ÿWPC Z•¡Û³§uÍËG¼ÆÄ±@zÌðtÍG¬¹¡Æ@Ä]]ä©Å7>¯…- £ú±¾˜5ø6z4ç4\øº±ì>àÖ|—îN²c{ Ä"iâ\ØÀŒÛ—R“š Ú«~Õ>ÙM°ðMÖŸñ?Ä·«’$%í%×+XR—á8 ¨rôß0íî= p•Ñí æÍœNÝy2}­ÒÓPÇ(ÈÜÓÓÿõR5‹‰ÌØõ™§½ì ¢b®ûD¬4󾆼ÈÝ®¡SÓÊS²°ýŠ*($BbÚºTAõ`C½ /©³:]c‚Ïjí0†öþ}Ò°tÓµ/ ¶Ø{)Jòûœx“9N=á„øð5óªDÐȃL?”áC6JSãÖ¢§Â×—ìT?½Hûù‘åœc !øAÛÔÆíÂ8Ü¿¡ô„êÍ—‰îÕÆyΞ!A¦¾ÀoÕJz/Ší[šA¨z)Dmó‰õˆ[œˆ]2©…¦y ~‡š“…úr^£{Ì‘Ñ;hávœÌ6âlF­´¸®#]¾Å:äÔ©a éíå´“<ÂÄQÒW‡³Ÿÿ|Ø8,b#Á\ % 0D# 0ˆg UNï N= f? zA Ò» a z¡ Ò ^ í Æù Æ¿ Æ…ÆKwN4+E:< m>> 0DU™™™f¨aªª¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾¾bÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆÆ 0ëÎÎÎÎ B ¹¹ 0¤Ö D3z D-­ 0KÚÚ AS%Æx 0¤>> A«â˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularä ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptTABLE A ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptŸY-s Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5üPH, vk1ˆ¡3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒR$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôþMò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThere€is€no€judgment€of€conviction€or€any€other€information€regarding€case€number€49900092€in€the€recordÐ ° Ðon€appeal.œTABLE B - ù-(|G2$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôþMò»»Ô d(|3‡q$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_XYEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3‡q$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼C»»»ÔÑ8€ÉXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îS¤î»¼CÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼C»îîS¤ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€May€15,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡XÉX»¼CÔÌò òÔ#†¼C»XXÉ#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€ROMANIA€ANN€Ô_ÔGADSONÔ_Ôòòóóó óÐ úJ ÐÌÔ€XÉX»¼CÔà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Montgomery€CountyÐ  p Ðà@@øøìàNos.€40811,€40000089,€40000380,€49900072,€40100017,€40100053,€40100068Ð  \ ÐJohn€H.€Ô_ÔGasawayÔ_Ô,€III,€JudgeÐ ø H ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<»` AßÐ ¼  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„01212„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€25,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ·  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<Ž` AßÐ ß  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Romania€Ann€Ô_ÔGadsonÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€in€the€Montgomery€County€Circuit€Court€to€sevenÐ ŠÚ Ðfelonies.€€While€she€was€on€probation€for€those€crimes,€the€defendant€committed€and€was€convictedÐ vÆ Ðof€three€additional€felonies€and€one€misdemeanor.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€revokedÐ b² Ðthe€defendantððs€probation,€determined€that€her€effective€sentence€for€the€ð ðoldðð€convictions€wasÐ Nž Ðtwelve€years,€and€ordered€that€she€serve€the€twelve„year€sentence€in€incarceration.€€The€trial€courtÐ :Š Ðalso€sentenced€the€defendant€to€an€effective€sentence€of€five€years€in€confinement€for€the€ð ðnewððÐ &v Ðconvictions€and€ordered€that€she€serve€the€five„year€sentence€consecutively€to€the€twelve„yearÐ b Ðsentence.€€The€defendant€appeals,€claiming€(1)€that€the€trial€court€incorrectly€calculated€the€effectiveÐ þN Ðsentence€for€her€old€convictions€to€be€twelve€years;€(2)€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€her€toÐ ê: Ðthe€maximum€punishment€in€the€range€for€one€of€her€new€convictions;€and€(3)€that€she€should€haveÐ Ö& Ðreceived€a€community€corrections€sentence€for€her€new€convictions.€€As€to€the€defendantððs€claim€thatÐ Â Ðthe€trial€court€incorrectly€calculated€her€twelve„year€sentence,€we€remand€the€judgments€ofÐ ®þ Ðconviction€to€the€trial€court.€€As€to€the€defendantððs€new€convictions,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€courtÐ šê Ðproperly€sentenced€the€defendant€and€affirm€those€judgments€of€conviction.Ð †Ö ÐÓIÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Circuit€Courtó ó€ò òAffirmed€in€Part;Ð ^!®  ÐCase€Remandedó óÐ N"ž! ÐÌòòÓ  ÓJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoe€G.€Rileyóó€and€òòJamesÐ &$v# ÐÔ_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð %b $ ÐÌÔ_ÔLonnaÔ_Ô€K.€Ô_ÔHildrethÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€attorney€for€appellant,€Romania€Ann€Ô_ÔGadsonÔ_Ô.Ð ê&:"& ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Renee€W.€Turner,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€Ð Â($( ÐJohn€Wesley€Ô_ÔCarneyÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Lance€A.€Baker,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ®)þ$) ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð š*ê%* ÐÓ¥ ÓÌÐ  r,Â',ý ÐÔ_Ôà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÐ ° ÐÌòòóóÓ  Óà  àBetween€August€1999€and€October€2000,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€in€four€cases€to€sevenÐ ˆØ Ðfelonies.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€her€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender€to€the€following:Ð tÄ ÐÌÔ*’ƒV d ädd Xdd Xdd X°(#°(#’ÔÔ,edd ÔÔ,îdd ÔÔ,dd ÔÔ,‘dd ÔÔ, dd ÔÔ+  ÔÐ $L œL œ „„$ÐCaseÐ °  ÐNumberÐ 'œ ì" „„'ÐCountÐ '° " „„'ÐOffenseÐ '°  " „„'ÐOffenseÐ °   ÐClassificationÐ 'œ ì " „„'ÐSentenceÐ A7°  " `íã@40811‰`íã@‰AÐ40811Ð _U+ l  `íã@40811 `íã@  ð?1„„‰ð?‰_Ð1Ð <20 l"  ð?1 ð? <ÐTheft€of€property€valuedÐ  l Ðover€$500Ð   X ÐClass€E€felonyÐ   l Ð1€year€to€be€served€as€118Ð  l Ðdays€in€jail,€the€remainderÐ  X Ðon€probationÐ  ô D  ÐÐ =3 tÄ   @2„„‰@‰=Ð2Ð <20tÄ "  @2 @ <ÐAggravated€burglaryÐ  tÄ  ÐClass€C€felonyÐ  tÄ  Ð3€years€to€be€served€asÐ tÄ  Ð118€days€in€jail,€theÐ `°  Ðremainder€on€probationÐ  Lœ  ÐÐ =3 Ì  @3„„‰@‰=Ð3Ð <20Ì"  @3 @ <ÐTheft€of€property€valuedÐ Ì Ðover€$500Ð  ¸ ÐClass€E€felonyÐ  Ì  Ð1€year€to€be€served€as€118Ð Ì! Ðdays€in€jail,€the€remainderÐ ¸" Ðon€probationÐ ;1 ¤ô# @QˇA49900072‰@QˇA‰;Ð49900072Ð bX.$t$ @QˇA49900072 @QˇA  @3„„‰@‰bÐ3Ð <20$t%"  @3 @ <ÐAggravated€burglaryÐ  $t& ÐClass€C€felonyÐ  $t' Ð4€years€to€be€served€as€1Ð $t( Ðyear€in€jail,€the€remainderÐ `) Ðon€probationÐ  üL* ÐÐ =3 |Ì+  @4„„‰@‰=Ð4Ð <20|Ì,"  @4 @ <ÐTheft€of€property€valuedÐ |Ì- Ðover€$1,000Ð  h¸. ÐClass€D€felonyÐ  |Ì/ Ð2€years€to€be€served€asÐ |Ì0 Ð120€days€in€jail,€theÐ h¸1 Ðremainder€on€probationÐ ;1 T¤2 ÈÒƒA40000089‰ÈÒƒA‰;Ð40000089Ð bX.Ô$3 ÈÒƒA40000089 ÈÒƒA  ð?1„„‰ð?‰bÐ1Ð <20Ô$4"  ð?1 ð? <ÐForgeryÐ  Ô$5 ÐClass€E€felonyÐ  Ô$6 Ð2€years€to€be€served€onÐ Ô$7 ÐprobationÐ ;1 À8 àÛƒA40000380‰àÛƒA‰;Ð40000380Ð bX.@9 àÛƒA40000380 àÛƒA  ð?1„„‰ð?‰bÐ1€Ð <20@:"  ð?1 ð? <ÐPossession€ofÐ @; Ðcontraband€in€a€penalÐ , |< ÐinstitutionÐ  !h= ÐClass€C€felonyÐ  @> Ð3€years€to€be€served€onÐ @? ÐprobationÐ , |@  ÐÌThe€sentences€within€case€numbers€40811€and€49900072,€respectively,€were€to€be€servedÐ  #pA Ðconcurrently.€€The€effective€three„year€sentence€for€case€number€40811,€the€effective€four„yearÐ  $\B Ðsentence€for€case€number€49900072,€and€the€two„year€sentence€for€case€number€40000089€were€toÐ ø$H C Ðbe€served€consecutively.€€The€three„year€sentence€for€case€number€40000380€was€purportedly€to€beÐ ä%4!D Ðserved€concurrently€to€case€number€49900092.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð Ð& "E Ðâ âÐ ¼' #F Ðà  àOn€April€5,€2001,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€burglary,€burglary,€theft€of€propertyÐ ° Ðâ âvalued€over€five€hundred€dollars,€and€theft€of€property€valued€less€than€five€hundred€dollars.€€TheÐ œì Ðdefendant€admitted€that€she€had€violated€the€probation€she€was€serving€for€her€old€convictions€andÐ ˆØ Ðwaived€a€probation€violation€hearing.€€On€May€15,€2001,€the€trial€court€held€a€sentencing€hearing€forÐ tÄ Ðthe€four€new€convictions.Ð `° ÐÌà  àAt€the€hearing,€Cathy€Gadson,€the€defendantððs€mother,€testified€that€the€then€twenty„year„oldÐ 8 ˆ Ðdefendant€had€been€a€good€child€and€was€not€violent.€€Then,€Ms.€Gadsonððs€son€was€killed,€and€hisÐ $ t Ðdeath€destroyed€the€family.€€The€defendant€had€idolized€her€brother€and€blamed€herself€for€his€death.€Ð  ` ÐAlthough€the€defendant€got€counseling,€it€did€not€help€her,€and€she€started€using€drugs.€€AccordingÐ ü L  Ðto€Ms.€Gadson,€if€the€trial€court€granted€the€defendant€an€alternative€sentence,€the€defendant€wouldÐ è 8  Ðlive€with€her€and€get€help€for€her€drug€problem.€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€that€she€started€committing€crimes€when€she€was€eighteen€years€oldÐ ¬ü  Ðbecause€after€her€brother€died,€no€one€had€been€around€to€keep€her€in€line€and€out€of€trouble.€€TheÐ ˜è  Ðdefendant€had€never€used€a€weapon€or€threatened€anyone€during€her€crimes,€and€no€one€was€in€theÐ „Ô  Ðhomes€that€she€burglarized.€€The€defendant€had€returned€stolen€property€to€one€of€her€victims€andÐ pÀ Ðhad€been€accepted€into€an€alcohol€and€drug€rehabilitation€program€at€Turning€Point.€€The€defendantÐ \¬ Ðtestified€that€her€drug€addiction€caused€her€to€commit€her€crimes,€and€she€acknowledged€that€if€theÐ H˜ Ðtrial€court€allowed€her€to€get€treatment€for€her€addiction,€she€would€stay€away€from€a€life€of€crime.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àThe€defendantððs€presentence€report€reflects€that€the€defendant€is€single€and€obtained€a€highÐ  \ Ðschool€diploma€while€she€was€incarcerated€in€a€juvenile€facility.€€The€defendant€reported€being€inÐ øH Ðfair€physical€health€and€having€skin€cancer.€€The€report€shows€that€the€defendant€has€a€history€ofÐ ä4 Ðdrug€and€alcohol€abuse€and€that€she€started€using€crack€cocaine€when€she€was€eighteen€years€old.€Ð Ð  ÐIn€the€report,€the€defendant€stated€that€she€started€smoking€crack€cocaine€ð ðeveryday,€all€dayðð€and€thatÐ ¼  Ðshe€wanted€help€for€her€drug€addiction.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender€to€the€following:€€Ð €Ð Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à¹Ô*¸ƒVddedd eîdd îdd ‘dd ‘ dd  V °(#°(#¸ÔÔ,edd ÔÔ,îdd ÔÔ,dd ÔÔ,‘dd ÔÔ, dd ÔÔ+  ÔÐ $X ¨X ¨ „„$ÐCaseÐ ¼  ÐNumberÐ '¨!ø " „„'ÐCountÐ '¼ !" „„'ÐOffenseÐ '¼ "" „„'ÐOffenseÐ ¼ # ÐClassificationÐ '¨!ø$" „„'ÐSentenceÐ D:¼ %" ˆƒA40100017‰ˆƒA‰DÐ40100017Ð bX.(#x& ˆƒA40100017 ˆƒA  ð?1„„‰ð?‰bÐ1Ð <20(#x'"  ð?1 ð? <ÐAggravated€burglaryÐ  (#x( ÐClass€C€felonyÐ  (#x) Ð3€yearsÐ  (#x* ÐÐ =3 ¨$ø+  @2„„‰@‰=Ð2Ð <20¨$ø,"  @2 @ <ÐTheft€of€property€valuedÐ ¨$ø- Ðover€$500Ð  ”%ä . ÐClass€E€felonyÐ  ¨$ø/ Ð2€yearsÐ ;1 ¨$ø0 ¨ƒA40100053‰¨ƒA‰;Ð40100053Ð bX.'d"1 ¨ƒA40100053 ¨ƒA  ð?1„„‰ð?‰bÐ1Ð <20'd"2"  ð?1 ð? <ÐBurglaryÐ  'd"3 ÐClass€D€felonyÐ  'd"4 Ð2€yearsÐ ;1 'd"5  ƒA40100068‰ ƒA‰;Ð40100068Ð bX.”(ä#6  ƒA40100068  ƒA  ð?1„„‰ð?‰bÐ1Ð <20”(ä#7"  ð?1 ð? <ÐTheft€of€property€valuedÐ ”(ä#8 Ðless€than€$500Ð  €)Ð$9 ÐClass€AÐ ”(ä#: ÐmisdemeanorÐ  €)Ð$; Ð11€months,€29€daysÐ ”(ä#<  Ðâ âÐ œ*ì%< ÐThe€trial€court€ordered€that€the€sentences€in€case€number€40100017€be€served€concurrently€for€anÐ ° Ðâ âeffective€sentence€of€three€years.€€It€also€determined€that€the€defendant€was€on€bail€for€the€aggravatedÐ œì Ðburglary€and€felony€theft€offenses€in€case€number€4010017€when€she€committed€the€burglary€offenseÐ ˆØ Ðin€case€number€40100053.€€It,€therefore,€held€that€under€Rule€32(c)(3)(C),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,€she€hadÐ tÄ Ðto€serve€the€sentence€for€the€latter€case€consecutively€to€those€for€the€former.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.Ð `° ÐP.€32(c)(3)(C)€(providing€for€mandatory€consecutive€sentencing€when€a€defendant€commits€a€felonyÐ L œ Ðwhile€released€on€bail€for€another€offense€and€the€defendant€is€convicted€of€both€offenses).€€Finally,Ð 8 ˆ Ðit€ordered€that€the€sentence€in€case€number€40100068€be€served€concurrently€to€the€sentence€in€caseÐ $ t Ðnumber€40100053€for€an€effective€sentence€of€five€years.€€The€trial€court€revoked€the€defendantððsÐ  ` Ðprobation€for€her€old€convictions€and€ordered€that€she€serve€the€five„year€sentence€consecutively€toÐ ü L  Ðthe€effective€twelve„year€sentence€that€she€had€received€for€the€old€convictions.€€The€defendantÐ è 8  Ðappeals,€raising€several€sentencing€issues.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àAppellate€review€of€sentencing€is€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€on€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€the€trialÐ ¬ü  Ðcourtððs€determinations€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d).€€As€the€SentencingÐ ˜è  ÐCommission€Comments€to€this€section€note,€the€burden€is€now€on€the€defendant€to€show€that€theÐ „Ô  Ðsentence€is€improper.€€This€means€that€if€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,Ð pÀ Ðmade€findings€of€fact€that€are€adequately€supported€in€the€record,€and€gave€due€consideration€andÐ \¬ Ðproper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principles€that€are€relevant€to€sentencing€under€the€1989€SentencingÐ H˜ ÐAct,€we€may€not€disturb€the€sentence€even€if€a€different€result€were€preferred.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805Ð 4„ ÐS.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð  p ÐÌà  àHowever,€ð ðthe€presumption€of€correctness€which€accompanies€the€trial€courtððs€action€isÐ øH Ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ ä4 Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð Ð  Ð1991).€€In€this€respect,€for€the€purpose€of€meaningful€appellate€review,€Ð ¼  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àthe€trial€court€must€place€on€the€record€its€reasons€for€arriving€at€theÐ ”ä Ðfinal€sentencing€decision,€identify€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ €Ð Ðfactors€found,€state€the€specific€facts€supporting€each€enhancementÐ l¼ Ðfactor€found,€and€articulate€how€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ X ¨ Ðfactors€have€been€evaluated€and€balanced€in€determining€the€sentence.€Ð D!” ÐT.C.A.€ðð€40-35-210(f)€(1990).Ð0"€ ` x` x ÐÌòòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€599€(Tenn.€1994).Ð $X" ÐÌà  àAlso,€in€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review,€we€must€consider€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€atÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€trial€and€sentencing€hearing,€(2)€the€presentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€andÐ Ì&"% Ðarguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conduct,Ð ¸'#& Ð(5)€any€mitigating€or€statutory€enhancement€factors,€(6)€any€statement€that€the€defendant€made€onÐ ¤(ô#' Ðher€own€behalf€and€(7)€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-102,Ð )à$( Ð-103,€and€-210;€€òòseeóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€168;€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€236-37€(Tenn.Ð |*Ì%) Ð1986).Ð h+¸&* Їà  àThe€sentence€to€be€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€presumptively€the€minimum€in€the€range€forÐ ° Ða€Class€B,€C,€D,€or€E€felony€unless€there€are€enhancement€factors€present.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ œì Ð40-35-210(c).€€Procedurally,€the€trial€court€is€to€increase€the€sentence€within€the€range€based€uponÐ ˆØ Ðthe€existence€of€enhancement€factors€and,€then,€reduce€the€sentence€as€appropriate€for€any€mitigatingÐ tÄ Ðfactors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210(d)€and€(e).€€The€weight€to€be€afforded€an€existing€factor€isÐ `° Ðleft€to€the€trial€courtððs€discretion€so€long€as€it€complies€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989Ð L œ ÐSentencing€Act€and€its€findings€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ 8 ˆ Ð40-35-210,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€€òòMossóó,€727€S.W.2d€at€237;€€òòseeóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ $ t Ðat€169.Ð  ` ÐÌÓ  Óà @ àà @` àà @¸ àà @ àà @h àà @À àò òI.€€TWELVE„YEAR€SENTENCE€CALCULATIONó óÐ è 8  ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€calculating€the€effective€sentence€for€herÐ À  Ðold€convictions€to€be€twelve€years.€€She€claims€that€her€effective€sentences€in€case€numbers€40811,Ð ¬ü  Ð49900072,€40000089,€and€40000380€were€three,€four,€two,€and€three€years,€respectively.€€She€assertsÐ ˜è  Ðthat€although€the€sentences€for€the€first€three€cases€were€to€be€served€consecutively,€the€trial€courtÐ „Ô  Ðordered€that€she€serve€her€three„year€sentence€in€case€number€40000380€concurrently€to€ð ðtheÐ pÀ Ðsentence€that€she€was€then€serving.ðð€€She€contends€that€upon€revoking€her€probation,€the€trial€courtÐ \¬ Ðshould€have€ordered€her€to€serve€an€effective€sentence€of€nine€years€in€confinement.€€The€state€claimsÐ H˜ Ðthat€the€twelve„year€sentence€is€correct.€€Based€upon€the€record€before€us,€we€cannot€determineÐ 4„ Ðwhether€the€trial€court€correctly€calculated€the€defendantððs€effective€sentence.Ð  p ÐÌà  àDuring€the€sentencing€hearing€for€the€defendantððs€new€convictions,€the€trial€court€read€theÐ øH Ðdefendantððs€sentences€for€her€old€convictions€and€stated€that€the€defendant€was€to€serve€her€three„Ð ä4 Ðyear€sentence€in€case€number€40000380€concurrently€to€her€sentence€in€case€number€49900092.€€TheÐ Ð  Ðjudgment€for€case€number€40000380€also€reflects€that€the€three„year€sentence€for€that€case€was€toÐ ¼  Ðbe€served€concurrently€with€her€sentence€in€case€number€49900092.€€However,€we€have€no€judgmentÐ ¨ø Ðor€any€other€information€about€case€number€49900092.€€Although€we€suspect€that€the€trial€courtÐ ”ä Ðintended€for€the€defendantððs€sentence€in€case€number€40000380€to€be€served€concurrently€with€caseÐ €Ð Ðnumber€49900072,€we€cannot€make€that€assumption.€€Therefore,€we€remand€the€case€to€the€trialÐ l¼ Ðcourt.€€If€the€trial€court€determines€that€the€defendant€was€to€serve€her€sentence€for€case€numberÐ X ¨ Ð40000380€concurrently€to€case€number€49900072,€then€upon€revoking€the€defendantððs€probation,Ð D!” Ðthe€trial€court€should€have€ordered€her€to€serve€an€effective€sentence€of€nine€years€in€confinementÐ 0"€  Ðfor€the€old€convictions.€Ð #l! ÐÌà  àWe€note€that€the€stateððs€brief€claims€in€a€footnote€that€under€Rule€32(c),€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.,Ð ô$D # Ðthe€trial€court€correctly€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€twelve€years€because€the€defendant€committedÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€offense€in€case€number€40000380€while€she€was€on€probation€in€case€numbers€40811,€49900072,Ð Ì&"% Ðand€40000089.€€òòóóHowever,€as€the€defendantððs€reply€brief€points€out,€Rule€32(c)(3)(A)€provides€forÐ ¸'#& Ðmandatory€consecutive€sentencing€when€a€defendant€commits€a€felony€while€on€parole,€notÐ ¤(ô#' Ðprobation,€for€another€felony.€€There€is€no€evidence€that€the€defendant€was€on€parole€at€the€time€sheÐ )à$( Ðcommitted€the€offense€in€case€number€40000380.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àWe€also€note€that€the€judgment€for€count€four€in€case€number€49900072€reflects€that€theÐ ° Ðdefendant€was€convicted€of€theft€of€property€over€$1,000,€a€Class€C€felony.€€However,€that€offenseÐ œì Ðis€a€Class€D€felony.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„405(3).€€Because€the€indictment€states€that€theÐ ˆØ Ðdefendant€was€indicted€for€Class€D€felony€theft€and€the€defendant€was€sentenced€to€the€minimumÐ tÄ Ðin€the€range€for€a€Class€D€felony,€we€believe€the€trial€court€made€a€clerical€error€on€the€judgment.€Ð `° ÐTherefore,€we€also€remand€count€four€in€case€number€49900072€for€correction€of€the€judgment€toÐ L œ Ðreflect€the€correct€offense€classification.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌÓ  Óò òII.€€SENTENCE€FOR€THE€FELONY€THEFT€CONVICTIONÐ  ` Ðó óÌÓ  Óà  àNext,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€sentencing€her€to€the€maximumÐ è 8  Ðpunishment€in€the€range€for€her€theft€of€property€valued€over€five€hundred€dollars€conviction€in€caseÐ Ô$  Ðnumber€40100017.€€Specifically,€she€contends€that€the€applicable€mitigating€factors€outweighed€theÐ À  Ðenhancement€factors.€€The€state€claims€that€the€trial€court€properly€sentenced€the€defendant.€€WeÐ ¬ü  Ðagree€with€the€state.€€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àIn€sentencing€the€defendant,€the€trial€court€noted€that€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender,€theÐ pÀ Ðappropriate€statutory€ranges€of€punishment€were€three€to€six€years€for€aggravated€burglary,€a€ClassÐ \¬ ÐC€felony;€two€to€four€years€for€burglary,€a€Class€D€felony;€one€to€two€years€for€theft€of€propertyÐ H˜ Ðvalued€more€than€five€hundred€dollars,€a€Class€E€felony;€and€up€to€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€daysÐ 4„ Ðfor€theft€of€property€valued€less€than€five€hundred€dollars,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€trial€courtÐ  p Ðdetermined€that€enhancement€factor€(1),€that€the€defendant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminalÐ  \ Ðconvictions€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€the€appropriate€range,€and€factor€(8),€that€theÐ øH Ðdefendant€has€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€a€sentenceÐ ä4 Ðinvolving€release€into€the€community,€applied€to€all€four€convictions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð Ð  Ð114(1),€(8).€€The€trial€court€also€applied€enhancement€factor€(13),€that€the€defendant€committed€aÐ ¼  Ðfelony€while€on€release€status,€to€the€aggravated€burglary,€burglary,€and€theft€of€property€valued€overÐ ¨ø Ðfive€hundred€dollars€convictions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(13).€€In€mitigation,€the€trialÐ ”ä Ðcourt€applied€the€following€factors€to€all€four€of€the€convictions:€(1)€the€defendantððs€criminal€conductÐ €Ð Ðdid€not€cause€or€threaten€serious€bodily€injury;€(5)€the€defendant,€before€detection,€compensated€theÐ l¼ Ðvictim€of€criminal€conduct€for€the€damage€or€injury€the€victim€sustained;€(6)€the€defendant,€becauseÐ X ¨ Ðof€her€youth,€lacked€substantial€judgment€in€committing€the€offenses;€and€(13)€the€defendant,€byÐ D!” Ðpleading€guilty,€saved€the€state€the€time,€effort,€and€expense€of€going€to€trial.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð 0"€  Ððð€40„35„113(1),€(5),€(6),€(13).€€Ð #l! ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€weighed€the€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€and€sentenced€the€defendant€Ð ô$D # Ðto€the€minimum€in€the€range€for€the€aggravated€burglary€and€burglary€convictions,€three€years€andÐ à%0!$ Ðtwo€years,€respectively.€€For€the€felony€and€misdemeanor€theft€of€property€convictions,€the€trial€courtÐ Ì&"% Ðsentenced€the€defendant€to€the€maximum€in€the€range,€two€years€and€eleven€months,€twenty„nineÐ ¸'#& Ðdays,€respectively.€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àAlthough€the€defendant€contends€that€the€mitigating€factors€outweighed€the€enhancementÐ |*Ì%) Ðfactors€and€that€the€trial€court€should€have€sentenced€her€to€the€minimum€in€the€range€for€her€felonyÐ h+¸&* Ðtheft€conviction,€we€believe€that€the€trial€court€properly€sentenced€the€defendant.€€As€previouslyÐ ° Ðstated,€the€weight€to€be€afforded€an€existing€factor€is€left€to€the€trial€courtððs€discretion€so€long€as€itÐ œì Ðcomplies€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Sentencing€Act€and€its€findings€are€adequatelyÐ ˆØ Ðsupported€by€the€record.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€òòMossóó,Ð tÄ Ð727€S.W.2d€at€237;€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.€€In€sentencing€the€defendant€to€the€maximumÐ `° Ðpunishment€in€the€range€for€a€Class€E€felony,€the€trial€court€determined€that€the€enhancement€factorsÐ L œ Ðoutweighed€the€mitigating€factors.€€The€record€before€us,€especially€the€defendantððs€extensiveÐ 8 ˆ Ðcriminal€history,€supports€the€weight€that€the€trial€court€gave€to€the€applicable€enhancement€andÐ $ t Ðmitigating€factors€and€the€trial€courtððs€sentencing€her€to€the€maximum€punishment€available€for€theÐ  ` Ðoffense.€Ð ü L  Ðà  àà ` àÌÓ  Óò òIII.€€ALTERNATIVE€SENTENCINGÐ Ô$  ÐÌÓ  Óà  àó óFinally,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€ordering€her€to€serve€her€effectiveÐ ¬ü  Ðfive„year€sentence€in€confinement.€€She€claims€that€she€is€eligible€for€€community€corrections€underÐ ˜è  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(a).€€In€addition,€she€claims€that€her€drug€addiction€and€skin€cancerÐ „Ô  Ðconstitute€ð ðspecial€needsðð€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(c)€that€ð ðmake€her€moreÐ pÀ Ðqualified€for€the€Community€Corrections€Program.ðð€€€The€state€contends€that€the€trial€court€properlyÐ \¬ Ðdenied€alternative€sentencing.€€We€agree€with€the€state.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àWhen€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€should€consider€that€(1)Ð  p Ðconfinement€is€needed€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€ofÐ  \ Ðcriminal€conduct,€(2)€confinement€is€needed€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€orÐ øH Ðconfinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€people€likely€to€commitÐ ä4 Ðsimilar€offenses,€or€(3)€less€restrictive€measures€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ Ð  Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169€(citing€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¼  Ð40-35-103(1)(A)„(C)).€€òòóóThe€trial€court€may€also€consider€the€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors€setÐ ¨ø Ðforth€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-113€and€„114.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210(b)(5);€òòState€v.Ð ”ä ÐBostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Additionally,€a€trial€court€should€considerÐ €Ð Ða€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€when€determining€if€an€alternativeÐ l¼ Ðsentence€would€be€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.ðð€40-35-103(5);€òòBostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€438.€Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àIn€denying€the€defendantððs€request€for€alternative€sentencing,€the€trial€court€stated,Ð 0"€  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àAnd€the€Court€finds€that€there€is€no€reasonable€expectationÐ $X" Ðthat€Ms.€Gadson€can€rehabilitate€herself€in€a€probated€status.€€She€hasÐ ô$D # Ðbeen€on€probation€for€multiple,€multiple€offenses.€€She€simply€cannotÐ à%0!$ Ðfollow€the€rules€and€regulations,€and€sheððs€demonstrated€that€over€andÐ Ì&"% Ðover€and€over.и'#&` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àA€release€status€through€community€correction€would€not€beÐ )à$( Ðâ âany€different€than€to€be€in€a€release€status€under€a€probated€sentence.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐShe€has€to€be€confined,€so€sheððs€[ordered]€to€serve€this€effective€15Ð ° Ðyear€sentence€at€TDOC.€€Thatððs€all.Мì` x` x Ðâ âÌà  àBased€upon€our€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€ordering€theÐ tÄ Ðdefendant€to€serve€her€entire€five„year€sentence€in€incarceration.€€The€defendant€had€seven€priorÐ `° Ðfelony€convictions,€and€while€she€was€on€probation€for€those€offenses,€she€committed€three€moreÐ L œ Ðfelonies€and€one€misdemeanor.€€Although€the€defendant€blamed€her€actions€on€her€drug€problem,Ð 8 ˆ Ðshe€continued€to€commit€crimes€without€seeking€treatment.€€According€to€the€presentence€report,€theÐ $ t Ðdefendant€ð ðadvised€she€has€skin€cancer€and€she€takes€medication€for€itching,€but€otherwise€defendantÐ  ` Ðreported€being€healthy.ðð€€The€defendant€did€not€testify€about€her€skin€cancer€at€the€sentencingÐ ü L  Ðhearing.€€We€believe€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€defendantððs€previous€sentences€involvingÐ è 8  Ðrelease€into€the€community€have€been€unsuccessful€and€that€the€defendant€does€not€reflect€a€highÐ Ô$  Ðpotential€for€rehabilitation.€€Moreover,€the€defendant€has€not€demonstrated€that€she€has€special€needsÐ À  Ðthat€can€best€be€treated€in€the€community.€€We€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€a€communityÐ ¬ü  Ðcorrections€sentence.Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  à€Based€upon€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€we€remand€the€judgments€of€convictionÐ pÀ Ðin€case€numbers€40811,€49900072,€40000089,€and€40000380€to€the€trial€court€to€determine€whetherÐ \¬ Ðthe€defendantððs€effective€sentence€for€those€convictions€is€nine€or€twelve€years€and€to€correct€theÐ H˜ Ðjudgment€for€count€four€in€case€number€49900072.€€As€to€the€defendantððs€remaining€convictions,Ð 4„ Ðwe€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court.Ð  p ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð Ð  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGE