WPC ]AnAIYogBTymiѼn>J݋F#+;h\ fX: x^9S5  \$PIVl8iZ9V{P^=M{[ 4ļ"S̎,GUռ)Xmg$QMKײW҉&* OY      TheAppellantalsoallegesthathispleaagreementisvoidbecausethetrialcourt failedto   signoffonthepleaagreement.Thisargumentisclearlymisplaced.Thetrialcourtisnotaparty  tothepleaagreement;therefore,itssignatureontheagreementisnotrequired.Therecorddoes,  however,includedanOrder,signedbythetrialcourt,acceptingtheAppellantspleasofguiltyas k providedbythetermsofthepleaagreement.Accordingly,thisissueiswithoutmerit. T  2.IllegalSentence & v    Last,theAppellantassertsthathistwoconcurrenteighteenyearsentencesareillegalbecause  J theyare outsidetheStatutoryMandatesofT.C.A.4035111and4035112,whichrequiresthat  3  anypersonconvictedofrapeofachild,andwhoissentencedwithintheRangeIasastandard    offender,thatsuchshallreceiveamandatorysentenceoftwentyfive(25)years.Insum,the   Appellantarguesthathissentencesareillegalbecauseheshouldhavereceivedtwentyfiveyear   sentencesratherthantheimposedeighteenyearsentences.Thisargumentisillfoundedasneither   ourcriminalcodenoroursentencinglawsrequirethatadefendantwhoisconvictedofrapeofa p  childbemandatorilysentencedtotwentyfiveyearsimprisonment. Y    TheAppellantwasconvictedoftwocountsofrapeofachild,classAfelonies,andsentenced +{ asaRangeIoffender.TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035112(a)(1)(2003)providesthatthe d sentencingrangeforaRangeIstandardoffenderforaclassAfelonyisfifteentotwentyfiveyears. M Clearly,theAppellantstwoeighteenyearsentencesfortheseclassAfeloniesarewithinthe 6 appropriaterange.Accordingly,thesentencesimposedarenotillegal.Thus,havingdeterminedthat  theAppellantpresentednocognizableclaimsforreliefinhispetitionforwritofhabeascorpus,the  trialcourtwascorrectinsummarilydismissingthepetitionwithoutappointmentofcounselora  hearing.  @GG% CONCLUSION \   Basedupontheforegoingreasons,weaffirmtheWayneCountyCircuitCourtsdismissal 0 oftheAppellantspetitionforwritofhabeascorpus. i #XXX Xu #   `     h     ___________________________________ #"    `     h     DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE