ÿWPC ct!'RYد{Øý>Ä£ö•UXà!ÝE¯Ùàª3Im üHM’’0=WÝg(ì!Sü‹$‡¦:é”/‡jl¾Æò‘½‚âñam{mµTÉo¤tùÖœ6& ô|*Q ²tN£’Èê¤ÉE‘€^Þt‰©ˆ½êJH…g‹9’1౦䚟±mSŽ~)ŒØ=Z®Cµ ·ÿq^À¯’6Ì @™Ü"jÒ"d„€†F%Ô„2Ê^‚Fˆy똞sxA ‚â¿lÙÇù›[Á’0½<û@!?t£Ø7#Åå¶¶RSvª¤6¢™¼,Û† ëeÅh—‰™Z ì¤^X0òÚ@¿¤Àš¨®óùÖ§ŠÇ÷©áßK~1vºì?ÔÛêí/€Æýµ™Â‹ýnÕ}Þ¤í|©×Ùa¤#¸Áö]‘,¯ê󼟯D¾´±‰ËiNl¡kcœ¥ ÏZ nì>%»G²™ºé–9 ±¬M¦ò‰Ü™·ÖUÚY[±ŽµÈ+±Ó´â‚ª<~‹k Tl¬Ûþ…#åm'ÊŠ,m>˵=ÓJKXsò& UÛj ÈÞÎftà9(ˆjÿôi²„~wEø'n\Àvg=;”~¨¢'¡.9ý§iÍÖ»…7b#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz UN‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1÷NÿÿÿEb 0ë     Böö 0¤ D5· D-ì 0K ASdÆ· 0¤} 0D! A«e˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»õ~?,s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular¹b8,”{Ÿk1„!  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - ù-(|G2?€$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€B»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôñýò»»Ô d(|3Gq$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€B»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gq$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€B»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€B»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼B»»»ÔÑ8€XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îG”BÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼B»îîG” #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€December€18,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XX»¼BÔÌò òÔ#†¼B»XX"#ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóÔ_ÔDERRANNÔ_Ô€WILLIAM€Ô_ÔESTILLÔ_ÔÔ‡XX»¼BÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Bedford€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€14,829€€€€€€F.€Lee€Russell,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„01859„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€January€25,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant€was€convicted€of€theft€of€property€valued€between€$1,000€and€$10,000,€a€Class€DÐ xÈ  Ðfelony,€and€criminal€trespass.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€him€as€a€Range€II,€multiple€offender€to€sixÐ d´ Ðyears€incarceration€for€the€theft€conviction€and€to€thirty€days€incarceration€for€the€criminal€trespassÐ P  Ðconviction,€with€the€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€The€Defendant€argues€that€insufficientÐ <Œ Ðevidence€was€presented€at€trial€to€convict€him€of€theft€or€criminal€trespass.€€We€affirm€the€judgmentÐ (x Ðof€the€trial€court.€€Ð d ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed€and€CaseÐ ì< ÐRemandedó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼B»àXà#ÔÔ‡XX.¼BÔRobert€W.€Wedemeyer,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Tiptonóó€andÐ ° ÐòòThomas€T.€Woodall,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌGregory€D.€Smith,€Clarksville,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€Andrew€J.€Dearing,€III,€Fayetteville,Ð tÄ ÐTennessee€(at€trial€and€on€appeal);€Curtis€H.€Gann,€€and€Larry€F.€Wallace,€Jr.,€Shelbyville,€TennesseeÐ `° Ð(at€trial),€for€the€Appellant,€Ô_ÔDerrannÔ_Ô€William€Ô_ÔEstillÔ_Ô.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Kathy€D.