ÿWPCl ¨ZÔ·DÛU0íŒT,aü?´{ ȈìÅaÄj1‰"·O@¢´R”²œÉMÉ¥ ¤‚ó¬­F4ÛŽ…º±/.‚±´² Î/M\¦j0ôÆþ_3ej<¥Œüľ@ý£% û¹ÉGª¹Ãqiç¸VräšÊzâ#cm‡¼"ëJKXêòƒàó/¹4’ gy‹LÖüŒÍ“ý]]!©qK¡í–(TÆF?QóVNë^EåSc×2×nZBD*oÚÖ³ôçæBÔGuñ‹jÕҿWÙêgQ”.‡Œ7²ŽÒ8ô¨C° ÿÌ!ó †\DoçS¤ôµMan³¥Ü_Æøƒ9R{v³.äªZ𶩉¢Þh=(¨L¤Õ\ÉaÆOŠÚá´Ñ£Ì æÛ“­N±Ø6•+ÚñzËÍL`Vל§ïOêÂÿ§ô5Ô‡-Ûמ ðã_2gK’]Ó©\¼jeÿI7Žøl«ª4l$þ¥Ù)™öÓ5Œ“G”²–zû>aq¬œ”zÓ˜ïa÷EËTc–€”Äé;y_H:*m±UÆŠM¦œ@f¢QDwv(g¤ÂD“DJ£FA²%6$œ(ÔW—IÐ]Š…˜/^½Æbj>Â:™¯;)-U@†bUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ Ð #ÁØ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë 0D±NõUN÷ƒEEÈ 1Ê 0cW 1uº 72////////////////////baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0ëiiii BTT 0¤q D3 D-H 0Kuu ASÀÆ 0¤Ù 0D} A«Á(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ówœz+ ÖJ~'ê:i  3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular yÝ ƒRFÊ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôŠ,ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAt€sentencing,€the€trial€judge€advised€that€the€two€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€convictions€would€be€merged€into€one€count€of€drivingÐ ° Ðunder€the€influence,€reflecting€a€single€judgment€of€conviction.€€However,€no€judgment€of€conviction€for€Ô_ÔDUIÔ_Ô€is€includedÐ tÄ Ðin€the€record.€€Accordingly,€we€find€it€necessary€to€remand€in€order€to€insure€that€a€judgment€of€conviction€is€includedÐ 8ˆ Ðin€the€circuit€court€case€file.(¦ÙCEMU]emu}AutoList1(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)- ù-(|G2FÊ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€;$»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôŠ,ò»»Ô d(|3Ga$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€;$»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ga$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€;$»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€;$»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼;$»»»ÔÑ8€u¸XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î7e;$ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼;$»îî7e #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€19,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡Xu¸X»¼;$ÔÌò òÔ#†¼;$»XXu¸##ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€STEVE€A.€CLARKòòóóÔ‡Xu¸X»¼;$Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔGrundyÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€3314€€€€€€J.€Curtis€Smith,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„03148„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€30,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡Xu¸XXXu¸ÔThe€Appellant,€Steve€A.€Clark,€was€convicted€by€a€Ô_ÔGrundyÔ_Ô€County€jury€for€driving€under€theÐ xÈ  Ðinfluence,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„401(a)(1),€driving€with€an€alcohol€concentration€of€.10%€orÐ d´ Ðmore,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„401(a)(2),€and€driving€without€a€license.Ô_Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€€On€appeal,€Clark€raisesÐ P  Ðone€issue€for€our€review:€Whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€admitting€into€evidence€the€results€of€theÐ <Œ ÐÔ_ÔintoximeterÔ_Ô€test?€€After€review,€we€find€no€error€and€affirm€Clarkððs€conviction€for€driving€under€theÐ (x Ðinfluence.Ô#†Xu¸XXXu¸ç#ÔÔ#†¼;$»XXu¸™#ÔÔ‡Xu¸X»¼;$ÔÐ d ÐÓÛÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Conviction€Affirmed;€Remanded€for€Entry€of€Judgment€of€Convictionó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼;$»àXu¸^#ÔÔ‡Xu¸X.¼;$ÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€P.€J.,óó€and€òòJerryÐ Ä ÐL.€Smithóó,€J.,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌPhilip€A.€Ô_ÔCondraÔ_Ô,€District€Public€Defender,€Jasper,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Steve€A.€Clark.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€J.€Ross€Dyer,Ð `° ÐAssistant€Attorney€General;€James€Michael€Taylor,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Steve€Strain,Ð L œ ÐAssistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÔ#†¼;$»XXu¸F #ÔÔ‡Xu¸X»¼;$ÔÌÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONÐ ü#L# Ðó óÔ#†¼;$»XXu¸ #ÔÔ‡Xu¸X»¼;$ÔÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼;$»XXu¸› #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€Xu¸X»¼;$ÔÔ‡Xu¸XXXu¸Ôà  àShortly€after€midnight€on€February€16,€1999,€Officer€Brian€Wiley€of€the€Ô_ÔMonteagleÔ_Ô€PoliceÐ ¬'ü"' ÐDepartment€observed€a€car€traveling€towards€him€with€one€headlight€out€and€pulled€the€vehicle€over.€Ð ˜(è#(ýG ÐÔ_ÔOfficer€Wiley€approached€the€Appellant,€who€was€the€operator€of€the€car,€and€asked€to€see€hisÐ ° Ðdriverððs€license.€€After€the€license€was€produced,€Officer€Wiley€noticed€that€the€Appellantððs€driverððsÐ œì Ðlicense€had€expired€five€days€earlier.€Officer€Wiley€detected€a€strong€odor€of€alcohol€from€within€theÐ ˆØ Ðinterior€of€the€vehicle€and€observed€an€open€beer€container€wedged€between€two€seats.€€He€furtherÐ tÄ Ðobserved€five€cans€of€unopened€beer€in€the€vehicle.€€When€Officer€Wiley€asked€the€Appellant€if€heÐ `° Ðhad€been€drinking,€the€Appellant€replied,€ð ðWhatððs€it€f„„„„ing€matter.€€This€is€bullshit.ðð€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àOfficer€Wiley€asked€the€Appellant€to€exit€his€vehicle€so€that€he€could€conduct€field€sobrietyÐ $ t Ðtests.€€The€Appellant€initially€refused€but€after€several€requests€and€upon€arrival€of€another€officerÐ  ` Ðat€the€scene,€the€Appellant€complied.€€The€Appellant€then€explained€that€he€had€ð ðbad€kneesðð€and€toldÐ ü L  ÐOfficer€Wiley€that€he€could€not€do€the€one„leg€stand.€€Officer€Wiley€asked€the€Appellant€to€performÐ è 8  Ðthe€heel/toe€test,€but€the€Appellant€ð ðcouldnððt€comprehendðð€what€the€officer€was€asking€and€neverÐ Ô$  Ðtried€to€perform€the€test.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àAt€this€time,€Officer€Wiley€placed€the€Appellant€under€arrest.€Wiley€and€the€AppellantÐ ˜è  Ðarrived€at€the€Grundy€County€Sheriffððs€Office€at€12:49€a.m.€€The€Appellant€signed€an€impliedÐ „Ô  Ðconsent€form€at€1:00€a.m.€and€Deputy€Sheriff€Jimmy€Lewis€administered€the€breathalyser€test€at€1:15Ð pÀ Ða.m.€€The€test€results€indicated€that€the€Appellantððs€blood€alcohol€level€was€.25%.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àAt€trial,€the€Appellant€testified€that€he€had€frequented€two€bars€and€consumed€four€beersÐ 4„ Ðbetween€8:00€p.m.€and€11:30€p.m.€the€night€of€his€arrest.€€He€admitted€that€five€cans€of€unopenedÐ  p Ðbeer€were€found€in€his€vehicle€and€stated€ð ðthere€might€have€been€one€open€thatððs€been€setting€in€the€Ð  \ Ðcar€.€.€.€I€couldnððt€honestly€say,€I€do€not€recall€drinking€one.ðð€€€Ð øH ÐÌò òÓ  ÓANALYSISÐ Ð  ÐÌó óÓ  Óà  àThe€Appellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€admitting€the€results€of€his€intoximeterÐ ¨ø Ðtest€into€evidence.€Specifically,€he€contends€that€the€State€failed€to€comply€with€the€requirements€ofÐ ”ä ÐòòState€v.€Sensingóó,€843€S.W.2d€412€(Tenn.€1992)€by€ð ðfail[ing]€to€lay€the€evidentiary€foundation€forÐ €Ð Ðadmissibility€of€the€breath€test€results,€either€in€the€hearing€on€the€motion€or€during€the€testimonyÐ l¼ Ðoffered€at€trial.ððÐ X ¨ ÐÌà  àIn€òòSensingóó,€our€supreme€court€set€forth€the€following€six€requirements€that€must€beÐ 0"€  Ðestablished€before€the€results€of€a€breathalyser€test€can€be€admitted€into€evidence:Ð #l! ÐÌÓ  Óà  à(1)€à8 ` àthat€the€tests€were€performed€in€accordance€with€the€standards€andÐ ô$D # Ðoperating€procedure€promulgated€by€the€forensic€services€divisionÐ à%0!$ Ðof€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation;ÐÌ&"%` x` x ÐÌÓ€ (¦Ù83ÓØ! !ØÝ"‚3£"ÝÝ  Ýà8  àÝ‚3£–ÝÔ2¦ÙÔ(Ú  Ú2Ú  Ú)Ô3  Ôà0` Ð Ð àÝ  Ý€that€he€was€properly€certified€in€accordance€with€those€standards;݃3£–Ï݌Ф(ô#'` Ð ` Ð  Ðâ âŒÝ  ÝÐ )à$( Ðà8  à(3)€à8` Ð Ð àthat€the€evidentiary€breath€testing€instrument€used€was€certified€byÐ ° Ðthe€forensic€services€division,€was€tested€regularly€for€accuracy€andÐ œì Ðwas€working€properly€when€the€breath€test€was€performed;ЈØ` x` x Ðâ âÌà8  à(4)€à8` Ð Ð àthat€the€motorist€was€observed€for€the€requisite€20€minutes€prior€toÐ `° Ðthe€test,€and€during€this€period,€he€did€not€have€foreign€matter€inÐ L œ Ðhis€mouth,€did€not€consume€any€alcoholic€beverage,€smoke,€orÐ 8 ˆ Ðregurgitate;Ð$ t` x` x ÐÌà8  à(5)€à8` Ð Ð àevidence€that€he€followed€the€prescribed€operational€procedure;Ðü L ` x` x ÐÌà8  à(6)€à8` Ð Ð àidentify€the€print-out€record€offered€in€evidence€as€the€result€of€theÐ Ô$  Ðtest€given€to€the€person€tested.€€ÐÀ ` x` x ÐÌòòÓ  ÓSensingóó,€843€S.W.2d€at€416.€€The€State€had€the€burden€of€proving€that€the€breath€test€complied€withÐ ˜è  Ðthe€òòSensingóó€requirements.€€òòState€v.€McCaslinóó,€894€S.W.2d€310,€312€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€OnÐ „Ô  Ðappeal,€we€presume€that€the€trial€courtððs€determination€regarding€the€òòSensingóó€requirements€is€correctÐ pÀ Ðunless€the€evidence€preponderates€otherwise.€€òòState€v.€Edisonóó,€9€S.W.3d€75,€78€(Tenn.€1999).Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àPrior€to€trial,€the€Appellant€filed€a€motion€in€limine€requesting€that€the€trial€court€prohibit€theÐ 4„ ÐState€from€admitting€into€evidence€the€results€of€the€breathalyser€test€because€the€requirements€ofÐ  p ÐòòSensingóó€were€not€met.€€After€hearing€oral€arguments€on€the€motion,€the€trial€court€denied€theÐ  \ ÐAppellantððs€request€finding:Ð øH ÐÌà8  à[Deputy€Lewis]€testifies€that€he€was€close,€physically€close€within€a€matter€of€feet€ofÐ Ð  Ðthe€defendant€all€during€this€time€.€.€.€I€think€thatððs€sufficient€observation€for€a€20Ð ¼  Ðminute€period€to€come€within€the€requirements€of€òòSens[i]ngóó,€so€I€do€find,€based€uponÐ ¨ø Ðthe€testimony€of€the€two€officers,€particularly€the€first€officer€[Wiley],€that€he€didÐ ”ä Ðobserve€the€defendant€for€a€period€of€20€minutes€and€that€he€didnððt€take€any€foreignÐ €Ð Ðmatter€into€his€mouth€or€consume€any€alcoholic€beverage,€smoke,€or€regurgitateÐ l¼ Ðduring€that€period€of€time.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  ÐÌAt€the€conclusion€of€the€Stateððs€proof,€the€Appellant€renewed€his€objection€to€the€admission€of€theÐ 0"€  Ðbreathalyser€test€results€and€was€again€overruled€by€the€trial€court.Ð #l! ÐÌò òó óà  àThe€Appellant€first€argues€that€the€State€failed€to€fulfill€the€òòSensingóó€requirements€when€itÐ ô$D # Ðð ðasked€no€questions€about€(1)€the€operating€procedure[,]€(2)€the€certification€and€testing€of€theÐ à%0!$ Ðmachine€for€accuracy[,]€or€(3)€compliance€with€operational€procedure.ðð€€Deputy€Jimmy€Lewis,€whoÐ Ì&"% Ðperformed€the€breath€test€on€the€Appellant,€testified€that€he€was€trained€by€the€Tennessee€Bureau€ofÐ ¸'#& ÐInvestigation€with€regard€to€the€proper€operating€procedure€to€be€followed€when€administering€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðtest.€€Although€Deputy€Lewis€could€not€recall€when€the€machine€was€last€calibrated€prior€to€testingÐ )à$( Ðthe€Appellant,€he€testified€that€the€calibration€was€done€on€a€regular€basis€and€recorded€on€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðcertificate€located€near€the€machine.€€Deputy€Lewis€also€testified€that€he€tested€the€machine€to€makeÐ h+¸&* Ðsure€it€was€working€properly€prior€to€administering€the€Appellantððs€test.€€He€also€entered€all€relevantÐ ° Ðinformation€about€the€Appellant€into€the€machine€prior€to€running€the€test.€€Additionally,€DeputyÐ œì ÐLewis€testified€that€the€intoximeter€printout€introduced€by€the€State€correctly€reflected€the€results€ofÐ ˆØ Ðthe€test€he€conducted€on€the€Appellant.€€We€conclude€that€this€testimony€supports,€by€aÐ tÄ Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence,€the€first,€second,€third,€fifth€and€sixth€requirements€under€òòSensingóó.Ð `° ÐÌà  àThe€Appellant€next€asserts€that€because€neither€officer€had€eye€to€eye€contact€with€theÐ 8 ˆ ÐAppellant€for€the€entire€twenty€minute€period,€the€State€failed€to€prove€compliance€with€the€fourthÐ $ t Ðrequirement€of€òòSensingóó.€€The€purpose€of€the€fourth€requirement€is€to€ensure€ð ðthat€no€foreign€matterÐ  ` Ðis€present€in€the€defendantððs€mouth€that€could€retain€alcohol€and€potentially€influence€the€results€ofÐ ü L  Ðthe€test.ðð€€òòState€v.€Cookóó,€9€S.W.3d€98,€100„01€(Tenn.€1999).€€This€court€has€discussed€on€manyÐ è 8  Ðoccasions€the€issue€of€whether€eye€to€eye€contact€for€the€entire€twenty€minute€period€is€necessary€inÐ Ô$  Ðorder€to€meet€the€fourth€requirement€of€òòSensingóó.€€In€òòState€v.€Luckettóó,€No.€M2000„00528„CCA„R3„Ð À  ÐCD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€Mar.€8,€2001),€this€court€held€that€the€purpose€of€the€observationÐ ¬ü  Ðperiod€is€satisfied€where€the€officer€remains€in€very€close€proximity€to€the€defendant€for€the€entireÐ ˜è  Ðtime,€engages€him€or€her€in€conversation,€and€loses€direct€eye€contact€for€only€brief€intervals€of€time.€Ð „Ô  ÐSimilarly,€in€òòState€v.€Gregory€L.€Parkeróó,€No.€M1999„00209„CCA„R3CD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€atÐ pÀ ÐNashville,€Dec.€30,€1999),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.,€Oct.€23,€2000),€this€court€affirmed€theÐ \¬ Ðtrial€courtððs€admission€of€the€defendantððs€breath€test€results€based€upon€the€officer€being€within€closeÐ H˜ Ðproximity€of€the€defendant€during€the€waiting€period.€€€òòBut€seeóó€òòState€v.€Korsakovóó,€34€S.W.3d€534Ð 4„ Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2000)(evidence€preponderates€against€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€twentyÐ  p Ðminute€requirement€was€satisfied€where€the€officer€was€looking€at€paperwork€during€the€waitingÐ  \ Ðperiod);€òòState€v.€Harold€E.€Fieldsóó,€No.€01C01„9412„CC„00438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€Apr.Ð øH Ð12,€1996)€(trial€court€erred€in€admitting€results€of€breathalyser€test€where€deputy€filled€out€paperworkÐ ä4 Ðduring€twenty€minute€time€period€and€failed€to€keep€the€defendant€in€view€entire€twenty€minutes);Ð Ð  ÐòòState€v.€Deloitóó,€964€S.W.2d€909€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)(trial€court€erred€in€admitting€the€resultsÐ ¼  Ðof€defendantððs€breathalyser€test€where€officer€filled€out€paperwork€in€the€front€seat€of€his€vehicleÐ ¨ø Ðwhile€the€defendant€was€in€the€back€seat).€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€Officer€Wiley€arrived€at€the€sheriffððs€office€at€12:49€a.m.€€Once€inside,Ð l¼ Ðthe€Appellant€also€met€with€Deputy€Lewis.€€Deputy€Lewis€testified€that€he€observed€the€AppellantÐ X ¨ Ðfor€a€period€of€twenty€minutes€before€the€test€was€administered€at€1:15€a.m.€€€Deputy€Lewis€admittedÐ D!” Ðthat€he€did€not€have€ð ðeyeball€to€eyeballðð€contact€with€the€Appellant€the€entire€twenty€minutesÐ 0"€  Ðbecause€he€had€to€look€down€to€enter€the€Appellantððs€data€into€the€machine.€€Nonetheless,€heÐ #l! Ðtestified€that€the€Appellant€was€eight€feet€from€him€the€entire€time€and€that€he€did€not€observe€theÐ $X" ÐAppellant€eat,€drink,€chew€gum,€smoke,€regurgitate,€vomit€or€belch€prior€to€taking€the€test.€€OfficerÐ ô$D # ÐWiley€also€remained€with€the€Appellant€until€the€test€was€administered.€€Officer€Wiley€testified€thatÐ à%0!$ Ðhe€sat€and€looked€at€the€Appellant€uninterruptedly€for€twenty€minutes€and€that€he€was€within€ð ðarmððsÐ Ì&"% Ðlengthðð€of€the€Appellant€the€entire€time.€€The€State€must€establish,€by€a€preponderance€of€theÐ ¸'#& Ðevidence,€that€the€Appellantððs€mouth€was€free€of€foreign€matter€for€a€period€of€twenty€minutes€priorÐ ¤(ô#' Ðto€his€taking€the€breathalyser€test.€€òòóóWe€conclude€that€the€State€has€met€this€burden.Ð )à$( ÐÌÐ h+¸&* Ðò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONÐ ° ÐÌó óÓ  Óà  àAfter€review,€we€find€that€the€State€established€the€six€requirements€set€forth€in€òòSensingóó€byÐ ˆØ Ða€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€Accordingly,€the€Appellantððs€conviction€for€DUI€is€affirmed.€€AsÐ tÄ Ðpreviously€noted€in€footnote€1€of€this€opinion,€this€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€entry€of€aÐ `° Ðjudgment€of€conviction.Ð L œ ÐÔ#†Xu¸XXXu¸= #ÔÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ô$  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE