ÿWPC ‘H¤müæ|yq+xIž:˜"ÏÈ—<âÜÕA¨»Q?{À›?µ%êy© ­µ°^ÞFÒØƒ²Ø–õíÎS³È:¤êk±”)UËŬBÏÓHäÁ¿·<ô;9ƒÔ{ùÁHYm¼?Òvò¶${€…wÛ‘ «YÈv$|K­Û×RAŽr#PÏõÝØ. ð."q4ñáa#i4W£yç­œ°TNJÖƒƒô·b™APt=°£RrRYƒÌ§–˜BŠ ïC•wÊÖ %Î }%¤É’¬ICF§¸/ÀZR²u"–öSw ßÑ|Ñq»÷Ī)ò±Z€ä5aœ2C耳BæQ¾þ‚×—ÐfŒ¯'ÙCƒe;¹qê ˜ÙöÂþ/òehq¨Ú¶œDë(йìh“<¢­êCDZ>32¸N±Qp&¼ŸôH—ºþ»¿^zêßYÝ}ɸe¸gäî|(”<½‡áí Ï*Xä<®û^þ\Ž,jU ¥ñü*ÄïÚŒ»Æ$ÒE$2vÛ®O™Æ¥W,cFNäbP0^ ÃûŒ³_qõÜ&ÆÒ”[<#!Su¡B¾3ß2¸°âX+/š„àÝtÄŒe ±1úæ4‚©›ø‘ .?º^²ùæÀðG„Üö¾~Çb#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ë N±±±E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D5i D-ž 0KËË ASÆi 0¤/ 0DÓ A«˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»rœ0-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,,Úf€9˜¢ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2†þ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€[M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôæò»»Ô d(|3‡€$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€[M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡€$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€[M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€[M»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼[M»»»ÔÑ8€ÑXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îJl[MÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼[M»îîJl #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€20,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡XÑX»¼[MÔÌò òÔ#†¼[M»XXÑ #ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóJASON€HOWARD€Ô_ÔCOPELYÔ_ÔÔ‡XÑX»¼[MÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€66487€€€€€€Mary€Beth€Ô_ÔLeibowitzÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2002„00468„CCA„R3„CD€Ð ¥õ  ÐSeptember€16,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant€pled€guilty€to€facilitation€of€attempt€to€commit€especially€aggravated€robbery.€€TheÐ xÈ  Ðtrial€court€sentenced€the€Defendant€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender€to€seven€years€in€the€TennesseeÐ d´ ÐDepartment€of€Correction,€with€eleven€months€of€the€sentence€to€be€served€in€the€Knox€County€jailÐ P  Ðfollowed€by€probation€for€the€remainder€of€the€sentence.€€A€probation€violation€warrant€wasÐ <Œ Ðsubsequently€issued€against€the€Defendant,€alleging€that€the€Defendant€had€violated€his€probatedÐ (x Ðsentence€by€leaving€his€residence€without€permission€and€by€removing€his€electronic€monitor.€€AnÐ d Ðamended€probation€violation€warrant€was€later€filed€alleging€that€the€Defendant€had€also€violatedÐ P Ðhis€probation€by€committing€misdemeanor€theft.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€revoked€theÐ ì< ÐDefendantððs€probation€and€ordered€him€to€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€ofÐ Ø( ÐCorrection.€€This€appeal€ensued.€€After€reviewing€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ Ä Ðcourt.Ð ° ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ˆØ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼[M»àXÑ»#ÔÔ‡XÑX.¼[MÔRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€andÐ `° ÐòòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€J.óó,€joined.Ð L œ ÐÌMark€E.€Stephens,€District€Public€Defender,€and€David€Gall,€Assistant€District€Public€Defender,Ð $"t! ÐKnoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Jason€Howard€Ô_ÔCopelyÔ_Ô.Ð #`" ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Peter€M.€Ô_ÔCoughlanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð è$8 $ ÐRandall€Eugene€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€Marsha€Mitchell,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ Ô%$!% ÐGeneral;€and€Ben€Ô_ÔWhitehouseÔ_Ô,€Special€Prosecuting€Attorney,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð À&"& ÐÓF ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼[M»XXÑu #ÔÔ‡XÑX»¼[MÔÐ ˜(è#( ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼[M»XXÑÅ#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÑX»¼[MÔà@ìàI.€€Procedural€HistoryˆÐ p*À%* ÐÌà  àIn€September€1998,€the€Knox€County€Grand€Jury€indicted€the€Defendant€for€the€offenses€ofÐ H,˜', Ðfelony€murder€and€attempted€especially€aggravated€robbery.€€In€September€2000,€pursuant€to€a€pleaÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôagreement,€the€Defendant€pled€guilty€to€one€count€of€facilitation€of€attempt€to€commit€especiallyÐ ° Ðaggravated€robbery,€a€Class€C€felony.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€Defendant€as€a€Range€II€multipleÐ œì Ðoffender€to€seven€years€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction,€with€eleven€months€of€theÐ ˆØ Ðsentence€to€be€served€in€the€Knox€County€jail€followed€by€probation€for€the€remainder€of€theÐ tÄ Ðsentence.€€At€the€time€of€this€conviction,€the€Defendant€was€serving€a€three„year€sentence€forÐ `° Ðaggravated€assault.€€On€December€4,€2001,€a€violation€of€probation€warrant€was€issued€against€theÐ L œ ÐDefendant.€€In€the€warrant,€the€Defendantððs€probation€officer€alleged€that€the€Defendant€ð ðviolatedÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€conditions€of€his€probation€by€leaving€his€residence€without€permission€and€removing€hisÐ $ t Ðelectronic€monitor€and€absconding€supervision.ðð€€Both€violations€allegedly€occurred€on€or€aboutÐ  ` ÐDecember€1,€2001.€€On€December€7,€2001,€an€amended€violation€of€probation€warrant€was€issuedÐ ü L  Ðagainst€the€Defendant,€in€which€the€Defendantððs€probation€officer€alleged€that€the€Defendant€wasÐ è 8  Ðcharged€with€a€misdemeanor€theft€that€allegedly€occurred€on€November€29,€2001.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àOn€February€15,€2002,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€hearing€concerning€the€allegations€in€theÐ ¬ü  Ðprobation€violation€warrant€and€in€the€amended€warrant€and€found€that€the€Defendant€had€violatedÐ ˜è  Ðthe€terms€and€conditions€of€his€probated€sentence.€€The€trial€court€revoked€the€Defendantððs€probationÐ „Ô  Ðand€ordered€the€Defendant€to€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€TheÐ pÀ ÐDefendant€now€appeals€this€determination€by€the€trial€court.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ \¬ Ðcourt.Ð H˜ ÐÌà@‘‘%ìàII.€€FactsˆÐ  p ÐÌà  àThe€facts€from€the€probation€violation€hearing€are€basically€uncontested.€€Misti€BoldenÐ øH Ðtestified€that€she€signed€an€affidavit€alleging€that€the€Defendant€and€his€brother€ð ðstole€[her]€tire€offÐ ä4 Ð[her]€car€and€were€phone€harassing€[her].ðð€€She€testified€that€a€tire€was€stolen€from€her€vehicle€andÐ Ð  Ðthat€the€Defendant€was€around€her€house€on€the€day€of€the€theft.€€Karen€Durham€testified€that€sheÐ ¼  Ðknew€the€Defendant€and€that€on€November€29,€2001,€she€saw€the€Defendant€and€the€DefendantððsÐ ¨ø Ðbrother€stealing€a€tire€from€Misti€Boldenððs€car.€€Officer€Peter€Franzen,€a€police€officer€with€theÐ ”ä ÐKnoxville€Police€Department,€testified€that€he€arrested€the€Defendant€pursuant€to€the€violation€ofÐ €Ð Ðprobation€warrant€that€had€been€issued.€€During€the€arrest,€the€Defendant€locked€himself€in€the€backÐ l¼ Ðbedroom€of€a€residence€and€refused€to€come€out,€resulting€in€the€deployment€of€a€negotiations€teamÐ X ¨ Ðand€the€special€operations€squad€to€assist€in€the€arrest,€which€took€several€hours.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àVyvian€McCarthy,€an€employee€of€the€State€of€Tennessee€Board€of€Probation€and€Parole,Ð #l! Ðtestified€that€she€was€ð ðsitting€inðð€for€probation€officer€Paula€Hawley€who€was€on€sick„leave€on€theÐ $X" Ðday€of€the€hearing.€€McCarthy€testified€that€Paula€Hawley€had€received€information€from€theÐ ô$D # ÐDefendantððs€mother€that€the€Defendant€had€removed€his€monitoring€bracelet€on€December€1,€2001.€Ð à%0!$ ÐA€ð ðviolation€reportðð€from€the€electronic€monitoring€company€was€admitted€into€evidence€in€supportÐ Ì&"% Ðof€the€allegation€that€the€Defendant€had€improperly€removed€the€monitoring€bracelet.Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àAfter€hearing€the€evidence,€the€trial€court€determined€that€the€Defendant€had€violated€theÐ )à$( Ðâ âterms€of€his€probated€sentence.€€Upon€considering€the€Defendantððs€prior€criminal€history€and€hisÐ |*Ì%) Ðinability€to€conform€his€behavior€ð ðto€the€dictates€of€society,ðð€the€trial€court€ordered€that€theÐ ° ÐDefendant€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.Ð œì Ðâ âÌà@éé#ìàIII.€€AnalysisˆÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àWe€begin€our€analysis€with€several€well€settled€principles€of€law€pertaining€to€the€revocationÐ L œ Ðof€a€probated€sentence.€€When€a€trial€court€determines€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðprobationer€has€violated€the€conditions€of€his€or€her€probation,€the€trial€court€has€the€authority€toÐ $ t Ðrevoke€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(e).€€Once€the€trial€court€makes€such€a€finding,€itÐ  ` Ðis€vested€with€the€statutory€authority€to€ð ðrevoke€the€probation€and€suspension€of€sentence€and€causeÐ ü L  Ðthe€defendant€to€commence€the€execution€of€the€judgment€as€originally€entered.ðð€€òòId.óó€€WhenÐ è 8  Ðprobation€is€revoked,€ð ðthe€original€judgment€so€rendered€by€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€andÐ Ô$  Ðeffect€from€the€date€of€the€revocation€of€such€suspension€.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„310.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àThe€decision€to€revoke€probation€is€in€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€judge.€€òòState€v.Ð ˜è  ÐMitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€to€revokeÐ „Ô  Ðprobation€will€be€upheld€on€appeal€unless€there€has€been€an€abuse€of€discretion.€òòóó€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,Ð pÀ Ð811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€To€find€an€abuse€of€discretion€in€a€probation€revocation€case,€theÐ \¬ Ðrecord€must€be€void€of€any€substantial€evidence€that€would€support€the€trial€courtððs€decision€that€aÐ H˜ Ðviolation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€occurred.€€òòId.óó;€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2d€285,€286€(Tenn.Ð 4„ Ð1978);€òòState€v.€Delpóó,€614€S.W.2d€395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980).€€Proof€of€a€probation€violationÐ  p Ðis€sufficient€if€it€allows€the€trial€court€to€make€a€conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment.€€òòState€v.Ð  \ ÐMiltonóó,€673€S.W.2d€555,€557€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1984).Ð øH ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€the€Defendant€argues€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€byÐ Ð  Ðrevoking€his€probation€ð ðwithout€considering€reasonable€alternatives€to€revocation.ðð€€The€thrust€ofÐ ¼  Ðthe€Defendantððs€argument€is€not€that€the€Defendant€did€not€violate€the€terms€of€his€probatedÐ ¨ø Ðsentence,€but€that€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€require€the€Defendant€to€serve€his€sentence€in€theÐ ”ä Ðpenitentiary€is€too€harsh.€€Specifically,€the€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€should€haveÐ €Ð Ðconsidered€the€Community€Corrections€program€as€an€alternative.€€The€State€argues€that€consideringÐ l¼ Ðthe€Defendantððs€ð ðclear€violations€of€probation€and€his€seeming€inability€to€control€himself,€especiallyÐ X ¨ Ðwhile€off€his€medications,€the€[D]efendant€was€properly€ordered€back€into€the€custody€of€theÐ D!” ÐTennessee€Department€of€Correction.ðð€€We€agree€with€the€State.€€Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àSubstantial€evidence€was€presented€at€the€hearing€on€the€probation€violation€warrant€toÐ $X" Ðsupport€the€trial€courtððs€decision€that€a€violation€of€the€conditions€of€probation€occurred.€€SubstantialÐ ô$D # Ðevidence€was€also€presented€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€order€the€Defendant€to€serve€hisÐ à%0!$ Ðsentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€The€trial€court€found€that€the€Defendant€wasÐ Ì&"% Ðunable€to€control€his€behavior,€particularly€when€he€fails€to€take€appropriate€medication.€€TheÐ ¸'#& ÐDefendant€has€a€prior€conviction€for€aggravated€assault.€€Regarding€the€Community€CorrectionsÐ ¤(ô#' Ðprogram,€we€conclude€that€a€serious€issue€exists€as€to€the€Defendantððs€eligibility€for€that€programÐ )à$( Ðdue€to€the€Defendantððs€prior€conviction€for€aggravated€assault€and€due€to€the€violent€nature€of€thisÐ |*Ì%) Ðoffense.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(a).€€In€our€view,€the€trial€court€exercised€conscientiousÐ h+¸&* Ðjudgment€in€revoking€the€Defendantððs€probation€and€ordering€him€to€serve€his€original€sentence€inÐ ° Ðconfinement.€€The€record€does€not€indicate€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion.Ð œì ÐÌÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.Ð `° ÐÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ü L  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBERT€W.€WEDEMEYER,€JUDGE