ÿWPCe0 …# VU:a %› 0 ¡w@¥ 4å ù 0H 0DP ” 0Jœ 0Tæ 0^: 0h˜ 0r 0|r 0†î 0t 1u 0dy BÝU*úB)$ D3MDC€ AMà 0@¼P' 3›H÷ã]Ú87%v~o'vÓí( AOÀ.Æ/ 0DÕ/ D/0 BH0˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLüÏ, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX(Üg$¡¡Ñ°ÑÑ€°ÑÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€YXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñ öE÷øUùú'dûDüUýPþPÿÓ€³†;$3|x (ø(3Mò$¤¤Ý ƒg!ÝѰÑÑ€°ÑÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€oÅXXdædæ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýà Ø àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ d< Œ 9p`(Arial% Line 7 d$$$$'ÿÿdxd))))7Border 1dd€-+Cþÿ << Gÿÿ("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò ²Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÔ€(ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€(XÔÌÌJuneÏ9,Ï1998ÌÌCecilÏW.ÏCrowsonÌAppellateÏCourtÏClerkÔ  Ôó ó Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔThere€were€additional€counts€included€in€the€indictments,€but€they€were€considered€alternativeÏcounts.€€Upon€the€entry€of€appellantððs€guilty€pleas,€those€were€nolle€prosequi.Ì Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔAppellant€was€on€probation€when€the€instant€offenses€were€committed.€€The€trial€court€revokedÏhis€probation€and€reinstated€the€original€four€(4)€year€sentence.Ì ‘Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔThis€enhancement€factor€was€added€to€the€statute€in€1995€and€applies€to€the€sentencing€ofÏany€defendant€committing€an€offense€on€or€after€July€1,€1995.€€Because€appellant€committed€the€instantÏoffenses€in€August€and€September€of€1995,€it€was€proper€for€the€trial€court€to€consider€that€factor.Ì íÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔWith€the€exception€of€one€felony,€appellant€entered€guilty€pleas€to€all€those€offenses€onÏNovember€14,€1994€in€Williamson€County.€€He€received€a€four€(4)€year€sentence,€suspended€after€theÏservice€of€280€days,€and€then€placed€on€supervised€probation€for€six€(6)€years.€€Appellant€served€theÏ280€days,€was€released,€and€committed€the€instant€offenses€within€four€(4)€months.€€As€a€result,Ïappellantððs€probation€was€revoked€and€he€was€ordered€to€serve€the€original€four€(4)€year€sentence.€€TheÏeffective€thirty€(30)€year€sentence€resulting€from€the€instant€cases€was€ordered€to€run€consecutively€toÏthat€four€(4)€year€sentence.€€See€note€2.Ì SÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔConsecutive€sentencing€was€mandatory€for€a€number€of€appellantððs€sentences€because€heÏwas€on€bail€when€the€offenses€were€committed.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim›.€P.€32(c)(3)(C).€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð40„20„111(b)€(1990).€€The€trial€court€considered€and€apparently€followed€that€rule€whenÏsentencing€the€appellant.€€However,€in€order€for€the€judgments€to€reflect€compliance€with€Rule€32,€inÏIndictment€Numbers€I„1095„293,€I„296„55,€I„296„56,€and€I„296„57,€the€forms€should€state€that€thoseÏsentences,€although€concurrent€with€one€another,€are€consecutive€to€the€sentences€for€appellantððs€pre„bail€offenses,€No.€I„1195„316.€€Because€those€sentences€are€concurrent€with€one€another,€theÏmodification€in€no€way€alters€the€length€of€appellantððs€effective€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Billy€RayÏSmithsonóó,€No.€œ01C01›„9507„CC„00229€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Nashville,€August€1,€1996);€òòState€v.€KevinÏFosteróó,€No.€œ03C01›„9510„CC„00337€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€June€27,€1996).Ì .Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€d#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€(ôÔJudge€Jones€died€on€May€1,€1998,€following€a€distinguished€career€as€a€trial€attorney€andÏas€a€respected€member€of€this€Court€since€his€appointment€in€November,€1986.€€He€will€be€greatlyÏmissed.ÌPtPtHHØ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ellan Geneva ÒÒ  ellan Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€(ÔÑ  ÑÑ € ÑÒ € ÒÒ X ÒÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ#€Xd#ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÝ  ÝÙ€€ÙßR€,.+A1-j|` , `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌà@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌóóÌà@ àòòAT€NASHVILLE€óóÌÌà@ à€€OCTOBER€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àNo.€01C01„9612„CC„00505€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppelleeà àà àà àà à)à à€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àWILLIAMSON€COUNTYÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€DONALD€P.€HARRIS,ÌJOSEPH€W.€EZELL,à àà àà à)à àJUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellant.à àà àà àà à)à à(Sentencing)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellant:óóà àà àà àà àà àòòFor€the€Appellee:óóÌÌJohn€H.€Hendersonà àà àà àà àà àJohn€Knox€WalkupÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌLarry€D.€Drolsumà àà àà àà àà àKaren€M.€Yacuzzoà àà àÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌ407„C€Main€Streetà àà àà àà àà à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌFranklin,€TN€37065à àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493ÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJoseph€D.€Baugh,€Jr.Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJeffrey€P.€BurksÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneyÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliamson€County€CourthouseÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àSuite€G„6Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àFranklin,€TN€37065ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€___________________ÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÇœ›à@ àò òOPINIONó óÌÌÌÓÓà àThe€appellant,€Joseph€W.€Ezell,€appeals€as€of€right€the€sentences€he€received€Ïin€the€Williamson€County€Circuit€Court.€€Appellant€œwas€given›€an€effective€sentence€ofÏthirty€(30)€years€as€a€Range€II€offender€for€his€guilty€pleas€to€numerous€theft€andÏburglary€offenses.€€On€appeal,€he€challenges€both€the€length€of€his€sentences€andÏthe€order€of€consecutive€sentences.€€After€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€theÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ìà àDuring€August€and€September€of€1995,€appellant€broke€into€a€number€ofÏresidences€in€Williamson€County€and€stole€personal€property€from€the€owners.€€As€aÏresult€of€that€and€other€criminal€activity,€œhe›€was€indicted€for€six€(6)€counts€ofÏaggravated€burglary;€five€(5)€counts€of€felony€theft;€three€(3)€counts€of€misdemeanorÏtheft;€three€(3)€counts€of€forgery;€and€one€(1)€count€of€evading€arrest.× ƒ/ ××  ×€€AppellantÏentered€guilty€pleas€to€a€number€of€the€indicted€offenses€with€no€agreement€as€to€theÏsentences€he€would€receive.€€Ìà àAt€a€subsequent€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€applied€certainÏenhancement€factors€and€ordered€the€following€sentences:€(1)€eleven€months€andÏtwenty€nine€days€for€three€counts€of€misdemeanor€theft;€(2)€four€years€for€counts€two,Ïthree,€and€four€of€forgery;€(3)€eleven€months€and€twenty€nine€days€for€count€five€ofÍevading€arrest;€(4)€ten€years€for€six€counts€of€aggravated€burglary;€and€(5)€eight€yearsÏfor€four€counts€of€theft€over€one€thousand€($1,000)€dollars.€€Count€five€of€evadingÏarrest€was€ordered€to€œbe€served›€œconsecutively›€to€count€one€of€misdemeanor€theft€andÏcount€two€of€forgery.€€Three€counts€of€aggravated€burglary,€each€carrying€a€ten€(10)Ïyear€sentence,€were€ordered€to€œbe€served›€œconsecutively›€to€each€other,€with€oneÏcount€also€running€œconsecutively›€to€appellantððs€probation€revocation.× ƒ0 ××  ×€€TheÏremaining€sentences€were€ordered€to€run€concurrently.€€€Ìà àWhen€a€defendant€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€aÏsentence,€we€must€conduct€a€de€novo€review€of€the€record.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„401(d)€(1990).€€The€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€accompanied€by€aÏpresumption€of€correctness€and€the€appealing€party€carries€the€burden€of€showingÏthat€the€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„401€(SentencingÏCommission€Comments).€€The€presumption,€however,€is€conditioned€upon€anÏaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÏprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,Ï169€(Tenn.€1991).€€Because€the€trial€court€in€this€case€carefully€considered€theÏprinciples€of€sentencing,€we€accord€its€judgment€the€presumption€of€correctness.€€Ìà àAppellant€first€alleges€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€the€maximumÏsentence€for€each€offense.€€He€contests€both€the€application€of€enhancement€factorsÏand€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€consider€any€mitigating€factors.€€We€find€no€error€in€theÏlength€of€appellantððs€sentences.€€Ìà àIn€enhancing€the€sentences€for€appellantððs€felony€convictions,€the€trial€courtÏapplied€four€enhancement€factors:€(1)€appellantððs€previous€history€of€criminalÏconvictions;€(8)€appellantððs€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€termsÏof€a€sentence€involving€release€into€the€community;€(13)€appellant€was€on€probationÏfor€a€prior€felony€at€the€time€the€instant€offenses€were€committed;€and€(20)€theÏappellant€was€adjudicated€to€have€committed€a€delinquent€act€as€a€juvenile€thatÏwould€constitute€a€felony€if€committed€by€an€adult.× ƒ1 ××  ×€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„114Ï(Supp.€1995).€€Finding€no€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€sentenced€appellant€to€theÏmaximum€sentence€in€the€range€for€each€offense.Ìà àAlthough€appellant€attacks€the€trial€courtððs€application€of€the€enhancementÏfactors,€he€fails€to€specifically€explain€why€they€were€applied€erroneously.€€ContraryÏto€his€claims,€our€review€reveals€that€the€œenhancers›€were€properly€applied.€€TheÏrecord€reflects€that€appellantððs€adult€criminal€record€contains€ten€(10)€prior€felonyÍconvictions€and€two€(2)€misdemeanor€convictions.× ƒ2 ××  ×€€His€juvenile€record€is€repleteÏwith€violations€beginning€at€age€twelve€(12).€€While€many€of€those€violations€were€forÏtruancy€and€unruliness,€appellant€began€committing€thefts€at€the€age€of€fifteen€(15).€ÏAs€a€juvenile,€he€was€adjudicated€delinquent€for€the€theft€of€an€œautomobile.€€SuchÏadjudication€›€would€have€constituted€a€felony€if€committed€by€an€adult.€€Based€uponÏappellantððs€record,€the€trial€court€correctly€applied€all€four€enhancement€factors.€€€Ìà àAppellantððs€arguments€primarily€relate€to€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€considerÏmitigating€factors.€€He€argues€that€the€trial€court€should€have€considered€hisÏyouthfulness€at€the€time€he€committed€the€earlier€offenses€and€that€his€conductÏneither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„113(1),€(6)€(1990).€€Appellant€was€twenty„one€(21)€years€of€age€at€the€time€ofÏsentencing.€€In€light€of€the€sheer€number€of€offenses€that€appellant€amassed€at€a€veryÏyoung€age,€and€in€such€a€short€period€of€time,€we€conclude€that€appellantððs€age€is€ofÏlittle€mitigating€value.€€We€acknowledge€that€appellantððs€conduct€did€not€threaten€orÏcause€serious€bodily€injury.€€However,€any€mitigation€to€which€appellant€was€entitledÍin€that€regard€was€severely€œundercut›€by€the€substantial€weight€the€trial€courtÏaccorded€the€enhancement€factors.ÌÌÌà àThe€weight€given€to€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€as€longÏas€its€findings€are€supported€by€the€record.€€òòState€v.€œBoggs›óó,€932€S.W.2d€467,€475„76Ï(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.óó€òòapp.óó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1996);€òòState€v.€Santiagoóó,€914€S.W.2dÏ116,€125€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€òòperm.óó€òòapp.óó€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1996);€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,Ï854€S.W.2d€116,€123,€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992).€€The€enhancement€factors€inÏappellantððs€case€were€supported€by€the€record€and€were€entitled€to€great€weight.€€Ìà àAppellant€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€should€have€considered€that€heÏassisted€authorities€in€locating€or€recovering€property,€that€he€was€remorseful,€that€heÏconfessed,€and€that€he€has€good€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð40„35„113(10),€(13)€(1990).€€However,€none€of€those€mitigating€factors€areÏsupported€by€the€factual€record€before€us.€€There€was€no€proof€that€appellantÏassisted€authorities€or€that€he€made€confessions€to€law€enforcement.€€In€reviewingÏappellantððs€testimony€at€sentencing,€we€detect€little,€if€any,€remorse.€€Ìà àMoreover,€we€believe€appellantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation€was€poor.€€WhenÏasked€if€he€would€commit€any€other€offenses€when€released,€he€said€that€he€hopedÏhe€would€not,€but€he€could€not€be€sure.€€He€further€stated€that€every€time€he€isÍreleased,€he€promises€not€to€offend€again,€but€always€does.€€The€trial€court€did€not€errÏin€declining€to€mitigate€appellantððs€sentences.Ìà àAppellant€also€contests€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€certain€sentences€be€servedÏconsecutively€to€one€another.œ× ƒ3 ××  ×›€€He€argues€that€his€classification€as€a€ð ðprofessionalÏcriminalðð€and€the€designation€of€his€criminal€record€as€extensive€were€in€error.€€òòSeeóóÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„115(1),€(2)€(1990).€€We€disagree.Ìà àIn€order€to€direct€sentences€to€be€served€consecutively€because€the€defendantÏis€a€professional€criminal,€it€must€be€shown€that€he€has€knowingly€devoted€himself€toÏcriminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„115(1)Ï(1990).€€Proof€at€the€sentencing€hearing€demonstrated€that€appellant€had€a€poorÏemployment€record,€having€been€unable€to€hold€any€position€for€more€than€a€fewÏmonths.€€He€stated€at€the€sentencing€hearing€that€he€quit€or€abandoned€the€jobs€heÏhad€in€the€past.€€He€also€said€that€the€jobs€he€could€perform€did€not€pay€well€and€thatÏstealing€was€the€fastest€way€to€make€money.€€Ìà àIn€the€presentence€report,€appellant€declined€to€list€any€previous€employment,Ïcommenting€instead,€ð ðHell,€if€I€worked,€I€wouldnððt€be€out€stealing€from€people.ðð€€HeÏalso€told€the€presentence€officer€that€he€was€ð ðtoo€lazy€to€work.ðð€€During€his€testimonyÏat€the€sentencing€hearing,€appellant€indicated€that€he€was€not€working€when€some€ofÏthe€offenses€were€committed€and€that€they€were€his€primary€source€of€income.€ÏConsidering€that€evidence,€the€trial€court€was€justified€in€finding€that€appellantððsÏcriminal€acts€were€a€major€source€of€his€livelihood.€Ìà àAlthough€only€one€statutory€factor€is€necessary€to€order€consecutiveÏsentencing,€the€trial€court€also€found€that€appellant€is€an€offender€whose€record€ofÏcriminal€activity€is€extensive.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„115(2)€(1990).€€In€only€threeÏ(3)€years€as€an€adult,€appellant€has€amassed€a€lengthy€criminal€record,€nowÏconsisting€of€twenty„nine€(29)€offenses,€only€six€(6)€of€which€are€misdemeanors.€€HisÏcriminal€record€speaks€for€itself.Ìà àOur€review€demonstrates€that€the€maximum€sentence€for€each€offense€wasÏreadily€supported€by€the€record€in€this€case.€€Furthermore,€the€trial€courtððs€order€ofÏconsecutive€sentencing€for€certain€offenses€was€in€conformity€with€the€principles€ofÏthe€1989€Sentencing€Act€and€supported€by€the€factual€record.€€We€affirm€theÏjudgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà àà à_____________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌòò€€€€€€(Not€Participating)Ù*ÙÑ , ÑÑ   ÑÑ  ÑÑ€) §u` Ñ× ƒ4 ××  ×€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌJoe€B.€Jones,€Presiding€JudgeÌÌÌÌ__________________________ÌJoe€G.€Riley,€Judge€€€œÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÑ  Ñà@ àòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌóóÌà@ àòòAT€NASHVILLE€óóÌÌà@ à€€OCTOBER€1997€SESSIONÌÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à)à àNo.€01C01„9612„CC„00505€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppelleeà àà àà àà à)à à€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àWILLIAMSON€COUNTYÌV.à àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àHON.€DONALD€P.€HARRIS,ÌJOSEPH€W.€EZELL,à àà àà à)à àJUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àAppellant.à àà àà àà à)à à(Sentencing)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à)à àò òAFFIRMEDó óÌà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àÌÌòòà@ àJUDGMENTóóÌÌÓÓà àCame€the€appellant,€Joseph€W.€Ezell,€by€and€through€counsel,€and€also€cameÏthe€Attorney€General€on€behalf€of€the€State,€and€this€case€was€heard€on€the€recordÏon€appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€of€Williamson€County;€and€in€consideration€thereof,Ïthis€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€there€is€no€reversible€error€in€the€judgment€of€the€trialÏcourt.Ìà àIn€accordance€with€the€opinion€filed€herein,€it€is,€therefore,€ordered,€andÏadjudged€by€this€Court€that€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed,€and€the€case€isÏremanded€to€the€Circuit€Court€of€Williamson€County€for€the€execution€of€the€judgmentÏof€that€court€and€for€the€collection€of€the€costs€accrued€below.Ìà àIt€appearing€that€the€appellant€is€indigent,€the€costs€of€this€appeal€will€be€paidÏby€the€State€of€Tennessee.ÌÓÓÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àWilliam€M.€Barker,€JudgeÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJoe€G.€Riley,€Judge›