WPC0B C`л׸ Ŕy=_\=D~Gb-h\it[[& sVtOqY=I%=9% 0DO z  z Y ^ +w7;4SNgixEz m| 0UE 0 0} 0B 0 0 0m 0 0 0b 0' 0 0 0X 0 0 0; 0 0] 0! 0!b" 0" 0O# 0# 0$ 0)% 0% 0E& 0& 0' 0>s( 0( 0) 0* 0m+ 0O, 01- 0. 0. 02/ 0/ 0:0 0Y1 0_`1 0 1 02 0K4 B*Q6 D/{6 06 D/8 08 069 09 0:: 0^%; 0; 0<n< 1e<U6= BE=U*b= 0= D50> D-e> 0K> 1u> ASR?? 0k@ 0DA ASA 72A\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3,,,,0(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman(#$  0   C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptY1 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5b.rtyBarN3|xU WeinmanTiptonT.R.A.P. CrimAdkissonDupreeTHURMANWHITSEYv.Biondich CuppcolorableReTrialSneedBlountAdrianneNolesHaywoodAshbyT.C.A.rebuttableincarcerativecodefendant EvidSpadaNEVILS DUIHardin S.W.SandovalHenning L.EdT.P.I.BaumgartnerTalleyHarvill*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  - -(55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKU<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KU<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/KU<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7J(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?W%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d dI)1dxd<:zTop of For7L(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?W%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  I)2dxd0KS.SampleKU<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKU<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      (|G2$ !.8\ dd8         0  2 0CommentB  "#$%&'() 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<6X9`(Courier New d%2A`Arial(|3Gx$ !.8\ dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gx$ !.8\ dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK\i) !.8\ dd8     _   \ 8XXdd8@tt[\ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#\ [ #Ԉ &   June15,2004Session L XX\  #\ XX#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.TIMOTHYWADEDAVISXX\   J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforKnoxCounty  J @@No.69067RichardBaumgartner,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200302162CCAR3CDFiledOctober25,_2004_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     #\ Xo#XX.\ JosephM.Tipton,J.,concurring. d #\ XX#XX\   Iconcurintheresultsandmostoftheanalysisinthemajorityopinion.However,Ibelieve < thedifferencesreflectedinthesearchwarrantaffidavitsintherecordwouldjustifysuppressionof (x theitemsseizedpursuanttoRule41_(c_),Tenn.R.Crim.P.Sucharesult,though,isnotneeded, d becausetherecorddoesnotreflectthatthecopiesoftheaffidavitsintherecordarethoserequired P byRule41_(c_)tobeidentical.Ontheotherhand,evenifsuppressionwererequired,Ibelievemany < ofthedefendantsstatementsagainstinterestcouldbeadmissible. (   Rule41_(c_)requiresthatthemagistratemaketwoexactcopiesoftheoriginal,onetobekept  bythemagistrateandonetobeleftwiththetargetofthesearch.Theoriginalisheldbythe  executingofficerandreturnedtothemagistratewithaninventoryoftheitemsseized.Rule41(d),  Tenn.R.Crim.P.Thepurposeoftheexactcopiesistoensurethattheoriginalisnotalteredafter t themagistratehasissuedit.SeeStatev.Gambrel,783S.W.2d191,192(Tenn.Crim.App.1989). ` RelativetothepredecessorstatutetoRule41_(c_),whichcontainedthesameprovisions,oursupreme L  courthasstated, Itsintentnodoubtwastosecurethecitizenagainstcarelessnessandabuseinthe 8!  issuanceandexecutionofsearchwarrants.Talleyv.State,208Tenn.275,278,345S.W.2d867, $"t! 869(1961).Thecourtviewedthestatutesprovisionthatfailuretocomplywiththerequirements #`" wouldmakeanysearchandseizureunderthewarrantillegalasanexpressionoflegislativeintent #L#  tosecurestrictcompliancewiththerequirementsoftheact.208Tenn.at279,345S.W.2dat869. $8 $   Apracticeofconvenience,occurringinthiscase,hasarisenthatisnotinstrictcompliance &"& withRule41_(c_).Therequestingofficerpreparestheaffidavitandsearchwarrantandmakescopies '"' ofthembeforesubmittingthemtoamagistrate.Themagistratethensignsanddatestheoriginaland (#( thecopies.Althoughthiscourthaspreviouslyheldsuchactiondoesnotrenderawarrantinvalid, )$) Ithinkitusurpsajudicialfunctionprovidedbytherule.SeeStatev.JamesCalvinHarvill,No.01 p*%* C019011CR00289,DavidsonCounty(Tenn.Crim.App.June6,1991);seealsoStatev.Steele, \+&+ 894S.W.2d318,319(Tenn.Crim.App.1994)(noting,inaRule41_(c_)case,therisk createdbythe H,', delegationtoortheassumptionbyapoliceofficerofafunctionexpectedtobeperformedbythe 4-(- _magistrate).IwouldrequirestrictcompliancewithRule41(c)relativetothepreparationofthe  affidavitandsearchwarrantinthemakingofcopies.  8  8`    Theuseofprintedformshasmadetheprocurementofa t searchwarrantthemerestformality,consideringthefundamental ` constitutionalrightwhichthesearchinvades.Certainly,thisCourt L  candonolessthantorequirethatthefewblankspacesbefilledin, 8  andtheotherdetailsoftheformalitybecarriedoutwithcareand $ t precision. `` x` x #\ XXP# T"#$%&'()(03\?+ ` hp x X?XX\ Everettv.State,182Tenn.22,28,184S.W.2d43,45(1944).Ibelievethatthedifferencesshown  8  intheaffidavitsintherecordwouldconstitutegroundsforholdingthewarrantinvalid. $    However,nothingintherecordreflectsthateitherthemagistratescopyorthecopyleftat   thedefendantsaddresswasdissimilartotheoriginal.Atonepointinahearing,thestateoffered   toretrievethecopyretainedbythemagistrate,butapparentlyitdidnotfollowthrough.Underthese   circumstances,Iwouldholdthatthedefendanthasfailedtoprovethatanoriginalandtwoexact p copieswerenotmadewiththemagistrateretainingonecopyandtheothercopybeingleftwiththe \ defendant.Therefore,Iconcludethatthesearchwarrantisvalid. H   Finally,evenifsuppressionoftheseizeditemswererequired,Iwoulddisagreewiththe  p positiontakeninthemajorityopinionregardingsuppressionofthedefendantsstatements.Items  \ listedinthesearchwarrantaboutwhichthedefendantwasquestionedwerethosethevictim H describedtothepolice.Baseduponherstatements,thepolicehadprobablecausetoarrestthe 4 defendantandtoquestionhimaboutthethingsthatthevictimtoldthem.Thefactthatthedefendant   wasquestionedaboutthesameitemsaftertheywereseizedwouldnotnecessarilyrenderthe   defendantsstatementsinadmissible.     `     h     ____________________________________ X     `     h     JOSEPHM.TIPTON,JUDGE D! #\ XX#