ÿWPC  6E{è;Eç{Ýñ[MÛ_ÔT¼µl-yVDßõ¹Rs)ƒ³nɰówí@pYìƒ^ýf(¢TͶUÆ;hOú–‘úÏõÖ‹½í¾DN¯ÕUÒsbUV>¹G¹Þ5gœ…CDZ°dó8×á¼SØÔÄ%þD$¨Öñ¯‘õ∋6XSŽ+˜ÛuŒƒ­×}Øgpt‡\ì«ʱWI¬P’‚ç ¼á‘2˜m |€›M®J)˜¿fÝ’yÌn:e CúªÎ"Zë­ý6†)ú¯ð®Ê^ yQÜðºH 1PÍxU2wäÃÄ^3d”•”/,¦æÍ!OÈÇZІRX;!»ÃJ~dÞOªÎÚK,¶Œ”ÂãÙœÚ÷aç°Qv¯÷X&#cg¥o¥ O ÒMÛ@îöšcœ¿×ŽŒý–~lòàË]NŠO„ktÚZ™|Ï·•f5Kq jJ1ŸJ>çEU¢ÔgîMÃw¾Tˆ‰ñR|òÍã=l/$Xg2†ìuºYÓî…¹ú‚ØK*¤;ž˜¾V¦Þ½Ÿbت²ƒß4fw‚öÚeO®ÍÇ?áSüŒjÓŽ´¡Ú‰y‰»11û(ç „îžzÏÞÿ‹èÑÎŽßèÜpcb#Á\ % N# 0ˆ% U N­ ­ U @û z; Òµ z‡ Ò ^ Ó wß Æã Æ© ÆoÆ54ûN E" m$Æ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;b 0ë     Bôô 0¤ D3µ D-è 0K AS`Ƴ 0¤y 0D A«a˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ÆúI Z‹(Times New Roman  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptQ€-s Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53j1,ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Blount P.J.WedemeyerBoucekBallardhydrocodone CrimHarkins DelpShaffer- ù-(|G2Ä$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôçEò»»Ô d(|3‡z$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡z$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€K=»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼K=»»»ÔÑ8€!XXdì»»d8ÑÔ€¼K=»»¼K=Ôà@ttìàÔ‡î’ÄK=ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼K=»îî’Ä+#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€October€29,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡X!X»¼K=ÔÌò òÔ#†¼K=»XX!@#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€TINA€CUNNINGHAMòòóóÔ‡X!X»¼K=Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Blount€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNos.€C„7704,€7773,€11640,€and€11753€€€€€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2002„00571„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐDecember€13,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Tina€Cunningham,€was€convicted€of€two€counts€of€introduction€of€contraband€intoÐ xÈ  Ða€penal€facility.€€The€trial€court€imposed€a€six„year€sentence€and€granted€immediate€probation.€€Later,Ð d´ Ðthe€trial€court€extended€the€original€six„year€sentence€by€two€years€when€the€defendant€was€convictedÐ P  Ðof€two€counts€of€forgery,€but€permitted€the€defendant€to€remain€on€probation.€€The€trial€courtÐ <Œ Ðimposed€an€effective€sentence€of€four€years€for€the€forgery€convictions,€to€be€served€on€probationÐ (x Ðand€consecutively€to€the€sentence€for€introduction€of€contraband€into€a€penal€facility.€€At€some€point,Ð d Ðthe€trial€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€complete€a€drug€program.€€When€she€failed€to€do€so,€the€trialÐ P Ðcourt€revoked€the€defendant's€probation€and€ordered€her€to€serve€the€balance€of€her€sentence€in€aÐ ì< Ðcommunity€corrections€program.€€When€the€defendant€failed€to€comply€with€the€requirements€of€theÐ Ø( Ðprogram,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€community€corrections€sentence€and€ordered€the€defendant€toÐ Ä Ðserve€the€balance€of€her€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€In€this€appeal€as€of€right,€theÐ ° Ðsingle€question€presented€for€our€review€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€the€defendantÐ œì Ðto€fully€serve€the€balance€of€her€sentence.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð ˆØ ÐÓÿÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmedó óÐ `° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼K=»àX!·#ÔÔ‡X!X.¼K=ÔGary€R.€Wade,€P.J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòRobert€W.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐWedemeyer,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð $"t! ÐÌMack€Garner,€District€Public€Defender,€for€the€appellant,€Tina€Cunningham.Ð ü#L# ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Braden€H.€Boucek,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€andÐ Ô%$!% ÐTammy€Harrington,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€the€State€of€Tennessee.Ð À&"& ÐÓ{ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼K=»XX!ª #ÔÔ‡X!X»¼K=ÔÐ ˜(è#( ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼K=»XX!#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X!X»¼K=Ôà  àOn€November€22,€1994,€the€defendant€entered€pleas€of€guilt€to€two€counts€of€introductionÐ p*À%* Ðof€contraband€into€a€penal€facility.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„201.€€In€June€of€1995,€the€trialÐ \+¬&+ Ðcourt€imposed€concurrent€sentences€of€six€years€for€each€conviction€and€granted€probation.€€In€JuneÐ H,˜', Ðof€1999,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€forgery€and€received€an€effective€sentence€of€fourÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ôyears,€to€be€served€on€probation€and€consecutively€to€the€1995€sentences.€€As€a€result€of€the€JuneÐ ° Ð1999€plea,€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued€for€the€1995€charges.€€The€trial€court€did€notÐ œì Ðrevoke€the€defendant's€probation,€but€extended€her€six„year€sentence€by€two€years.€€Later,€a€warrantÐ ˆØ Ðwas€filed€alleging€that€the€defendant€had€failed€to€comply€with€the€terms€of€her€probation.€€As€aÐ tÄ Ðresult,€the€trial€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€complete€a€drug€program.€€When€the€defendant€failedÐ `° Ðto€do€so,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€probation€and€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€the€balance€of€herÐ L œ Ðsentence€in€community€corrections.€€A€warrant€was€filed€in€September€of€2001€alleging€that€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðdefendant€had€failed€to€comply€with€her€community€corrections€sentence.Ð $ t ÐÌà  àAt€the€revocation€hearing€that€resulted€in€the€order€of€incarceration,€Pat€Ballard,€supervisorÐ ü L  Ðof€the€Blount€County€Community€Corrections€program,€testified€that€€the€defendant€was€placed€inÐ è 8  Ðcommunity€corrections€when€she€failed€to€comply€with€the€terms€of€the€drug€program.€€Thereafter,Ð Ô$  Ðthe€defendant€failed€to€pay€court€costs€and€fees€in€a€timely€manner€and€had€to€be€sent€to€MethodistÐ À  ÐHospital€for€detoxification€from€hydrocodone.€€When€the€defendant€missed€two€weeks€of€mandatoryÐ ¬ü  Ðgroup€meetings€and€admitted€to€Ms.€Ballard€that€she€continued€to€use€hydrocodone,€Ms.€BallardÐ ˜è  Ðinformed€the€defendant€that€she€would€have€to€"do€six€weekends€in€jail."Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àTwo€months€later,€Ms.€Ballard€learned€that€the€defendant€had€not€yet€reported€to€serve€anyÐ \¬ Ðof€her€jail€term.€€When€confronted,€the€defendant€claimed€that€she€had€reported€to€the€jail€"several"Ð H˜ Ðtimes€but€was€turned€away€on€all€but€one€occasion€because€there€was€no€record€of€her€requiredÐ 4„ Ðsentence.€€The€defendant€also€claimed€that€she€had€failed€to€serve€the€weekends€in€jail€because€herÐ  p Ðhusband,€who€had€been€charged€with€domestic€violence,€was€not€living€at€home,€leaving€no€one€toÐ  \ Ðwatch€her€children€on€the€weekends.€€After€investigating€further,€Ms.€Ballard€learned€that€theÐ øH Ðdefendant€had€been€untruthful€about€the€absence€of€her€husband.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àNevertheless,€Ms.€Ballard€agreed€that€if€the€defendant€would€report€to€serve€weekends€in€jail,Ð ¼  Ðshe€would€not€recommend€revocation€of€the€community€corrections€sentence.€€Yet€again,€theÐ ¨ø Ðdefendant€failed€to€report€to€jail€and€also€failed€to€attend€mandatory€group€meetings.€€At€theÐ ”ä Ðrevocation€hearing,€Ms.€Ballard€recommended€a€sentence€of€split€confinement,€suggesting€that€aÐ €Ð Ðcombination€of€incarceration€and€drug€treatment€was€necessary€because€"it's€[not]€possible€for€[theÐ l¼ Ðdefendant]€to€stay€sober€in€the€environment€in€which€she€is€living."Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant,€who€had€a€lengthy€criminal€history,€admitted€that€she€had€violated€the€termsÐ 0"€  Ðof€her€community€corrections€sentence€by€using€hydrocodone,€missing€mandatory€meetings,€andÐ #l! Ðfailing€to€report€for€the€six€weekends€in€jail.€€She€acknowledged€that€she€had€violated€all€of€herÐ $X" Ðsentences€involving€release€into€the€community.€€The€defendant€simply€asked€the€court€for€mercy,Ð ô$D # Ðasserting€that€she€needed€to€stay€out€of€jail€in€order€to€take€care€of€her€five€minor€children€and€herÐ à%0!$ Ðelderly€father.Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€characterized€the€violations€as€"examples€of€a€long€pattern€of€violating€the€lawÐ ¤(ô#' Ðand€violating€the€rules€of€release."€€After€observing€that€the€defendant€had€been€"given€more€andÐ )à$( Ðmore€chances€because€of€.€.€.€different€people€thinking€mistakenly€that€[she]€ought€to€have€anotherÐ |*Ì%) Ðchance,"€the€trial€court€ordered€a€sentence€of€confinement,€concluding€that€the€defendant's€potentialÐ h+¸&* Ðfor€rehabilitation€was€"very€low."€€The€trial€court€also€pointed€out€the€futility€of€"making€new€rulesÐ ° Ðand€giving€[the€defendant]€a€chance€to€follow€them."Ð œì ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€concedes€that€the€trial€court€properly€revoked€her€community€correctionsÐ tÄ Ðsentence,€but€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€her€to€serve€the€balance€of€her€sentence€inÐ `° Ðconfinement.€€The€defendant€contends€that€she€should€have€received€a€sentence€of€split€confinement.Ð L œ ÐÌà  àOur€general€law€provides€that€a€trial€court€may€revoke€a€sentence€of€probation€upon€findingÐ $ t Ðby€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€has€violated€the€conditions€of€his€release.Ð  ` ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-311(e)€(Supp.€2001);€òòStamps€v.€Stateóó,€614€S.W.2d€71,€73€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ü L  ÐApp.€1980).€€On€appeal,€a€revocation€will€be€upheld€absent€an€abuse€of€discretion.€€In€order€toÐ è 8  Ðestablish€that€the€trial€court€has€abused€its€discretion,€the€defendant€must€show€that€there€is€noÐ Ô$  Ðsubstantial€evidence€to€support€the€determination€that€he€violated€€his€probation.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,Ð À  Ð811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991)€(citing€òòState€v.€Grearóó,€568€S.W.2d€285,€286€(Tenn.€1978));€òòStateÐ ¬ü  Ðv.€Delpóó,€614€S.W.2d€395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980)).€€Relief€can€be€granted€only€when€"'the€trialÐ ˜è  Ðcourt's€logic€and€reasoning€were€improper€when€viewed€in€the€light€of€the€factual€circumstances€andÐ „Ô  Ðthe€legal€principles€involved.'"€€òòState€v.€Shafferóó,€45€S.W.3d€553,€555€(Tenn.€2001)€(quoting€òòState€v.Ð pÀ ÐMooreóó,€6€S.W.3d€235,€242€(Tenn.€1999)).Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àIn€this€instance,€the€defendant€has€been€unable€to€establish€that€the€trial€judge€did€not€exerciseÐ 4„ Ða€conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€946€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð  p ÐApp.€1997).€€The€defendant€conceded€that€she€had€violated€the€terms€of€her€community€correctionsÐ  \ Ðsentence€and€had€relapsed€into€drug€use.€€Tennessee€law€provides€that,€upon€a€finding€that€theÐ øH Ðdefendant€has€violated€the€terms€of€probation,€a€trial€court€may€order€that€the€defendant€beÐ ä4 Ðincarcerated€for€the€remainder€of€his€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-310,€-311(e)€(Supp.Ð Ð  Ð2001).€€The€trial€court's€determination€that€the€defendant€serve€a€sentence€of€incarceration€will€notÐ ¼  Ðbe€overturned€absent€an€abuse€of€discretion.€€òòSeeóó€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82.€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àBecause€the€defendant€acknowledged€that€she€had€continued€to€use€drugs€during€her€releaseÐ €Ð Ðand€because€she€was€unsuccessful€in€meeting€the€terms€of€her€probation€or€community€correctionsÐ l¼ Ðsentences,€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€by€ordering€incarceration.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð 0"€  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð à%0!$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGE