ÿWPC¶ ©„Áˆ=:´peÒ{œÑ-L硵F,‘T­¿ãqe^ß0·t¯ƒlŽîé1]FŸ@ÿdKü9XšJSMk"!n‚öv¼lö"|Pi ¹åµ@uæ¬÷$ĸÏ"Žu¤Ì”ÀoAMú’érþvBÜŸ$;°ž¸…Š!†`[ú·}”H/˜ß†áòûcÏ9a—מ®g0Ýà&G£­%”%ˆþáÄâpm£¤hÍ@¡¸;Tv(–¦Ïxk‘JˆŒdtÕvQÞÉ’Qp³·r<ú{RFµÜXhòVµãÏb"ë2Iü,¶þÎi?Ö¢×>[Ónµtî2Íq°¸Jƒñºó!ì*†Ð\ôö”®—ÐD7ÏæÇã{¹ðZÏÐÄI³y&ÿu”ˆ\¾…ÙÉðnî .ÖK•Þ2ÝÊâ L\! »v¹áëZ2Ã}KÐ ‘¢üˆæ~Uß(FM1\  tÆl¾¶. ri­ÿ,¦pW¶*”·¯]O£ äeÓx•EáèBê§ŠbàV™Zü脥٠̚ʼ _®U Ÿ Õ÷žŸêà§VÈKb#Á\ % 0D# 0ˆg UNï N= f? zA Ò»  z• Ò ^ á Æí Ƴ ÆyÆ?wN 4 E.0 m2aI 0D]UN¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡bïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïïï 0ë÷÷÷÷ Bââ 0¤ÿ D3£ D-Ö 0K ASNÆ¡ 0¤gg A« ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt—o-s Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5üPH,.bk1h¶¦3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀTABLE A(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular- ù-(|G2Dü$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z-»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôíåò»»Ô d(|3G|$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z-»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_XYEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3G|$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z-»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Z-»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Z-»»»ÔÑ8€ qXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îCìZ-ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼Z-»îîCì #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àMay€14,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X qX»¼Z-ÔÌò òÔ#†¼Z-»XX q#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€DANIEL€JAMES€COSGROVEòòóóÔ‡X qX»¼Z-Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Bedford€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€14878€€€€€€William€Charles€Lee,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02127„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€November€15,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Daniel€James€Cosgrove,€pled€guilty€in€the€Bedford€County€Circuit€Court€to€nineteenÐ xÈ  Ðfelonies€and€thirty„one€misdemeanors.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€him€to€an€effective€sentence€ofÐ d´ Ðtwenty„one€years€and€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days€in€confinement€to€be€served€consecutivelyÐ P  Ðto€another€sentence€for€which€his€probation€was€revoked.€€The€defendant€appeals,€claiming€that€theÐ <Œ Ðtrial€court€failed€to€apply€and€weigh€mitigating€factors€properlyÔ#†¼Z-»XX q#ÔÔ‡X qX»¼Z-Ô€and€improperly€ordered€consecutiveÐ (x Ðsentencing.€€We€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ð d ÐÓ²ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Circuit€Courtó ó€ò òAffirmedó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Z-»àX q÷#ÔÔ‡X qX.¼Z-ÔJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòJamesÐ È ÐÔ_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ´ ÐÌÔ_ÔMerrilynÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔFeirmanÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€Donna€Leigh€Ô_ÔHargroveÔ_Ô,€District€PublicÐ ŒÜ ÐDefender;€and€Andrew€Jackson€Ô_ÔDearingÔ_Ô,€III,€Assistant€District€Public€Defender€(at€trial),€for€theÐ xÈ Ðappellant,€Daniel€James€Cosgrove.Ð d´ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Helena€Walton€Ô_ÔYarbroughÔ_Ô,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ 4 H&˜!<  $@10„„‰$@‰>Ð10Ð =31È'#="  $@10 $@ =ÐAggravated€assaultÐ  È'#> ÐClass€C€felonyÐ  È'#? Ð5€years,€3€monthsÐ >4 È'#@  &@11„„‰&@‰>Ð11Ð =31H)˜$A"  &@11 &@ =ÐCriminal€impersonationÐ  H)˜$B ÐClass€B€misdemeanorÐ  H)˜$C Ð6€months€at€75%Ð >4 H)˜$D  (@12„„‰(@‰>Ð12Ð =31È*&E"  (@12 (@ =ÐTheft€of€property€valued€moreÐ È*&F Ðthan€$1,000€but€less€than€$10,000Ð  ´+'G ÐClass€D€felonyÐ  È*&H Ð3€yearsâ âÐ >4 È*&I  *@13„„‰*@‰>Ð13Ð =31d"  *@13 *@ =Ðâ âTheft€of€property€valued€less€thanÐ d Ð$500Ð  P ÐClass€A€misdemeanorÐ  d Ð11€months,€29€days€atÐ d Ð75%Ð  P „„Ð14€„€16Ð €Ð" ÐFelony€reckless€endangermentÐ  €Ð ÐClass€E€felonyÐ  €Ð  Ð2€years€for€each€countÐ >4 €Ð   1@17„„‰1@‰>Ð17Ð =31 P "  1@17 1@ =ÐEvading€arrestÐ   P  ÐClass€D€felonyÐ   P  Ð4€yearsÐ >4  P  2@18„„‰2@‰>Ð18Ð =31€ Ð"  2@18 2@ =ÐFailing€to€yield€to€an€emergencyÐ € Ð ÐvehicleÐ  l ¼ ÐClass€C€misdemeanorÐ  € Ð Ð30€days€at€75%Ð  € Ð „„Ð19„€24Ð ì <" ÐForgeryÐ  ì < ÐClass€E€felonyÐ  ì < Ð2€years€for€each€countÐ  ì < „„Ð25€„€50Ð l¼ " ÐPassing€a€worthless€check€lessÐ l¼  Ðthan€$500Ð  X¨  ÐClass€A€misdemeanorÐ  l¼  Ð11€months,€29€days€atÐ l¼  Ð75%€for€each€countÐ X¨   ÐÌà  àÌà  àThe€trial€court€ordered€that€the€defendantððs€misdemeanor€sentences€(counts€1,€5,€11,€13,€18,Ð Lœ  Ðand€25€through€50)€run€concurrently€for€an€effective€sentence€of€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days.€Ð 8ˆ  ÐThe€defendantððs€forgery€sentences€(counts€6€,€7,€and€19€through€24)€and€sentence€for€theft€of€propertyÐ $t! Ðvalued€more€than€$500€but€less€than€$1,000€(count€8)€were€to€run€concurrently€for€an€effectiveÐ `" Ðsentence€of€two€years.€€The€defendantððs€sentences€for€aggravated€robbery€(count€9);€aggravatedÐ üL# Ðassault€(count€10);€burglary€(count€2);€theft€of€property€valued€more€than€$10,000€but€less€thanÐ è8$ Ð$60,000€(count€3);€and€theft€of€property€valued€more€than€$1,000€but€less€than€$10,000€(count€12),Ð Ô$% Ðwere€to€run€concurrently€for€an€effective€sentence€of€ten€years.€€His€sentences€for€recklessÐ À& Ðendangerment€(counts€14€through€16)€and€evading€arrest€(count€17)€were€to€run€concurrently€for€anÐ ¬ü' Ðeffective€sentence€of€four€years.€€All€of€these€effective€sentences€were€to€run€consecutively€to€eachÐ ˜è( Ðother€and€to€the€defendantððs€five„year€sentence€for€possession€of€a€Schedule€II€controlled€substanceÐ „Ô) Ðwith€intent€to€resell€(count€4)€for€a€total€of€twenty„one€years€and€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€daysÐ pÀ* Ðin€confinement.€€Finally,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€defendantððs€probation€that€he€had€been€servingÐ \¬+ Ðfor€his€prior€aggravated€burglary€conviction€and€ordered€that€he€serve€all€of€his€new€sentencesÐ H˜, Ðconsecutively€to€that€four„year€sentence.€€The€defendant€appeals,€claiming€that€the€trial€court€failedÐ 4„- Ðto€apply€and€weigh€mitigating€factors€properly€and€erred€by€ordering€consecutive€sentencing.€€Ð  p. ÐÌà  àAppellate€review€of€sentencing€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€on€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€the€trialÐ ø!H0 Ðcourtððs€determinations€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d).€€As€the€SentencingÐ ä"41 ÐCommission€Comments€to€this€section€note,€the€burden€is€now€on€the€defendant€to€show€that€theÐ Ð# 2 Ðsentence€is€improper.€€This€means€that€if€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,Ð ¼$ 3 Ðmade€findings€of€fact€that€are€adequately€supported€in€the€record,€and€gave€due€consideration€andÐ ¨%ø 4 Ðproper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principles€that€are€relevant€to€sentencing€under€the€1989€SentencingÐ ”&ä!5 ÐAct,€we€may€not€disturb€the€sentence€even€if€a€different€result€were€preferred.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805Ð €'Ð"6 ÐS.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð l(¼#7 ÐÌà  àHowever,€ð ðthe€presumption€of€correctness€which€accompanies€the€trial€courtððs€action€isÐ D*”%9 Ðâ âconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ 0+€&: Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð ° Ð1991).€€In€this€respect,€for€the€purpose€of€meaningful€appellate€review,€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àthe€trial€court€must€place€on€the€record€its€reasons€for€arriving€at€theÐ tÄ Ðfinal€sentencing€decision,€identify€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ `° Ðfactors€found,€state€the€specific€facts€supporting€each€enhancementÐ L œ Ðfactor€found,€and€articulate€how€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ 8 ˆ Ðfactors€have€been€evaluated€and€balanced€in€determining€the€sentence.€Ð $ t ÐT.C.A.€ðð€40-35-210(f)€(1990).Ð `` x` x ÐÌòòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€599€(Tenn.€1994).Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àAlso,€in€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review,€we€must€consider€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÐ À  Ðthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing,€(2)€the€presentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€andÐ ¬ü  Ðarguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct,Ð ˜è  Ð(5)€any€mitigating€or€statutory€enhancement€factors,€(6)€any€statement€that€the€defendant€made€onÐ „Ô  Ðhis€own€behalf,€and€(7)€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-102,Ð pÀ Ð-103,€-210;€€òòseeóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€168;€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€236-37€(Tenn.€1986).Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àThe€sentence€to€be€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€presumptively€the€minimum€in€the€range€forÐ 4„ Ða€Class€B,€C,€D,€or€E€felony€unless€there€are€enhancement€factors€present.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ  p Ð40-35-210(c).€€Procedurally,€the€trial€court€is€to€increase€the€sentence€within€the€range€based€uponÐ  \ Ðthe€existence€of€enhancement€factors€and,€then,€reduce€the€sentence€as€appropriate€for€any€mitigatingÐ øH Ðfactors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210(d)„(e).€€The€weight€to€be€afforded€an€existing€factor€is€leftÐ ä4 Ðto€the€trial€courtððs€discretion€so€long€as€it€complies€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989Ð Ð  ÐSentencing€Act€and€its€findings€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¼  Ð40-35-210,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€€òòMossóó,€727€S.W.2d€at€237;€€òòseeóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ ¨ø Ðat€169.€€We€note€that€the€law€provides€no€presumptive€minimum€for€misdemeanor€sentencing.€€òòSeeóó,òòÐ ”ä Ðe.g.óó,€òòState€v.€Creasyóó,€885€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€However,€in€misdemeanorÐ €Ð Ðsentencing,€the€trial€court€must€consider€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€Criminal€SentencingÐ l¼ ÐReform€Act€of€1989.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-302(d).Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àFirst,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€apply€and€give€proper€weight€toÐ 0"€  Ðmitigating€factors.€€Specifically,€he€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€refusing€to€apply€mitigatingÐ #l! Ðfactor€(1),€that€the€defendantððs€criminal€conduct€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury,Ð $X" Ðto€his€property€crimes€and€his€aggravated€robbery€and€aggravated€assault€convictions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð ô$D # ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€In€addition,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€failing€toÐ à%0!$ Ðfind€that€his€drug€addiction€was€a€mitigating€factor.€€òòSeeóó€òòóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(13).€€TheÐ Ì&"% Ðstate€claims€that€the€trial€court€properly€applied€and€weighed€mitigating€factors.€€We€believe€the€trialÐ ¸'#& Ðcourt€properly€sentenced€the€defendant.Ð ¤(ô#' Ðà  àÌà  àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(1),€that€the€defendantÐ |*Ì%) Ðhas€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions,€to€all€of€his€convictions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€30„Ð h+¸&* Ð35„114(1).€€In€addition,€the€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(10),€that€the€defendant€had€noÐ ° Ðhesitation€about€committing€a€crime€when€the€risk€to€human€life€was€high,€and€factor€(16),€that€heÐ œì Ðcommitted€a€crime€under€circumstances€in€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€a€victim€was€great,Ð ˆØ Ðto€all€of€his€sentences€except€those€for€his€aggravated€robbery€and€aggravated€assault€convictions.€Ð tÄ ÐòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€30„35„114(10),€(16).€€Finally,€the€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(13),Ð `° Ðthat€the€defendant€committed€the€felonies€while€on€probation€for€a€prior€felony,€and€gave€itÐ L œ Ðsignificant€weight.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€30„35„114(13).Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€stated€that€it€did€not€believe€mitigating€factor€(1)€could€apply€to€theÐ  ` Ðdefendantððs€property€crime€sentences€because€ð ðwhere€the€defendantððs€conduct€neither€caused€norÐ ü L  Ðthreatened€serious€bodily€injury€.€.€.€is€inherent€in€every€property€crime€[or]€is€included€as€an€elementÐ è 8  Ðof€the€offense.ðð€€The€trial€court€noted,€though,€that€if€the€mitigating€factor€applied€to€those€crimes,Ð Ô$  Ðthen€the€factor€was€worth€very€little€weight.€€As€to€the€defendantððs€claim€that€his€drug€addiction€wasÐ À  Ða€mitigating€factor,€the€trial€court€strongly€disagreed,€finding€that€the€defendant€failed€to€getÐ ¬ü  Ðtreatment€for€his€drug€addiction€when€help€was€available.€€After€weighing€the€applicableÐ ˜è  Ðenhancement€and€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€at€least€the€midpointÐ „Ô  Ðin€the€range€of€punishment€for€each€felony€conviction€and€the€maximum€punishment€for€eachÐ pÀ Ðmisdemeanor.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àInitially,€we€note€that€because€there€is€no€prohibition€against€ð ðdouble€mitigation,ðð€the€trialÐ 4„ Ðcourt€erred€by€concluding€that€it€would€not€apply€mitigating€factor€(1)€to€the€defendantððs€propertyÐ  p Ðcrime€sentences.€€òòState€v.€Stacy€Allen€Bullardóó,€No.€E1999-00796-CCA-R3-CD,€Bradley€County,€slipÐ  \ Ðop.€at€17€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Mar.€15,€2000),€òòapp.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€Sept.€11,€2000).€€€However,€the€trialÐ øH Ðcourt€stated€that€if€it€were€to€apply€that€mitigating€factor,€it€would€give€the€factor€very€little€weight.€Ð ä4 ÐWe€do€not€believe€that€the€trial€courtððs€error€as€to€mitigating€factor€(1)€would€have€changed€theÐ Ð  Ðdefendantððs€property€crime€sentences€in€this€case.€€Moreover,€we€do€not€believe€mitigating€factor€(1)Ð ¼  Ðapplies€to€the€defendantððs€aggravated€robbery€and€aggravated€assault€convictions,€because€theÐ ¨ø Ðdefendantððs€use€of€a€gun€threatened€serious€bodily€injury€to€his€victims.€€We€also€believe€the€trialÐ ”ä Ðcourt€properly€refused€to€find€that€the€defendantððs€drug€addiction€was€a€mitigating€factor.€€As€notedÐ €Ð Ðby€the€trial€court,€the€defendant€committed€fifty€crimes€over€an€extended€period€of€time€withoutÐ l¼ Ðseeking€treatment€for€his€drug€problem.€€The€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€have€his€drug€addictionÐ X ¨ Ðapplied€as€a€mitigating€factor€and€has€not€shown€that€the€lengths€of€his€sentences€are€improper.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àNext,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€him€to€serve€his€effectiveÐ #l! Ðsentences€consecutively.€€He€acknowledges€that€some€consecutive€sentencing€was€required€becauseÐ $X" Ðhe€committed€some€of€his€felony€offenses€while€he€was€on€bond.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C)Ð ô$D # Ð(providing€for€mandatory€consecutive€sentencing€when€a€defendant€commits€a€felony€while€releasedÐ à%0!$ Ðon€bail€for€another€offense€and€the€defendant€is€convicted€of€both€offenses).€€However,€he€claims€thatÐ Ì&"% Ðhe€should€serve€the€remaining€sentences€concurrently€because€an€effective€sentence€of€twenty„fiveÐ ¸'#& Ðyears€and€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days€ð ðin€no€reasonably€way€relates€to€the€severity€of€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðoffenses€committedðð€and€does€not€reflect€the€defendantððs€ð ðtrue€nature.ðð€€ò òó óÐ )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àIn€ordering€consecutive€sentencing,€the€trial€court€took€into€account€that€some€of€theÐ ° Ðâ âdefendantððs€sentences€for€felony€convictions€had€to€be€served€consecutively€to€other€sentences€underÐ œì ÐTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C).€€However,€the€trial€court€failed€to€state€its€reasons€for€orderingÐ ˆØ Ðadditional€consecutive€sentencing.€€Nevertheless,€our€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€reveals€that€any€consecutiveÐ tÄ Ðsentencing€was€appropriate€in€this€case€because€the€defendant€committed€fifty€crimes,€an€extensiveÐ `° Ðlist,€while€he€was€on€probation€for€his€1998€aggravated€burglary€conviction.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð L œ Ððð€40„35„115(b)(2),€(6)€(providing€for€consecutive€sentencing€if€a€defendant€receives€multipleÐ 8 ˆ Ðconvictions€and€has€an€extensive€record€of€criminal€activity€and€is€sentenced€for€an€offenseÐ $ t Ðcommitted€while€on€probation).€€Thus,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€properly€imposed€an€effectiveÐ  ` Ðsentence€of€twenty„one€years,€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days€and€that€the€defendant€has€failed€toÐ ü L  Ðdemonstrate€that€he€received€an€excessive€sentence.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€we€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trialÐ À  Ðcourt.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌÌò òó óÓ  ÓÌÓ  Óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à__________________________________€Ð \¬ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGE