ÿWPC¾ p>Qò.GH !#›!#J±ÔUÐÚõ±„#íÖb î$cŒó)þ•æ7k¿A/¿ôܪèUê ª¡âÒ÷Œ”†ªã_G•E¨õ»ˆ —¾Üš‹f=#³KUošê6«uù®.3Î{+yù1Ž~IééëNKË6dðþ„š‡OTgpøYºÀ¸K–6ÂÄq ³©$ÚM:gœs.ãJa‹a+ X|íT{4>˜¾ó¼!ʲ)lá¿ð:‘:Gd3D(œ…G ¥àþ ûúÉï:|lhy\ 8Ö±YàŸ~»Lº0—3évû#©×f“œÊM´ ñVó@­¾ŒÝÕÙá†U2Æ’–ÝË8ºÓ‰»›Š~…pӥϖ$wÓ7}!6{Rz0® ¾ÓeaÛ;Üwh~Ü•Eæ5O[g·þ›¯N>¯m’b]¿N/ ƒÖ…dƒ»Øne!ìy YꓨcH|Ðá¶|ѨÖì¯!/y›?‘oy1®æ7sW|‰!÷WÕ2/{½~È&Ï|'ÛJ%¼ïç ys¡½î™²ù‡fP+ä[óâ™e³Š¥Æä` ;%ÐF³·BDÔÕXÇ^iàá€Kó¿Bæz}‘´ëõß1¤LIMs|C‹úb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÉÐ ü™ Æ• Æ[Æ!ÆççN­­­E¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯b±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±±± 0ë¹¹¹¹ B¤¤ 0¤Á D5e D-š 0KÇÇ ASÆe 0¤+ 0DÏ A«»«j2Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï.ê:i¢×+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 CLOYDHCBledsoeAslingerindigencyUsseryNorvellPottsNewsomeBomarPassarella t]heN]eitherLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô®yò»»Ô d(|3ÿr$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿr$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Å»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Å»»»ÔÑ8€[ÅXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î€î»¼ÅÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼Å»îî€ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€January€25,€2005Ð üL ÐÔ‡X[ÅX»¼ÅÔÌò òÔ#†¼Å»XX[Å!#ÔKELVIN€WADE€CLOYDòòóó€v.€HOWARD€CARLTON,€òòóóWARDENÔ‡X[ÅX»¼ÅÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Johnson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€4412€€€€€€Lynn€W.€Brown,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2004„02003„CCA„R3„HC€„€Filed€March€10,€Ô_Ô2005Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€petitioner,€Kelvin€Wade€Cloyd,€appeals€the€summary€dismissal€of€his€petition€for€habeas€corpusÐ xÈ  Ðrelief.€€He€alleges€that€he€was€denied€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel,€claims€that€the€stateÐ d´ Ðknowingly€used€false€testimony€during€his€trial,€and€asserts€that€he€was€erroneously€assessed€costs.€Ð P  ÐThe€judgment€is€affirmed.Ð <Œ ÐÓ¸ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmedó óÐ d ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Å»àX[Åž#ÔÔ‡X[ÅX.¼ÅÔGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ôóó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,óó€andÐ ì< ÐòòNorma€McGee€Ogle,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð Ø( ÐÌKelvin€Wade€Cloyd,€Mountain€City,€Tennessee,€pro€se.Ð ° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€and€John€H.€Bledsoe€and€Kathy€D.€Aslinger,Ð ˆØ ÐAssistant€Attorneys€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð tÄ ÐÓÁÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Å»XX[Åð#ÔÔ‡X[ÅX»¼ÅÔÐ L œ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼Å»XX[Å… #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X[ÅX»¼ÅÔà  àIn€1996,€the€petitioner€was€convicted€of€two€counts€of€vehicular€homicide€and€possession€ofÐ $"t! Ða€controlled€substance.€€This€court€affirmed€on€direct€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Kelvin€Wade€Cloydóó,€No.Ð #`" Ð03C01„9704„CR„00153€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.,€at€Knoxville,€Apr.€2,€1998),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.Ð ü#L# ÐDec.€14,€1998).€€The€petitioner€filed€a€timely€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€alleging€ineffectiveÐ è$8 $ Ðassistance€of€counsel€and€a€violation€of€the€requirements€of€òòBrady€v.€Marylandóó,€373€U.S.€83€(1963).€Ð Ô%$!% ÐThe€post„conviction€court€denied€relief€and€this€court€affirmed.€€òòSeeóó€òòKelvin€Wade€Cloyd€v.€Stateóó,Ð À&"& ÐNo.€E2003„00125„CCA„R3„PC€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.,€at€Knoxville,€Nov.€3,€2003),€òòperm.€app.€deniedóóÐ ¬'ü"' Ð(Tenn.€Jan.€26,€2004).Ð ˜(è#( ÐÌà  àOn€June€3,€2004,€the€petitioner€filed€a€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief,€alleging€that€his€trialÐ p*À%* Ðcounsel€was€ineffective€by€failing€to€inform€him€of€a€plea€offer€and€that€the€state€violated€his€dueÐ \+¬&+ Ðprocess€rights€by€utilizing€testimony€it€knew€to€be€false.€€The€trial€court€summarily€dismissed€theÐ H,˜', Ðpetition,€concluding€that€the€petitioner€had€failed€to€establish€a€claim€for€habeas€corpus€relief.€Ð 4-„(-ý‘ ÐÔ_ÔBecause€he€had€failed€to€file€an€affidavit€of€indigency,€the€trial€court€taxed€the€costs€to€the€petitioner.€Ð ° ÐIn€this€appeal,€the€petitioner€restates€his€earlier€claims€and€complains€about€the€assessment€of€courtÐ œì Ðcosts.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àA€writ€of€habeas€corpus€may€be€granted€only€when€the€petitioner€has€established€a€lack€ofÐ `° Ðjurisdiction€for€the€order€of€confinement€or€that€he€is€otherwise€entitled€to€immediate€release€becauseÐ L œ Ðof€the€expiration€of€his€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòUssery€v.€Averyóó,€222€Tenn.€50,€432€S.W.2d€656€(1968);€òòStateÐ 8 ˆ Ðex€rel.€Wade€v.€Norvellóó,€1€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€447,€443€S.W.2d€839€(1969).€€Habeas€corpus€relief€isÐ $ t Ðavailable€in€this€state€only€when€it€appears€on€the€face€of€the€judgment€or€the€record€that€the€trialÐ  ` Ðcourt€was€without€jurisdiction€to€convict€or€sentence€the€petitioner€or€that€the€sentence€ofÐ ü L  Ðimprisonment€has€otherwise€expired.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157,€164€(Tenn.€1993);€òòPotts€v.Ð è 8  ÐStateóó,€833€S.W.2d€60,€62€(Tenn.€1992).€€Unlike€the€post„conviction€petition€which€would€afford€aÐ Ô$  Ðmeans€of€relief€for€constitutional€violations,€such€as€the€deprivation€of€the€effective€assistance€ofÐ À  Ðcounsel,€the€purpose€of€the€habeas€corpus€petition€is€to€contest€a€void,€not€merely€a€voidable,Ð ¬ü  Ðjudgment.€€òòState€ex€rel.€Newsome€v.€Hendersonóó,€221€Tenn.€24,€424€S.W.2d€186,€189€(1969).€€AÐ ˜è  Ðpetitioner€cannot€attack€a€facially€valid€conviction€in€a€habeas€corpus€proceeding.€€òòPottsóó,€833€S.W.2dÐ „Ô  Ðat€62;€òòState€ex€rel.€Holbrook€v.€Bomaróó,€211€Tenn.€243,€364€S.W.2d€887,€888€(1963).Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€first€asserts€that€his€conviction€is€void€because€his€trial€counsel€was€ineffectiveÐ H˜ Ðby€failing€to€communicate€a€plea€offer€from€the€state.€€He€also€asserts€that€his€right€to€due€processÐ 4„ Ðwas€violated€because€the€state€used€false€testimony.€€These€claims,€even€if€true,€would€not€entitle€theÐ  p Ðpetitioner€to€habeas€corpus€relief.€€Instead,€they€would€entitle€the€petitioner€to€post„conviction€relief,Ð  \ Ðwhich€has€a€one„year€statute€of€limitations.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€òòNewsomeóó,€424€S.W.2d€at€189.€€InÐ øH Ðconsequence,€it€is€our€view€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€by€summarily€dismissing€the€petition.€€òòSeeóóÐ ä4 ÐòòPassarella€v.€Stateóó€891€S.W.2d€619,€627€(Tenn.€1994)€(holding€that€the€trial€court€may€summarilyÐ Ð  Ðdismiss€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€when€the€allegations€do€not€state€a€cognizable€claim);Ð ¼  Ðòòsee€alsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„21„109.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€petitioner€also€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€taxing€the€costs€of€the€proceedingÐ €Ð Ðbelow€to€him€because€he€is€indigent.€€The€state€submits€that€because€the€petitioner€failed€to€file€anÐ l¼ Ðaffidavit€of€indigency,€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€by€taxing€the€costs€to€the€petitioner.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€29„21„125€provides€that€"[t]he€costs€of€[habeas€corpusÐ 0"€  Ðproceedings],€except€when€otherwise€expressly€provided,€shall€be€adjudged€as€the€court€or€judge€mayÐ #l! Ðthink€right,€and€taxed€and€collected€as€in€other€cases."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„21„125.€€Our€lawÐ $X" Ðallows€for€the€commencement€of€a€civil€action,€including€the€filing€of€a€petition€for€writ€of€habeasÐ ô$D # Ðcorpus,€without€giving€security€for€the€costs€and€without€paying€litigation€taxes€when€the€petitionerÐ à%0!$ Ðfiles€an€oath€of€poverty€and€affidavit€of€indigency.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€20„12„127(a).€€That€statuteÐ Ì&"% Ðalso€provides,€however,€that€"[t]he€filing€of€a€civil€action€without€paying€the€costs€or€taxes€or€givingÐ ¸'#& Ðsecurity€for€the€costs€or€taxes€does€not€relieve€the€person€filing€the€action€from€responsibility€for€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðcosts€or€taxes€but€suspends€their€collection€until€taxed€by€the€court."€€Even€if€the€petitioner€had€filedÐ )à$( Ðthe€necessary€documentation€to€proceed€without€securing€the€costs,€he€would€not€be€exempt€fromÐ |*Ì%) Ðthe€payment€of€costs€in€the€trial€court€on€this€basis€alone.€€Our€supreme€court€has€held€as€follows:Ð h+¸&* Їà8  à[N]either€the€plain€language€of€[Supreme€Court€Rule€29],€nor€the€plain€language€ofÐ ° ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€20-12-127(a)€(Supp.€1999),€contemplates€thatÐ œì Ðindigent€litigants€are€permanently€relieved€from€their€responsibility€to€pay€litigationÐ ˆØ Ðtaxes.€€Rather,€Rule€29€and€section€20-12-127(a)€only€contemplate€that€an€indigentÐ tÄ Ðlitigant€will€not€be€denied€access€to€the€courts€to€commence€a€civil€action€solelyÐ `° Ðbecause€of€an€inability€to€pay€litigation€taxes.ÐL œÐ Ð  ÐòòFletcher€v.€Stateóó,€9€S.W.3d€103,€106€(Tenn.€1999).Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€authority€to€tax€the€costs€of€habeas€corpus€litigation€to€the€petitioner€is€within€theÐ  ` Ðdiscretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„21„125.€€Nothing€in€our€statutory€or€case€lawÐ ü L  Ðexempts€the€petitioner€from€the€payment€of€costs€based€upon€his€indigency.€€As€indicated,€theÐ è 8  Ðpetition€for€writ€of€habeas€corpus€was€without€merit.€€The€issues€had€been€previously€litigated€in€aÐ Ô$  Ðpost„conviction€petition.€€In€our€view,€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€under€theseÐ À  Ðcircumstances€by€taxing€the€costs€to€the€petitioner.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð „Ô  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð H˜ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGE