WPC  /̈́tcC#489i[\8S3Cm2d{;le?mV/@ U.k0 O=VOrصGum/}3X7+&gJ̅f8?%]Yȗ d>2XMX*߆^BS?(~Ùv xI,&{>mF/eɛaM&vp_$4^V3+JHI0Nᐿ=KmK֚IӠ x DTV[ci' \Mc=Ͷ#v;7X2J3-RN2q@pW8šOs>>zCgYɅƈ ]s=z~Yc/}7_~Nw~tF5=tt~yׂRUL3ʔOchЬGHxyd?6l~zB99efkMWU N % 0:^ Pw\4`t mUN#b N E B (  Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,Jy^-s Yo)+003|xU ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60- - d !USUS.,  __  XXXX 7X X   8XXdd8  INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @@%ATJACKSON# XX 7r# X X &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsJuly9,2002 L # XX r#  7X XSTATEOFTENNESSEEv.RONALD_DOTSON_# XX 75#  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforShelbyCounty  Z @@No.9912263JosephB.Dailey,Judge  F @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200102548CCAMR3CD_Ԅ_ԀFiledOctober29,_2002_   AV) ` dE<` A      Thedefendantappealshissentenceoflifeimprisonmentwithoutparole#XXX XS# XXXXԀasarepeatviolentoffender   #XXX Xf#becausehewasnottriedwithin180daysofarraignment. XXXXBecausethedefendantdidnotprovethat t hesufferedprejudicefromthedelayinbringinghiscasetotrial,weaffirmthedecisionofthetrial ` court. L  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed  $t   JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichNormaMcGeeOgleand L AlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined. 8 ACWharton,Jr.,DistrictPublicDefender;W.MarkWardandRussellWhite,AssistantPublic  Defenders,fortheappellant,Ronald_Dotson_.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;BradenH._Boucek_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;  WilliamL.Gibbons,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andJenniferS._Nichols_,AssistantDistrictAttorney p General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. \  #XXX X# OPINION   #p"   Thedefendant,Ronald_Dotson_,appealshissentenceoflifewithoutparoleasarepeatviolent $H $ offender.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035120.Thedefendantcontendsthathecouldnotbesentenced %4!% asarepeatviolentoffenderbecausehewasnottriedwithin180daysofarraignment.Wedisagree. & "&     I.Facts  (#(    OnOctober28,1999,thedefendantwasindictedfortheSeptember2,1998,aggravated *%* robberyoftheDavidsFoodStoreinMemphisownedbyKim_Doan_.OnNovember4,1999,the l+&+ defendantwasarraigned.OnFebruary9,2000,theStateservedthedefendantnoticeofhisstatus X,', asarepeatoffender.Thedefendantwastriedandfoundguiltyofaggravatedrobberybyajuryon D-(- _June2021,2001.AsentencinghearingwasheldonJuly20,2001.Afterfindingthedefendantto  bearepeatviolentoffender,thetrialcourtimposedtheonlyavailablesentence,lifewithoutthe  possibilityofparole.    Thedefendantdoesnotdisputethesufficiencyofevidenceofthechargeofaggravated ` robbery.Attrial,theStateintroducedthevictimstestimony,avideotapeoftherobbery,andthe L  defendantsconfession.Thedefendantdoesnotallegeanyprejudice. 8      II.Analysis   ` x XXXX  Thedefendantarguesthatheshouldnothavebeensentencedasarepeatviolentoffender  8  becausehewasnottriedwithin180daysofhisarraignment.Thedefendantreliesuponthelanguage $  inTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035120(i)(1)thatarepeatviolentoffendershallbetried   within180daysofthearraignmentontheindictmentpursuanttoRule10oftheRulesofCriminal   Procedure.ThedefendantwasarraignedonNovember4,1999,andwasheldincustodyforoneand   onehalfyearsbeforebeingtriedonJuly2021,2001.Thedefendantdoesnotarguethathewas   prejudicedbythelengthofhiscustodybutarguesthatthelanguageofthestatuteshouldbe p construed,literally,toprohibitsentencingundertheRepeatViolentOffenderAct,absentcompliance \ withthe180dayrule. H   TheStatearguesthatthedefendantwaivedhisissuebecausetherecordisincomplete.The  p Statecontendsthatthedefendantdidnotincludeproofofthedateofhisarraignmentoracopyof  \ theStatesnoticeofthedefendantsstatusasarepeatviolentoffenderinthetechnicalrecord.Itis H wellestablishedthattheappellanthasa dutytopreparearecordwhichconveysafair,accurateand 4 completeaccountofwhattranspiredwithrespecttotheissuesformingthebasisoftheappeal.   Statev.Ballard,855S.W.2d557,560(Tenn.1993).#XXX X# XXXXIftheappellaterecordisinadequateforreview,   thisCourtmustpresumethatthetrialcourtruledcorrectly.Statev.Keen,996S.W.2d842,844  (Tenn.Crim.App.1999)#XXX XӞ# XXXX.    Weconcludethatthedefendantdidincludeadequateproofofthearraignmentdatebeing l November4,1999.Suchproofisfoundinthedocumenttitled,Order,whichbothstatesthatthe X  defendantappearedinopencourtonarraignmentandissignedbythetrialjudgeandtheclerkofthe D! court. 0"    TherequirementsofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035120(i)(1997)provide: $X"  X X ` Achargeasarepeatviolentoffendershallbetriedwithinonehundredeighty $D # (180)daysofthearraignmentontheindictmentpursuanttoRule10oftheRulesof %0!$ CriminalProcedureunlessdelayiscausedby: &"% $,XX$ 4  ` (A)Thedefendant; '#&  4  ` (B)Anexaminationforcompetency; (#'  4  ` (C)Acompetencyhearing; )$(  4  ` (D)Anadjudicationofincompetencyfortrial; |*%) 0 4  ` 0 4 4  ` (E)Acontinuanceallowedafteracourtsdeterminationofthedefendants h+&* physicalincapacityforatrial;or  0 4 0` 4 4 0 ` `  ` (F)Aninterlocutoryappeal.Acontinuancemaybegrantedtoanyparty,  includingthecourt,forgoodcauseshown.   X X( X,X(Thedefendant,however,doesnotallegeprejudiceasaresultofanydelay.#XXX Xӹ# XXXXThisCourthasheldthat t the180dayruleisnotanironcladruletobeconstruedinfavorofthedefendant.SeeStatev. ` Thompson,36S.W.3d102(Tenn.Crim.App.2000).Therefore,thedefendant,absentashowing L  ofprejudice,maybesentencedasarepeatviolentoffendereventhoughhewasnottriedwithin180 8  daysofhisarraignment.#XXX X # XXXX $ t    III.Conclusion #XXX X"# XXXX  L  7#   Accordingly,weaffirmthedecisionofthetrialcourt. $  #XXX XӉ### XXXX#XXX Xk$#   `     h     ____________________________________ \    `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE H