ÿWPC j7w÷/Hp4k¯ï .Ì,›³¿IåL7ÉØÚq4çÿs²ÜŸ Ô:ö4`ÚÛÁJµ}Îp­02GÕÛ£d ÁgM3«å>ås†ý™~¢LE•Ú —–|´9Ùïg3À¨„™{¢;þHÞæÉ§â‡mˆ„A‹ dKæ"éoL}o`yÞûurLˆìÂ%?œ'Î*hïv5¿ëÑ¢5u´AÕßC6 dßNÎV[­—fõdÍùpäl“iŽÙÝ‚kÛµ øHâÇ7“P@¥>p![á^Éj*Ù á&t+¡.ác]ý­´s E½_ÔÌŠMáÕÔCM}²EéøqäEá\Ürˆ›"Š'lÉyèxüg5iЋٵE îUƒ¨øæ•×eâ½ù:‚k°ÍIø v†g²cU ˆ)04u ¡²êK12:’j5eËf\b®}æ+M!&|FŠxÔÛ»D´RýÐðïÊA^ëÅh¿axª¯»ƒqyòöö•öï·;±6±ÌäiÒh£áÉ'sÙ´¼¯%Ø@Ì­¹ÛyGLvÀÙŠ¶B¦,‡i«?‹*µ¹‘0öM K€¥J¡ôu^e­V bÀKÜ£i¢b %\^ b 0ˆnU NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ±NÇU@ÉÉE                        b                                     0ë Bþþ 0¤ D3¿ D-ò 0K ASjƽ 0¤ƒ 0D' A«k»‡œ,-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularüPH,:\3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 Ñ ° Ñ(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman - ù-(|G2~”$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€u»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôº-ò»»Ô d(|3þï$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€u»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3þï$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€u»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€u»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ8€O XXdì»»d8ÑÑ€OYÑà@ttìàÔ‡î´î»»ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†»u»îî´ò#ԈРÖ& Ðà@¼ ¼ ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€May€21,€2002ˆÐ üL ÐÌò òà@CCìàSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€EDWARD€BUCK€FRANKLINó óˆÐ  p ÐÌÔ€XO X»»uÔà@ ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Sumner€CountyˆÐ F – Ðà@  ìàNos.€129„2000€&€155„2000€€€€€€Jane€Ô_ÔWheatcraftÔ_Ô,€JudgeˆÐ 2 ‚ ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<õ` A߈Ð öF  ÐÌà@4 4 ìàNo.€M2001„02303„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€12,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ԈРñA  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<È` AßÐ É  Ðó óÌDefendant,€Edward€Buck€Franklin,€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€attempted€rape€and€one€count€ofÐ Ä Ðaggravated€burglary.€€He€received€a€sentence€of€three€years€for€each€conviction,€with€two€of€theÐ ° Ðsentences€to€be€served€concurrently€with€each€other€but€consecutive€to€the€sentence€for€the€thirdÐ œì Ðconviction,€for€an€effective€sentence€of€six€years.€€After€receiving€credit€for€time€previously€servedÐ ˆØ Ðin€jail,€his€sentences€were€suspended€and€he€was€placed€on€probation.€€Thereafter,€three€probationÐ tÄ Ðviolation€warrants€were€filed€against€him.€€Following€a€hearing€on€the€third€warrant,€the€trial€courtÐ `° Ðrevoked€Defendantððs€probation€and€ordered€that€he€serve€his€sentence€in€the€Department€ofÐ Lœ ÐCorrection.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð 8ˆ ÐÌò òà@DDìàTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óˆÐ ` ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJohn€Everett€Williams€óóandÐ è8 ÐòòNorma€McGee€Ogleóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð Ô$ ÐÌDavid€Allen€Doyle,€District€Public€Defender;€and€Thomas€J.€Smith,€Assistant€Public€Defender,Ð ¬ü ÐÔ_ÔGallatinÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Edward€Buck€Franklin.Ð ˜ è ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€P.€Robin€Dixon,€Jr.,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð p"À! ÐLawrence€Ray€Whitley,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Sallie€Wade€Brown,€Assistant€DistrictÐ \#¬" ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð H$˜# ÐÌò òà@66'ìàOPINIONó óˆÐ  &p!% ÐÌà  àThe€record€reveals€that€on€or€about€June€3,€1999,€Defendant€unlawfully€entered€the€home€ofÐ ø'H#' Ðthe€first€victim€of€attempted€rape.€€She€was€sleeping€at€the€time.€€Defendant€awoke€her€and€told€herÐ ä(4$( Ðthat€he€ð ðwas€going€to€have€her.ðð€€The€victim,€a€martial€arts€expert,€fended€Defendant€off,€picked€himÐ Ð) %) Ðup,€and€threw€him€out€of€her€apartment.€€Later€that€same€evening,€Defendant€was€in€the€company€ofÐ ¼* &* Ðthe€second€victim€of€attempted€rape.€€Defendant€tore€off€her€dress€while€she€begged€him€ð ðnot€to€doÐ ¨+ø&+ Ðthis.ðð€€The€second€victim€had€a€straight€razor€in€her€possession€and€nicked€Defendant€between€hisÐ ”,ä', Ðlegs.€€While€he€was€writhing€in€pain,€she€was€able€to€escape.Ð €-Ð(-ýG ÐÔ_Ô‡à  àFollowing€his€indictment€by€the€Grand€Jury€of€Sumner€County,€Defendant€pled€guilty€onÐ ° ÐJune€5,€2000,€pursuant€to€a€negotiated€plea€agreement€as€set€forth€above.€€On€January€31,€2001,€theÐ œì Ðthird€probation€violation€warrant€was€filed€against€Defendant.€€It€is€not€clear€from€the€record€whatÐ ˆØ Ðled€to€the€filing€of€the€first€two€probation€violation€warrants.€€The€third€warrant€alleged€that€he€hadÐ tÄ Ðviolated€a€condition€of€his€probation€by€moving€into€a€residence€where€a€minor€child€lived€withoutÐ `° Ðthe€probation€officerððs€permission€and€without€a€ð ðchaperone€agreement.ðð€€In€August€2001,€anÐ L œ Ðamendment€to€the€third€probation€violation€warrant€was€filed€alleging€that€Defendant€had€movedÐ 8 ˆ Ðwithout€his€probation€officerððs€knowledge€or€permission€in€February€2001,€had€not€reported€to€hisÐ $ t Ðprobation€officer€since€January€30,€2001,€and€had€not€paid€any€fees€since€his€probation€commenced.€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àAt€the€evidentiary€hearing€for€the€probation€violation€warrant,€as€amended,€the€probationÐ è 8  Ðofficer€testified€that€(1)€she€had€no€proof€that€Defendant€had€paid€any€of€his€probation€fees;€(2)Ð Ô$  ÐDefendant€had€absconded€for€several€months;€and€(3)€her€investigation€showed€Defendant€hadÐ À  Ðmoved€into€a€home€where€a€minor€child€resided,€in€violation€of€one€of€the€conditions€of€hisÐ ¬ü  Ðprobation,€and€had€admitted€this€to€her.€€Defendant€also€testified€at€the€hearing.€€He€stated€that€heÐ ˜è  Ðwas€forced€to€move€from€a€half„way€house€in€Hendersonville,€where€he€had€been€residing,€becauseÐ „Ô  Ðhe€was€wrongfully€accused€of€using€drugs.€€His€excuse€for€not€reporting€back€to€his€probation€officerÐ pÀ Ðwas€that€he€was€living€in€Shelbyville€and€ð ðfigured€[the€probation€officer]€would€have€a€warrantÐ \¬ Ðsigned€on€me.ðð€€When€questioned€by€the€trial€court,€Defendant€admitted€that€he€left€the€area€becauseÐ H˜ Ðhe€did€not€want€to€go€to€jail.Ð 4„ Ðà  àÌà  àBased€upon€the€proof€presented,€the€trial€court€found€Defendant€to€be€in€violation€ofÐ  \ Ðconditions€of€his€probation,€revoked€his€probation,€and€ordered€that€he€serve€his€sentence€in€theÐ øH ÐDepartment€of€Correction.€€On€appeal,€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€exercise€ð ðaÐ ä4 Ðconscientious€and€intelligent€judgmentðð€by€finding€him€in€violation€of€his€probation€by€aÐ Ð  Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence.Ð ¼  ÐÌÔ‡XO XXXO Ôà  àA€trial€court€may€revoke€probation€and€order€the€imposition€of€the€original€sentence€if€it€findsÐ ”ä Ðby€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€person€has€violated€a€condition€of€probation.€€Tenn.Ð €Ð ÐCode€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„310,€311€(1997).€€The€decision€to€revoke€probation€rests€within€the€soundÐ l¼ Ðdiscretion€of€the€trial€court.€€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€Ð X ¨ ÐRevocation€of€probation€and€a€community€corrections€sentence€is€subject€to€an€abuse€of€discretionÐ D!” Ðstandard€of€review,€rather€than€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€standard.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.Ð 0"€  Ð1991).€€Discretion€is€abused€only€if€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€theÐ #l! Ðconclusion€of€the€trial€court€that€a€violation€of€probation€or€community€correction€sentence€hasÐ $X" Ðoccurred.€€òòId.óó;€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€946€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€Proof€of€a€violationÐ ô$D # Ðneed€not€be€established€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€and€the€evidence€need€only€show€that€the€trialÐ à%0!$ Ðjudge€exercised€a€conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment,€rather€than€acting€arbitrarily.€€òòGregoryóó,€946Ð Ì&"% ÐS.W.2d€at€832;€òòState€v.€Leachóó,€914€S.W.2d€104,€106€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ð ¸'#& ÐÔ#†XO XXXO ¥#Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àÌà  àAfter€our€review€of€the€entire€record,€we€conclude€that€there€is€substantial€evidence€to€supportÐ )à$( Ðâ âthe€trial€courtððs€conclusion€that€a€violation€of€probation€occurred,€and,€therefore,€the€trial€court€didÐ |*Ì%) Ðnot€abuse€its€discretion€in€revoking€probation€and€ordering€Defendant€to€serve€his€sentence€in€theÐ ° ÐDepartment€of€Correction.€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€in€this€appeal.Ð œì Ðâ âÌò òà@FF%ìàCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€AFFIRMED.Ð L œ ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð  ` Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE