ÿWPC Hk÷OÂŒ~©»@ĹïKƒdíV‹f¯"ïÑÎ1’4”5Ø |HR;|M\¬3GÀ6@;2¿Ò~ü‡o°ÙBÙŠ]i§ó´°ïX< ȸ¨T³L2‰^«=»šïM+NثÞL¿—Þ2êAôfËÏ#”©'÷×ì¨2‰Ã_ã7ž:ªéx6P ·Â©g-Ñ×›¨7æ}#fq«kà ¶Ý:Ñ ÊÒ‹.vl½š"OÛtßìnQ¤|q×ælÈ´gÞUi¿Qmê (sŠ(¬DÒ|'*Ú`¼ÙX4ÊüÚ±y¥ë䜖g)²æ÷t&F¼iú>ŽM0…µs¸Œð‹-ÿqF®RV£Ð R»÷(ð»•ö_½:.UÐ[V6JÁ¯€yÐ%xåsjåwÓ2ƽƒçÜ æNÇÚã'LEúŸÄw߬$ÌÞ.m·Ëj¿0gt³é‰]lß*«0¨¸´“\\Æ°S²*Ì{D¯`ð­ kd£î„h­fyuY¯Xs2vý|i¶œíÖ*Àh´fÔz—”Jvˆ“$GMåÅžŠ“;EP}rlží]/ɶxG+¹°HÇÔ„Ý'ÛNêÿØøbùF m ” vy |½·²tÉ*UBL %ŽU.”ÂnXÒ 0P*4zŽ 0”– 0D*w@nU:®èU: ÌA – Õ£U:xU:² 0Dì'0U:WU:‘‘U:ËË–U:›››› AQÕÆ& 0Dì 0D0 Btt D/‘‘ BÀ D3Ý<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|Xñ«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP((­À$¡¡ÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Ó:M+%(D(3¾Á$¤¤Ý ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ÝÞEßàEáâEãäDåæÓ€,†r‰AZ‹"Arial Regular Ô‡ôݺôXXÔÔ€ôz¢ôôôݺÔÝ ƒ ¾ÁÿÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€appellant€was€also€charged€with€two€counts€of€theft€under€$500,€one€count€of€attempt€toÐ `  Ðcommit€aggravated€burglary,€and€one€count€of€theft€over€$1000.€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.€Ervinóó,€939€S.W.2d€581,Ð ( È Ð582„582€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€However,€these€charges€and€their€resulting€sentences€are€not€atÏissue€in€this€appeal., øð AZ"Arial Regular ÂÔ€XÙëXXXÔÔ‡ôï ôXXÙëÔÝ ƒ ¾ÁÿÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€trial€courtððs€statements€at€the€resentencing€hearing€suggest€that,€at€the€time€the€initial€pleasÐ `  Ðwere€entered,€the€plea€agreement€was€based€upon€the€recommendation€of€a€specific€sentence,Ïpursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)(C).€€Because€a€transcript€of€the€initial€plea€hearing€was€notÏincluded€in€the€record€and€because€the€court€failed€to€enter€specific€findings€on€this€issue,€we€are€unableÏto€reach€such€a€conclusion€for€purposes€of€this€appeal.€€Moreover,€the€ð ðOrder€Accepting€Plea€of€Guilty,ððÏwhich€is€included€in€the€record,€provides€ð ðthe€Court€is€to€hear€the€evidence€and€fix€punishment.€.€.€,ððÏappears€inconsistent€with€the€courtððs€statement€that€the€initial€plea€was€entered€pursuant€to€a€specificÏsentence,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)(C). ŒÔ€XÙëXXXÔÔ‡ôï ôXXÙëÔÝ ƒ ¾ÁÿÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAs€thrust€for€the€appellantððs€argument,€he€refers€to€the€doctrine€of€ð ðjudicial€vindictivenessðð€asÐ `  Ðreason€why€the€trial€court€improperly€modified€his€sentences€from€five€to€six€years.€€€This€doctrine€holdsÏthat€a€harsher€sentence€after€a€new€trial€raises€a€presumption€of€judicial€vindictiveness€absent€anÏaffirmative€showing€on€the€record€of€the€reasons€for€the€harsher€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€€òòNorth€Carolina€v.Ð ¸ X ÐPearceóó,€395€U.S.€711,€89€S.Ct.€2072€(1969);€òòState€v.€Gilliamóó,€901€S.W.2d€385,€392€(Tenn.€1995).€Ð €  ÐBecause€we€have€modified€the€appellantððs€sentences€following€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€find€it€unnecessaryÐ H è Ðto€address€this€issue. ËÔ€XÙëXXXÔÔ‡ôï ôXXÙëÔÝ ƒ ¾ÁÿÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAlthough€the€trial€courtððs€statements€at€the€resentencing€hearing€suggest€that,€at€the€time€theÐ `  Ðinitial€pleas€were€entered,€the€plea€agreement€was€based€upon€the€recommendation€of€a€specificÏsentence,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)(C).€€Because€a€transcript€of€the€initial€plea€hearing€wasÏnot€included€in€the€record€and€because€the€court€failed€to€enter€specific€findings€on€this€issue,€we€areÏunable€to€reach€such€a€conclusion€for€purposes€of€this€appeal.€€Moreover,€the€ð ðOrder€Accepting€Plea€ofÏGuilty,ðð€which€is€included€in€the€record,€provides€ð ðthe€Court€is€to€hear€the€evidence€and€fix€punishment.€.Ï.€,ðð€appears€inconsistent€with€the€courtððs€statement€that€the€initial€plea€was€entered€pursuant€to€a€specificÏsentence,€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)(C)., øð AZ"Arial Regular+ÄâK AZ"Arial Regular($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó Ý ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X9†XXXÔÔ€O/ XX9†ÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X9†X O/ÔÐ  ÐÌò òOctober€2,€1998Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ô€À ôXX9†ÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó, øð AZ"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular ŒÔ€XÙëXXXÔÔ‡ôï ôXXÙëÔÝ ƒ ¾ÁÿÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAs€thrust€for€the€appellantððs€argument,€he€refers€to€the€doctrine€of€ð ðjudicial€vindictivenessðð€asÐ `  Ðreason€why€the€trial€court€improperly€modified€his€sentences€from€five€to€six€years.€€€This€doctrine€holdsÏthat€a€harsher€sentence€after€a€new€trial€raises€a€presumption€of€judicial€vindictiveness€absent€anÏaffirmative€showing€on€the€record€of€the€reasons€for€the€harsher€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€€òòNorth€Carolina€v.Ð ¸ X ÐPearceóó,€395€U.S.€711,€89€S.Ct.€2072€(1969);€òòState€v.€Gilliamóó,€901€S.W.2d€385,€392€(Tenn.€1995).€Ð €  ÐBecause€we€have€modified€the€appellantððs€sentences€following€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€find€it€unnecessaryÐ H è Ðto€address€this€issue., øð AZ"Arial Regular!"#&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý d(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd$$$$'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýñæñ›ñæñÑ` °ÑÑX°ÑÒŽ¦ÒÒDÒÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'redlineÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XÉßXXXÔÑ7€ 9† XXdæXXdð7Ññæñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eêf ` ttx$"` ð Úrß›ñæñà ` àà ¸ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌà@KK:)àAT€KNOXVILLEˆÌÌà@HH8)àJUNE€1998€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌó óÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À àà  à)ó óÐ Ðp  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò ò)ó óà p àò òC.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9707„CC„00311ó óÐ À`  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,à h àò ò€€€€€à À àà  à)Ð °P  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àBLOUNT€COUNTYó óÐ  @  ÐVS.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò ò)Ð 0  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àHON.€D.€KELLY€THOMAS,€JR.,Ð €  ÐKENNETH€W.€ERVIN,à h àà À àà  à)à p àJUDGEÐ p Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àà ¸ àó óAppellant.ò òà h àà À àà  à)à p àó ó(Resentencing)ò òÐ Pð Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANT:óóà h àà À àà  à€€€€€òòà p àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:óóÐ ° ÐÌÌò òMACK€GARNERà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ à€ Ðó óDistrict€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àà p àAttorney€General€&€Reporterò òÐ Ð p Ðó ó419€High€St.ò òÐ À!` Ðó óMaryville,€TN€37804à h àò òà À àà  àà p àJANIS€L.€TURNERó óÐ °"P Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAsst.€Attorney€GeneralÌ€€à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àJohn€Sevier€Bldg.Ð $0 Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à425€Fifth€Ave.,€Northà Ð àà (# àÐ €%  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243„0493Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òà À àà  àà p àMIKE€FLYNNó óÐ P(ð! Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òà À àà  àà p àEDWARD€P.€BAILEY,€JR.ó óÐ  +À!$ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à363€Court€St.Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àMaryville,€TN€37804ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌOPINION€FILED:____________________ÌÌÌÌœò òREVERSED€AND€REMANDED›Ð P7ð-1 Ðó óÌÌò òDAVID€G.€HAYES,ó óÐ  :À04 ÐJudgeÌÐ  < 26S ÐÑÜXÑÓ  ÓÓÓÔ‡ X9†XXXÉßÔà@‚‚=)àòòò òOPINIONóóó óˆÐ `  ÐÓ  ÓÌà ` àThe€appellant,€Kenneth€W.€Ervin,€appeals€the€sentences€imposed€by€the€BlountÏCounty€Circuit€Court€following€revocation€of€his€Community€Corrections€sentences.€ÏThe€appellantððs€placement€in€the€Community€Corrections€program€stemmed€from€hisÏguilty€pleas€to€three€class€C€œfelonies.€€This€appeal€is€before€this€court€from€a€previousÏremand€of€the€sentencing€hearingñÝñ€following€revoñÝññÞññÝñcñÝññÞññßñcatñßññàññßñopmnñßññàññáñion.€€Upon€remañáññâññáñinñáññâññãñnd,€ñãññäñ›€›€Following›€revocation›€of›€these›€sentences,›€ñäñthe›€trial€courtÏincreased€the€term€imposed€for€each€of€the€multiple€sentences€by€one€year€andÏmodified€the€previously€ordered€concurrent€sentences€to€reflect€that€they€be€servedÏconsecutively.€€In€this€appeal,€the€appellant€contends€(1)€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÏincreasing€his€sentences€by€one€year;€(2)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€hisÏsentences€to€run€consecutively;€and€(3)€that,€because€the€plea€agreement€violatedÏmandatory€consecutive€sentencing€requirements,€he€should€have€been€allowed€toÏwithdraw€his€guilty€pleas.ÌÌà ` àAfter€review€of€the€record€before€us,€we€reverse€and€remand€this€case€to€the€trialÏcourt€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.ÌÌà@áá;)àò òBackgroundó óˆÐ Ä)d $ ÐÌà ` àIn€1994,€the€appellant€was€arrested€on€one€count€of€aggravated€burglary€in€caseÏnumber€C„8088.€€While€on€bail€for€this€offense,€he€was€arrested€on€another€count€ofÏaggravated€burglary€(C„8252)€and€one€count€of€theft€of€property€valued€over€tenÏthousand€dollars€(C„8253).׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€record€indicates€that€in€May€1994,€the€appellantÐ Ì2l). Ðentered€guilty€pleas€to€each€of€the€three€counts€and,€pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,ñåñœ×ƒ×ñåññåñ׃×ñåñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  כР`  Ðwas€sentenced€to€four€years€on€each€count,€to€be€served€concurrently.€€Each€of€theÏfour€year€sentences€were€ordered€to€be€served€in€the€Community€Corrections€program,Ïpreceded€by€one€year€in€the€county€jail.€ÌÌà ` àAfter€completing€his€time€in€the€county€jail,€the€appellant€was€released€into€theÏCommunity€Corrections€program.€€Shortly€thereafter,€April€1995,€the€appellant€violatedÏthe€behavioral€conditions€of€his€Community€Corrections€contract.€€On€May€30,€1995,Ïthe€trial€court€revoked€his€Community€Corrections€sentence€and,€at€resentencing,Ïincreased€his€sentences€from€four€to€five€years€in€the€Department€of€Corrections,€withÏcredit€for€all€time€served.€€The€appellant€appealed€this€sentencing€decision€to€this€court.€ÏOn€appeal,€this€court€affirmed€the€revocation€of€the€appellantððs€Community€CorrectionsÏsentence.€€òòSeeóó€€òòErvinóó,€939€S.W.2d€at€582.€€However,€because€this€court€found€the€trialÐ ð Ðcourtððs€findings€incomplete€and€insufficient€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review,€this€courtÐ ¼ \ Ðremanded€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing.€€òòErvinóó,€€939€S.W.2dÐ Œ", Ðat€582,€584.ÌÌà ` àOn€March€20,€1997,€a€rehearing€was€held.€€Neither€party€presented€anyÏsentencing€evidence€to€supplement€that€which€already€appeared€in€the€case€file;€bothÏrelying€on€the€proof€previously€introduced.€€At€this€hearing,€the€trial€court€noted,Ïfollowing€reexamination€of€the€sentencing€proof€in€the€record,€€that€the€appellantððsÏprevious€sentence€was€illegal€because€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C)€(felony€committedÏwhile€defendant€released€on€bail)€mandates€that€the€terms€should€have€beenÐ ì0Œ', Ðconsecutive€and€not€concurrent.€€The€trial€judge€also€noted€that€the€appellantððs€initialÏsentence€was€entered€pursuant€to€a€plea€agreement,€and,€on€the€second€occasion,€theÏcourtððs€resentencing€of€the€appellant€was€based€upon€the€Stateððs€recommendation€ofÏfive€years.€€As€such,€the€trial€judge€noted€that€this€was€the€first€time€that€the€court€hadÏweighed€all€of€the€evidence€and€looked€at€the€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors€in€thisÏcase.€€After€review€of€the€applicable€sentencing€factors€and€after€acknowledgment€ofÏTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C),€the€trial€court€modified€the€sentence€by€increasing€theÏsentences€from€five€€to€six€years€on€each€count,€the€maximum€in€the€range,€andÏordered€them€to€run€consecutively,€for€an€effective€sentence€of€twelve€years.ÌñäñœœñäñÌà@È È *)àò òI.€€Consecutive€Sentencing/€Illegal€Sentencesó óˆÐ Xø ÐÌà ` àAt€the€rehearing,€the€trial€court€found€that€two€felonies€were€committed€while€theÏappellant€was€released€on€bail.€€Clearly,€the€appellantððs€sentence€is€subject€to€beingÏvacated€because€the€sentence€violates€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€32(c)(3)(C).€€òòState€v.Ð ”"4 ÐBurkhartóó,€566€S.W.2d€871,€873€(Tenn.€1978).€€Rule€32(c)(3)(C)€provides€that€if€aÐ `$ Ðperson€commits€a€felony€while€on€bail€for€another€offense€and€the€person€is€convictedÏof€both€offenses,€the€two€sentences€are€òòrequiredóó€to€be€served€consecutively.€€The€ruleÐ ø'˜" Ðmakes€the€manner€of€serving€the€sentences€compulsory,€regardless€of€what€theÏjudgment€might€recite.€€In€other€words,€the€manner€of€serving€the€sentences€is€òònon„Ð +0"& Ðnegotiableóó,€and€the€provisions€of€the€rule€cannot€be€altered€by€a€plea€agreement.€€òòSeeóó€Ð \-ü#( ÐòòState€v.€Connorsóó,€No.€03C01„9506„CC„00176€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€Dec.€17,Ð (/È%* Ð1996).ÌñäñœñäñÌà ` àBecause€the€statute€mandates€consecutive€sentencing€in€such€a€situation,€theÏtrial€court€erred€in€ordering€the€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€A€court€is€with€theÏauthority€to€correct€an€òòillegalóó€sentence€at€any€time,€even€if€it€has€otherwise€becomeÐ $8Ä.4 Ðfinal.€€òòBurkhartóó,€566€S.W.2d€at€873.€€However,€in€the€present€case,€the€convictionsÐ `  Ðwere€based€upon€a€negotiated€plea€agreement.€€Thus,€if€the€plea€agreement€wasÏconditioned€upon€the€concurrent€service€of€the€sentences,€the€State€could€not€legallyÏfulfill€its€part€of€the€plea€agreement.€€As€previously€noted,€we€are€unable€to€determineÏfrom€the€record€before€us€whether€the€appellantððs€guilty€pleas€were€so€conditioned.€ÏMoreover,€no€findings€as€to€this€issue€were€entered€by€the€trial€court€at€the€hearing€onÏremand.€€This€court€may€not€act€as€a€factfinder€as€our€jurisdiction€is€appellate€only€andÏis€limited€to€review€of€the€final€judgments€of€trial€courts.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ16-5-108(a).€€Accordingly,€this€cause€must€be€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€aÏdetermination€of€whether€the€appellantððs€guilty€pleas€were€entered€contingent€upon€hisÏreceiving€concurrent€sentences.€Ìà ` àÌà ` à€Upon€remand,€if€the€trial€court€determines€that€the€plea€bargain€was€conditionedÏupon€the€imposition€of€concurrent€sentences,€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€withdraw€hisÏguilty€pleas.€€òòBurkhartóó,€566€S.W.2d€at€873.€€In€the€event€that€the€appellant€elects€toÐ ˆ"( Ðproceed€to€trial€and€is€convicted€of€both€offenses,€the€sentences€imposed€must€beÏserved€consecutively.€€However,€if€the€trial€court€determines€that€the€appellantððs€guiltyÏpleas€were€not,€in€any€degree,€conditioned€upon€the€concurrent€service€of€theÏsentences,€the€court€has€the€authority€to€correct€the€illegal€sentences€and€should€doÏso.ÌœñÑñ̛̛ÌñÑñ›Ìà@ÄÄ4)àò òII.€€Length€of€Sentencesó óˆÐ /¼%* ÐÌà ` àAlthough€our€ruling€in€this€appeal€renders€the€appellantððs€remaining€issue€as€toÏthe€length€of€the€sentences€premature,€we€elect€to€proceed€with€our€review€to€furtherÏprevent€unnecessary€and€protracted€litigation€of€this€remaining€issue.€€€If€the€trial€courtÏdetermines€that€the€appellantððs€pleas€were€not€conditioned€upon€the€concurrent€serviceÐ $8Ä.4 Ðof€his€sentences,€the€issue€remains€whether€the€trial€courtððs€increase€of€the€appellantððsÏsentences€from€five€to€six€years€was€proper.€€ÌÌà ` àAgain,€four€year€sentences€were€originally€imposed.€€After€revocation€from€theÏCommunity€Corrections€program,€the€trial€court€increased€the€sentences€from€four€toÏfive€years.€€On€appeal,€this€court€remanded€the€case€because€the€trial€court€failed€toÏenter€findings€of€fact€on€the€record.€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€again€increased€theÏappellantððs€sentences,€from€five€to€six€years.€€The€appellant€concedes€that€the€five€yearÏsentences€were€proper;€however,€he€contends€that€the€six€years€sentences€areÏexcessive.ÌÌà ` àWhen€the€length€of€sentence€is€challenged€on€appeal,€this€court€conducts€a€òòdeÐ $Ä Ðnovoóó€review€conditioned€upon€the€presumption€that€the€determination€made€by€the€trialÐ ô” Ðcourt€is€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„201(d)€(1990).€€This€presumption€onlyÏapplies,€however,€if€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€trial€court€properly€consideredÏrelevant€sentencing€principles.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€InÐ \$ü Ðthe€case€before€us,€the€trial€court€considered€relevant€sentencing€principles;€thus,€theÏpresumption€applies.€€Moreover,€this€court€may€only€modify€a€sentence€if€the€sentenceÏis€excessive€or€the€manner€of€service€is€inappropriate.€€òòState€v.€Russellóó,€773€S.W.2dÐ À)` $ Ð913,€915€(Tenn.€1989).€€On€appeal€the€appellant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€theÏsentence€imposed€was€improper.€Sentencing€Commission€Comments,€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d)(1990).ÌÌà ` àIn€increasing€the€appellantððs€sentences,€the€trial€court€applied€threeÏenhancement€factors:€(1)€the€appellant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions,ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€(1994€Supp.);€(8)€the€appellant€has€a€previous€historyÏof€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentence€involving€release€in€theÐ  8À.4 Ðcommunity,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(8);€and€(3)€the€offense€involved€more€thanÏone€victim,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(3).€€The€court€found€no€applicable€mitigatingÏfactors.ÌÌà ` àNo€new€evidence€was€presented€at€the€remand€sentencing€hearing.€€TheÏpresentence€report€indicates€that€the€appellant€has€prior€convictions€for€burglary€andÏseveral€misdemeanors.€€The€appellant€has€also€repeatedly€violated€the€conditions€ofÏprior€sentences€involving€release€in€the€community.€€Thus,€the€trial€court€properlyÏenhanced€the€appellantððs€sentences€on€the€basis€that€he€has€a€previous€history€ofÏcriminal€convictions€and€has€shown€an€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€aÏsentence€involving€release€in€the€community.ÌÌà ` àThe€trial€court€also€found€that€ð ð[t]wo€of€these€offenses€[the€burglaries]€involveÏmore€than€one€victim.ðð€€The€victim€impact€statements€reflect€that€one€of€the€families,Ïwhose€home€was€burglarized€by€the€appellant,€had€young€children.€€The€children€areÏafraid€to€go€in€their€homes€at€night€before€their€parents€go€through€the€house€and€theyÏð ðwonððt€sleep€in€their€own€beds€and€are€terrified€to€go€in€their€home.ðð€€€To€properly€applyÏthis€factor€in€enhancing€a€sentence€for€aggravated€burglary,€more€than€one€victim€mustÏbe€òòpresentóó€at€the€time€the€crime€was€committed.€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.€Wilsonóó,€No.€01C01„Ð ¸)X $ Ð9602„CC„00073€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€Jul.€31,€1997),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,Ð „+$"& Ð(Tenn.€Apr.€20,€1998)€(citing€òòState€v.€Dentonóó,€No.€02C01„9409„CR„00186€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð P-ð#( ÐApp.€at€Jackson,€Aug.€2,€1996);€òòRegister€v.€Stateóó,€No.€01C01„9210„CC„00329€(Tenn.Ð /¼%* ÐCrim.€App.€at€Nashville,€Aug.€12,€1993),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€Dec.€28,Ð è0ˆ', Ð1993)).€€In€the€case€before€us,€there€is€no€proof€to€show€that€any€of€the€victims€wereÏpresent€at€the€time€of€the€burglary.€€Additionally,€only€one€count€of€aggravated€burglary,ÏC„8252,€is€supported€by€evidence€showing€that€more€than€one€person€was€victimizedÏby€the€appellant.€€Thus,€it€was€error€for€the€trial€court€to€apply€this€enhancing€factor.€€€€€€Ð 8¸.4 Їà ` àThe€sentencing€range€for€the€appellant,€a€Range€I€standard€offender,€for€theÏcrimes€committed,€which€were€class€C€felonies,€is€three€to€six€years.€€òòSeeóó€€Tenn.€CodeÐ , Ì ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(3)€(1990).€€When€there€are€enhancement€factors€and€noÏmitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€may€set€the€sentence€above€the€minimum€within€theÏapplicable€sentencing€range,€but€still€within€the€range.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼210(d)€(1990).€Ô#†XÙëXX XéÓ’#ÔÔ‡XÙëXXXÙëÔ€€Beginning€with€the€presumptive€minimum€sentence,€the€trial€court€mustÐ \ü  Ðthen€"enhance€the€sentence€within€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€enhancementÏfactors,€and€then€reduce€the€sentence€within€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€mitigatingÏfactors."€€òòIdóó.€€Again,€the€trial€court€found,€and€we€agree,€that€enhancement€factors€(1)Ð   Ðand€(8)€and€no€mitigating€factors€are€applicable.€€However,€we€have€determined€thatÏfactor€(3)€is€not€supported€by€the€proof€in€the€record€and€is,€therefore,€inapplicable.€€InÏview€of€our€finding€that€the€trial€court€misapplied€one€enhancing€factor,€modification€ofÏthe€maximum€sentence€is€necessary.ñÍñ׃×ñÍññÍñ׃×ñÍñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Upon€òòde€novoóó€review,€after€weighing€the€twoÐ €  Ðapplicable€enhancement€factors€found,€we€conclude€that€a€sentence€of€five€years€onÏeach€conviction€is€justified.€€Ô#†XÙëXXXÙëë@#ÔÔ‡ XéÓXXXÙëÔÐ @#à ÐÌà ` àAccordingly,€this€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€a€determination€ofÏwhether€the€appellantððs€guilty€pleas€were€conditioned€upon€the€concurrent€service€ofÏhis€sentences.€€If€the€court€finds€that€the€pleas€were€so€conditioned,€the€appellant€shallÏbe€given€the€opportunity€to€withdraw€his€guilty€plea€and€either€enter€into€a€newÏagreement€or€proceed€to€trial.€€However,€if€the€concurrent€aspect€of€the€sentences€wasÏnot€of€relevance€in€the€appellantððs€decision€to€plead€guilty,€the€appellantððs€sentencesÏshould€be€modified€to€reflect€a€term€of€five€years€on€each€count,€with€the€sentences€inÐ ´1T(, Ðcases€C„8252€and€C„8253€to€run€consecutive€to€the€sentence€in€case€C„8088,€for€aÏtotal€effective€sentence€of€ten€years.ÌÌà ` àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed€and€thisÏcase€is€remanded€to€that€court€for€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.Ô#†XÙëXX XéÓE#ÔÐ 0 ÐÌÓÓœñÒñÌñÒñ›œñÒñÌñÒñ›ÌÌñÍñ›ñÍñÌñÍñœñÍññÊñà ` àñÊññÊñà ¸ àñÊññÊñà  àñÊññÊñà h àñÊññÊñà À àñÊññÊñ__________________________________ñÊññËñ__ñËñà (# àñÌññÇñà ` àñÇññÇñà ` àñÇññÇñà ` àñÇññÇñà ` àñÇññÇñà ` àñÇñ›à ` à›à ` à›à ` à›à ` à›à ` à›à ` àñÌññÍñ›œñÍññÉñà ` à_______________________________ñÉññÌñ›Ð  ¨ Лà ` à›à ` àñÌññÍñ›ñÍñÐ ìŒ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àñÍñœñÍñDAVID€G.€HAYES,ñÍñ›ñÍñ€JudgeÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ______________________________ÌñÍñœñÍñJOHN€H.€PEAY,ñÍñ›ñÍñ€JudgeÌÌÌÌ______________________________ÌñÍñœñÍñJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,ñÍñ›ñÍñ€Judge