ÿWPC± ‹j32g¯ÓÎu os¾§D³šI/‘^Þ%8R®ë@Q8ßâ6´IîY%ÍX°ÝžÆƒûè´.p#¤Ü}DA±’ù e¸w^ÿ¦Ö–(×Ùn ‹µxŒ‘b¦´ƒBn–v)Ô9»ÉpBùK‘,+›Ûþ N )n>2›Û£ )Æ~3'‘,O<ÆçCöÏô)^"P'þ ÚµQ­ÅÄq=§Ùî“2õ¾HªXmy\†%ƒ̽¢"Ýdôk¡Ž&T2½nãb…‹È$pÊ"‹ÆÓ€tÈVhŽÏ×WÑWý–£úÀ8PÞÖëWZ.¬ñ÷ÙçœhÚš¦V—‹&H§mÏUqMšS7¾Á~½Acü›áöì€;õé,ª£š-ÛÍVøØ5ÂÌÆëT!É×fÇú÷‰IÄæâ©Ì É:ÆD˜ÜB ú ÓP"ûuót‹·~M«º'øûص´òLå ãÕô¯ÛQ B`(!ò@²q¿M_°Tó×{#ÞœlÓ •™Ôò6ö2&Z9hÞîKÜÃðSž^Ôè¢*Id‹=f—ø9‘´YZÑ%;›€£å¸ÇAx RtÉTæ9ŸÐ)&jxD%åoÖV˜…ƦÏ÷Úr[/öÖÒNÛ³¯5¤1ÿgb#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ U%N· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ȱNy 0D{U N¿E U>bMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 0YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU 0ë®®®® B™™ 0¤¶ D3Z D- 0Kºº ASÆX 0¤ 0D A«˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»¬‹-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,,Úf€9xH« ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 ¾Ý ƒRDÀ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôõõò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔIn€entering€an€òòAlfordóó€plea,€a€defendant€ð ðfaced€with€strong€evidence€of€guilt€and€no€substantial€evidentiaryÐ ° Ðsupport€for€[his]€claim€of€innocenceðð€may€refrain€from€admitting€his€culpability€and€accept€a€sentence.€€òòNorth€CarolinaÐ tÄ Ðv.€Alfordóó,€400€U.S.€25,€91€(1970).(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regularô\  `‹&Times New Roman- ù-6ÿÿ4HyperlinkóóòòÔ ÿ ÔóóÔ  Ô(|G2DÀ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôõõò»»Ô d(|3Ç{$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ç{$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€@]»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼@]»»»ÔÑ8€!XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îIl@]ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼@]»îîIl #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€October€29,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡X!X»¼@]ÔÌò òÔ#†¼@]»XX!!#ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóSHERRIE€MAE€CRAWFORDÔ‡X!X»¼@]Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sullivan€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNos.€S45,578;€S45,579;€and€S45,580€€€€€€Phyllis€H.€Miller,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2002„01292„CCA„R3„CD€Ð ¥õ  ÐDecember€11,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓPursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€the€Defendant€pled€guilty€to€theft€under€$500€and€to€violating€anÐ xÈ  Ðhabitual€traffic€offender€order.€€She€entered€òòÔ_ÔAlfordÔ_Ôóó€pleas€to€possession€of€marijuana€with€intent€toÐ d´ Ðsell,€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€and€two€counts€of€contributing€to€the€delinquency€of€a€minor.€Ð P  ÐHer€total€effective€sentence€was€two€years€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€plus€eleven€months€andÐ <Œ Ðtwenty„nine€days€on€supervised€probation.€€The€manner€of€service€of€the€two„year€sentence€was€toÐ (x Ðbe€determined€by€the€trial€court€following€a€sentencing€hearing.€€The€trial€court€denied€alternativeÐ d Ðsentencing€and€ordered€the€Defendant€to€serve€the€entire€two€years€in€the€Tennessee€Department€ofÐ P ÐCorrection.€€In€this€appeal,€the€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€impose€anÐ ì< Ðalternative€sentence.€€Concluding€that€the€record€supports€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€alternativeÐ Ø( Ðsentencing,€we€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ð Ä ÐÓëÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ œì ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼@]»àX!#ÔÔ‡X!X.¼@]ÔRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€andÐ tÄ ÐòòJoe€G.€Riley,€J.óó,€joined.Ð `° ÐÌSteve€Ô_ÔMcEwenÔ_Ô,€Mountain€City,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€and€Leslie€S.€Hale,€Assistant€PublicÐ 8!ˆ  ÐDefender,€Ô_ÔBlountvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee€(at€trial),€for€the€appellant,€Sherrie€Mae€Crawford.Ð $"t! ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Christine€M.€Ô_ÔLappsÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ü#L# ÐH.€Greeley€Wells,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€William€B.€Harper,€II,€Assistant€DistrictÐ è$8 $ ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð Ô%$!% ÐÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONÐ ¬'ü"' ÐÌI.€€BackgroundÐ „)Ô$) Ðó óÔ#†¼@]»XX!K #ÔÔ‡X!X»¼@]ÔÌÓ  Óà  àThe€Defendant€was€indicted€by€the€Sullivan€County€Grand€Jury€for€operating€a€motor€vehicleÐ \+¬&+ Ðwhile€a€judgment€declaring€the€Defendant€to€be€an€habitual€traffic€offender€was€in€effect,€possessionÐ H,˜', Ðwith€intent€to€sell€64.6€grams€of€marijuana,€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia,€two€counts€ofÐ 4-„(-ý$ ÐÔ_Ôcontributing€to€the€delinquency€of€a€minor,€and€theft€under€$500.€€Pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€theÐ ° ÐDefendant€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€theft€under€$500€and€received€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€andÐ œì Ðtwenty„nine€days€on€probation.€€The€Defendant€entered€an€òòAlfordóó׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€plea€and€received€a€sentence€ofÐ ˆØ Ðone€year€for€the€possession€with€intent€to€sell€marijuana€conviction,€along€with€concurrent€sentencesÐ tÄ Ðof€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€for€the€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia€conviction€and€forÐ `° Ðeach€of€the€contributing€to€the€delinquency€of€a€minor€convictions.€€The€Defendant€entered€a€guiltyÐ L œ Ðplea€and€received€a€one€year€sentence€for€the€violation€of€the€habitual€traffic€offender€order,€to€beÐ 8 ˆ Ðserved€consecutively€to€the€other€sentences.€€Thus,€the€Defendant€received€an€effective€sentence€ofÐ $ t Ðtwo€years,€with€the€trial€court€to€determine€the€manner€of€service€of€those€two€years,€plus€anÐ  ` Ðadditional€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€on€probation€for€the€theft€under€$500€conviction.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àThe€transcripts€of€the€plea€hearing€and€the€sentencing€hearing,€together€with€the€technicalÐ Ô$  Ðrecord,€indicate€that€the€Defendant€shoplifted€a€camera€and€a€pack€of€cigarettes€from€Wal„Mart€onÐ À  ÐFebruary€12,€2001.€€On€February€14,€2001,€the€Defendant€was€arrested€in€a€hotel€room€in€Kingsport,Ð ¬ü  ÐTennessee,€and€charged€with€possessing€64.6€grams€of€marijuana€with€the€intent€to€sell,€along€withÐ ˜è  Ðdrug€paraphernalia.€€The€presence€of€two€minor€children€of€the€Defendant€at€the€scene€resulted€inÐ „Ô  Ðthe€two€charges€of€contributing€to€the€delinquency€of€a€minor.€€On€February€19,€2001,€theÐ pÀ ÐDefendantððs€week€of€criminal€activity€culminated€in€her€arrest€for€operating€a€motor€vehicle€whileÐ \¬ Ða€judgment€declaring€her€to€be€an€habitual€traffic€offender€was€in€effect.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,Ð H˜ Ðthe€Defendant€admitted€that€she€was€driving,€but€explained€that€she€was€initially€a€passenger€and€wasÐ 4„ Ðrequired€to€drive€when€it€became€apparent€that€her€father€was€driving€the€vehicle€under€the€influenceÐ  p Ðof€alcohol.€€The€Defendant€candidly€admitted€that€she€stole€the€camera€and€cigarettes€from€Wal„Ð  \ ÐMart,€but€denied€ownership€of€the€marijuana,€claiming€that€it€actually€belonged€to€her€ð ðchargeÐ øH Ðpartner,ðð€Jimmy€Adams.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àFollowing€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€alternative€sentencing€and€ordered€theÐ ¼  ÐDefendant€to€serve€the€two€year€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction.€€This€appealÐ ¨ø Ðensued.€€After€a€careful€review€of€the€record,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€committed€no€errorsÐ ”ä Ðin€sentencing€the€Defendant,€and€thus€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ð €Ð ÐÌà@éé$ìàò òII.€€Analysisó óˆÐ X ¨ ÐÌÔ‡X!XXX!Ôà  àWhen€a€criminal€defendant€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,Ð 0"€  Ðthe€reviewing€court€must€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ #l! Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€òòóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€ThisÐ $X" Ðpresumption,€however,€ð ðis€conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÐ ô$D # Ðconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Ð à%0!$ Ðâ âS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€the€event€that€the€record€fails€to€show€such€consideration,€theÐ Ì&"% Ðreview€of€the€sentence€is€purely€òòdeóó€òònovoóó.€€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ° Ð1992).Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àIn€making€its€sentencing€determination,€the€trial€court,€at€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencingÐ tÄ Ðhearing,€determines€the€range€of€sentence€and€then€determines€the€specific€sentence€and€the€proprietyÐ `° Ðof€sentencing€alternatives€by€considering€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€theÐ L œ Ðsentencing€hearing,€(2)€the€presentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€arguments€as€toÐ 8 ˆ Ðsentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved,€(5)Ð $ t Ðevidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€the€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors,€(6)€anyÐ  ` Ðstatements€the€defendant€wishes€to€make€in€the€defendantððs€behalf€about€sentencing,€and€(7)€theÐ ü L  Ðpotential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€òòóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„210(a),€(b),€„103(5);€òòState€v.Ð è 8  ÐWilliamsóó,€920€S.W.2d€247,€258€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àThe€presumptive€sentence€to€be€imposed€by€the€trial€court€for€a€Class€B,€C,€D€or€E€felonyÔ#†X!XXX!Æ#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ô€isÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€minimum€within€the€applicable€range€unless€there€are€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors€present.€Ð ˜è  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(c).€€If€there€are€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors,€the€court€must€startÐ „Ô  Ðat€the€presumptive€sentence,€enhance€the€sentence€as€appropriate€for€the€enhancement€factors,€andÐ pÀ Ðthen€reduce€the€sentence€in€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„210(e).€Ð \¬ ÐThe€weight€to€be€given€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€judge.€€òòSheltonóó,€854€S.W.2dÐ H˜ Ðat€123.€€However,€the€sentence€must€be€adequately€supported€by€the€record€and€comply€with€theÐ 4„ Ðpurposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Sentencing€Reform€Act.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€237Ð  p Ð(Tenn.€1986).Ð  \ ÐÌà  àWhen€imposing€a€sentence,€the€trial€court€must€make€specific€findings€of€fact€on€the€recordÐ ä4 Ðsupporting€the€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„209(c).€€The€record€should€also€include€anyÐ Ð  Ðenhancement€or€mitigating€factors€applied€by€the€trial€court.€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„210(f).€€Thus,€if€the€trialÐ ¼  Ðcourt€wishes€to€enhance€a€sentence,€the€court€must€state€its€reasons€on€the€record.€€The€purpose€ofÐ ¨ø Ðrecording€the€courtððs€reasoning€is€to€guarantee€the€preparation€of€a€proper€record€for€appellateÐ ”ä Ðreview.€€òòState€v.€Ervinóó,€939€S.W.2d€581,€584€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€Ô#†X!XXX!-%#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔÐ €Ð ÐÔ#†X!XXX!¶+#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔÌà  àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€that€theÐ X ¨ Ðcourt€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€theÐ D!” Ðfactors€and€principles€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€that€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€areÐ 0"€  Ðadequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentence€ð ðeven€if€we€would€haveÐ #l! Ðpreferred€a€different€result.ðð€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€Ô#†X!XXX! ,#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔTheÐ $X" Ðdefendant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€the€impropriety€of€the€sentence€imposed.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ ô$D # Ðat€169.òòóóÐ à%0!$ ÐÔ#†X!XXX!¤.#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ô€€€€€€€€€€Ð Ì&"% ÐÔ#†X!XXX!œ/#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ôà  àÔ#†X!XXX!ý/#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔSpecifically,€the€Defendant€argues€that€she€should€have€been€granted€some€form€ofÐ ¸'#& Ðalternative€sentencing.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„102(5)€provides€as€follows:€Ð ¤(ô#' Ðà8  àà ` àIn€recognition€that€state€prison€capacities€and€the€funds€to€build€and€maintainÐ )à$( Ðthem€are€limited,€convicted€felons€committing€the€most€severe€offenses,€possessingÐ |*Ì%) Ðcriminal€histories€evincing€a€clear€disregard€for€the€laws€and€morals€of€society,€andÐ h+¸&* Ðevincing€failure€of€past€efforts€at€rehabilitation€shall€be€given€first€priority€regardingÐ ° Ðsentencing€involving€incarceration€.€.€.€.€ÐœìÐ Ð  ÐA€defendant€who€does€not€fall€within€this€class€of€offenders€ð ðand€who€is€an€especially€mitigatedÐ ˆØ Ðoffender€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorableÐ tÄ Ðcandidate€for€alternative€sentencing€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð `° Ððð€40„35„102(6).€€Furthermore,€unless€sufficient€evidence€rebuts€the€presumption,€ð ð[t]he€trial€courtÐ L œ Ðmust€presume€that€a€defendant€sentenced€to€eight€years€or€less€and€not€an€offender€for€whomÐ 8 ˆ Ðincarceration€is€a€priority€is€subject€to€alternative€sentencing€and€that€a€sentence€other€thanÐ $ t Ðincarceration€would€result€in€successful€rehabilitation€.€.€.€.ðð€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,€379„80Ð  ` Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a).€€Tòòóóhe€Defendant,€as€a€standardÐ ü L  Ðoffender€convicted€of€two€Class€E€felonies,€òòóóis€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternativeÐ è 8  Ðsentencing.€€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àHowever,€all€offenders€who€meet€the€criteria€are€not€entitled€to€relief;€instead,€sentencingÐ ¬ü  Ðissues€must€be€determined€by€the€facts€and€circumstances€of€each€case.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€744Ð ˜è  ÐS.W.2d€919,€922€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987)€(citing€òòMossóó,€727€S.W.2d€at€235).€€Even€if€a€defendantÐ „Ô  Ðis€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€under€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ pÀ Ððð€40„35„102(6),€the€statutory€presumption€of€an€alternative€sentence€may€be€overcome€ifÐ \¬ Ðà8  àà ` à(A)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendantÐ H˜ Ðwho€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ð4„Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(B)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€theÐ  p Ðoffense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€toÐ  \ Ðothers€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses;€orÐøHÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(C)€[m]easures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recentlyÐ ä4 Ðbeen€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant€.€.€.€.ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C).€€In€choosing€among€possible€sentencing€alternatives,€theÐ ¼  Ðtrial€court€should€also€consider€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„103(5),€which€states,€in€pertinentÐ ¨ø Ðpart,€ð ðThe€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€the€rehabilitation€or€treatment€of€a€defendant€should€beÐ ”ä Ðconsidered€in€determining€the€sentence€alternative€or€length€of€a€term€to€be€imposed.ðð€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„Ð €Ð Ð103(5);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Dowdyóó,€894€S.W.2d€301,€305€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994).€€A€court€may€alsoÐ l¼ Ðconsider€the€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors€set€forth€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðððð€40„35„113Ð X ¨ Ðand€114€as€they€are€relevant€to€the€ðð€40„35„103€considerations.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(b)(5);Ð D!” ÐòòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àIn€addition€to€arguing€that€she€should€receive€a€Community€Corrections€sentence,€theÐ $X" ÐDefendant€argues€that€she€should€have€been€granted€probation.€€In€determining€whether€to€grant€orÐ ô$D # Ðdeny€probation,€the€trial€court€may€consider€the€circumstances€of€the€offense;€the€defendantððsÐ à%0!$ Ðcriminal€record,€background€and€social€history;€the€defendantððs€physical€and€mental€health;€theÐ Ì&"% Ðdeterrent€effect€on€other€criminal€activity;€and€the€likelihood€that€probation€is€in€the€best€interestsÐ ¸'#& Ðof€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.€€òòState€v.€Parkeróó,€932€S.W.2d€945,€958€òòóó(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐThe€Defendant€bears€the€burden€of€establishing€suitability€for€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð )à$( Ð303(b);€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.Ô#†X!XXX!K0#ÔÔ#†¼@]»XX!R#ÔÔ‡X!X»¼@]ÔÐ |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àIn€sentencing€the€Defendant,€the€trial€court€considered€the€Defendantððs€prior€criminal€record,Ð ° Ðwhich€is€extensive€in€this€case.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(2)€(Supp.€2002).€€Additionally,Ð œì Ðthe€trial€court€found€that€the€Defendant€acted€as€a€leader€in€the€commission€of€these€offenses,€thatÐ ˆØ Ðshe€has€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€releaseÐ tÄ Ðin€the€community,€that€she€abused€a€position€of€private€trust€in€exposing€her€minor€children€to€theÐ `° Ðmarijuana,€and€that€the€Defendant€had€failed€to€pay€administrative€fees.€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„114(3),€(9),€(16),Ð L œ Ðand€(22)€(Supp.€2002).€€The€trial€court€also€noted€that€the€Defendant€was€a€favorable€candidate€forÐ 8 ˆ Ðalternative€sentencing,€and€found€in€mitigation€that€the€Defendantððs€conduct€neither€caused€norÐ $ t Ðthreatened€serious€bodily€harm,€and€that€the€Defendant€assisted€the€authorities€in€locating€orÐ  ` Ðrecovering€any€property€involved€in€the€crime.€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„113(1)€and€(9).€€The€trial€court€expressedÐ ü L  Ðconcern€regarding€the€Defendantððs€truthfulness.€€The€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€has€held€that€aÐ è 8  Ðdefendantððs€lack€of€candor€or€untruthfulness€reflects€poorly€on€a€defendantððs€potential€forÐ Ô$  Ðrehabilitation€and€thus€supports€the€denial€of€probation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Neelyóó,€678€S.W.2d€48,€49Ð À  Ð(Tenn.€1984);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòState€v.€Nunleyóó,€22€S.W.3d€282,€289€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999);€òòState€v.Ð ¬ü  ÐZeoliaóó,€928€S.W.2d€457,€463€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€The€trial€court€also€determined€that€theÐ ˜è  ÐDefendant€had€failed€to€take€responsibility€for€her€actions.€€Our€supreme€court€has€held€that€aÐ „Ô  Ðdefendantððs€failure€to€acknowledge€culpability€for€his€or€her€actions€may€also€support€a€finding€thatÐ pÀ Ða€sentence€of€confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€an€offense.€€Ô‡X!XXX!ÔòòSeeóó€òòStateÐ \¬ Ðv.€Gutierrezóó,€5€S.W.3d€641,€647€(Tenn.€1999);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€ò òó óÔ#†X!XXX!;M#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔòòState€v.€Thomas€Wayne€Shieldsóó,€Ô#†X!XXX!ðM#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!ÔNo.€W2000„Ð H˜ Ð01524„CCA„R3„CD,€Ô#†X!XXX!WN#ÔÔ‡X!XXX!Ô2002€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€18,€at€*27€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€€Jan.Ð 4„ Ð4,€2000);€òòState€v.€Donald€Paul€Presleyóó,€No.€E2000„00592„CCA„R3„CD,€2001€Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð  p ÐLEXIS€629,€at€*24€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Aug.€14,€2001).Ð  \ ÐÌà  àBecause€the€trial€court€thoroughly€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€factsÐ ä4 Ðand€circumstances,€our€review€in€this€case€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€with€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€After€aÐ Ð  Ðcareful€review,€we€conclude€that€the€record€supports€the€sentence€imposed€and€that€the€presumptionÐ ¼  Ðof€alternative€sentencing€was€sufficiently€rebutted€in€this€case.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€we€AFFIRM€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ô#†X!XXX!ÉN#ÔÔ#†¼@]»XX!eD#ÔÔ‡X!X»¼@]ÔÐ €Ð ÐÔ#†¼@]»XX!fR#ÔÔ€X!X»¼@]ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 0"€  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBERT€W.€WEDEMEYER,€JUDGE