WPC I&czxָ5".MQ!+Gj^mD;+O&iҎrWB'DĻdcG;+nX[“\B3jѽԠF^t37 0.x]7a,8{tfΈN^K5;CȎv3{@bϜ_يÄ:LEԞۻu>}VKԬ0(:lQ:/ 2%fyӁF]v1ޡishxOB4x./=&" MH$kbȂ↍cK6q뛩 J^=ݣFt}Xz*'rVLLIe4B齢}`;|tʿ!$fݣU/ :vAZf$u%n{IX'A\g|> 7'Bi,Pb %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m # U:   W U@N#%UN-E{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{b}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} 0 Bpp 0 D51 D-f 0K AS1 0 0D Ad|-) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularr'):i+003|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0,6 AZ"Arial RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(uH Z(Times New Roman  (I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2;$ !.8 d d 8         0  v d(|3E$ !.8 d d 8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3E$ !.8 d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8<d d8     _   8wXXdd 8@tt@INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#@ #Ԉ &    @  @` July2000Session L XTmX #XXTm#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.SHANNON_CORLEY_XTmX  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Blount_ԀCounty  J @@No.C11285D.KellyThomas,Jr.,TrialJudge  6 @@*AV) ` dE< ` A    @@TTNo.E200000382CCAR3CD   September12,2000   AV) ` dE<` A      Thedefendantseeksfullprobationafterpleadingguiltytoaggravatedburglaryandtheft.Sheclaims   thetrialcourterredinrequiringhertobeincarceratedforninetydaysofherfouryearsentence.We   affirmthesentenceasimposed. s    Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  K B#XTm#XTmX.JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_and #s RobertW._Wedemeyer_,JJ.,joined. _ GeorgeWaters,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender,fortheappellant,Shannon_Corley_. 7 PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;ClintonJ.Morgan,CounselfortheState;Michael  L.Flynn,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andTammyM.Harrington,AssistantDistrictAttorney,forthe  appellee,StateofTennessee.  @66' OPINION #XXTm#XTmXԈ [   #XXTm #XTmX XThedefendant,Shannon_Corley_,committedaggravatedburglaryandtheftattwodifferent 3"" residencesintwodifferentcountiesandcriminaltrespassingatanotherresidenceinathirdcounty. #o# Thisopinionaddressesonlyhersentencesforaggravatedburglaryandtheftin_Blount_ԀCounty.As  $[$ partofanegotiatedpleaagreement,the_Blount_ԀCountyCircuitCourtsentencedherasaRangeI $G % offendertofouryearsontheaggravatedburglaryandoneyearonthetheft,concurrently.Thetrial %3!& courtorderedthatthedefendantserveninetydaysincarcerationwiththeremainderofthesentence &"' tobeservedonprobation.Shenowappeals,assertingthatsheshouldhavereceivedfullprobation. ' #( Ѐ )$*  *%+  k+&,  X  Background  W,'-  C-(. _ XV X @  @ d  OnJune19,1998,thedefendantandKeithHatleydrovetoahouseinBlountCounty,where  thedefendantbrokeintothehouseandstoleseveralfirearms.Theythendrovetoaresidencein  MonroeCounty,wheresheagainenteredthehouseandstoleproperty.Duringvehicularpursuitby  authorities,sheenteredacarportandattemptedtowalkintoaresidenceinLoudonCounty,forwhich t shewaschargedwithcriminaltrespassing. `   RegardingtheinstantBlountCountycharges,inMay1999thedefendantenteredan 8  agreementwiththestate,inwhichshepledguiltytoaggravatedburglary,aClassCfelony,andtheft $ t ofpropertyvaluedbetween$500and$1000,aClassEfelony.Consistentwiththatagreement,she  ` receivedsentencesoffouryearsontheburglaryandoneyearonthetheft,tobeservedconcurrently.  L    AtthesentencinghearingonOctober5,1999,thetrialcourtheardtestimonyfromthe $  twentyfouryearolddefendant.Shestatedthatalthoughshehadusedmarijuanaforfiveyears,she   hadnotusedanycontrolledsubstancesforthefivemonthsprecedingthehearing.Sheexpressed   remorseforherparticipationinthecrimes.     Thetrialcourtnotedthatthedefendanthadcommittedseveralseriousoffensesononeday p andfoundthatabsenceofanyconfinement wouldreallylessentheseriousnessoftheseoffenses. \ Thatcourtthusimposedasplitsentence:Thedefendantwouldserveninetydaysinjailandthe H remainderofthesentenceonsupervisedprobation. 4    @  @`  @  @  @h Analysis   \ _  Thedefendantassertsonlythatsheshouldhavereceivedfullprobationwithoutninetydays 4 ofincarceration.Whenadefendant XLk XXXTmԀ#XTmX X XLkz#XTmXXXTmchallengesthelengthormannerofserviceofasentence,itis   thedutyofthisCourttoconductadenovoreviewontherecord withapresumptionthatthe   determinationsmadebythecourtfromwhichtheappealistakenarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.  4035401(d).Thispresumption isconditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthe  trialcourtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.  Ashby,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Theappellantcarriestheburdenofshowingthathis l sentenceisimproper.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d)sentencingcommncmts;Statev. X  Jernigan,929S.W.2d391,395(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).#XTmXXXTm# Intheinstantcase,wegrantthe D! presumptionofcorrectness. 0"    TomeritthestatutorypresumptionforalternativesentencingprovidedinTennesseeCode $X" Annotated4035102(6),adefendantmust(1)beanespeciallymitigatedorastandardoffender; $D # (2)beconvictedofanClassC,D,orEfelony;and(3)notpossessa criminalhistor[y]evincinga %0!$ cleardisregardforthelawsandmoralsofsocietyor evincingfailureofpasteffortsat &"% rehabilitation.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102(5),(6).AsaClassCfelonyRangeIoffender '#& andnotidentifiedasapriorityforincarcerationbythestatute,thedefendantispresumedafavorable (#' candidateforalternativesentencing. )$(   |*%)   Evidencetothecontrary,however,canrebutthepresumption.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.40   35102(6).Adefendant isnotautomaticallyentitledtoprobationasamatteroflaw.SeeTenn.  CodeAnn.4035303(b)sentencingcommncomments;Statev.Hartley,818S.W.2d370,373  (Tenn.Crim.App.1991).ToimplementthepurposesoftheCriminalSentencingReformActof t 1989, thesentencingcourtconsiderswhether(1)incarcerationisnecessarytoprotectthepublicfrom ` anoffenderwithalonghistoryofcriminalconduct;(2)incarceration isnecessarytoavoid P  depreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffenseor isparticularlysuitedtoprovideaneffective <  deterrencetootherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses;and,(3) [m]easureslessrestrictivethan ( x confinementhavefrequentlyorrecentlybeenappliedunsuccessfullytothedefendant.Tenn.Code  d Ann.4035103(1)(A)(C).Anyofthesefactorsmayrebutthepresumptionfavoringan  P  alternativesentence.  <    Theinquiryregardingfullprobationdiffersfromthatforgeneralalternativesentencing.If   thedefendantisentitledtothestatutorypresumptionforalternativesentencing,thestatemustdefeat   thatpresumptionwithevidencetothecontrary.Evenwiththispresumption,however,adefendant   seekingfullprobationmustshowthatsuchprobationwill subservetheendsofjusticeandthebest   interestofbothpublicanddefendant.Statev.Dykes,803S.W.2d250,259(Tenn.Crim.App. t 1990);seealsoStatev.Bingham,910S.W.2d448,45556(Tenn.Crim.App.1995). `   Thetrialcourtimposedtheninetydaysofincarcerationbecauseitfoundthatnojailtime 8 woulddiminishtheseverityofthecircumstancesoftheoffense:severalseriousoffenses,involving $t homeinvasion,occurringduringoneday.Atrialcourtmayproperlyconsiderwhetheralternative ` sentencingwilldecreasetheseverityofanoffenseasabasisfordenyingalternativesentencing,but L suchadeterminationmustcompriseaconclusionthatthenatureoftheoffenseascommittedis 8  especiallyviolent,horrifying,shocking,reprehensible,offensive,orotherwiseofanexcessiveor $ exaggerateddegreetojustifydenialofprobation.Statev.Cleavor,641S.W.2d541,543(Tenn.  1985).Multiplicityofoffensescommittedoverashortperiodoftimemayconstitutethisexcessive  orexaggerateddegree.SeeStatev.Zeolia,928S.W.2d457,462(Tenn.Crim.App.1996)(The  defendantparticipatedintheburningoffourbarnswithinfortyeighthours.).    Theinstantfinding,however,addressesthedefendantsprovinghersuitabilityforfull \  probation.AsnotedinZeolia,wearenotrequiredtoignoremultiplecountsoverashortduration, H! and failuretoconsidermultiplicityofcountswouldbesimplyirrationalandoffensivetothe 4"  underlyingprinciplesofsentencing.Id.at462(citationomitted).Theinstantdefendanthasonly  #p! beenconvictedoftheLoudonCountycriminaltrespass,forwhichshereceived10daysinjailand  $\" subsequentprobation,andtheinstantcharges,butsheadmittedtotheothercrimesattheBlount $H # Countysentencinghearing.InZeolia,weconsideredmultiplicityinthecontextofdenying %4!$ alternativesentencingoutright,andhereweconcludethatwearenotboundtoignorethosesimilar & "% circumstancesregardingtheinstantcase.Participationinacrimespree,comprisingpurposefuland ' #& repeatedactions,contravenesargumentforfullprobation. (#'   Further,wenotethatthedefendantadmittedtoyearsofmarijuanaabuse.Shewasa *%) significantparticipantinaClassCfelonyandaClassEfelonyoffense.Therecordestablishesthat l+&* shemissedonecourtdateandonegrandjurysummonsregardingtheinstantcase.Also,the  probationofficerspresentencereportnotedthattheofficerobservedthedefendantdrivefroma  meeting,despiteherlackingavalidoperatorslicense.Overall,thesefactorsreflectpoorlyonher  respectforthelawandthusonherpotentialforrehabilitation.Wefindnoerrorinthetrialcourts t sentence. `    @  @`  @  @ CONCLUSION  8  O3  Thesentencefromthetrialcourtisaffirmed.  `          `     h     ___________________________________      `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE