WPC wGam .2SP߬ި2 Se%s̰sON0gTdKN _E7*jh"(ZZHԖ T*{&pn 0';57q|l @$M믔KN)ruEYOGCPg{6F5\]u~]vp7P"_3uGjdA-YjO|_ZU݀& r͜k153r,(6 >ƍiV<Ƃgm~K="~Mu5(E](H9Ay>K[_UݩoWS{<2 sm^+_z ү\aanɼCX/lU,rƚ>Cy%l Ιy 8Oɇ{"To)u*^'C !)mb#\ % U N# 0q U N ^ G wS zW  4   m   k 1NEb 0     B 0 D3 D- 0K ASb 0{ 0D AcHP LaserJet 4,,,,,,0(uH Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular{:)  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptq\;'k3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - -(|G2$ !.8 dd8         0  ܔ d(|3 $ !.8 dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3 $ !.8 dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8 dd8     _F    8XXdd8@)) INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @  #ATKNOXVILLE# #Ԉ ,    @  @` July2000Session X XX  # XX#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.NATHANIELLYNN_CROCKETT_XX    ` @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Blount_ԀCounty  h @@No.C11441,C11442D.KellyThomas,Judge  X @@*AV) ` dE` A (  @@TTNo.E199900694CCAR3CD '  September26,_2000_   AV) ` dE` A      XXXXTheDefendantpleadedguiltytotwocountsofburglaryandtwocountsoftheftover$1,000.The  trialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttotwoyearsforeachcountoftheftover$1,000andtooneyear  foreachcountofburglary.Thetrialcourtorderedthatallsentencesbeservedconcurrentlyand  thattheDefendantservesixmonthsinthecountyjailfollowedbyintensiveprobationforthe z remainderofthesentence.TheDefendantwasorderedtopay$2,500inrestitutionandtoperform f onehundredhoursofcommunityservice.Onappeal,theDefendantarguesthatthetrialcourt R erredinsentencinghimtosixmonthsinconfinement.Findingnoerror,weaffirm. > #XXXX$## XXۼ#XX  Tenn.R.App.3Appeal;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed   Z   # X۳#XX. RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_,and : JohnEverettWilliams,JJ.,joined. * GeorgeH.Waters,_Maryville_,Tennessee,fortheappellant,NathanielLynn_Crockett_.   PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ElizabethB._Marney_,AssistantAttorney !  General;MichaelL.Flynn,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andEdwardP.Bailey,Jr.,AssistantDistrict "! AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. z#" A @@OO& OPINION # XXp #XX  Z% $ # XX #XX  XXXX    Facts  :'"&    OnSeptember16,1999,theDefendant,NathanielLynn_Crockett_,pleadedguiltytotwo )b$( countsofburglaryandtotwocountsoftheftover$1,000.Thechargesaroseoutofseparate )N%) incidentsthatoccurredonthesameday.TheDefendantadmittedtoenteringintoonedealership *:&* bybreakingawindowandstealinghandtools,atoolbox,apaintspraygun,andeighteenquarts +&'+ ofpaint.Onthesameday,theDefendantbrokeintoanotherdealershipandstoleaspoilerfrom ,(, anautomobile. -(- _ԇ  ThesentencinghearingwasheldonNovember8,1999.Betweentheguiltypleain  SeptemberandthesentencinghearinginNovember,theDefendantwasconvictedoftwooffenses  ofpassingworthlesschecksupto$100.Additionally,therecordindicatesthattheDefendanthas  alengthycriminalhistory,whichincludesconvictionsforassault,harassment,drivingona t suspendedlicense,disorderlyconduct,possessionofahandgun,trespass,andvandalism.Foreach ` priorconviction,theDefendantreceivedasentenceofprobation.TheDefendanttestifiedatthe L  sentencinghearingthathehadbeencitedforcontemptofcourtforfailuretoappearincourtfour 8  orfivetimes. $ t   Atthesentencinghearing,thetrialcourtsentencedtheDefendanttotwoyearsforeach  L  chargeoftheftover$1,000andtooneyearforeachchargeofburglary.Thetrialcourtordered  8  thatallsentencesbeservedconcurrentlyandorderedtheDefendanttoservesixmonthsinthe $  countyjailfollowedbyintensiveprobationfortheremainderofthesentence.TheDefendantwas   alsoorderedtoperformonehundredhoursofcommunityserviceandtopayrestitutioninthe   amountof$2,500.ThetrialcourtconsideredtheDefendantslengthycriminalhistoryasan   enhancementfactor.ThetrialcourtalsoconsideredtheageoftheDefendantasamitigatingfactor.   Inaddition,thetrialcourtdeterminedthattheDefendantschancesofrehabilitationwereunlikely p  withoutsomepunishmentandjailtime. \    Sentencing  4   Inthiscase,theDefendantchallengesthetrialcourtsdeterminationthathemustbe  \ incarceratedforsixmonthsofhistwoyearsentence.Whenanaccusedchallengesthelength, H range,ormannerofserviceofasentence,thereviewingcourtmustconductadenovoreviewof 4 thesentencewithapresumptionthatthedeterminationsmadebythetrialcourtarecorrect.Tenn.   CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thispresumption,however, isconditionedupontheaffirmative   showingintherecordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfacts  andcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Intheeventthatthe  recordfailstoshowsuchconsideration,thereviewofthesentenceispurelydenovo.Statev.  Shelton,854S.W.2d116,123(Tenn.Crim.App.1992).Becausetherecordinthiscaseindicates l thatthetrialcourtadequatelyconsideredtheenhancementandmitigatingfactorsaswellasthe X  underlyingfactsandappropriateprinciplesofsentencing,ourreviewisdenovowitha D! presumptionofcorrectness.#XXXXT #XXXX# XX2 #XX  0"    Inmakingitssentencingdetermination,thetrialcourt,attheconclusionofthesentencing $X" hearing,determinestherangeofsentenceandthendeterminesthespecificsentenceandthe $D # proprietyofsentencingalternativesbyconsidering(1)theevidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialand %0!$ thesentencinghearing,(2)thepresentencereport,(3)theprinciplesofsentencingandarguments &"% astosentencingalternatives,(4)thenatureandcharacteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved, '#& (5)evidenceandinformationofferedbythepartiesontheenhancementandmitigatingfactors,(6) (#' anystatementsthedefendantwishestomakeinthedefendant'sbehalfaboutsentencing,and(7) )$( thepotentialforrehabilitationortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210(a),(b),103(5);State |*%) v.Williams,920S.W.2d247,258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995). h+&* Ї  ThepresumptivesentencetobeimposedbythetrialcourtforaClassB,C,DorEfelony#XXXXc#XXXX  istheminimumwithintheapplicablerangeunlessthereareenhancementormitigatingfactors  present.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210(c).Ifthereareenhancementormitigatingfactorsfora  ClassB,C,DorEfelony,thecourtmuststartattheminimumsentenceintherange,enhancethe t sentenceasappropriatefortheenhancementfactors,andthenreducethesentencewithintherange ` asappropriateforthemitigatingfactors.Id.4035210(d),(e).Theweighttobegiveneach L  factorislefttothediscretionofthetrialjudge.Statev.Shelton,854S.W.2d116,123(Tenn. 8  Crim.App.1992).However,thesentencemustbeadequatelysupportedbytherecordandmust $ t complywiththepurposesandprinciplesofthe1989SentencingReformAct.Statev.Moss,727  ` S.W.2d229,237(Tenn.1986).  L    Whenimposingasentence,thetrialcourtmustmakespecificfindingsoffactontherecord $  supportingthesentence.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c).Therecordshouldalsoincludeany   enhancementormitigatingfactorsappliedbythetrialcourt.Id.4035210(f).Thus,ifthetrial   courtwishestoenhanceasentence,thecourtmuststateitsreasonsontherecord.Thepurposeof   recordingthecourtsreasoningistoguaranteethepreparationofaproperrecordforappellate   review.Statev.Ervin,939S.W.2d581,584(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).#XXXX"#XXXX p #XXXXu)#XXXX  Ifourreviewreflectsthatthetrialcourtfollowedthestatutorysentencingprocedure,that H thecourtimposedalawfulsentenceafterhavinggivendueconsiderationandproperweighttothe 4 factorsandprinciplessetoutunderthesentencinglaw,andthatthetrialcourtsfindingsoffact  p areadequatelysupportedbytherecord,thenwemaynotmodifythesentence"evenifwewould  \ havepreferredadifferentresult."Statev.Fletcher,805S.W.2d785,789(Tenn.Crim.App. H 1991).#XXXX)#XXXXThedefendantbearstheburdenofshowingtheimproprietyofthesentenceimposed. 4 Ashby,823S.W.2dat169.   #XXXXq,#XXXX# XXҥ#XX   SincetheDefendantreceivedminimumconcurrentsentences,hisappealfocusesonthe  issueofconfinement.Sentencesofconfinementareproperlyimposedwhenconfinementis  necessarytoprotectsocietybyrestrainingadefendantwho,asinthiscase,hasalonghistoryof  criminalconduct.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1)(A).Sentencesofconfinementarealso l properlyimposedwhen,asinthiscase,measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhavefrequently X  orrecentlybeenappliedunsuccessfullytotheDefendant.Id.4035103(1)(C).Therecord D! indicatesthatthetrialcourtconsideredandappliedtheseprinciplesofsentencingwhenheordered 0"  sixmonthsofconfinementfortheDefendant. #l!   Thiscourtconcludesthatthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourtwascompletely $D # appropriate.Findingnoerror,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. %0!$ #XXXXU-## XXۗ-#XX    `     h     ___________________________________ *%)    `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE