ÿWPC—# P– IS8àɉYgIÞëÙÕ' 9Qø‘°bÛjmÕDV7½µwBß ³Í@s0è…¡Ó½ÚT›W§²qXËQ@"×9Ј,˜pr“×j1„·PßÒåæ¡Zí;Vôí8î6Ó'¾§Ý$c5ÂM;õÂtaOÔ~b %\Nb 0ˆdUNì¶: zð Òj z< Ò¶ ^ ˆw”4˜¬Æ»ÆÆGÆ ÓNÕ m×#ÁîE¯ 0D±±ˆõŠ}EU@LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLbŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒ 0ë”””” B 0¤œ D3@ D-s 0K    ASë Æ>! 0¤" 0D¨" A«ì"»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular ¬Ý ƒR8A$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€An€òòÔ_ÔAlfordÔ_Ôóó€plea,€otherwise€known€as€a€best€interest€guilty€plea,€may€be€entered€when€ð ð[Ô_Ôa]nÔ_Ô€individual€accusedÐ ° Ðof€a€crime€.€.€.€voluntarily,€knowingly,€and€understandingly€Ô_Ôconsent[sÔ_Ô]€to€the€imposition€of€a€prison€sentence€evenÐ tÄ Ð[though]€he€is€unwilling€or€unable€to€admit€his€participation€in€the€acts€constituting€the€crime.ðð€òòNorth€Carolina€v.€Ô_ÔAlfordÔ_Ôóó,Ð 8ˆ Ð400€U.S.€25,€37,€91€S.€Ct.€160,€167€(1970);€òòÔ‡ôµòòôµÔsee€alsoÔ#†ôµòòôµÛ#Ôóó€òòÔ_ÔDortchÔ_Ô€v.€Stateóó,€705€S.W.2d€687,€689€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1985).˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptšH-s 3j1,¸„§<`§3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ~Ý ƒR8A$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€At€the€probation€revocation€hearing,€the€appellant€conceded€that€he€pled€guilty€to€the€Ô_ÔunderlyingÔ_Ô€offenseÐ ° Ðbecause€he€touched€the€breast€of€a€five„year„old€child€and€placed€his€fingers€inside€her€vagina. Ò  0 ' ib014r200ib014r20 .    ;Ý ƒR8A$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€made€the€following€recommendations€to€be€implemented€if€the€appellant€remained€on€probation:Ð ° Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1.€€NO€contact€with€his€son€without€his€wifeððs€visual€supervision.ÐtÄ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à2.€€NO€contact€with€his€sister„in„law€under€any€circumstances.Ð8ˆ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à3.€€NO€contact€with€anyone€under€the€age€of€18€without€proper€supervision.ÐüL` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à4.€€NO€alcohol€and€he€be€mandated€to€go€to€AA€one€time€per€week.ÐÀ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à5.€€NO€viewing€of€X„rated€movies€or€other€pornographic€material.ЄÔ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à6.€€He€should€be€mandated€to€include€his€wife€in€his€treatment€with€me€or€with€€€€€Ð H ˜ Ѐ€€€€another€certified€sex€offender€treatment€person.Ð \` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à7.€€He€should€be€mandated€to€pass€a€polygraph€every€three€months€over€the€next€€Ð Ð  Ѐ€€€year.Д ä ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à8.€€He€should€be€mandated€to€obtain€a€full€and€complete€psychosexual€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_ԀРX ¨  Ѐ€€€€evaluation€as€recommended€by€the€Tennessee€State€[Ô_ÔS]exÔ_Ô€Offender€Board.(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G28A$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»Ô d(|3¿c$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3¿c$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€M»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼M»»»ÔÑ8€VaXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î<MÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼M»îî< #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àMay€21,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XVaX»¼MÔÌò òÔ#†¼M»XXVa#ÔòòSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEóó€v.€òòóóSTEVEN€D.€FISHÔ‡XVaX»¼MÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€C„11246€€€€€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2001„02200„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐOctober€8,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓAs€a€result€of€his€guilty€plea€to€one€count€of€attempted€rape€of€a€child,€the€appellant,€Steven€D.€Fish,Ð xÈ  Ðwas€sentenced€to€eight€years€incarceration€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction,€with€thirtyÐ d´ Ðdays€to€be€served€in€confinement€and€the€balance€served€on€supervised€probation.€€After€the€appellantÐ P  Ðbegan€serving€his€probationary€sentence,€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued.€€Subsequent€to€Ð <Œ Ða€probation€revocation€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€appellant€had€violated€the€terms€of€hisÐ (x Ðprobation€and€ordered€the€appellant€to€serve€the€remainder€of€his€sentence€in€confinement.€€OnÐ d Ðappeal,€the€appellant€alleges€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€revoking€his€probation.€€Upon€review€of€theÐ P Ðrecord€and€the€partiesðð€briefs,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð ì< ÐÓÜÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼M»àXVaˆ#ÔÔ‡XVaX.¼MÔNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ôóó€and€òòÐ œì ÐJohn€Everett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌEugene€B.€Dixon€(on€appeal)€and€Jerry€G.€Cunningham€(at€trial),€Ô_ÔMaryvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€theÐ `° Ðappellant,€Steven€D.€Fish.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Peter€M.€Ô_ÔCoughlanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð $"t! ÐMike€Flynn,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Kirk€Andrews€and€Edward€P.€Bailey,€Jr.,€AssistantÐ #`" ÐDistrict€Attorneys€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÓ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼M»XXVaJ #ÔÔ‡XVaX»¼MÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼M»XXVa® #ÔÔ‡XVaX»¼MÔÓ  Óà@ìàòòò òI.€€Factual€Backgroundó óóóÔ#†¼M»XXVa #ÔÔ€XVaX»¼MԈР¬'ü"' Ðà  àà ` àOn€August€31,€1998,€the€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ô€County€Grand€Jury€indicted€the€appellant€for€theÐ ˜(è#( Ðaggravated€sexual€battery€of€a€victim€under€thirteen€years€of€age.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„Ð „)Ô$) Ðâ â504(a)(4)€(1997).€€Subsequently,€the€appellant€entered€an€òòÔ_ÔAlfordÔ_Ôóó€plea€of€guilty€to€attempted€rape€ofÐ p*À%*ýà Ða€child.Ô_Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„12„101,€„13„522€(1997).€€The€plea€agreement€stipulated€that€theÐ ° Ðâ âappellant€would€receive€an€eight€year€sentence,€thirty€days€of€which€would€be€served€in€confinementÐ œì Ðwith€the€balance€served€on€supervised€probation.Ô_Ô׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€June€1,€2001,€the€appellantððs€probation€officer,€Carolyn€Brewer,€reported€to€theÐ `° Ðcourt€that€the€appellant€had€failed€to€comply€the€conditions€of€his€probation€because€he€violated€Ð L œ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àRule€#1€in€that€he€has€admittedly€driven€a€motor€vehicle€while€underÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€influence€of€alcohol[;]€Rule€#5€in€that€he€left€the€State€ofÐ $ t ÐTennessee€without€the€permission€of€his€probation€officer[;]€#7€in€thatÐ  ` Ðhe€admittedly€has€used€Ô_Ôal[co]holicÔ_Ô€beverages€while€on€probation[;Ð ü L  Ðand]€Rule€#9€in€that€he€has€not€followed€the€sex€offender€directives.€Ðè 8 ` x` x ÐBased€upon€this€information,€the€trial€court€issued€a€probation€violation€warrant.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€court€held€a€probation€violation€hearing€on€August€13,€2001.€€WilliamÐ ¬ü  ÐÔ_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô,€a€licensed€clinical€social€worker€supervising€the€appellantððs€sex€offender€treatment,€was€theÐ ˜è  Ðfirst€witness.€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€asserted€that,€based€upon€his€education€and€training,€he€would€classify€theÐ „Ô  Ðappellant€as€a€pedophile.€€Thus,€the€appellant€was€in€need€of€treatment.€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€explained€that€sexÐ pÀ Ðoffender€treatment€isÐ \¬ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àsupervision€and€monitoring€and€treatment€all€combined€into€oneÐ H˜ Ðpackage.€€A€part€of€treatment€is€polygraph€exams,€part€of€treatmentÐ 4„ Ðis€regular€group€treatment,€psychotherapy,€learning€different€skills€onÐ  p Ðhow€to€prevent€further€sexual€problems.Ð \` x` x ÐHe€further€asserted€that€sex€offender€treatment€is€ð ða€lifelong€process.€€Itððs€not€a€short„term€treatmentÐ øH Ðprocess.ðð€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€stated€that€it€had€recently€become€necessary€to€include€the€appellantððs€wife,Ð ä4 ÐMichelle€Fish,€in€the€appellantððs€treatment.€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€opined€that€the€appellant€was€doing€well€ð ðon€theÐ Ð  Ðintellectual€sideðð€of€treatment,€but€noted€three€areas€in€which€the€appellant€was€not€progressing.€Ð ¼  ÐSpecifically,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€maintained€that€the€appellant€ð ðcontinued€to€drink€alcohol,€he€continued€to€watchÐ ¨ø ÐX„rated€movies€with€his€wife,€even€though€he€had€been€warned,€and€he€continued€to€masturbate€toÐ ”ä Ðfantasies€regarding€his€[sixteen„year„old]€sister„in„law.ðð€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€explained€that€each€of€theseÐ €Ð Ðviolations€could€affect€the€appellantððs€control€and€cause€a€relapse.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àà ` àÔ_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€also€related€an€incident€that€the€appellant€reported€involving€the€appellantððsÐ D!” Ðthree„year„old€son.€€According€to€the€appellant,€when€his€son€gave€the€appellant€a€surprise€kiss€onÐ 0"€  Ðthe€back€of€the€neck,€the€appellant€ð ðgot€a€half€erection.ðð€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€related€that,€following€theÐ #l! Ðâ âappellantððs€confession,€the€appellant€ð ðwas€Ô_ÔpolygraphedÔ_Ô.ðð€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€also€maintained€that€the€appellantððsÐ $X" Ðadmission€of€the€incident€was€a€positive€factor€because€the€appellant€was€asking€for€help€instead€ofÐ ° Ðacting€out€the€incident.Ð œì Ðâ â€Ìà  àà ` àRegarding€the€problem€areas€in€the€appellantððs€treatment,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€indicated€that,€evenÐ tÄ Ðthough€the€appellant€knew€that€he€was€not€supposed€to€drink€alcoholic€beverages,€the€appellantÐ `° Ðcontinued€to€consume€alcohol.€€Furthermore,€a€psychological€test€revealed€that€the€appellantÐ L œ Ðpossessed€a€ð ðhigh€probability€for€a€substance€abuse€problem.ðð€€As€a€€result,€the€appellantððs€probationÐ 8 ˆ Ðofficer€mandated€the€appellantððs€attendance€at€Alcoholics€Anonymous€(A.A.)€meetings.€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àà ` àÔ_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€also€testified€that€the€X„rated€videos€were€purchased€prior€to€the€appellantððsÐ ü L  Ðmarriage€and€the€video€tapes€had€been€surrendered€to€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô.€€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€testified€that,€according€to€aÐ è 8  Ðpolygraph€taken€by€the€appellant€on€Ô_ÔAprilÔ_Ô€24òòóó,€2001,€the€appellant€was€truthful€when€he€related€thatÐ Ô$  Ðhe€had€not€had€recent€sexual€contact€with€anyone€under€the€age€of€eighteen.€€Moreover,€on€cross„Ð À  Ðexamination,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€responded€that€the€appellant€ð ðdid€fineðð€on€the€last€polygraph€and€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_ÔÐ ¬ü  Ðrecommended€that,€as€part€of€the€appellantððs€treatment,€he€be€tested€every€three€months€rather€thanÐ ˜è  Ðevery€six€months.€€Nevertheless,€as€a€precaution,€Michelle€Fish€signed€a€supervisorððs€agreementÐ „Ô  Ðpledging€to€monitor€the€appellantððs€behavior,€particularly€around€their€son.€€In€sum,€based€upon€theÐ pÀ Ðinformation€at€his€disposal,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€concluded€that€the€appellant€could€be€managed€in€the€communityÐ \¬ Ðwhile€on€supervised€probation.€€However,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€indicated€that€ð ðI€have€made€it,€I€think,€perfectlyÐ H˜ Ðclear€to€Mr.€Fish€and€to€Ms.€Brewer€that€with€any€violation€of€any€one€of€the€eight€recommendationsÐ 4„ Ðthat€Iððve€made,€then€he€needs€to€just€consider€going€to€jail.ððÔ_Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€As€an€aside,€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€advised€the€courtÐ  p Ðthat€the€appellant€had€not€undergone€a€psychosexual€evaluation€prior€to€his€original€sentencing€toÐ  \ Ðdetermine€the€appellantððs€risk€to€Ô_ÔreoffendÔ_Ô€and€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€recommended€that€the€court€authorize€suchÐ øH Ðtesting.€€Furthermore,€in€assessing€the€appellant€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€noted€that€the€appellant€was€a€hard€workerÐ ä4 Ðwho€supported€his€family€and€was€liked€by€his€employer.€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àCarolyn€Brewer,€the€appellantððs€probation€officer,€testified€that€the€appellant€paid€hisÐ ¨ø Ðfees€and€court€costs,€kept€her€informed,€and€notified€her€of€changes€in€residence€and€employment.€Ð ”ä ÐAdditionally,€he€passed€his€drug€tests€and€completed€the€Tennessee€Bureau€of€Investigation€(Ô_ÔTBIÔ_Ô)Ð €Ð Ðreports.€€However,€Brewer€testified€that€the€appellant€had€left€the€state€without€permission.€€BrewerÐ l¼ Ðstated€that€ð ð[Ô_Ôw]henÔ_Ô€I€called€asking€about€it,€he€did€admit€that€he€had€gone€[out€of€state€withoutÐ X ¨ Ðpermission].ðð€€She€maintained€that€the€appellant€attended€and€participated€in€sex€offenderÐ D!” Ðcounseling,€although€he€missed€approximately€three€meetings.€€Brewer€further€testified€that€theÐ ° Ðappellant€had€admitted€that,€since€being€placed€on€probation,€he€had€used€alcohol€and€had€driven€aÐ œì Ðvehicle€while€under€the€influence.€€She€also€informed€the€court€that€the€appellant€had€owned€andÐ ˆØ Ðwatched€X„rated€videos€and€had€contact€with€minors,€particularly€his€sister„in„law.€€The€appellantÐ tÄ Ðalso€confessed€to€ð ðaccidentally€brushing€up€againstðð€two€minor€females.€€Additionally,€BrewerÐ `° ÐÔ_ÔrelatedÔ_Ô€that€the€appellantððs€use€of€alcohol€seemed€to€be€increasing;€however,€the€appellant€claimedÐ L œ Ðhe€was€attending€A.A.€meetings.€€Nonetheless,€Brewer€related€that€the€probation€committeeÐ 8 ˆ Ðrecommended€that€the€appellant€remain€on€probation€with€the€implementation€of€ð ðtighten„upÐ $ t Ðcriteria,ðð€such€as€the€regulations€suggested€by€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àà ` àBased€upon€this€evidence,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation.€€However,Ð è 8  Ðthe€court€agreed€to€hold€another€probation€hearing€after€the€appellant€submitted€to€the€psychosexualÐ Ô$  Ðevaluation€he€should€have€undergone€prior€to€his€original€sentencing.€€At€the€subsequent€hearing€onÐ À  ÐSeptember€6,€2001,€Brewer€basically€repeated€her€testimony€from€the€prior€hearing.€€Additionally,Ð ¬ü  Ðshe€noted€that€the€appellant€ð ðhas€not€at€any€time€thought€he€had€a€problem€with€alcohol,ðð€explainingÐ ˜è  Ðthat€the€appellant€ð ðhas€minimized€it.ðð€€Moreover,€Brewer€acknowledged€that€she€had€recently€learnedÐ „Ô  Ðthat,€because€of€the€appellantððs€drinking,€the€appellant€and€his€wife€had€separated€for€three€monthsÐ pÀ Ðduring€his€probationary€period.€€However,€the€appellant€failed€to€disclose€this€information€to€Brewer.€Ð \¬ ÐAccordingly,€Brewer€concluded€that€the€appellant€had€not€been€honest€about€changes€in€his€familyÐ H˜ Ðlife.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellantððs€mother,€Arlene€Fish,€testified€that€the€appellant€had€a€goodÐ  \ Ðrelationship€with€his€son.€€She€also€maintained€that€she€would€assist€the€appellantððs€wife€inÐ øH Ðsupervising€the€appellantððs€behavior.€€Arlene€Fish€conceded€that€she€had€been€unaware€of€theÐ ä4 Ðappellantððs€alcohol€problem.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€testified€on€his€own€behalf.€€He€related€that,€at€the€time€of€the€hearing,Ð ¨ø Ðhis€wife€was€pregnant€with€their€second€child.€€He€stated€that€he€had€attended€three€A.A.€meetingsÐ ”ä Ðsince€the€previous€probation€revocation€hearing.€€He€asked€the€court€to€forgive€his€ð ðoversightðð€inÐ €Ð Ðcontinuing€to€drink€while€on€probation.€€He€averred€that€he€ð ðusedðð€alcohol€but€did€not€ð ðabuseðð€it;Ð l¼ Ðhowever,€he€admitted€that€becoming€intoxicated€would€constitute€an€abuse€of€alcohol.€€He€also€Ð X ¨ Ðconceded€that€he€had€been€intoxicated€while€on€probation.€€The€appellant€opined€that€the€A.A.Ð D!” Ðmeetings€had€been€helpful,€but,€Ô_Ôð ð[a]tÔ_Ô€this€point,ðð€he€was€unsure€if€he€was€an€alcoholic.€€€Ð 0"€  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€also€confessed€that€he€continued€to€have€Ô_ÔmasturbatoryÔ_Ô€fantasies€aboutÐ $X" Ðhis€sixteen„year„old€sister„in„law.€€Furthermore,€regarding€the€first€incident€of€ð ðaccidentally€brushingÐ ô$D # Ðup€againstðð€a€minor€female,€the€appellant€related€that€he€was€bent€over€tying€his€shoe€when€his€sister„Ð à%0!$ Ðin„law€asked€him€to€smell€the€perfume€she€received€for€Christmas.€€He€explained€that,€when€heÐ Ì&"% Ðraised€his€head,€his€face€ð ðsmacked€right€into€her€breast.ðð€€The€second€incident€occurred€when€a€minorÐ ¸'#& Ðfemale€neighbor€commented€that€she€was€fat.€€Thereupon,€the€appellant€ð ðwent€to€smack€her€bellyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðtelling€her€that€sheððs€not€fat.€€And€the€top€part€of€my€hand€hit€the€bottom€part€of€her€breast€when€IÐ )à$( Ðwent€to€smack€her€belly.ðð€€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àà ` àAdditionally,€upon€questioning,€the€appellant€attempted€to€explain€the€incidentÐ ° Ðinvolving€his€son.€€He€stated€that€he€and€his€wife€were€lying€in€the€floor€watching€television€whenÐ œì Ðhis€son€kissed€the€appellant€on€the€back€of€the€neck.€€The€appellant€turned€around,€thinking€that€hisÐ ˆØ Ðwife€had€kissed€him.€€The€appellant€stated€that,€when€he€discovered€that€the€kiss€came€from€his€son,€Ð tÄ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àI€was€very€nervous,€I€was€very€scared€that€he€had€kissed€me€and€it€wasÐ `° Ðnot€her€and€that€it€gave€me€a€tingly€sensation€because€I€thought€it€wasÐ L œ Ðher.€€I€got€up€and€I€got€so€nervous€that€I€completely€lost€control€of€anyÐ 8 ˆ Ðbodily€functions€or€whatever€you€want€toð!ðhowever€you€want€to€sayÐ $ t Ðthat,€and€I€did€get€a€half€erection,€but€it€was€not€a€sexualð!ðit€was€not€inÐ  ` Ða€sexual€way,€it€was€more€of€a€response€or€something€along€thatÐ ü L  Ðnature.€€Ðè 8 ` x` x ÐHe€further€asserted€that€he€was€not€aroused€by€his€son€on€that€occasion€or€at€any€time.€€Nonetheless,Ð Ô$  Ðthe€appellant€acknowledged€that€he€is€a€pedophile€and€that€he€found€the€diagnosis€ð ðembarrassing.ðð€Ð À  ÐThe€appellant€conceded€that€he€and€his€wife€had€separated€for€three€months€because€of€his€drinking.€Ð ¬ü  ÐHe€contended€that€he€was€unaware€that€he€was€required€to€inform€Brewer€of€the€separationÐ ˜è  Ðð ð[Ô_Ôb]ecauseÔ_Ô€I€thought€I€was€on€probation€for€sexual€battery,€not€divorce.ðð€€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€maintained€that€he€was€a€good€worker€who€was€appreciated€by€hisÐ \¬ Ðemployer€and€that€he€had€a€good€relationship€with€his€family.€€He€indicated€that€the€psychosexualÐ H˜ Ðevaluation€revealed€that€he€had€a€ð ðlow€to€moderateðð€chance€of€Ô_ÔreoffendingÔ_Ô.€€Regardless,€he€concededÐ 4„ Ðthat,€if€he€were€guaranteed€that€he€would€not€get€caught,€he€might€trick€or€force€someone€to€have€sexÐ  p Ðwith€him.€€The€psychosexual€evaluation€confirmed€this€hypothesis.€€The€appellant€alsoÐ  \ Ðacknowledged€that€he€was€prohibited€from€watching€X„rated€videos€and€admitted€that€hisÐ øH ÐÔ_ÔmasturbatoryÔ_Ô€fantasies€regarding€his€sister„in„law€could€lead€to€a€relapse.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àFinally,€the€appellantððs€wife,€Michelle€Fish,€testified.€€Michelle€related€that€theÐ ¼  Ðappellant€worked€to€support€the€family,€but€she€also€had€a€part„time€job€as€a€manager€at€a€Food€LionÐ ¨ø Ðgrocery€store.€€However,€she€maintained€that€she€could€not€economically€survive€without€theÐ ”ä Ðappellantððs€income.€€Michelle€confirmed€that€she€and€the€appellant€had€a€three„year„old€son€and€thatÐ €Ð Ðtheir€second€child€was€due€in€five€weeks.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àà ` àMichelle€testified€that€she€had€not€noticed€any€of€the€warning€signs€for€Ô_ÔreoffendingÔ_ÔÐ D!” Ðin€the€appellantððs€recent€behavior.€€However,€she€also€acknowledged€that€she€had€witnessed€noÐ 0"€  Ðbehavior€prior€to€the€underlying€offense€which€would€have€indicated€the€appellantððs€Ô_ÔpedophiliaÔ_Ô.€Ð #l! ÐMichelle€acknowledged€that€she€and€her€husband€owned€the€X„rated€videos€prior€to€their€marriage.€Ð $X" ÐAfter€the€appellant€revealed€that€he€was€prohibited€from€watching€X„rated€videos,€MichelleÐ ô$D # Ðrelinquished€the€videos€to€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô.€€Moreover,€she€confessed€that€she€and€the€appellant€separatedÐ à%0!$ Ðbecause€of€the€appellantððs€drinking.€€However,€she€was€unaware€until€later€that€the€use€of€alcoholÐ Ì&"% Ðconstituted€a€violation€of€the€appellantððs€probation.€€Nevertheless,€she€related€that€she€currently€doesÐ ¸'#& Ðnot€allow€alcohol€in€her€home.€€Furthermore,€Michelle€conceded€that€the€appellant€did€not€reveal€toÐ ¤(ô#' Ðher€the€facts€concerning€the€underlying€offense€until€after€he€was€arrested.€€In€sum,€MichelleÐ )à$( Ðconceded€that€the€appellant€had€not€been€very€honest€with€her€about€the€offense€or€about€hisÐ |*Ì%) Ðprobation.€€Ð h+¸&* Їà  àà ` àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€proof,€the€trial€court€found€no€reason€to€reinstate€theÐ ° Ðappellantððs€probation.€€The€court€noted€that€despite€two€years€of€treatment,€the€appellant€continuedÐ œì Ðto€consume€alcohol,€watch€X„rated€videos,€and€fantasize€about€minors€even€though€he€knew€suchÐ ˆØ Ðbehavior€violated€his€probation.€€The€trial€court€also€noted€its€concern€with€the€results€of€theÐ tÄ Ðpsychosexual€evaluation,€particularly€the€conclusion€that€the€appellant€would€force€or€trick€someoneÐ `° Ðto€have€sex€with€him€if€assured€that€he€would€not€be€caught.€€Accordingly,€it€was€the€courtððs€ð ðhonestÐ L œ Ðconclusion€that€you€have€not€responded€well€enough€to€this€treatment€program€to€risk€your€being€outÐ 8 ˆ Ðin€society.ðð€€The€trial€court€also€noted€that€ð ð[Ô_Ôi]fÔ_Ô€I€had€Ô_ÔhadÔ_Ô€this€report€before€the€sentencing,€I€donððtÐ $ t Ðknow€that€I€would€have€agreed€to€30€days€in€jail€and€the€balance€on€probation.€.€.€.€[Ô_ÔI]fÔ_Ô€I€had€seenÐ  ` Ðthese€kinds€of€things€in€the€report,€I€doubt€very€seriously€if€I€would€have€approved€the€agreement.ðð€Ð ü L  ÐÌà@éé$ìàòòò òII.€€Analysisóóó óˆÐ Ô$  Ðà  àà ` àOn€appeal,€the€appellant€argues€that€ð ðthe€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revokingÐ À  Ðappellantððs€grant€of€probation,ðð€and€ð ðthe€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€appellantððs€grantÐ ¬ü  Ðof€probation€based€on€the€admissions€of€the€appellant€which€were€disclosed€by€polygraph.ðð€€Initially,Ð ˜è  Ðwe€note€that,€upon€finding€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€appellant€has€violated€theÐ „Ô  Ðterms€of€his€probation,€a€trial€court€is€authorized€to€order€an€appellant€to€serve€the€balance€of€hisÐ pÀ Ðoriginal€sentence€in€confinement.€€òòSeeóó€Ô_ÔTennÔ_Ô.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„310€and€„311(d)€(1997);€òòState€v.Ð \¬ ÐÔ_ÔHarkinsÔ_Ôóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Ô_ÔTennÔ_Ô.€1991).€€Such€probation€revocation€rests€in€the€sound€discretionÐ H˜ Ðof€the€trial€court€and€will€not€be€overturned€by€this€court€absent€an€abuse€of€that€discretion.€€òòState€v.Ð 4„ ÐLeachóó,€914€S.W.2d€104,€106€(Ô_ÔTennÔ_Ô.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1995).€€An€abuse€of€discretion€exists€when€ð ðtheÐ  p Ðrecord€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion€that€a€violation€hasÐ  \ Ðoccurred.ðð€€òòState€v.€Conneróó,€919€S.W.2d€48,€Ô_Ô50Ô_Ô€(Ô_ÔTennÔ_Ô.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1995).€Ð øH ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€appellant€argues€that€the€allegations€constituted€only€ð ðtechnicalðð€violations€of€hisÐ Ð  Ðprobation.€€However,€at€the€hearings€and€on€appeal,€the€appellant€conceded€that€he€ð ðtruthfullyÐ ¼  Ðadmitted€to€his€probation€counselor,€Carolyn€Brewer€and€to€Mr.€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€that€while€on€probation€heÐ ¨ø Ðhad€consumed€alcohol,€watched€an€x„rated€video€with€his€wife€and€had€masturbated€to€a€fantasyÐ ”ä Ðregarding€his€sister„in„law.ðð€€The€appellant€contends€that€these€disclosures€to€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô€indicateÐ €Ð Ðprogress€in€his€treatment,€and€are€not€sufficient€evidence€to€revoke€his€probation.€€Specifically,€theÐ l¼ Ðappellant€complains€that€ð ð[Ô_Ôi]tÔ_Ô€thus€appears€that€by€following€the€rules€of€his€probation€which€requiredÐ X ¨ Ðhim€to€report€incidents€of€sexual€arousal€and€by€testifying€thereto,€[the€appellant]€was€Ô_Ôunknowing[lyÔ_Ô]Ð D!” Ðgiving€testimony€against€himself.ðð€€The€appellant€also€alleges€that€ð ð[Ô_Ôa]llÔ_Ô€of€the€ððtechnicalðð€violationsÐ 0"€  Ðwhich€were€used€to€revoke€Appellantððs€probation€were€initially€disclosed€by€means€of€courtÐ #l! Ðmandated€polygraph€examinations,€without€which€there€would€have€been€no€grounds€for€revocation.ðð€Ð $X" Ðà  àà ` àÌà  àà ` àWe€must€disagree€with€the€appellantððs€assessment.€€The€trial€court€specifically€foundÐ à%0!$ Ðthat€the€appellant€violated€probation€ð ðby€driving€under€the€influence,€leaving€the€State€withoutÐ Ì&"% Ðpermission,€using€alcoholic€beverages€while€on€probation,€and€also€continuing€to€do€things€that€youÐ ¸'#& Ðwere€told€not€to€do€by€the€Sex€Offender€Treatment€director.ðð€€The€trial€court€determined€that€thisÐ ¤(ô#' Ðð ðsteady€courseðð€of€probation€violations€indicated€a€risk€to€the€community.€€Notably,€the€trial€courtÐ )à$( Ðstated€that€ð ðI€canððt€think€of€a€course€of€conduct€that€a€sex€offender€could€follow€for€a€year€and€a€halfÐ |*Ì%) Ðthat€would€be€any€worse,€other€than€going€out€and€actually€committing€crimes.ðð€€The€trial€courtÐ h+¸&* Ðclearly€based€its€decision€to€revoke€the€appellantððs€probation€upon€the€appellantððs€confessedÐ ° Ðviolations,€namely€his€leaving€the€state€without€permission,€using€alcohol,€watching€X„rated€videos,Ð œì Ðand€utilizing€Ô_ÔmasturbatoryÔ_Ô€fantasies€featuring€a€minor.€€Therefore,€because€there€is€sufficientÐ ˆØ Ðevidence€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€decision,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€itsÐ tÄ Ðdiscretion€in€revoking€the€appellantððs€probation.€€òòÐ `° ÐÌà  àà ` àóóFinally,€the€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€improperly€revoked€the€appellantððsÐ 8 ˆ Ðprobation€based€on€admission€which€were€initially€disclosed€by€a€polygraph.€€Contrary€to€theÐ $ t Ðappellantððs€assertions,€the€record€does€not€reflect€that€the€results€of€the€polygraph€were€admitted€intoÐ  ` Ðevidence.€€Additionally,€the€record€does€not€indicate€that€all€of€the€information€considered€by€the€trialÐ ü L  Ðcourt€in€revoking€his€probation€was€revealed€pursuant€to€a€polygraph€examination.€€The€appellantððsÐ è 8  Ðwife€testified€to€the€appellantððs€consuming€alcohol€and€viewing€X„rated€movies.€Additionally,€theÐ Ô$  Ðappellant€confessed€his€violations€to€Ô_ÔTilleryÔ_Ô,€Brewer,€and€the€court.€Ô_ÔòòóóÔ_Ô€As€this€court€has€previouslyÐ À  Ðstated,€ð ð[Ô_Ôa]lthoughÔ_Ô€the€result€reached€in€this€case€might€appear€to€punish€the€[appellant]€for€bringingÐ ¬ü  Ðhis€urges€to€Ô_ÔreoffendÔ_Ô€to€his€probation€officerððs€attention,€we€believe€that€the€[appellantððs]€interestsÐ ˜è  Ðand€societyððs€interests€have€been€served.ðð€€òòState€v.€Kevin€Ô_ÔYantÔ_Ôóó,€No.€01C01„9206„CR„00187,€1993Ð „Ô  ÐTenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€422,€at€*9€(Nashville,€Jul.€8,€1993).€€Again,€we€conclude€the€trial€court€didÐ pÀ Ðnot€abuse€its€discretion€by€revoking€the€appellantððs€probation.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà@MM"ìàòòò òIII.€€ConclusionˆÐ 4„ Ðóóà0  àà0` (#(#àó óFinding€no€error,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€€€Ð p` (#` (# ÐÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ¼  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNORMA€Ô_ÔMcGEEÔ_Ô€OGLE,€JUDGE