó,Ð #l! Ð795€S.W.2d€689,€693€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1990),€this€Court€observed€that€ð ðthe€legislature€intendedÐ $X" Ðthat€the€delay€between€indictment€and€trial€apply€only€where€the€indictment€or€presentment€and€arrestÐ ô$D # Ðoccur€substantially€at€the€same€time.ðð€€The€appellant€was€arrested€for€this€offense€in€January,€but€wasÐ à%0!$ Ðindicted€four€(4)€months€later.€€Therefore,€based€upon€previous€holdings€of€this€Court€and€ourÐ Ì&"% ÐSupreme€Court,€we€conclude€that€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„14„105,€which€requires€a€fourteen€(14)€dayÐ ¸'#& Ðlapse€between€the€indictment€and€the€trial€date,€does€not€require€reversal€in€this€case.€€òòSeeóó€òòHood€v.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐStateóó,€216€S.W.2d€14,€16€(Tenn.€1948);€òòDukes€v.€Stateóó,€578€S.W.2d€659,€662€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.Ð )à$( Ð1978).Ð |*Ì%) Ðà  àThis€issue€is€without€merit.Ð h+¸&* Їà@dd)ìàò òIV.ó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àAfter€reviewing€the€record€presented€to€this€Court,€we€hold€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuseÐ ˆØ Ðits€discretion€in€denying€the€appellantððs€motion€for€a€continuance.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€theÐ tÄ Ðtrial€court€is€affirmed.Ô#†X¶øXXX¶øZ #ÔÔ#†¼á$»XX¶ø, #ÔÔ€X¶øX»¼á$ÔÐ `° ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  ` Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€SMITH,€JUDGE