ÿWPCÄ ÃCûùŠli5²µPfú3¾;1»…b+¿ùP}/ÜAÀ[{tÚ¬ˆè¿S6£§2kÊÐ<½É_¬—ø9¼ŽÓXI’çÑåà#å8>o„¨¿õz䟠pÓ•Ïe.U#•‰X¯\¿þ0DÝQ˜†ÔÉ#½Êrp€5Š¥éöž/8HÙ‰ýÂR·,Q£Û3°¬-1„*ÿ½S¦Î{ÄŠ6’¡ƒ-¤õÏÀ¥!*Á·›6SFœÚ»URÄ>19 º–lŸ{CRyx "0%lä´òÓ+µN*·ìÖ*TÏ)rPÁú›/ø#¢¿UÜT‡Ô-ÏJI¹ó‰çÑ¿m“£±¼Ã%‹#›ÝûŸ˜ÿªWã ÔXCÎJG_;.%‚azÞyÜlP‚à"·™x¿U˜¯V’Ü/§õ9Ó’ í?1HrÉ ë·ï#–7_gV}Ïè¶²wÄ<¶»Ü¢à[$U†¯˜ ®Ë«`ô4ª×k0åƒÓvFš^±7ö>HæíB:E>XSL`cæp‚ûDoÔ:}@t6óà޵횜¸4¢›§íÌÆpù\.ÿ˜Îë¯RÚ%=·äïï•ÄwäK즌†ÔÖlÜÜ¢´`¤\õ›ç £GJ&‚é{b#Á\ % N# 0ˆ% UN­ û ^  z Ò‰ w[ 4_ s ‚ Æ„ ÆJ Æ ÆÖ mœN³³³Eµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµb···································· 0ë¿¿¿¿ Bªª 0¤Ç D5k D-  0KÍÍ ASÆk 0¤1 0DÕ A«˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular *žE+â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptyG*\Pt™Ÿ3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(|G2³“$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÿ}ò»»Ô d(|3‡y$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡y$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K5»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K5»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼K5»»»ÔÑ8€ùXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îFTK5ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼K5»îîFT #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€25,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XùX»¼K5ÔÌò òÔ#†¼K5»XXù#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€Ô_ÔALONZOÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔCHATMANÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XùX»¼K5Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€70370€€€€€€Ray€L.€Jenkins,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„03123„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐOctober€5,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ_ÔAlonzoÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔChatmanÔ_Ô€appeals€the€Knox€County€Criminal€Courtððs€revocation€of€his€probationary€sentence.€Ð xÈ  ÐBecause€the€lower€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€revoking€probation€and€ordering€the€originalÐ d´ Ðsentence€into€execution,€we€affirm.Ô#†¼K5»XXùÔ#ÔÔ‡XùX»¼K5ÔÐ P  ÐÓøÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ (x ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼K5»àXù|#ÔÔ‡XùX.¼K5ÔJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_ÔóóÐ P Ðand€òòRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ì< ÐÌMark€Stephens,€Knox€County€Public€Defender;€Paula€R.€Voss€and€Aubrey€Davis,€Assistant€PublicÐ Ä ÐDefenders,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Ô_ÔAlonzoÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔChatmanÔ_Ô.Ð ° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Patricia€C.€Ô_ÔKussmanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ˆØ ÐRandall€E.€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Deborah€Ô_ÔHerstonÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ tÄ ÐGeneral,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð `° ÐÓÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼K5»XXùK#ÔÔ‡XùX»¼K5ÔÐ 8!ˆ  ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼K5»XXù‹ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XùX»¼K5Ôà  àà ` àOn€July€26,€2000,€judgment€was€entered€on€the€defendantððs€guilty€plea€to€the€offenseÐ #`" Ðof€aggravated€assault.€€The€defendant€received€a€three„year€probationary€sentence.€€The€judgmentÐ ü#L# Ðrecites€that€during€the€probationary€period,€the€defendant€must€refrain€from€violating€the€law,€refrainÐ è$8 $ Ðfrom€activities€inconsistent€with€good€citizenship,€pay€court€costs,€have€no€further€contact€with€theÐ Ô%$!% Ðvictim,€and€abide€by€any€conditions€established€by€the€probation€office.Ð À&"& ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€September€6,€2000,€a€probation€violation€warrant€issued€which€alleged€that€theÐ ˜(è#( Ðdefendant€had€failed€to€provide€the€probation€office€with€proof€of€employment€and€had€failed€toÐ „)Ô$) Ðreport€to€the€probation€office.€€Apparently,€the€defendant€was€taken€into€custody.€€Court€minutesÐ p*À%* Ðfrom€September€18,€2000€reflect€that€the€defendant€was€ð ðreleased€from€custody€under€supervisionÐ \+¬&+ Ðof€the€State€Probation€Office€.€.€.€conditioned€upon€his€residing€at€Ô_ÔCokerÔ_Ô€Hall.ðð€€The€case€wasÐ H,˜', Ðcontinued€until€November€17,€2000€for€a€revocation€hearing.€€However,€on€November€1,€2000,€aÐ 4-„(-ýŽ ÐÔ_Ôsecond€revocation€warrant€issued€which€alleged€that€the€defendant€had€been€arrested€for€twoÐ ° Ðadditional€offenses€and€had€failed€to€report€those€arrests.Ð œì ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€November€17,€2000,€the€court€held€a€revocation€hearing.€€Neither€side€presentedÐ tÄ Ðevidence.€€The€state€argued€that€the€defendant€had€never€reported€to€his€probation€supervisor,€neverÐ `° Ðreported€to€the€halfway€house€where€he€was€supposed€to€reside,€and€incurred€two€additional€charges.€Ð L œ ÐIn€response,€the€defense€acknowledged€that€the€defendant€never€reported€to€the€probation€office€orÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€halfway€house.€€However,€the€defense€asked€the€court€to€impose€ð ðenhanced€probation€rather€thanÐ $ t Ðsending€him€off€to€prison€.€.€.€.ðð€€The€court€revoked€the€defendantððs€probationary€sentence€andÐ  ` Ðordered€that€he€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€trial€court€found€only€thatÐ ü L  Ðð ðthe€defendant€has€been€guilty€of€violating€the€laws€of€this€State,€and€has€otherwise€violated€theÐ è 8  Ðconditions€of€his€probation.ððÐ Ô$  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€this€appeal,€the€defendant€complains€that€(1)€the€trial€court€failed€to€make€specificÐ ¬ü  Ðfindings€on€the€record,€thereby€violating€his€due€process€rights,€(2)€the€state€failed€to€prove€theÐ ˜è  Ðconditions€of€probation€or€that€the€defendant€had€been€arrested€while€on€probation,€and€(3)€the€trialÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€should€have€allowed€the€defendant€to€complete€his€sentence€on€enhanced€probation.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€standard€of€review€upon€appeal€of€an€order€revoking€probation€is€abuse€ofÐ H˜ Ðdiscretion.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€There€is€no€abuse€of€discretion€unlessÐ 4„ Ðthe€reviewing€court€finds€that€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€conclusionÐ  p Ðof€the€trial€judge€that€a€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation€has€occurred.€€òòId.óó€at€82;€òòState€v.€Delpóó,€614Ð  \ ÐS.W.2d€395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980).€€The€trial€court€is€required€only€to€find€that€the€violationÐ øH Ðof€probation€occurred€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-311(e)€(Supp.Ð ä4 Ð2000).€€Upon€finding€a€violation,€the€trial€court€is€vested€with€the€statutory€authority€to€"revokeÐ Ð  Ðprobation€and€suspension€of€sentence€and€cause€the€defendant€to€commence€the€execution€of€theÐ ¼  Ðjudgment€as€originally€entered."€€òòId.óó€Furthermore,€when€probation€is€revoked,€"the€original€judgmentÐ ¨ø Ðso€rendered€by€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€and€effect€from€the€date€of€the€revocation€of€suchÐ ”ä Ðsuspension."€€òòId.óó€ðð€40-35-310€(1997).€€The€trial€judge€retains€the€discretionary€authority€to€order€theÐ €Ð Ðdefendant€to€serve€the€original€sentence.€€òòSee€State€v.€Dukeóó,€902€S.W.2d€424,€427€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð l¼ Ð1995).€€€Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€this€case,€the€defendant€conceded€that€he€had€never€reported€to€his€probationÐ 0"€  Ðofficer.€€òòSee€State€v.€Michael€Emleróó,€No.€01C01-9512-CC-00424,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð #l! ÐNashville,€Nov.€27,€1996)€(where€the€defendant€admits€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation,Ð $X" Ðrevocation€by€the€trial€court€is€not€arbitrary€or€capricious);€òòState€v.€Mitzi€Ann€Boydóó,€No.Ð ô$D # Ð03C01-9508-CC-00246,€slip€op.€at€3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Nov.€1,€1996).€€Under€the€termsÐ à%0!$ Ðof€the€judgment,€the€defendant€was€to€submit€to€probation€supervision.€€His€failure€to€do€soÐ Ì&"% Ðamounted€to€a€violation€of€probation.€€Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àà ` àThus,€the€only€remaining€question€is€whether€the€court€abused€its€discretion€inÐ )à$( Ðordering€the€defendant€to€serve€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€TheÐ |*Ì%) Ðlower€court€was€statutorily€authorized€to€impose€the€original€sentence€upon€revocation€of€probation.€Ð h+¸&* ÐòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-310€(1997).€€Moreover,€the€trial€court€was€not€required€at€that€stageÐ ° Ðto€reconsider€the€sentencing€principles.€€òòState€v.€Howard€Luroy€Williamson,€Jr.óó,€No.Ð œì Ð02C01-9507-CC-00201,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€Sept.€30,€1996).€€The€defendantÐ ˆØ Ðhas€amply€demonstrated€his€lack€of€suitability€for€further€probationary€efforts€via€his€admitted€failureÐ tÄ Ðto€report€to€his€probation€officer,€to€submit€to€supervision€of€the€probation€department,€and€to€resideÐ `° Ðin€the€halfway€house.€€We€see€no€error€in€the€trial€courtððs€revocation€of€probation€and€ordering€intoÐ L œ Ðexecution€the€original€sentence.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àà ` àDespite€this€holding,€we€feel€compelled€to€address€deficiencies€in€the€proceedingsÐ  ` Ðbelow.€€Neither€party€offered€any€evidence€whatsoever€at€the€revocation€hearing.€€The€state€allegedÐ ü L  Ðthat€the€defendant€failed€to€report€his€arrest€on€two€new€charges,€but€it€offered€no€proof€that€theÐ è 8  Ðcriminal€charges€actually€existed€or€that€the€terms€of€probation€required€that€they€be€reported.€Ð Ô$  ÐLikewise,€the€state€failed€to€offer€any€proof€that€the€terms€of€probation€required€the€defendant€toÐ À  Ðprovide€proof€of€employment.€€The€lower€court€had€no€evidentiary€basis€for€finding€that€theÐ ¬ü  Ðdefendant€ð ðhas€been€guilty€of€violating€the€laws€of€this€state.ðð€Furthermore,€the€court€failed€to€specifyÐ ˜è  Ðhow€the€defendant€ð ðhas€otherwise€violated€the€conditions€of€his€probationðð€and€make€supportingÐ „Ô  Ðfactual€findings.€€Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€are€concerned€by€these€several€shortcomings;€however,€on€the€facts€of€this€case,Ð H˜ Ðthey€do€not€dictate€a€result€other€than€the€one€we€have€reached.€€The€defendant,€through€counsel,Ð 4„ Ðadmitted€that€he€did€not€report€to€his€probation€officer;€in€other€words,€he€admitted€a€probationÐ  p Ðviolation.€€The€defendant€is€now€ill€situated€to€complain€that€the€court€did€not€make€a€specificÐ  \ Ðfinding€to€this€effect.€€Only€one€basis€for€revocation€is€necessary.€€Therefore,€the€courtððs€failure€toÐ øH Ðmake€specific€findings€relative€to€any€other€grounds€for€revocation€included€in€ð ðotherwise€violat[ing]Ð ä4 Ðthe€conditions€of€.€.€.€probationðð€and€finding€that€the€defendant€violated€the€law€despite€the€stateððsÐ Ð  Ðlack€of€proof€on€that€basis€are€not€fatal.€€òòSee,€e.g.,€State€v.€Daryl€McKinley€Robinsonóó,€No.Ð ¼  ÐW1999-01386-CCA-R3-CD,€slip€op.€at€2„3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€May€4,€2000)€(appellateÐ ¨ø Ðcourt€not€required€to€address€lower€courtððs€deficiencies€in€fact€finding€on€additional€basis€forÐ ”ä Ðprobation€revocation€where€defendant€admitted€other€violations€of€probationary€terms).€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àà ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð X ¨ ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð $X" Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE