WPC M7]-N1t-Nu RƏ Jq+ gsL.nnHGZN&TďӣW yO9ký R#Czu_ {kˡ^ TL)3MPn6c⏞93$YG dM0kx 6I{zCCU2PC MUր0bj0wZۃ5 )=(^Rx:OBƔL;<nb!'=dRVaooܭ$ld~4N÷ߣX@cQcVj r)>~)?XxC;?tPf,I$g#Y(gC5wj 6R7D:e@$q].o7gɜFwrNXLɐ6`W qhKu8f3Wa8Zt%{63B';:"abTxp…:+}W#UN % 0: UN U@g g 1u 72 ^ N wZ 4^ r  m N UF  0| EA 0C 0 0 0t 0 0 0WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 0N 1e::::::::::::::: BHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(@ Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(@ Z(Times New Roman 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)S1 h_B0:i+003|xUQ 9Z+.Courier New Regular ESTRADAFarberBledsoe CrimBallardw]hereIrickmolotov*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (O$ 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. d !USUS.,  _  XϧXXX  XXϧ8ϧXXdd8@hh#XϧXt#iXXϧINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$#XϧXi#XXϧATNASHVILLE #    @  @` STATEOFTENNESSEE#XϧX#XXϧ#rI#rԀv.MARIOESTRADA   S @@ #XϧX6#AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforMauryCounty $ t @@No.12131RobertL.Jones,Judge 5  @@*AV) ` dE<` A C  @@TTNo.M200202707CCAR3CDFiledOctober19,_2004_ <  AV) ` dE<` A      Theappellant,MarioEstrada,appealsthetrialcourt'sdenialofhismotiontoreducehissentence  pursuanttoRule35oftheTennesseeRulesofCriminalProcedure.TheStatehasfiledamotion  requestingthatthisCourtdismisstheappealoraffirmthetrialcourt'sdenialofreliefpursuantto  Rule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.Afterareviewoftherecord,thiscourtdetermines s thattheStatesmotionshouldbegranted.#X$LXXXϧx#XϧXXX$LAppellanthasfailedtopresentanadequaterecordfor \ review.Moreover,appellanthasfailedtoshowthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretionindenying E themotiontomodifyappellantssentence.#X$LXXXϧ #XϧXXX$LԀAccordingly,theState'smotionisgrantedandthe .~ judgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. g  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmedPursuanttoRule20,Rulesof 9 theCourtofCriminalAppeals  #   #X$LXXϧ?#XϧXX$LROBERTW._WEDEMEYER_#X$LXXXϧ #XϧXXX$L,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDAVIDH.WELLES  #X$LXXϧE #XϧXXX$Land,JERRYL.SMITH,JJ.,#X$LXXXϧ #XϧXXX$LԀ#X$LXXXϧ] #XϧXXX$Ljoined.  RobinFarber,fortheappellant,MarioEstrada. a  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;JenniferL.Bledsoe,AssistantAttorneyGeneral, 3"! fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. #l"  @@OO& MEMORANDUMOPINION  $> $     #X$LXXXϧ #X XXX$Lda  XXԀ#_  daa # _#XϧXր #TheAppellantwasindictedfor:onecountofaggravatedarson;eightcountsofattempted &"& firstdegreemurder;andonecountofpossessionofaprohibitedweapon.OnDecember10,2001, '"' theAppellantpledguiltyto:onecountofarson,aclassCfelony;eightcountsofaggravatedassault, (#( classCfelonies;andonecountofpossessionofaprohibitedweapon,aClassEfelony.Pursuantto |)$) apleaagreement,theAppellantreceivedthree-yearsentencesforeachClassCfelonyconviction, e*%* andaoneyearsentenceforpossessionofaprohibitedweapon.Asprovidedbytheagreement,the N+&+ arsonconvictionandthreeoftheaggravatedassaultconvictionswereorderedtorunconsecutively, 7,', _withallothersentencesbeingconcurrent.Thisresultedinaneffectivetwelve-yearsentence.#X$LXXXϧ #XϧXXX$LԀState  v.Estrada,No.M200401291CCARMCD,2004WL1462647(Tenn.Crim.App.,Nashville,June  29,2004).Theappellantappealedtothiscourtontheissueofthetrialcourtsdenialofalternative  sentencing.FollowingaremandfromtheSupremeCourt,thiscourtaffirmedthetrialcourtsdenial k ofalternativesentencing.Id. T   Inthisappeal,theappellantassertsthatthetrialcourterredindenyingaTenn.R.Crim.P. & v 35motiontoreducehissentence.Theappellantassertsthathissentenceshouldbemodifiedtosplit  _ confinement.However,theappellanthasfailedtoincludeacopyoftheRule35motioninthe  H appellaterecord.Asthestatecorrectlyargues,itistheappellantsdutytoprepareanadequate  1  recordforreview.Tenn.R.App.P.24(b).InStatev.Ballard,855S.W.2d557,56061(Tenn.    1993),theSupremeCourtdeterminedthat [w]heretherecordisincompleteanddoesnotcontain   atranscriptoftheproceedingsrelevanttoanissuepresentedforreview,orportionsoftherecord   uponwhichthepartyrelies,anappellatecourtisprecludedfromconsideringtheissue.Therecord   containsthetranscriptofthehearingontheRule35motion,butdoesnotcontainacopyoftheRule n  35motionatissue.Itisdifficultforthiscourttoadequatelyreviewthisissuewithoutacopyofthe W  motionatissue. @   Inanyevent,thecourthasreviewedthetranscriptfromthehearingontheRule35motion b andtheappellantsbriefonappeal.AsentencemaybemodifiedunderRule35oftheTennessee K RulesofCriminalProcedurewhenthetrialcourtfindsthattheoriginalsentencemustbereduced 4  intheinterestsofjustice.Statev.Irick,861S.W.2d375,376(Tenn.Crim.App.1993).Appellate  reviewofTennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure35rulingsisgovernedbyanabuseofdiscretion  standard.Id.Basedontherecordbeforethecourt,wecannotdeterminethatthetrialcourtabused  itsdiscretionindenyingthemotiontomodifythesentence.Initsoralruling,thecourtspecifically  statedthatithadnotheardanythingnewatthehearingthatwouldjustifyareductioninthe q appellantssentence.Infact,thejudgestatedthattheproofatthehearingconvincedthecourtthat Z thesentencewascorrect.Theappellantthrewmolotovcocktailsintoahomeoccupiedbyeight C people,includinganeighteenmontholdchildandapregnantteenager.Estrada,No.M200401291 ,| CCARMCD,2004WL1462647at*1,*2.Asthetrialcourtnoted,itisfortunatefortheappellant e thatnooneinsidethehomewasseriouslyinjured.Theappellanthasfailedtoshowthatthetrial N courtabuseditsdiscretionindenyingtheRule35motiontomodifythesentence.#X$LXXXϧ#XϧXXX$L  7 #X$LXXXϧS#XϧXXX$L  #X$LXXXϧ#XϧXXX$LAccordingly,theStatesmotionisgranted.Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedin " ! accordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals. #" #X$LXXXϧ#XϧXXX$L   `    XXϧ h     #XϧXW!#XXϧ p  F'"& Ѐ   `     h ____________________________________ V(#'    `     h ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE f)$(   #XϧX!##X$LXXXϧ!#XϧXXX$LXXϧ   `     h   #XϧX###X$LXXXϧw##XϧXXX$L  #X$LXXXϧC$#