€Aslinger,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð $"t! ÐWilliam€Michael€McCown,€District€Attorney€General;€Michael€D.€Randles,€Assistant€DistrictÐ #`" ÐAttorney€General;€and€Hollynn€L.€Hewgley,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,Ð ü#L# ÐState€of€Tennessee.Ð è$8 $ ÐÓ5ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼B»XXd#ÔÔ‡XX»¼BÔÐ À&"& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼B»XX~ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XX»¼BÔà  àThe€Defendant€was€indicted€for€theft€of€property€valued€between€$1,000€and€$10,000,Ð ˜(è#( Ðcriminal€trespass€and€public€intoxication.€€The€Defendant€waived€his€right€to€a€jury€trial.€€FollowingÐ „)Ô$) Ða€bench€trial,€the€Defendant€was€convicted€of€theft€of€property€between€$1,000€and€$10,000€and€ofÐ p*À%* Ðcriminal€trespass.€€He€was€found€not€guilty€of€public€intoxication.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€him€asÐ \+¬&+ Ða€Range€II,€multiple€offender€to€six€years€incarceration€for€the€theft€conviction€and€to€thirty€daysÐ H,˜', Ðincarceration€for€the€trespass€conviction,€with€the€sentences€to€be€served€concurrently.€€In€this€appeal,Ð 4-„(-ýG Ðthe€Defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€presented€to€convict€him€of€both€crimes.€Ð ° ÐWe€conclude€that€the€evidence€is€sufficient€and€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ð œì ÐÌà@µµ(ìàFACTSˆÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àWilliam€Boyce€testified€that€he€owns€Boyce€Equipment,€a€farm€equipment€retailer.€Ð L œ ÐAccording€to€Boyce,€much€of€their€equipment€is€too€large€to€store€in€the€showroom,€so€it€is€keptÐ 8 ˆ Ðoutside.€€The€outside€lot€is€enclosed€in€the€front€and€on€the€sides€by€a€fence€and€in€the€back€by€aÐ $ t Ðriver.€€There€is€a€gate€in€the€front€of€the€lot€at€the€main€entrance€to€the€business.€€During€non„businessÐ  ` Ðhours,€tractors€are€usually€pulled€in€front€of€the€main€entrance€gate.€€The€normal€business€hours€forÐ ü L  ÐBoyce€Equipment€are€from€8:00€a.m.€until€5:00€p.m.,€Monday€through€Friday,€and€8:00€a.m.€untilÐ è 8  Ð12:00€p.m.€on€Saturday.€€An€Emergency€Medical€Services€(EMS)€building€is€located€on€one€side€ofÐ Ô$  ÐBoyce€Equipment.€€There€is€a€small€gate€on€the€side€of€Boyceððs€lot€that€leads€to€the€EMS€building.€Ð À  ÐBoyce€testified€that€there€is€a€field€between€the€EMS€building€and€Boyce€Equipment€and€that€no€roadÐ ¬ü  Ðor€driveway€leads€up€to€the€gate.€€This€gate€was€unlocked€on€the€night€of€the€offense.€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àBoyce€testified€that€police€came€to€his€home€around€4:30€a.m.€on€October€14,€2000€andÐ pÀ Ðinformed€him€that€there€had€been€an€incident€at€the€dealership.€€When€Boyce€arrived€at€theÐ \¬ Ðdealership,€he€noticed€a€white€truck€inside€the€business€lot.€€Boyce€recalled€that€the€truck€was€facingÐ H˜ Ðthe€main€entrance.€€Boyce€testified€that€a€trailer€was€attached€to€the€truck€with€a€safety€chain,€and€aÐ 4„ Ðlawn€mower€was€parked€directly€behind€the€trailer.€€Boyce€stated€that€both€the€trailer€and€the€mowerÐ  p Ðwere€owned€by€Boyce€Equipment€and€that€the€trailer€had€previously€been€parked€ð ðunder€a€tree€besideÐ  \ Ðthe€building.ðð€€According€to€Boyce,€the€trailer€tilts€so€that€equipment€may€be€easily€loaded€onto€theÐ øH Ðtrailer.€€The€trailer€was€tilted€when€Boyce€arrived€at€the€scene.€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àOfficer€Rod€Lewis€Stacy,€a€member€of€the€patrol€division€of€the€Shelbyville€PoliceÐ ¼  ÐDepartment,€testified€that€around€4:30€a.m.€on€October€14,€2000,€he€was€in€his€patrol€car€in€a€parkingÐ ¨ø Ðlot€at€the€intersection€of€Madison€Street€and€Ô_ÔWartraceÔ_Ô€Highway€waiting€for€Sergeant€DavidÐ ”ä ÐWilliams,€Jr.,€of€the€Bedford€County€Sheriffððs€Department.€€According€to€Stacy,€the€driverððs€sideÐ €Ð Ðwindow€was€down,€and€he€ð ðkept€hearing€like€a€metal€banging€noise,€like€two€pieces€of€metal€beatingÐ l¼ Ðtogether.ðð€€Stacy€testified€that€he€drove€into€the€back€parking€lot€of€the€EMS€building€where€he€couldÐ X ¨ Ðsee€the€front€doors€and€part€of€the€front€lot€of€Boyce€Equipment.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àStacy€testified€that€in€front€of€Boyce€Equipment,€he€observed€the€Defendant€ð ðin€front€of€aÐ #l! Ðwhite€pickup€truck€with€a€small€trailer€attached€to€the€back€of€it.ðð€€Stacy€stated€that€the€DefendantÐ $X" Ðwas€ð ðpushing€on€a€lawn€mower€and€rocking€it.ðð€€Stacy€then€drove€around€to€the€main€gate€of€BoyceÐ ô$D # ÐEquipment€and€walked€towards€the€building.€€Stacy€testified€that€he€caught€the€Defendantððs€attentionÐ à%0!$ Ðand€said,€ð ðBoy,€youððre€getting€an€awfully€early€start€this€morning,€arenððt€you?ðð,€to€which€theÐ Ì&"% ÐDefendant€replied,€ð ðYeah,€yeah,€I€got€to€get€these€mowers€loaded.ðð€€Once€Stacy€got€a€bit€closer,€heÐ ¸'#& Ðtold€the€Defendant,€ð ðYou€donððt€work€here.€€Put€your€hands€on€the€truck.ðð€€€Stacy€testified€that€whenÐ ¤(ô#' Ðhe€began€speaking,€the€Defendant€was€in€between€the€truck€and€the€trailer.€€Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àStacy€testified€that€he€asked€the€Defendant€how€he€got€his€truck€into€the€Boyce€EquipmentÐ ° Ðâ âlot,€and€the€Defendant€said€that€he€drove€it€in€ð ð[Ô_Ôt]hroughÔ_Ô€the€little€gate€over€thereðð€which€StacyÐ œì Ðunderstood€to€mean€the€gate€leading€to€the€EMS€building.€€Stacy€stated€that€he€began€to€look€aroundÐ ˆØ Ðand€could€see€where€the€Defendant€had€driven€through€the€grass€to€get€to€the€gate.€€Stacy€testifiedÐ tÄ Ðthat€safety€chains€attached€to€the€trailer€had€been€wrapped€around€the€ball€hitch€on€the€truck.€Ð `° ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€testified€that€on€the€night€of€the€offense,€he€and€his€girlfriend€had€been€at€anÐ 8 ˆ Ðengagement€party.€€His€girlfriend€was€two€months€pregnant,€so€they€had€decided€to€get€married.€Ð $ t ÐAccording€to€the€Defendant,€around€2:00€a.m.,€he€ð ðknew€it€was€time€.€.€.€to€go€home.ðð€€However,€heÐ  ` Ðand€his€girlfriend€got€into€an€argument€because€she€did€not€want€to€leave€the€party.€€The€DefendantÐ ü L  Ðtestified€that€he€left€the€party,€but€later€went€back€hoping€that€his€girlfriend€would€leave€also.€€TheÐ è 8  ÐDefendant€stated€that€his€girlfriend€still€did€not€want€to€leave€so€they€ð ðgot€in€an€argument,€and€[theÐ Ô$  ÐDefendant]€just€got€in€[his]€truck€and€started€driving.ðð€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€testified€that€he€was€worried€about€getting€arrested€for€driving€under€theÐ ˜è  Ðinfluence,€that€he€was€ð ðgetting€sick,ðð€and€that€he€had€to€ð ðrelieve€[himself],ðð€so€he€pulled€off€the€road.€Ð „Ô  ÐThe€Defendant€recalled€that€he€ð ðpulled€into€the€sideðð€of€a€building,€which€he€later€learned€was€theÐ pÀ ÐEMS€building;€got€out€of€the€car;€and€relieved€himself€on€a€nearby€tree.€€The€Defendant€testified€thatÐ \¬ Ðhe€heard€a€noise€coming€from€the€EMS€building€and€saw€a€ð ðred/black€mustang€sitting€there.ðð€€TheÐ H˜ ÐDefendant€stated€that€he€also€saw€the€lights€come€on€in€a€nearby€house€and€€ð ðpanicked.ðð€€AccordingÐ 4„ Ðto€the€Defendant,€he€got€in€his€truck€and€backed€it€towards€the€EMS€building.€€The€Defendant€statedÐ  p Ðthat€he€couldnððt€ð ðcircle€outðð€so€he€ð ðpushed€through€[the]€little€gateðð€behind€Boyce€Equipment.€€TheÐ  \ ÐDefendant€recalled€that€he€drove€through€the€grass€to€get€to€the€gate€and€that€he€ð ðscratched€[his]€truckÐ øH Ðup€pretty€goodðð€getting€through€the€gate.€€The€Defendant€maintained€that€he€went€through€the€gateÐ ä4 Ðbecause€he€did€not€want€to€go€back€through€the€EMS€parking€lot,€and€he€was€ð ðtrying€to€find€anotherÐ Ð  Ðway€out.ðð€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€testified€that€once€inside€the€gate,€he€drove€around€Boyce€Equipment€andÐ ”ä Ðdiscovered€that€he€could€not€get€out.€€The€Defendant€stated€that€he€could€not€exit€the€way€he€enteredÐ €Ð Ðbecause€the€small€gate€through€which€he€entered€ð ðonly€opened€outward,ðð€and€ð ðthere€was€no€way€forÐ l¼ Ð[him]€to€squeeze€back€through.ðð€€The€Defendant€testified€that€he€hooked€the€trailer€up€to€his€truckÐ X ¨ Ðbecause€he€ð ðfigured€that€maybe€[by]€pushing€that€trailer€up€to€there,€maybe€[he]€could€just€run€theÐ D!” Ðtruck€up,€there€since€itððs€a€small€wheeled€truck,€across€that€fence.ðð€€The€Defendant€maintained€thatÐ 0"€  Ðhe€did€not€try€to€move€the€mower€onto€the€trailer€and€that€he€was€just€going€to€use€the€trailer€as€aÐ #l! Ðramp€to€cross€over€the€fence€surrounding€the€lot.€€The€Defendant€claimed€that€he€never€hooked€theÐ $X" Ðtrailer€up€to€the€truck€and€that€the€officers€who€said€that€he€did€were€lying.€€Ð ô$D # ÐÌà@ÐÐ%ìàANALYSIS€€ˆÐ Ì&"% ÐÌÔ‡ XXXXÔà  àThe€Defendant€argues€that€insufficient€evidence€was€presented€at€trial€to€convict€him€of€theftÐ ¤(ô#' Ðand€criminal€trespass.€€When€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€an€appellateÐ )à$( Ðcourtððs€standard€of€review€is€whether,€after€considering€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€toÐ |*Ì%) Ðthe€prosecution,€any€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyondÐ h+¸&* Ða€reasonable€doubt.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e);€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€324€(1979);€òòStateÐ ° Ðv.€Duncanóó,€698€S.W.2d€63,€67€(Tenn.€1985).€€This€rule€applies€to€findings€of€guilt€based€upon€directÐ œì Ðevidence,€circumstantial€evidence,€or€a€combination€of€both€direct€and€circumstantial€evidence.€Ð ˆØ ÐòòState€v.€Pendergrassóó,€13€S.W.3d€389,€392„93€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€Court€should€not€re„weigh€or€re„evaluateÐ L œ Ðthe€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€779€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€Nor€may€thisÐ 8 ˆ ÐCourt€substitute€its€inferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€from€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Buggsóó,Ð $ t Ð995€S.W.2d€102,€105€(Tenn.€1999);€òòLiakas€v.€Stateóó,€286€S.W.2d€856,€859€(Tenn.€1956)òòóó.€€QuestionsÐ  ` Ðconcerning€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€of€the€evidence,€as€well€as€allÐ ü L  Ðfactual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòLiakasóó,€286€S.W.2d€at€859.òòóó€Ð è 8  ÐòòóóThis€Court€must€afford€the€State€of€Tennessee€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidenceÐ Ô$  Ðcontained€in€the€record,€as€well€as€all€reasonable€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence.€Ð À  ÐòòState€v.€Evansóó,€838€S.W.2d€185,€191€(Tenn.€1992).€€Because€a€verdict€of€guilt€against€a€defendantÐ ¬ü  Ðremoves€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€raises€a€presumption€of€guilt,€the€convicted€criminalÐ ˜è  Ðdefendant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€that€the€evidence€was€legally€insufficient€to€sustain€a€guiltyÐ „Ô  Ðverdict.€€òòId.óó€Ô#†XXX X$0#ÔÐ pÀ Ðà  àÌà  àThe€Defendant€was€charged€with€and€convicted€of€theft€of€property,€which€is€defined€asÐ H˜ Ðfollows:€"A€person€commits€theft€of€property€if,€with€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€property,€theÐ 4„ Ðperson€knowingly€obtains€or€exercises€control€over€the€property€without€the€owner's€effectiveÐ  p Ðconsent."€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39-14-103.€€Because€the€value€of€the€property€in€this€case€wasÐ  \ Ðestimated€to€be€between€$1,000€and€$10,000,€the€crime€is€a€Class€D€felony.€€òòId.óó€ðð€39„14„105(3).€€InÐ øH Ðfinding€the€Defendant€guilty€of€theft,€the€trial€court€stated,€Ð ä4 Ðà8  àIt€does€appear€to€me€that€there€was€an€exercise€of€control.€€The€trailer€was€moved.€Ð Ð  ÐAnd€it€appears€to€me€likewise€that€there€was€an€effort;€and€there€was€not€only€anÐ ¼  Ðeffort,€but€there€was€an€exercise€of€control€over€the€mower€as€well.ШøÐ Ð  ÐThe€trial€court€also€found€the€testimony€of€William€Boyce€and€Officer€Stacy€to€be€more€credible€thanÐ ”ä Ðthat€of€the€Defendant.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àWe€agree€that€the€State€presented€sufficient€evidence€to€support€the€Defendantððs€convictionÐ X ¨ Ðfor€theft€of€property€valued€between€$1,000€and€$10,000.€€Officer€Stacy€testified€that€he€saw€theÐ D!” ÐDefendant€ð ðpushing€a€lawn€mower€and€rocking€it.ðð€€When€Stacy€approached€the€Defendant€andÐ 0"€  Ðcommented€on€the€time,€the€Defendant€stated€that€he€needed€ð ðto€get€these€mowers€loaded.ðð€€OfficerÐ #l! ÐStacy€and€William€Boyce€also€observed€that€a€trailer€was€attached€to€the€Defendantððs€truck€with€aÐ $X" Ðchain.€€Boyce€testified€that€the€Defendant€did€not€have€permission€to€take€any€property€from€the€lot.€Ð ô$D # ÐBoyce€estimated€the€trailerððs€value€to€be€between€$700€and€$1,200,€and€he€estimated€the€mowerððsÐ à%0!$ Ðworth€to€be€about€$5,000.€€We€conclude€that€the€evidence€presented€at€trial€supports€the€juryððsÐ Ì&"% Ðfinding€that€the€Defendant,€with€the€intent€to€deprive€the€owner€of€the€property,€did€knowinglyÐ ¸'#& Ðexercise€control€over€the€property€without€Boyceððs€effective€consent.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àThere€was€also€sufficient€evidence€presented€to€convict€the€Defendant€of€criminal€trespass.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐThe€offense€of€criminal€trespass€is€committed€when€a€person€enters€or€remains€on€the€propertyÐ h+¸&* Ðwithout€the€owner's€effective€consent.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39-14-405(a);€òòState€v.€Langfordóó,€994Ð ° ÐS.W.2d€126,€129€(Tenn.€1999).€€ð ðThe€accusedððs€knowledge€that€he€or€she€did€not€have€the€ððeffectiveÐ œì Ðconsentðð€to€enter€the€property€may€be€inferred€from€ðð(1)€personal€communication€to€the€[accused]Ð ˆØ Ðby€the€owner€or€by€someone€with€apparent€authority€to€act€for€the€owner,ðð€and€(2)€ðð[Ô_Ôf]encingÔ_Ô€or€otherÐ tÄ Ðenclosure€obviously€designed€to€exclude€intruders.ðððð€òòState€v.€Hollingsworthóó,€944€S.W.2d€625,€628Ð `° Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996)€(quoting€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„405(a)(1)„(2)).Ð L œ ÐÌà  àIn€this€case,€Boyce€Equipment€was€enclosed€with€a€fence.€€The€only€openings€to€the€fenceÐ $ t Ðincluded€a€main€gate€in€the€front€and€a€small€gate€near€the€EMS€building.€€The€main€gate€wasÐ  ` Ðsecured€by€pulling€tractors€in€front€of€it.€€The€small€gate,€although€not€locked,€was€located€on€the€sideÐ ü L  Ðof€the€building€and€was€only€accessible€through€a€grassy€area.€€There€was€no€road€or€drivewayÐ è 8  Ðleading€to€the€small€gate.€€The€Defendant€was€on€the€property€at€4:30€a.m.€€The€normal€businessÐ Ô$  Ðhours€for€Boyce€Equipment€were€from€8:00€a.m.€until€5:00€p.m.,€Monday€through€Friday,€and€8:00Ð À  Ða.m.€until€12:00€p.m.€on€Saturday.€€We€conclude€that€the€trial€court€properly€found€that€theÐ ¬ü  ÐDefendant€was€on€the€property€without€the€ownerððs€effective€consent.€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àFinally,€the€Defendant€argues€that€although€the€charge€of€public€intoxication€(Count€3€of€theÐ pÀ Ðindictment)€was€dismissed,€the€judgment€shows€that€the€Defendant€was€sentenced€to€thirty€daysÐ \¬ Ðincarceration€for€this€charge,€concurrent€with€the€theft€and€criminal€trespass€sentences.€€TheÐ H˜ Ðjudgment€indicates€that€the€Defendant€was€found€ð ð[Ô_Ôn]otÔ_Ô€[Ô_Ôg]uiltyÔ_Ôðð€of€public€intoxication.€€Thus,€theÐ 4„ Ðjudgment€should€be€amended€to€show€that€the€Defendant€did€not€receive€a€sentence€for€publicÐ  p Ðintoxication,€and€we€therefore€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€solely€for€that€purpose.€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court€are€AFFIRMED€and€the€case€is€REMANDEDÐ ä4 Ðfor€the€entry€of€an€amended€judgment€in€Count€3.Ð Ð  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð €Ð Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBERT€W.€WEDEMEYER,€JUDGE