ÿWPC rdÊ$uBQjqvýç8(€= ðºØXØ>ÅŠ­ö±chÿÅxF“1@aFrŽ6¯bù|i2QÜ£!D•ê°ÞðN©À#¤C({•îhãY_ªþ_—S&‚Ûag´­;\cwnOwd«*8r¥tÉÓrn‚¥xTÍ´s7 }‚µ{\gQ%²$äü¿'G抠7®%æ›Ò!v“b:¿¼ÓËPÍ—OìšB‘üæGºB"¤t9¡G;0½¤á+`êb†²g¬ÂÔ¥•ÑÞ©hSžgÒ7õ‹Üè}×þmFñi5ñŠŽQ Ëö"•V •ØCj¢ª¤Ãûê»ì® Ïk†ÎÈ9¤ú˯|0Û•a΄ì1·=d¿ºG‚Vª¾ÏÄùx¹¥„Ò“?ð ¹`’‰“å¯nZjc²Ô‘æya¡]†s*L›¨Èþ dÁT©Ÿ·Cl=x3d¼<Ç&®_'ˆ4BÔ€ÁÖß.s-ÏEÓ>«z! †ß¯›„æDÖ„5B„c^˜ÞäèÈŠÛÖÎ= Ê¡ÚhÙŒðhÌ÷NøgñäJ0ä-qþíÅCâP·„I*æ­¾l”`uÍõðHoÚ¬U»èÌNÙôëŸvÐ!ˆÄ63ÙóoÈÛN]÷‰vb %\U@b 0ˆ¢UN*^ xw„4ˆ zœÒ è ÷ mù § Æ· Æ} ÆC Æ 0DÏ N§§¼EcUNe#Á³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³btttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt 0ë|||| Bgg 0¤„ D3( D-[ 0Kˆˆ ASÓÆ& 0¤ì 0D A«Ô»(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular]ˆ5+ ÖJ~'  2LÕ¡ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Ý ƒRnü$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºmò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„301.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒRnü$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºmò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„603. Ý ƒRnü$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºmò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„39„108.(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0- ù-(|G2nü$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôºmò»»Ô d(|3?u$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?u$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Õ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Õ»»»ÔÑ8€E XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îÕÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼Õ»îî #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAugust€14,€2001€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XE X»¼ÕÔÌò òÔ#†¼Õ»XXE #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€MATTHEW€PATRICK€FRONTERA,€A/K/AÐ úJ ÐMATTHEW€ANTHONY€FRONTERA,€A/K/A€PATRICK€MATTHEWÐ  ^ ÐFOSTER,€A/K/A€DERRICK€JOSHUA€FOSTERÔ‡XE X»¼ÕÔó óÐ " r ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Williamson€CountyÐ " r Ðà@@øøìàNo.€I„133„600€€€€€€Donald€P.€Harris,€JudgeÐ ^  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Ñ` AßÐ Ò"  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„02747„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€21,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ Í  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<¤` AßÐ ¥õ Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€Matthew€Patrick€Frontera,€pleaded€guilty€to€criminal€impersonation,€a€Class€BÐ  ð Ðmisdemeanor.€€Sentencing€was€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€€As€part€of€his€plea€agreement,Ð ŒÜ Ðthe€Defendant€attempted€to€reserve€the€right€to€appeal€a€certified€question€of€law€relating€to€theÐ xÈ Ðlegality€of€his€stop,€detention€and€questioning€by€police€officers.€€In€this€appeal,€the€DefendantÐ d´ Ðasserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€refusing€to€suppress€the€evidence€obtained€against€him€due€to€anÐ P  Ðunlawful€stop€and€detention.€€He€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€sentencing€him€to€serve€sixÐ <Œ Ðmonths€in€the€county€jail€with€release€eligibility€at€seventy„five€percent.€€Because€the€DefendantÐ (x Ðfailed€to€properly€reserve€his€issue€concerning€his€stop€and€detention,€we€are€unable€to€reach€theÐ d Ðmerits€of€that€issue.€€We€affirm€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.Ð P ÐÌò òÓ  ÓTenn.€R.€App.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Appeal€of€Certified€Question€Dismissed;€SentenceÐ Ø( ÐAffirmedó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓa ÓÔ#†¼Õ»àXE #ÔÔ‡XE X.¼ÕÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòJamesÐ œ ì ÐÔ_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ˆ!Ø  ÐÌMark€C.€Ô_ÔScruggsÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Matthew€Patrick€Frontera.Ð `#°" ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Jennifer€L.€Ô_ÔBledsoeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð 8%ˆ $ ÐRon€Davis,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Sharon€E.€Ô_ÔGuffeeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð $&t!% Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð '`"& ÐÌà@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Õ»XXE - #ÔòòóóÓÓÔ€XE X»¼ÕÔòòÔ‡XE XXXE ÔóóˆÐ è(8$( ÐÓÓà  àOn€May€21,€2000,€the€Defendant€was€observed€loitering€in€and€around€the€boyððs€restroomÐ À*&* Ðnear€the€baseball€fields€at€a€park€in€Brentwood,€Tennessee.€€Some€of€the€parents€of€the€children€whoÐ ¬+ü&+ Ðplayed€baseball€in€the€park€had€become€concerned€because€of€a€report€of€an€individual€who€wasÐ ˜,è', Ðhanging€around€the€restrooms€in€such€a€manner€as€to€frighten€or€annoy€the€children.€€The€next€night,Ð „-Ô(-ý÷ Ðon€May€22,€2000,€the€father€of€one€of€the€children€again€saw€the€Defendant€in€the€restroom€andÐ ° Ðnoticed€that€the€Defendant€seemed€to€remain€in€the€restroom€for€a€rather€lengthy€period€of€time.€€TheÐ œì Ðchildððs€father€and€another€man€decided€to€confront€the€Defendant€while€someone€else€called€theÐ ˆØ Ðpolice€on€a€cellular€telephone.€€Before€the€police€arrived,€the€two€men€did€confront€the€DefendantÐ tÄ Ðinside€the€restroom.€€The€Defendant€refused€to€give€the€men€his€name,€and€asked€them€what€he€wasÐ `° Ðbeing€accused€of.€€The€men€told€the€Defendant€that€the€police€had€been€called€and€asked€him€to€stayÐ L œ Ðand€speak€to€the€police.€€The€Defendant€told€them€that€he€was€going€to€leave,€and€he€began€walkingÐ 8 ˆ Ðaway€just€as€a€policeman€arrived.€€The€policeman€ordered€the€Defendant€to€stop€and€the€DefendantÐ $ t Ðeventually€complied.€€At€first€the€Defendant€refused€to€give€the€policeman€his€name.€€Eventually,Ð  ` Ðthe€Defendant€gave€the€police€officer€a€name,€date€of€birth€and€social€security€number,€all€of€whichÐ ü L  Ðturned€out€to€be€false.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendant€was€eventually€indicted€for€criminal€impersonation,׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€evading€arrest,׃T×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€andÐ À  Ðfailing€to€register€as€a€sex€offender.׃à×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€Defendant€entered€an€open€plea€of€guilty€to€the€charge€ofÐ ¬ü  Ðcriminal€impersonation,€with€sentencing€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€judge.€€The€charge€ofÐ ˜è  Ðevading€arrest€was€dismissed.€€Following€a€bench€trial,€the€Defendant€was€found€not€guilty€of€failingÐ „Ô  Ðto€register€as€a€sex€offender.€€Subsequently,€following€a€sentencing€hearing€on€the€criminalÐ pÀ Ðimpersonation€conviction,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€Defendant€to€six€months€in€the€county€jailÐ \¬ Ðwith€release€eligibility€set€at€seventy„five€percent.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àWe€will€first€address€the€certified€question€which€the€Defendant€has€attempted€to€reserveÐ  p Ðpursuant€to€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€37(b).€€The€Defendant€filed€a€motion€to€suppressÐ  \ Ðall€evidence€obtained€against€him€based€upon€his€assertion€that€he€was€illegally€stopped,€detainedÐ øH Ðand€questioned€by€the€police.€€He€asserted€that€the€police€officer€had€no€legal€justification€to€stop,Ð ä4 Ðdetain€and€question€him€and€therefore€the€statement€he€gave€to€the€police€officer€should€beÐ Ð  Ðsuppressed.€€After€conducting€an€evidentiary€hearing€on€the€Defendantððs€motion,€the€trial€judgeÐ ¼  Ðoverruled€the€motion.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àOn€October€4,€2000,€the€Defendant€filed€a€ð ðpetition€for€waiver€of€trial€by€jury€and€request€forÐ €Ð Ðacceptance€of€plea€of€guilty.ðð€€This€document€was€signed€by€the€Defendant,€his€counsel,€and€theÐ l¼ Ðassistant€district€attorney€general.€€On€the€same€date,€the€Defendant€filed€a€ð ðnegotiated€pleaÐ X ¨ Ðagreement.ðð€€This€document€stated€that€the€Defendant€agreed€to€plead€guilty€to€the€offense€ofÐ D!” Ðcriminal€impersonation€with€the€sentence€to€be€set€by€the€trial€court.€€The€document€also€stated€thatÐ 0"€  Ðthe€plea€was€ð ðentered€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€37„issue„whether€State€possessed€reasonableÐ #l! Ðsuspicion€to€stop€Mr.€Frontera€on€5„22„00€and€ask€him€questions€regarding€his€identity.€€This€issueÐ $X" Ðis€dispositive€of€the€case.ðð€€This€document€is€also€signed€by€the€Defendant,€his€attorney,€and€theÐ ô$D # Ðassistant€district€attorney€general.€€It€is€not€signed€by€the€trial€court.€€Also€on€October€4,€2000,€theÐ à%0!$ Ðtrial€judge€signed€an€order€authorizing€the€waiver€of€trial€and€accepting€the€Defendantððs€plea€ofÐ Ì&"% Ðguilty.€€This€order€makes€no€reference€to€the€reservation€of€a€question€of€law€pursuant€to€Rule€37.€Ð ° ÐOn€October€23,€2000,€the€trial€court€entered€judgment€finding€the€Defendant€guilty,€upon€his€pleaÐ œì Ðof€guilty,€of€criminal€impersonation€and€setting€his€sentence€at€six€months€in€the€county€jail€withÐ ˆØ Ðrelease€eligibility€set€at€seventy„five€percent.€€This€judgment€contains€the€following€notation:€Ð tÄ Ðð ðDefendant€reserves€R37€certified€question€of€stop.ðð€Ð `° ÐÌÔ#†XE XXXE § #Ôà  àTennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€37(b)€provides€that€an€appeal€lies€from€any€judgmentÐ 8 ˆ Ðof€convictionÐ $ t Ðà8  à(2)€Upon€a€plea€of€guilty€or€nolo€contendere€if:Ð `Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(Ô_ÔiÔ_Ô)€Defendant€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€under€Rule€11(e)€but€explicitlyÐ ü L  Ðreserved€with€the€consent€of€the€state€and€of€the€court€the€right€to€appeal€a€certifiedÐ è 8  Ðquestion€of€law€that€is€dispositive€of€the€case;€or€ÐÔ$ Ð Ð  Ðà  à.€.€.€Ð À  Ðà8  àà ` à(iv)€Defendant€explicitly€reserved€with€the€consent€of€the€court€the€right€toÐ ¬ü  Ðappeal€a€certified€question€of€law€that€is€dispositive€of€the€case.Иè Ð Ð  ÐÌÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Prestonóó,€759€S.W.2d€647€(Tenn.€1988),€our€supreme€court€set€forth€the€followingÐ \¬ Ðprerequisites€for€appellate€review€of€certified€questions€pursuant€to€this€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure:Ð H˜ Ðà8  àòòRegardless€of€what€has€appeared€in€prior€petitions,€orders,€colloquy€in€open€court€orÐ 4„ Ðotherwise,€the€final€order€or€judgment€from€which€the€time€begins€to€run€to€pursueÐ  p Ða€Ô_ÔT.R.A.P.Ô_Ô€3€appeal€must€contain€a€statement€of€the€dispositive€certified€question€ofÐ  \ Ðlaw€reserved€by€defendant€for€appellate€reviewóó€and€the€question€of€law€must€be€statedÐ øH Ðso€as€to€clearly€identify€the€scope€and€the€limits€of€the€legal€issue€reserved.€€ForÐ ä4 Ðexample,€where€questions€of€law€involve€the€validity€of€searches€and€theÐ Ð  Ðadmissibility€of€statements€and€confessions,€etc.,€the€reasons€relied€upon€byÐ ¼  Ðdefendant€in€the€trial€court€at€the€suppression€hearing€must€be€identified€in€theÐ ¨ø Ðstatement€of€the€certified€question€of€law€and€review€by€the€appellate€courts€will€beÐ ”ä Ðlimited€to€those€passed€upon€by€the€trial€judge€and€stated€in€the€certified€question,Ð €Ð Ðabsent€a€constitutional€requirement€otherwise.€€Without€an€explicit€statement€of€theÐ l¼ Ðcertified€question,€neither€the€defendant,€the€State€nor€the€trial€judge€can€make€aÐ X ¨ Ðmeaningful€determination€of€whether€the€issue€sought€to€be€reviewed€is€dispositiveÐ D!” Ðof€the€case.€.€.€.€Also,€the€order€must€state€that€the€certified€question€was€expresslyÐ 0"€  Ðreserved€as€part€of€a€plea€agreement,€that€the€State€and€the€trial€judge€consented€toÐ #l! Ðthe€reservation€and€that€the€State€and€the€trial€judge€are€of€the€opinion€that€theÐ $X" Ðquestion€is€dispositive€of€the€case.€€òòOf€course,€the€burden€is€on€defendant€to€see€thatÐ ô$D # Ðthese€prerequisites€are€in€the€final€orderóó€and€that€the€record€brought€to€the€appellateÐ à%0!$ Ðcourts€contains€all€of€the€proceedings€below€that€bear€upon€whether€the€certifiedÐ Ì&"% Ðquestion€of€law€is€dispositive€and€the€merits€of€the€question€certified.€€No€issueÐ ¸'#& Ðbeyond€the€scope€of€the€certified€question€will€be€considered.Ф(ô#'Ð Ð  ÐÌòòId.óó€at€650€(emphasis€added);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔPendergrassÔ_Ôóó,€937€S.W.2d€834,€836„37€(Tenn.€1996).€Ð |*Ì%) ÐIf€the€judgment€itself€does€not€satisfy€the€requirements€of€òòPrestonóó€but€does€refer€to€or€incorporateÐ h+¸&* Ðanother€document€which€would€satisfy€those€requirements,€then€the€certification€of€issues€will€beÐ ° Ðsufficient€for€appellate€review.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Irwinóó,€962€S.W.2d€477,€479€(Tenn.€1998);€òòÔ_ÔPendergrassÔ_Ôóó,Ð œì Ð937€S.W.2d€at€837.€€€Ð ˆØ Ðà  àÌà  àIn€this€case,€the€judgment€merely€states,€ð ðDefendant€reserves€R37€certified€question€of€stop.ðð€Ð `° ÐObviously,€this€statement€does€not€satisfy€the€strict€requirements€of€òòPrestonóó.€€It€does€not€refer€to€orÐ L œ Ðincorporate€any€document€which€would€arguably€meet€the€requirements€of€òòPrestonóó.€€òòSeeóó€òòIrwinóó,€962Ð 8 ˆ ÐS.W.2d€at€479;€òòÔ_ÔPendergrassÔ_Ôóó,€937€S.W.2d€at€837.€€Thus,€we€have€no€choice€but€to€hold€that€theÐ $ t ÐDefendant€did€not€properly€reserve€his€certified€question€for€review.€€That€portion€of€the€appealÐ  ` Ðwhich€seeks€review€of€the€certified€question€is€therefore€dismissed.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àIn€his€next€issue,€the€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€probation€orÐ Ô$  Ðsplit€confinement€rather€than€ordering€his€six„month€sentence€to€be€served€in€the€county€jail€withÐ À  Ðrelease€eligibility€set€at€seventy„five€percent.€€The€trial€judge€conducted€the€sentencing€hearingÐ ¬ü  Ðimmediately€following€the€bench€trial€on€the€Defendantððs€charge€of€failing€to€register€as€a€sexÐ ˜è  Ðoffender.€€In€sentencing€the€Defendant,€the€trial€judge€noted€that€he€believed€that€the€DefendantÐ „Ô  Ðthought€he€was€supposed€to€register€as€a€sex€offender€and€that€he€gave€the€officers€the€false€nameÐ pÀ Ðfor€the€purpose€of€avoiding€detection.€€The€trial€judge€observed€that€had€the€Defendant€beenÐ \¬ Ðconvicted€of€failing€to€register€as€a€sex€offender,€the€minimum€sentence€would€have€been€180€days.€Ð H˜ ÐThe€judge€then€stated€that€he€believed€the€appropriate€sentence€would€be€six€months€with€seventy„Ð 4„ Ðfive€percent€release€eligibility.Ð  p ÐÌÔ‡XE XXXE Ôà  àMisdemeanor€sentencing€is€controlled€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„302,Ð øH Ðwhich€provides€in€part€that€the€trial€court€shall€impose€a€specific€sentence€consistent€with€theÐ ä4 Ðpurposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„Ð Ð  Ð35„302(b).€€In€misdemeanor€sentencing,€a€separate€sentencing€hearing€is€not€mandatory,€but€the€courtÐ ¼  Ðis€required€to€provide€the€defendant€with€a€reasonable€opportunity€to€be€heard€as€to€the€length€andÐ ¨ø Ðmanner€of€the€sentence.€€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„302(a).€€The€trial€court€retains€the€authority€to€place€theÐ ”ä Ðdefendant€on€probation€either€immediately€or€after€a€time€of€periodic€or€continuous€confinement.€Ð €Ð ÐòòId.óó€ðð€40„35„302(e).€€Misdemeanor€sentencing€is€designed€to€provide€the€trial€court€with€continuingÐ l¼ Ðjurisdiction€and€a€great€deal€of€flexibility.€€One€convicted€of€a€misdemeanor,€unlike€one€convictedÐ X ¨ Ðof€a€felony,€is€not€entitled€to€a€presumption€of€a€minimum€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔCreasyÔ_Ôóó,€885€S.W.2dÐ D!” Ð829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994)òòóó.Ô#†XE XXXE “9#ÔÐ 0"€  ÐÌà  àIn€this€case€we€note€that€the€trial€judge€did€not€make€specific€findings€of€fact€whenÐ $X" Ðdetermining€what€portion€of€the€Defendant's€sentence€would€be€served€in€confinement.€€While€theÐ ô$D # Ðbetter€practice€is€to€make€findings€on€the€record€when€fixing€a€percentage€of€a€Defendant's€sentenceÐ à%0!$ Ðto€be€served€in€incarceration,€our€supreme€court€has€held€that€a€trial€court€need€only€consider€theÐ Ì&"% Ðprinciples€of€sentencing€and€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€in€order€to€comply€with€theÐ ¸'#& Ðmisdemeanor€sentencing€statute.€€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔTroutmanÔ_Ôóó,€979€S.W.2d€271,€274€(Tenn.€1998).€€ð ðThe€lackÐ ¤(ô#' Ðof€findings€is€no€basis€for€holding€the€trial€court€in€error.ðð€€òòState€v.€Russellóó,€10€S.W.3d€270,€278Ð )à$( Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€State€introduced€evidence€that€the€Defendant€had€a€priorÐ ° Ðconviction€in€Texas€for€ð ðTheft€Over€$750.ðð€€In€addition,€although€not€contained€in€the€record€onÐ œì Ðappeal,€the€State€introduced€a€certified€copy€of€a€conviction€for€committing€a€ð ðlewd€act€upon€a€childððÐ ˆØ Ðin€South€Carolina€in€1991.€€In€reviewing€the€video€transcript€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€assistantÐ tÄ Ðdistrict€attorney€clearly€introduced€what€purports€to€be€such€a€document€and€stated€the€documentÐ `° Ðreflects€a€ten„year€sentence€for€this€offense€in€the€South€Carolina€Department€of€Correction.€€TheÐ L œ Ðassistant€district€attorney€also€stated€that€the€certified€record€from€South€Carolina€includes€twoÐ 8 ˆ Ðprobation€violations€pertaining€to€this€sentence.€€The€assistant€district€attorney€general€stated€that€thisÐ $ t Ðconviction€was€entered€and€the€sentence€served€under€the€name€of€ð ðPatrick€Matthew€Foster.ðð€€ThereÐ  ` Ðappears€to€be€no€question€that€ð ðPatrick€Matthew€Fosterðð€is€the€same€person€as€Matthew€PatrickÐ ü L  ÐFrontera,€the€Defendant€herein.€€Although€this€documentation€is€not€found€in€the€record€on€appeal,Ð è 8  Ðwe€note€that€it€is€the€duty€of€the€appellant€to€prepare€a€record€that€conveys€a€fair,€accurate€andÐ Ô$  Ðcomplete€account€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€the€issues€that€form€the€basisÐ À  Ðfor€the€appeal.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b);€òòseeóó€òòÔ_ÔTroutmanÔ_Ôóó,€979€S.W.2d€271,€274€(Tenn.€1998).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€Defendantððs€primary€complaint€on€appeal€concerning€his€sentence€is€that€the€trial€courtÐ „Ô  Ðdenied€him€probation.€€The€Defendantððs€history€of€criminal€conduct,€which€apparently€includes€twoÐ pÀ Ðinstances€of€probation€violation,€adversely€reflects€upon€his€suitability€for€probation.€€Based€on€ourÐ \¬ Ðreview€of€the€record€in€this€case,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€acted€within€its€discretionaryÐ H˜ Ðauthority€in€setting€the€Defendantððs€sentence€at€six€months€with€release€eligibility€after€service€ofÐ 4„ Ðseventy„five€percent€of€the€sentence.Ð  p ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€that€portion€of€the€Defendantððs€appeal€addressing€the€certified€question€of€lawÐ øH Ðis€dismissed.€€The€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àÌà  àÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à___________________________________€Ð l¼ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE