ÿWPC" zZèŠ$.¨ŽŸ;F™ô«}¦c`np7¥`½Æ[û74ý”K$刀ÖÖŸEJiNhƒÓµÐ” žÐï7¯ /¨bÅ’s'oszUMÈÝ+Lýökß» wo\î ëã}î­0‹Bôä$ ¬†¥Ä úq<Åǃ·õú½ÅÁÖB˜ÙYÔn"ñµý¢ƒvú‰}Û×yʉVD½Ó{W?F¥Ütà@(A’üÒr[ؽµm¸øNÉÇÎ"=ÇðE.oÏ-R½½-~œÇÙ‹­ÆsX:ÀWu<ºéU­Òý}‘æ÷Úãø|K¹†SÙÌÏï­¡¬M™ìù'ic¥/ 2¨(h¢ú_„Õ¿D£0x\wféa*œÐÃr æ‚Ù’gþb|FÁòœÿy¡yÃOFfè‚$‘*NŸ{Œ¢¼J¶³RÃþ¤}ó#}¥H8§õFB¬ÏÞP½Øðv}Ε`5œ—"áÏÁ‘=s®„Ì]âÅÿ|§ ® Gtèïû¯¶„È qR}ÊhøýR-ãª9»-¼gÐŒt;öçþ;Ù„I^»v±õ€|UGmJ+ΧÎôÒ*´#–=õ~*º$CÛÇg“§ÌÝ÷ºgvŒ«nÝ£Lë­EÂ.õw›ÉüÔKb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÉÐ UN™ Æç Æ­ ÆsÆ9 0DÿNCüEEEAAÔCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCb 0ë B   0¤' D3Ë D-þ 0K++ ASvÆÉ 0¤ 0D3 A«w»©ŽL1Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï.5 –3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó òÝ ƒRúÙ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¬uò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„113(8)€(2003)€provides€as€a€mitigating€factor€that€ð ð[t]he€defendantÐ ° Ðwas€suffering€from€a€mental€or€physical€condition€that€significantly€reduced€the€defendantððs€culpability€for€the€offense;Ð tÄ Ðhowever,€the€voluntary€use€of€intoxicants€does€not€fall€within€the€purview€of€this€factor[.]ðð€ BowlinStricklandAdkins CrimMcKnightGraingerHaleysheetrock W]eb]ased t]he- ù-(|G2úÙ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¬uò»»Ô d(|3h$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3h$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼=»»»ÔÑ8€SµXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îè=ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼=»îîè #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€17,€2004Ð üL ÐÔ‡XSµX»¼=ÔÌò òÔ#†¼=»XXSµ #Ôà @ àTHOMAS€J.€FAULKNER,€JR.òòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóóÔ‡XSµX»¼=Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Grainger€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€7403€€€€€€O.€Duane€Ô_ÔSloneÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2004„00813„CCA„R3„PC€„€Filed€October€12,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ԀР¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡ XSµXXXSµÔThe€Appellant,€Thomas€Jefferson€Faulkner,€Jr.,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€judgment€of€the€GraingerÐ xÈ  ÐCounty€Circuit€Court€denying€his€petition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€Faulkner€argues€that€he€wasÐ d´ Ðdenied€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel€at€sentencing€due€to€trial€counselððs€failure€to€introduceÐ P  Ðmitigating€evidence.€€After€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€denial€of€post„conviction€relief.€€Ô#†XSµXX XSµó#ÔÔ#†¼=»XXSµ©#ÔÔ‡XSµX»¼=ÔÐ <Œ ÐÓçÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ d ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼=»àXSµ)#ÔÔ‡XSµX.¼=ÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.€óóandÐ ì< ÐòòAlan€E.€Glennóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð Ø( ÐÌRobert€M.€Ô_ÔBurtsÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔRutledgeÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Thomas€J.€Faulkner,€Jr.€Ð ° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Brent€C.Ð ˆØ ÐCherry,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€and€Charles€L.€Murphy,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€forÐ tÄ Ðthe€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð `° ÐÌÔ#†¼=»XXSµö#ÔÔ‡XSµX»¼=ÔÓÇÓà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼=»XXSµî #ÔÔ‡XSµX»¼=ÔÐ 8!ˆ  ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ #`" ÐÌÔ‡ XSµXXXSµÔÓ  Óà  àIn€1999,€Faulkner€was€convicted€of€four€counts€of€attempted€first€degree€murder€and€oneÐ è$8 $ Ðcount€of€theft€over€$1,000,€and€he€received€an€effective€seventy„three„year€sentence.€€TheÐ Ô%$!% ÐAppellantððs€convictions€and€sentence€were€affirmed€on€direct€appeal.€€òòSee€State€v.€Thomas€J.Ð À&"& ÐFaulkner,€Jr.óó,€No.€E2000„00309„CCA„R3„CD€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€Apr.€17,€2001),Ð ¬'ü"' Ðòòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€2001).€€The€relevant€facts,€as€summarized€by€this€court€in€theÐ ˜(è#( ÐAppellantððs€direct€appeal,€reflect€that:Ð „)Ô$) ÐÌà8  àà ` àIn€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€the€evidence€at€trial€demonstrated€thatÐ \+¬&+ ÐAllison€Christine€ð ðChrisðð€Hurt€wanted€her€husbandððs€ex„wife,€Judy€Hurt,€killed€soÐ H,˜', Ðthat€she€could€live€in€the€home€occupied€by€Judy€Hurt.€€Chris€Hurt€promisedÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_ÔFaulkner€and€the€Ogles€the€pick€of€the€personal€property€at€the€Judy€Hurt€residenceÐ ° Ðif€they€would€kill€Judy€Hurt.МìÐ Ð  ÐÌà  à.€.€.€.Ð tÄ Ðà  àÌà8  àà ` àJudy€Hurt€was€home€that€evening€with€her€daughter,€Angel€Olsen,€her€son„in„Ð L œ Ðlaw,€Rick€Olsen,€and€her€granddaughter,€Haley€Olsen.€€Rick€Olsen€was€on€the€livingÐ 8 ˆ Ðroom€sofa€when€Ms.€Hurt€answered€the€door€to€Ted€and€Ronnie€Ogle.Ð $ t ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àThat€night,€the€defendants€lay€in€wait€outside€the€Hurt€home€until€all€of€theÐ ü L  Ðlights€were€out.€€They€cut€the€phone€lines€to€the€home.€€Sometime€betweenÐ è 8  Ðapproximately€midnight€and€2:00€a.m.,€Faulkner,€Ted€Ogle€and€Terry€Ogle€openedÐ Ô$  Ðfire€on€the€first€floor€of€the€home,€where€all€four€of€the€victims€were€asleep.€€Two„Ð À  Ðyear„old€Haley€Olsen€suffered€two€bullet€wounds.€€One€of€the€bullets€lodged€in€herÐ ¬ü  Ðpelvic€area€and€could€not€be€removed€by€medical€personnel.€€Judy€Hurt€sustained€aÐ ˜è  Ðgunshot€wound€to€the€elbow.€€The€hail€of€gunfire€so€badly€damaged€the€sheetrockÐ „Ô  Ðwalls€that€the€dust€from€loose€sheetrock€made€ð ðsmokeðð€throughout€the€house.€€TheÐ pÀ Ðbullets€penetrated€a€hot€water€heater,€and€hot€water€sprayed€into€the€home.Ð \¬ ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àImmediately€after€this€assault,€Faulkner,€Ted€and€Terry€Ogle€fled€the€sceneÐ 4„ Ðin€Rick€Olsenððs€truck.€Once€the€defendants€were€all€gone,€the€victims€went€toÐ  p ÐJefferson€City€Hospital,€where€Judy€Hurt€and€Haley€Olsen€were€treated€for€theirÐ  \ Ðinjuries.€€Haley€Olsen€had€to€be€transported€to€University€of€Tennessee€MedicalÐ øH ÐCenter€in€Knoxville€due€to€the€extent€of€her€injuries.Ð ä4 ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àFaulkner€acknowledged€in€a€statement€given€to€law€enforcement,€ð ðOur€planÐ ¼  Ðwas€to€kill€everyone€in€the€house€and€steal€the€stuff€in€it.€€I€was€supposed€to€shoot€inÐ ¨ø Ða€window€with€Terry€and€the€people€were€going€to€be€shot€by€Ted€as€they€ran€to€theÐ ”ä Ðfront€of€the€house.ðð€€He€also€admitted€shooting€into€the€house€and€taking€the€truck.Ð €Ð ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àThe€defendantððs€version€of€events€at€trial€was€that€he€was€a€minimal€playerÐ X ¨ Ðin€the€crimes.€€He€claimed€that€he€had€no€recollection€whether€Chris€Hurt€asked€himÐ D!” Ðto€kill€Judy€Hurt.€€He€said€his€only€intent€in€going€to€Judy€Hurtððs€home€was€to€stealÐ 0"€  Ðproperty.€€He€specifically€disavowed€any€intent€to€injure€anyone,€and€he€claimed€thatÐ #l! Ðthere€were€many€facts€in€his€pretrial€statement€that€were€untrue.€€Faulkner€testifiedÐ $X" Ðthat€he€was€extremely€intoxicated€on€the€night€of€the€crimes€and€had€no€memory€ofÐ ô$D # Ðportions€of€the€evening€while€he€was€at€the€Hurt€residence.Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  ÐÌòòId.€óóÐ ¸'#& Ðà8  àà ` àÐ Ð Ð  Ðà  àOn€September€9,€2002,€the€Appellant€filed€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€wherein€heÐ )à$( Ðâ âargued€that€he€received€the€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel.€€A€hearing€was€held€on€September€22,Ð |*Ì%) Ð2003,€at€which€the€Appellant€and€trial€counsel€testified.€€The€post„conviction€court€denied€relief€byÐ ° Ðwritten€order€on€April€22,€2004.€€This€timely€appeal€followed.Ð œì Ðâ âÌò òÓ  ÓANALYSISó óÐ tÄ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€Appellant€contends€that€ð ðtrial€counsel€was€ineffective€because€the€wrong€psychiatricÐ L œ Ðreport€was€submitted€at€his€sentencing€and€included€in€the€appellate€record.ðð€€The€following€factsÐ 8 ˆ Ðare€pertinent€to€the€issue€as€presented€by€the€Appellant.€€Dr.€Russell€D.€McKnight€performed€aÐ $ t Ðpsychiatric€evaluation€of€the€Appellant€prior€to€trial€and€prepared€a€report€based€upon€hisÐ  ` Ðobservations€of€the€Appellant.€€In€the€report,€Dr.€McKnight€stated,€Ð ü L  ÐÌà8  àà ` àIn€my€opinion€[the€Appellant]€at€the€time€of€the€attempted€break„in€for€whichÐ Ô$  Ðhe€was€arrested€was€under€the€influence€of€multiple€drugs€including€marijuana,Ð À  ÐValium€and€cocaine.€€I€think€it€is€probable€that€he€was€heavily€intoxicated€at€the€timeÐ ¬ü  Ðand€that€he€has€impaired€memories€of€these€events.€€Ð˜è Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àAt€the€post„conviction€hearing,€trial€counsel€testified€that€the€defense€theory€was,€ð ð[W]eÐ pÀ Ðproceeded€on€the€fact€that€[the€Appellant]€was€intoxicated€and€therefore€couldnððt€form€specific€intentÐ \¬ Ðas€far€as€attempting€to€kill€someone.ðð€€Trial€counsel€further€testified,€Ð H˜ ÐÌà8  àà ` àAt€the€trial€I€didnððt€feel€like€what€Dr.€McKnight€said€rose€to€the€point€of€beingÐ  p Ða€defense,€at€that€point.€€My€intention€was,€certainly,€to€use€that€at€the€sentencingÐ  \ Ðwithout€having€to€call€Dr.€McKnight.€.€.€.€€ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à.€.€.€€But€it€was€my€intention,€while€I€didnððt€think€it€made€a€defense,€I€thoughtÐ Ð  Ðit€mitigated,€particularly€at€his€young€age,€I€think€this€happened€like€six€or€seven€daysÐ ¼  Ðafter€he€was€eighteen,€with€that€certainly€should€have€had€some€influence€on€the€juryÐ ¨ø Ðand€perhaps€get€him€a€lesser€sentence.ДäÐ Ð  ÐÌAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€a€report€was€introduced€into€evidence.€€In€support€of€mitigation,€trialÐ l¼ Ðcounsel€argued€that:Ð X ¨ ÐÌà8  àà ` àAlso,€in€looking€at€the€report€from€Dr.€McKnight€„€„€we€did€file€someÐ 0"€  Ðmitigating€factors.€€Ð#l!Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð ô$D # ÐÌà8  àà ` àI€submit€to€the€Court€in€looking€at€the€report€of€Dr.€McKnight€and€in€lookingÐ Ì&"% Ðat€this€Pre„Sentence€Report€he€deserves€to€have€more€feeling€from€the€Court€I€thinkÐ ¸'#& Ðas€far€as€his€age€and€his€situation€at€that€point€in€time;€as€far€as€his€background,€too.€Ð¤(ô#'Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ )à$( ÐFollowing€the€conclusion€of€proof,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€seventy„three„year€sentence.€€InÐ ° Ðpronouncing€the€Appellantððs€sentence,€the€trial€court€stated€that€such€a€sentence€was€warrantedÐ œì Ðð ð[b]ased€upon€the€evidence€in€this€case,€the€Pre„Sentence€Investigation.ðð€€Ð ˆØ Ðâ âÌà  àThe€Appellant€appealed€his€sentence€to€this€court,€arguing€that€his€sentence€was€excessive.€Ð `° ÐHowever,€Dr.€McKnightððs€report€was€not€included€in€the€record€on€appeal.€€This€court€noted,€€Ð L œ ÐÌà8  àà ` àIn€support€of€factor€(8),׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€mental€or€physical€condition€that€significantlyÐ $ t Ðreduced€culpability€for€the€offense,€it€appears€that€the€defendant€intended€to€offer€aÐ  ` Ðpsychiatric€report€of€Russell€D.€McKnight,€M.D.€€The€only€report€of€Dr.€McKnightÐ ü L  Ðin€the€appellate€record,€however,€pertains€to€an€individual€named€Randy€Bowlin,€whoÐ è 8  Ðappears€to€be€another€client€of€the€defendant€Faulknerððs€attorney.€€Nothing€in€Dr.Ð Ô$  ÐMcKnightððs€report€relative€to€Randy€Bowlin€has€any€bearing€on€the€defendantÐ À  ÐFaulknerððs€mental€or€physical€condition.€€As€such,€the€trial€court€committed€no€errorÐ ¬ü  Ðin€declining€to€apply€mitigating€factor€(8).Иè Ð Ð  ÐÌòòId.€óó€(footnotes€omitted).€€Moreover,€the€State€concedes€that€the€trial€court€did€not€have€the€correctÐ pÀ Ðreport€at€the€sentencing€hearing.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àTo€succeed€on€a€challenge€of€ineffective€assistance€of€counsel,€the€Appellant€bears€the€burdenÐ 4„ Ðof€establishing€the€allegations€set€forth€in€his€petition€by€clear€and€convincing€evidence.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ  p ÐAnn.€ðð€40„30„110(f)€(2003).€€The€Appellant€must€demonstrate€that€counselððs€representation€fellÐ  \ Ðbelow€the€range€of€competence€demanded€of€attorneys€in€criminal€cases.€€òòBaxter€v.€Roseóó,€523€S.W.2dÐ øH Ð930,€936€(Tenn.€1975).€€Under€òòStrickland€v.€Washingtonóó,€466€U.S.€668,€687,€104€S.€Ct.€2052,€2064€Ð ä4 Ð(1984),€the€Appellant€must€establish€(1)€deficient€performance€and€(2)€prejudice€resulting€from€theÐ Ð  Ðdeficiency.€€The€Appellant€is€not€entitled€to€the€benefit€of€hindsight,€may€not€second„guess€aÐ ¼  Ðreasonably€based€trial€strategy,€and€cannot€criticize€a€sound,€but€unsuccessful,€tactical€decision€madeÐ ¨ø Ðduring€the€course€of€the€proceedings.€€òòAdkins€v.€Stateóó,€911€S.W.2d€334,€347€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ”ä Ð1994).€€This€deference€to€the€tactical€decisions€of€trial€counsel€is€dependant€upon€a€showing€that€theÐ €Ð Ðdecisions€were€made€after€adequate€preparation.€€òòCooper€v.€Stateóó,€847€S.W.2d€521,€528€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð l¼ ÐApp.€1992).Ð X ¨ ÐÐ Ðà  àIt€is€unnecessary€for€a€court€to€address€deficiency€and€prejudice€in€any€particular€order€orÐ 0"€  Ðeven€to€address€both,€if€the€petitioner€makes€an€insufficient€showing€on€either.€€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.Ð #l! Ðat€697,€104€S.€Ct.€at€2069.€€In€order€to€establish€prejudice,€the€Appellant€must€establish€a€ð ðreasonableÐ $X" Ðprobability€that,€but€for€counselððs€unprofessional€errors,€the€result€of€the€proceeding€would€have€beenÐ ô$D # Ðdifferent.€A€reasonable€probability€is€a€probability€sufficient€to€undermine€confidence€in€theÐ à%0!$ Ðoutcome.ðð€€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€463€(Tenn.€1999)€(quoting€òòStricklandóó,€466€U.S.€at€694,€104Ð Ì&"% ÐS.€Ct.€at€2068).€Ð ¸'#& ÐÐ Ðà  àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€Appellant€testified€about€his€problems€with€drugs€and€alcohol,Ð œì Ðand€trial€counsel€referred€to€the€information€contained€in€Dr.€McKnightððs€report€during€his€argumentÐ ˆØ Ðin€support€of€mitigation.€€Moreover,€the€Appellant,€his€aunt,€and€his€cousin€testified€at€trialÐ tÄ Ðconcerning€his€intoxication€on€the€night€the€crimes€were€committed.€€Although€the€trial€court€mayÐ `° Ðnot€have€received€the€correct€report,€the€court€was€aware€of€the€information€contained€in€Dr.Ð L œ ÐMcKnightððs€report€through€the€testimony€of€witnesses€and€the€argument€presented€by€trial€counsel.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐMost€importantly,€as€noted€by€this€court€on€direct€appeal,€ð ðTo€the€extent€that€the€defendant€may€haveÐ $ t Ðbeen€relying€on€trial€evidence€that€he€was€intoxicated€at€the€time€of€the€offense,€factor€(8)€specificallyÐ  ` Ðexcludes€mitigation€on€this€basis.ðð€€òòThomas€J.€Faulkner,€Jr.óó,€No.€E2000„00309„CCA„R3„CD€(citingÐ ü L  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(8)€(2003)).€€Thus,€the€Appellantððs€argument€that€ð ðthe€correct€reportÐ è 8  Ðwould€have€helped€in€describing€the€degree€and€effect€of€[his]€intoxicationðð€at€the€time€of€the€crimeÐ Ô$  Ðis€misplaced,€as€our€legislature€has€specifically€removed€voluntary€intoxication€as€a€relevantÐ À  Ðmitigator€for€sentencing€purposes€under€factor€(8).€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€that€no€prejudiceÐ ¬ü  Ðresulted€from€the€alleged€deficiency.€€This€claim€is€without€merit.Ð ˜è  ÐÌÓ  Óò òCONCLUSIONó óÐ pÀ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€conclude€that€the€post„conviction€court€did€not€err€in€rulingÐ H˜ Ðthat€the€Appellant€received€the€effective€assistance€of€counsel.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€theÐ 4„ ÐGrainger€County€Circuit€Court€is€affirmed.Ð  p ÐÌÐ ÐÔ#†XSµXX XSµÂ #ÔÔ#†¼=»XXSµ_ #ÔòòóóÔ€XSµX»¼=Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ä4 Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE