WPCV  .{ Bx2-W="h\qND\HK(g+u+ޚӡV]I&Os*݂QQ}EbOŢ$SY@!6N}3.iDc#իc] X!*$̌ԝ) uL:F׼[h?\\' ¦~ I7,QDrg#lY }_~i%. a{^t-c&Xܿ( a H[ ҇ж3@к$+_v=)uT@7 p\Xk\6tE!R%b廛 go.J݌-M-g">f_181K ߭213i{RoB3RJまᚁS\h vbjEW#UN % 0: UN U @g g ^ w 4   m  U: N5 5 5 5 5 5 E7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 B9 HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(@ Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(@ Z(Times New Roman S1 h_B0:i+003|xU ,cAZ"Arial Regular d !USUS.,  _  XGXXX  QXXG8GXXdd8@hh#XGXQt#`XXGINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$#XGX`#QXXGATNASHVILLE #    @  @` STATEOFTENNESSEE#XGXQ#QXXG#uBQI#QuBԀv.MARIAVICTORIACRUZ   S @@ #XGXQ6#AppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Dickson_ԀCounty $ t @@No.682231F02GeorgeSexton,Judge 5  @@*AV) ` dE<` A C  @@TTNo.M200303048CCAR3CDFiledOctober19,_2004_ <  AV) ` dE<` A      Theappellant,MariaVictoriaCruz,appealsherconvictionofspeedingand30daysuspended  sentenceandfineoffiftydollars.TheStatehasfiledamotionrequestingthatthisCourtaffirmthe  trialcourt'sjudgmentpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Afterareview  oftherecord,thiscourtdeterminesthattheStatesmotionshouldbegranted.#X.DXXXGx#XGXXX.DAppellanthasfailed s topresentanadequaterecordforreview.#X.DXXXG#XGXXX.DԀAccordingly,theState'smotionisgrantedandthe \ judgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. E  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmedPursuanttoRule20,Rulesof g theCourtofCriminalAppeals  Q   #X.DXXGr#XGXX.DROBERTW._WEDEMEYER_#X.DXXXG#XGXXX.D,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDAVIDH.WELLES $ #X.DXXGw #XGXXX.Dand,JERRYL.SMITH,JJ.,#X.DXXXG" #XGXXX.DԀ#X.DXXXG #XGXXX.Djoined.   MariaVictoriaCruz,prose.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;ReneeW.Turner,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,for a  theappellee,StateofTennessee. J!  @@OO& MEMORANDUMOPINION  #l"     #X.DXXXG #XGXXX.DFollowingajurytrial,theappellantwasconvictedofspeedingandwasgivena30day $? $ suspendedsentenceandafiftydollarfine.Theappellantfiledamotionfornewtrial,whichwas %(!% denied.Onappeal,theappellantraisesthefollowingissues: 1.Thefindingofguiltbythejurywas &"& againstthemanifestweightoftheevidence.2.Videotapeintroducedwashighlyprejudicialand '"' irrelevantandshouldnothavebeenadmittedintoevidence.3.[The]caseshouldhavebeen (#( dismissedasamatteroflaw.4.Thetrialcourtviolatedtheappellantsconstitutionalrights.#X.DXXXG| #XGXXX.DԀ |)$)   Inreviewingtheappellaterecord,thecourtnotesthattheappellantfailedtoincludethe N+&+ affidavitofcomplaint,hermotionforappointmentofcounsel,anaffidavitofindigencefiledinthe 7,', _trialcourt,thetrialcourtsorderdenyingappointmentofcounsel,andatranscriptorstatementof  theevidence.Asthestatecorrectlyargues,itistheappellantsdutytoprepareanadequaterecord  forreview.Tenn.R.App.P.24(b).InStatev.Ballad,855S.W.2d557,56061(Tenn.1993),the  SupremeCourtdeterminedthat [wheretherecordisincompleteanddoesnotcontainatranscript k oftheproceedingsrelevanttoanissuepresentedforreview,orportionsoftherecorduponwhich T thepartyrelies,anappellatecourtisprecludedfromconsideringtheissue. =    Thiscourtcannotaddresstheappellantsfirstthreeissuesbecausetheappellantfailedto  _ includeatranscriptorstatementoftheevidence.TheappellantarguesinaresponsetotheStates  H motiontoaffirmthatshecouldnotpresentatranscriptbecauseatranscriptwasnotrecordedinher  1  case.However,thereisnothingintheappellaterecordcertifiedbythetrialcourtconfirmingthis    allegation.Moreover,theRulesofAppellateProcedurespecificallyaddresshowanappellant   shouldproceedwhenatranscriptisunavailable.TheRulesrequirethatastatementoftheevidence   bepreparedandapprovedbythetrialcourt.Tenn.R.App.P.24(c).Therecordcontainsneither   atranscriptnorastatementoftheevidence.Therefore,thiscourtcannotreviewtheappellantsfirst n  threeissues.#X.DXXXGn#XGXXX.DWhentherecordisincompleteanddoesnotcontaintheproceedingsanddocuments W  relevanttotheissues,thisCourtmustconclusivelypresumethattherulingofthetrialcourtwas @ correct.#X.DXXXG#XGXXX.DStatev.Boling,840S.W.2d944,951(Tenn.Crim.App.1992)#X.DXXXG#XGXXX.D;Statev.Locke,771S.W.2d )y 132,138(Tenn.Crim.App.1988). b   Theappellantcontendsinherfourthissuethatthetrialcourtviolatedherconstitutionalrights 4 bydenyinghercounsel.However,thereisnothingintherecordbeforethiscourtdeclaringthe  appellantindigent.DefendantsinTennesseeareappointedcounselinfelonyandmisdemeanorcases  wherethedefendantisinjeopardyofincarcerationonlyafterafindingbythetrialcourtthatthe  defendantisindigent.Tenn.S.CtR.13Sec.1(d)(1).#X.DXXXG-#X*q XXX.DԀ#X.DX XX*q#XGXXX.DThereisnosuchfindingintherecordbefore  thiscourt.Moreover,therecordisdevoidofevidencethattheappellantrequestedcounselinthe q trialcourt.Accordingly,theappellantsfourthissuerelatingtothetrialcourtserrorinfailingto Z appointcounseliswithoutmerit.XGXXXGԀ#XGXXXG#XGXXXG C #XGXXXG #  Therebeingnoevidenceintherecordtosupporttheappellantsallegationsonappeal,XGXXXGԀthe e Statesmotionisgranted.ThejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedinaccordancewithRule20, N RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.  7 #XGXXXG#XGXXXG   `    QXXG h     #XGXQ0 #QXXG p  $# Ѐ   `     h ____________________________________ % $    `     h ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE &!%   #XGXQ ##XGXXXG#XGXXXGQXXG   `     h   #XGXQo"##XGXXXGP"#XGXXXG  #XGXXXG##