WPC 46_0DaXr00Vo5ɇೝ1deKACK BrafqRe.Ne*#/_YV}/4ү~nl39j`O? l|>^ U8+T¼4]V|]^Fmxoƒ-#/3HWߔe?>f=ǘ@0p^D})l3ݤ9*6c}kĒy#sJx]gz] /vVAWSBm>Uc;e9r!\Pa.W gBn@%cT 8l/{)Jm%ϙ1GNwkJ @R*3 Jz 7b %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m UN #   s9 0DNCEEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASO 0h 0D  AP)t/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularlk.01s023|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0    Rz$      1  <  _WithregardtotheAppellantsargumentthatrefusaltosubmittoabreathalcoholtestisprotectedbytheFifth  Amendment,weareconstrainedtonotethatthisargumenthasbeenrepeatedlyrejectedbythecourtsofthisState.State q v.Frazier,914S.W.2d467,47172(Tenn.1996);Statev.Humphreys,70S.W.3d752,761(Tenn.Crim.App.2001); 2 Statev.Morgan,692S.W.2d428,430(Tenn.Crim.App.1985);Statev.Smith,681S.W.2d569,57071(Tenn.Crim. C App.1984). Soloman DUITiptonTorryMcMurtryThurman CrimTroutmanBallardEwerlingHumphreys- -(|G2z$ !.8dd8         0  < d(|37($ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|37($ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8'XXdd8@hh9^INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#9^ #Ԉ #    @  @` AssignedonBriefsSeptember17,2003 F X'X #XX'##STATEOFTENNESSEEv.WILLIAMO.EWERLINGX'X  ? @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty  9 @@No.2001T567CarolSoloman,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200202459CCAR3CDFiledNovember20,_2003_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^      XXXX'TheAppellant,WilliamO.Ewerling,appealshisconvictionbyaDavidsonCountyjuryfordriving V  undertheinfluenceofanintoxicant(DUI),firstoffense.Onappeal,Ewerlingraisesthreeissuesfor ? ourreview:(1)whetherthetrialcourtsadmissionofcertainevidenceattrialwaserror;(2)whether (x theevidencewassufficienttosupporthisconviction;and(3)whether_Ewerling_srefusaltosubmit a toabreathalcoholtestwasprotectedbyhisFifthAmendmentrightagainstselfincrimination. J Becausetherecordonappealfailstoincludeeitheratranscriptoftheevidencefrom_Ewerling_strial 3 orastatementoftheevidenceaspermittedbyTenn.R.App.P.24,wefindthattheseissuesare  procedurallydefaulted.Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.  #X'XX X##XX'#X'X Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed.     #X'/ #X'X.DavidG.Hayes,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM.TiptonandJohn Z EverettWilliams,JJ.,joined. C GregoryD.Clayton,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,WilliamO.Ewerling. e PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;MichaelMoore,SolicitorGeneral;J.RossDyer,  7  AssistantAttorneyGeneral;#XX' #X'XVictorS.Torry,III,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andScottMcMurtryand ! ! DougThurman,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheAppellee,StateofTennessee. " " #XX' #X'X @@OO& OPINION #XX' #X'X t% %  FactualBackground  G'"' #XX'R #  X'X XXXX'  OnDecember12,2001,theAppellantwasindictedbyaDavidsonCountygrandjuryfor )j$) DUIandviolationoftheimpliedconsentlaw.Followingajurytrial,theAppellantwasfoundguilty *S%* ofDUIandsentencedtoelevenmonths,twentyninedays,withallbuttendayssuspended.On *<&+ August13,2002,theAppellantfiledamotionfornewtrial,whichwasdenied. +%',   Onappeal,theAppellantraisesthreeissues:(1)whethertheadmissionintoevidenceof a ,(- lifesizedcutoutofElvira,TheMistressoftheEvening,holdingatwelvepackofbeer,foundseat -(. _beltedintothepassengerseatoftheAppellantscar,waserror;(2)whethertheconvictingevidence  wassufficient;and(3)whethertherefusaltotakeabreathtestisprotectedbytheFifthAmendment.  Therecordonappealisvoidofanyevidenceofthetrialproceedings.Thenarrationoffacts  contained intheAppellantsbriefisnotevidenceandmaynotbeconsideredassuch.Statev. k Roberts,755S.W.2d833,836(Tenn.Crim.App.1988). T   ItistheAppellantsdutyto havepreparedatranscriptofsuchpartoftheevidenceor & v proceedingsasisnecessarytoconveyafair,accurateandcompleteaccountofwhattranspiredwith  _ respecttothoseissuesthatarethebasesofappeal.Tenn.R.App.P.24(b);seealsoStatev.  H Troutman,979S.W.2d271,274(Tenn.1998).Whennoreport,recital,ortranscriptisavailable,  1  theAppellanthasadutytoprepareastatementofevidence, fromthebestavailablemeans,    includingtheAppellantsrecollection.Tenn.R.App.P.24(c).TheAppellanthasfailedtomeet   thisrequirement.Wehaverepeatedlyheldthatintheabsenceofatranscriptoftheproceedingsor   astatementofevidencerelevanttoanissuepresentedforreview,theappellatecourtisprecluded   fromconsideringthemeritsoftheissue.Statev.Ballard,855S.W.2d557,56061(Tenn.1993). n  Iftheappellaterecordisinadequate,thereviewingcourtmustpresumethatthetrialcourtruled W  correctly.Statev.Ivy,868S.W.2d724,728(Tenn.Crim.App.1993).Theobligationofpreparing @ acompleteandadequaterecordfortheissuespresentedonappealrestsupontheappealingparty. )y Tenn.R.App.P.24(b).Forthesereasons,weareunabletoaddresstheAppellantsissuesas b presentedonappeal. #  1       K     @GG% CONCLUSION    Basedupontheforegoing,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.#X'XX X #     `     h     ___________________________________ g    `     h     DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE