ÿWPCl ò[DA²&Æ Bù‘¡Bu‹H·´”ãKO _hɉi/ŸågXÚµ…m:v·‘öJˆ~ðºÍ‡ŸôHq ­Œ1¼±ð~ÿF€º9HäN¯Y’ë[sL*¤•¯£ýÉ”{“hn1„r9eŸó ª'3§ÕlÃü·ìû‹&PsÒ}‹åÊΗ¨¿¥cûç‘«übÜ) ¬ò•/Å/?÷©2G{#%´ ‚»û;F€ŒÆ·Àsƒû À7’ÇβèÆHŠDk‡’¤üRÈøvnÉÆìµL&q¢DÝ š/…½“«„¬³ôÜídûÓ0KÔlcˆŒÅNP:œ¹—ŸB Y›â@±ñÌ&y ñš°o­+ž.=¶mùp»õŸ XVÕÉõ}qê 2ó”Õ’rˆ<[ô*^IŸ8nfã’ýIŸ¦Z;;”³\Mp¬[ƒïGj·_½‘]q°² 0«C ¨šu«o¬-àŠŽOdúÏq§®†· Ð^×ÜoWü²¶x}Ï© "—¾0O‡LÒ”Ã<á+#;èëÊ<˜+°#v+,í…FNa4I¶ß¿¤ÔŸÃ½óËÀo‘ð;~’ê¿ld„¶ÕS.íÐÈ’€†Ã£YŸábUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 0D‘ ÆÕ Æ› Æa Æ'UNíN;¿=cüE________________________baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0ëiiii BTT 0¤q D3 D-H 0Kuu ASÀÆ 0¤Ù 0D} A«Á(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó50-s üPH,bk28§3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular µÝ ƒR($ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€find€little€consistency€in€the€spelling€of€the€Appellantððs€name€in€the€lower€court€proceedings.€€It€is€theÐ ° Ðpolicy€of€this€court€to€use€the€name€of€the€Appellant€as€set€forth€in€the€charging€instrument.€€The€criminal€informationÐ tÄ Ðuses€the€name€of€Jonathan€Omar€Echevarrio.€€On€all€documents€in€the€record,€the€Appellant€signed€his€name€JonathanÐ 8ˆ ÐO.€Echevarria.€€At€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€Appellant€testified€through€an€interpreter€that€his€name€was€JonathanÐ üL ÐEchevarria€Fuentes.€€ YÝ ƒR($ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€five€victims€were€Pedro€Matamoros,€Jose€De€la€Cruz,€Feliciano€Jose€Cisneros,€Antonio€Martinez,€andÐ ° ÐHector€Cisnero.€€The€stolen€money€was€recovered€from€the€Appellant€and€returned€to€the€victims.€- ù-(|G2($¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôò»»Ô d(|3Z$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Z$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€&»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼&»»»ÔÑ8€l¸XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î2•&ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼&»îî2• #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€14,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡Xl¸X»¼&ÔÌò òÔ#†¼&»XXl¸ #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JONATHAN€OMAR€Ô_ÔECHEVARRIAÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡Xl¸X»¼&Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€2001„I„722€€€€€€Steve€Dozier,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02703„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€16,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡Xl¸XXXl¸ÔÌThe€Appellant,€Jonathan€Omar€Ô_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ô,€appeals€from€the€sentencing€decision€of€the€DavidsonÐ d´ ÐCounty€Criminal€Court€imposing€a€sentence€of€four€years€incarceration.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€sentence€arose€fromÐ P  Ða€guilty€plea€entered€by€Ô_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ô€to€one€count€of€attempted€aggravated€robbery.€In€this€appeal,Ð <Œ ÐÔ_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ô€raises€the€issue€of€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€a€sentence€of€totalÐ (x Ðconfinement€rather€than€a€less€restrictive€alternative.€€After€review,€we€find€no€error.€€Accordingly,€Ð d Ðthe€judgment€is€affirmed.Ð P ÐÔ#†Xl¸XXXl¸ð#ÔÔ#†¼&»XXl¸À#ÔÔ‡Xl¸X»¼&ÔÓäÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼&»àXl¸€#ÔÔ‡Xl¸X.¼&ÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòNorma€McGeeÐ ° ÐOgleóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌAmy€D.€Ô_ÔHarwellÔ_Ô€and€C.€Dawn€Ô_ÔDeanerÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Public€Defenders,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€theÐ tÄ ÐAppellant,€Jonathan€Omar€Ô_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ô.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Elizabeth€B.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÔ_ÔMarneyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€Victor€S.€(Ô_ÔTorryÔ_Ô)€Johnson,€III,€District€Attorney€General;€andÐ $"t! ÐJon€Ô_ÔSeaborgÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð #`" ÐÔ#†¼&»XXl¸= #ÔÔ‡Xl¸X»¼&ÔÐ  ü#L#ýG ÐÓ Óà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼&»XXl¸é #ÔÔ‡Xl¸X»¼&ÔÐ ° ÐÌò òProcedural€Historyó óÐ ˆØ ÐòòóóÔ#†¼&»XXl¸s #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€Xl¸X»¼&ÔÌÔ‡Xl¸XXXl¸Ôà  àOn€June€30,€2001,€the€Appellant,€armed€with€two€pistols,€a€.25€caliber€and€.38€caliber,€wentÐ `° Ðto€the€home€of€five€individuals€who€had€previously€attempted€to€start€a€fight€with€the€AppellantððsÐ L œ Ðyounger€brother.€€The€Appellant€admitted€that€he€had€previous€ð ðdifferencesðð€with€these€individuals.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐUpon€arrival€at€the€residence,€the€Appellant€forced€his€way€inside€and,€holding€the€victims€atÐ $ t Ðgunpoint,€took€approximately€$2300.00€in€cash€from€them.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р ` ÐÌà  àIn€July€2001,€the€Appellant€was€charged€by€way€of€a€criminal€information€with€five€countsÐ è 8  Ðof€attempted€aggravated€robbery.€€On€August€30,€2001,€the€Appellant€pled€guilty€to€one€count€ofÐ Ô$  Ðattempted€aggravated€robbery.€€The€plea€agreement€provided€that€the€Appellant€would€receive€a€four„Ð À  Ðyear€sentence€and€the€remaining€four€counts€would€be€dismissed.€€The€manner€of€service€of€theÐ ¬ü  Ðsentence€was€to€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àFollowing€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€Appellantððs€request€for€alternativeÐ pÀ Ðsentencing€and€ordered€that€the€four„year€sentence€be€served€in€confinement€in€the€countyÐ \¬ Ðworkhouse.€€This€appeal€followed.Ð H˜ ÐÌà@‚‚&ìàò òAnalysisˆÐ  p ÐÌó óà  àOur€law€provides€that€when€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€ofÐ øH Ða€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ ä4 Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€ThisÐ Ð  Ðpresumption€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÐ ¼  Ðconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823Ð ¨ø ÐS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€600€(Tenn.€1994).€€ð ðIf€the€trialÐ ”ä Ðcourt€applies€inappropriate€factors€or€otherwise€fails€to€follow€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€theÐ €Ð Ðpresumption€of€correctness€falls.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔSheltonÔ_Ôòòóóóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1992).€Ð l¼ ÐIn€this€case,€the€presumption€of€correctness€is€applied€as€we€find€the€trial€court€considered€theÐ X ¨ Ðsentencing€principles€and€€relevant€facts.€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€provide€that€theÐ D!” Ðburden€is€on€the€Appellant€to€show€the€impropriety€of€the€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401,Ð 0"€  ÐSentencing€Commission€Comments.€Ð #l! ÐÌà  àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of:€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€the€trial€andÐ ô$D # Ðsentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report;€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€and€the€arguments€ofÐ à%0!$ Ðcounsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€anyÐ Ì&"% Ðmitigating€or€enhancing€factors;€(6)€any€statements€made€by€the€defendant€in€his€own€behalf;€and€(7)Ð ¸'#& Ðthe€defendantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€„210.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐòòóóÌà  àBecause€the€Appellant€in€this€case€was€convicted€as€a€standard€offender€of€a€class€C€felony,Ð œì Ðhe€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€ð ðfor€alternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absence€ofÐ ˆØ Ðevidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).€€With€certain€statutory€exceptions,Ð tÄ Ðprobation€must€be€automatically€considered€by€the€trial€court€if€the€sentence€imposed€is€eight€yearsÐ `° Ðor€less.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b).€€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àIn€òòÔ_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€our€supreme€court€encouraged€the€grant€of€considerable€discretionary€authority€toÐ $ t Ðour€trial€courts€in€matters€such€as€these.€€òòÔ_ÔAshbyÔ_Ôóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€171.€€€ð ðIt€is€not€the€policy€or€purposeÐ  ` Ðof€this€court€to€place€trial€judges€in€a€judicial€straight„jacket€in€this€or€any€other€area,€and€we€areÐ ü L  Ðalways€reluctant€to€interfere€with€their€traditional€discretionary€powers.ðð€€òòId.óóÐ è 8  ÐÌà  àThe€Appellant€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ð ðdenying€[his]€request€for€alternativeÐ À  Ðsentencing.ðð€€Specifically,€he€argues€that€the€evidence€introduced€at€the€hearing€is€insufficient€toÐ ¬ü  Ðrebut€the€presumption€favoring€an€alternative€sentence.€€Guidance€as€to€what€may€constitute€evidenceÐ ˜è  Ðto€the€contrary€or€evidence€sufficient€to€rebut€the€presumption€of€entitlement€to€an€alternativeÐ „Ô  Ðsentencing€option€is€set€out€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„103.€€òòSee€State€v.€Binghamóó,€910Ð pÀ ÐS.W.2d€448,€454€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1995).€€A€sentence€of€total€confinement€should€be€based€on€theÐ \¬ Ðfollowing€considerations:€Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àà ` à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€Ð  p Ðà  àà ` à€€€€€€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ð  \ Ðà  àÌà  àà ` à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousnessÐ ä4 Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€of€the€offense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provideÐ Ð  Ðà  àà ` à€€€€€€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similarÐ ¼  Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€à0  à€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€offenses;€or€€€€Ð¨ø(#(# ÐÌà  àà ` à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€Ð €Ð Ѐà0  àà0` (#(#à€€€€€€or€recently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.Ðl¼` (#` (# ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C).Ð D!” ÐÌà  àIn€addition,€ð ð[Ô_Ôt]heÔ_Ô€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€the€rehabilitation€.€.€.€of€the€defendantÐ #l! Ðshould€be€considered€in€determining€the€sentence€alternative€.€.€.€.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð $X" Ð103(5).€€Thus,€confinement€may€still€be€appropriate€despite€the€presumption€if€the€record€adequatelyÐ ô$D # Ðshows€that€one€of€these€particular€considerations€outweighs€a€defendantððs€rehabilitative€capabilities.€Ð à%0!$ ÐòòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€788€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1991).€€Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àThe€proof€introduced€at€the€sentencing€hearing€established€that€at€the€time€of€this€offense€theÐ ¤(ô#' ÐAppellant€was€eighteen€years€old€and€had€dropped€out€of€high€school€after€the€eleventh€grade.€€HeÐ )à$( Ðwas€born€in€Puerto€Rico€and€moved€to€the€United€States€four€years€ago.€€For€the€last€two€years,€heÐ |*Ì%) Ðhad€been€living€in€Nashville€with€his€aunt.€€The€Appellantððs€work€history€is€sporadic€at€best,€and€heÐ h+¸&* Ðoffered€no€employment€prospects€if€released.€€Only€three€months€prior€to€this€offense,€he€was€foundÐ ° Ðin€possession€of€marijuana,€which€resulted€in€a€misdemeanor€drug€conviction€and€sentence€of€ninetyÐ œì Ðdays.€€The€Appellant€is€the€father€of€a€four„year„old€child€residing€in€Springfield,€Massachusetts,Ð ˆØ Ðwhom€he€has€never€supported€and,€at€the€time€of€sentencing,€his€current€girlfriend€was€pregnant.€€InÐ tÄ Ðdenying€an€alternative€sentence,€the€trial€court€recited€the€following€findings:Ð `° ÐÌà8  àà ` à[Ô_ÔJ]ustÔ_Ô€observing€Mr.€Ô_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ô€here€today,€heððs€„€„€I€donððt€know€if€itððs€justÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€way€he€is€„€„€he€just€still€seems€to€have€some€kind€of€anger€or€„€„€maybe€heððsÐ $ t Ðangry€heððs€in€jail€or€„€„€I€donððt€know€what€it€is,€what€perception€I€get€of€him.Ð `Ð Ð  Ðà  àà ` à.€.€.€Ð ü L  ÐÌà8  àà ` àI€have€to€consider€what€actually€happened;€that€is,€he€admits€he€went€intoÐ Ô$  Ðsome€peopleððs€residence€and€robbed€them€at€gunpoint€of€their€money,€just€becauseÐ À  Ðof€some€problem,€in€his€mind,€that€they€had€with€his€brother.Ьü Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àSo,€youððve€got€guns,€youððve€got€potential€for€life„threatening€injuries,€youÐ „Ô  Ðhave€violence.€€On€the€other€hand,€I€acknowledge€heððs€young€and,€other€than€thisÐ pÀ Ðmarijuana€case,€doesnððt€have€a€prior€record.Ð\¬Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àI€mean,€heððs€gotten€a€benefit€from€his€representation€and€the€plea€bargainÐ 4„ Ðthatððs€been€agreed€upon.Ð pÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àIððm€not€convinced€that€his€aunt,€who€I€thinkððs€a€nice€person€and€trying€to€doÐ øH Ðas€best€she€can€in€raising€her€child,€providing€for€her€family,€would€be€able€to€controlÐ ä4 ÐMr.€Ô_ÔEchevarriaÔ_Ôððs€behavior;€and€sheððs€not€responsible€for€that.ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àSo,€based€on€the€nature€of€the€offense,€I€think€confinement€is€necessary,€toÐ ¨ø Ðavoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.ДäÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àAnd€Iððm€not€at€this€time€inclined€to€grant€probation.€€Itððs€just€rare€thatÐ l¼ Ðsomebody€that€just€flat„out€commits€multiple€armed€robberies€would€get€probation,Ð X ¨ Ðregardless€of€it€being€an€attempted„robbery€plea.ÐD!”Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àWhen€determining€the€proper€sentence€for€a€guilty€plea,€a€trial€judge€is€permitted€to€lookÐ #l! Ðbehind€the€plea€and€consider€the€actual€offense€committed.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔHollingsworthÔ_Ôóó,€647€S.W.2d€937,Ð $X" Ð939€(Tenn.€1983).€€In€the€present€case,€the€actual€offense€committed€was€aggravated€robbery.€€TheÐ ô$D # ÐAppellant€admittedly€forced€his€way€into€a€home€with€two€guns€and€took€a€substantial€amount€ofÐ à%0!$ Ðmoney€from€his€victims.€€The€Appellant€admits€he€undertook€these€actions€simply€because€he€wasÐ Ì&"% Ðangry€someone€had€attempted€to€fight€with€his€younger€brother.€€The€record€supports€the€finding€that,Ð ¸'#& Ðbased€upon€the€degree€of€force€exerted,€the€presence€of€weapons,€and€the€number€of€victimsÐ ¤(ô#' Ðinvolved,€the€offense€as€committed€was€violent€and€excessive.€Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àThe€trial€court€also€expressed€concerns€on€the€record€with€regard€to€the€Appellantððs€demeanorÐ ° Ðâ âand€attitude€at€sentencing.€€Moreover,€the€proof€presented€an€unemployed€high€school€drop„out€withÐ œì Ðno€known€job€prospects€and€a€recent€criminal€drug€conviction.€€These€facts€lend€support€to€aÐ ˆØ Ðdetermination€that€the€Appellantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€is€poor.Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àBased€upon€the€proof,€we€conclude€that€the€record€fully€supports€the€trial€courtððs€finding€thatÐ L œ Ðthe€nature€and€circumstances€of€this€crime€outweighed€all€factors€favoring€an€alternative€sentence.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐòòState€v.€Fieldsóó,€40€S.W.3d€435,€441€(Tenn.€2001)€(citing€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔCleavorÔ_Ôóó,€691€S.W.2d€541,€543Ð $ t Ð(Tenn.€1985);€òòState€v.€Hartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€374„75€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1991)€(holding€thatÐ  ` Ðconfinement€is€proper€when€the€circumstances€of€the€offense€are€especially€violent,€horrifying,Ð ü L  Ðshocking,€reprehensible,€offensive,€or€otherwise€of€an€excessive€or€exaggerated€degree€and€the€natureÐ è 8  Ðof€the€offense€must€outweigh€all€factors€favoring€probation)).€€The€Appellant€has€failed€to€establishÐ Ô$  Ðthe€impropriety€of€the€sentence.€€Accordingly,€we€agree€that€under€the€circumstances€of€this€case€aÐ À  Ðperiod€of€confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà@ôô%ìàò òConclusionó ó€ˆÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àFor€the€above€stated€reasons,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€in€ordering€that€theÐ `° ÐAppellantððs€sentence€of€four€years€be€served€in€the€county€workhouse.Ô#†Xl¸XXXl¸*#ÔÐ Lœ ÐÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ô$ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE