ÿWPCZ …# VUNa %¯ 0(µw@Ý4 1 @ H 0JN 0T˜ 0^ì 0hJ 0r² 0|$ 0†  0& 1u¶ 0d+ U> U6Í B)DC, AMo B¼U*Ùîv~ñvÓo D3B 0@u AOµÆ 0DÊ D/ B=˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 (ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ bEcdefUg ehUijÓ€v»{s 3|xzH2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman< Œ 9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d""""7Border 1dd€-#Cþÿ << Gÿÿ d< Œ 9p`(Arial äÝ ƒ!ÝÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÔ€&ÔÔ€&ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€&XÔÌÌò òSeptember€30,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€&ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'@Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò%%%%'ÿÿdxd("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ ÔÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ Ð ÒÓ  ÓÑ ` Ñò òÔ€!ÔÑ\R AØ'\Ñ›œ›ÌÌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEó óÌÙ€€ÙœßL€$'#;+'h|ÝÅ` Å `€€Lß›Ìò òAT€JACKSONÌÌJANUARY€SESSION,€1996ó óÌÌÌÌÓ  Óò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à àà àà à€]à àC.C.A.Ï#02C01„9508„CC„00248Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€]Ìà àó óAppellee,à àà àà àà àò ò€]Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€]Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€]à àHARDIN€COUNTYÌVS.à àà àà àà àà àà à€]Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€]à àHON.€C.€CREED€McGINLEYÌKATHERINE€H.GALLAHERà àà à€]€€€JUDGEÌà àà àà àà àà à€€€€€€]Ìó óà àAppellant.à àà àà à€ò ò]€€€€€€€(Second€Offense€DUI)ÌÌó óÔ€ ÔÌÌòòÔ€!ÔFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à àà àà àà àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:ÌÌMR.€J.€DANIEL€FREEMONà àà àà àCHARLES€W.€BURSONÌAttorney€at€Lawà àà àà àà àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÌFreemon€and€HillhouseÌP.O.€Box€787ÌLawrenceburg,€TN€38426à àà àà àCHARLOTTE€H.€RAPPUHNÌà àà àà àà àà àà à€€€€à àAttorney€Generalððs€OfficeÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àJOHN€W.€OVERTONÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àAsst.€District€AttorneyÏGeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àMain€StreetÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àSavannah,€TN€38372Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€___________________________ÌÌAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIEDÌÌLYNN€W.€BROWN,€SPECIAL€œJUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÑ ` ÑÓÓÔ% € ÔÑ7€Æ8XXdìXXdì7ÑÌÌÌà@ àò òOPINIONó óÌÌà àThe€appellant,€Katherine€H.€Gallaher,€pleaded€guilty€in€theÏCriminal€Court€for€Hardin€County,€Tennessee,€to€the€offense€ofÏdriving€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant,€second€offense.€ÏThe€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€11€months€and€29€days€ofÏwhich€the€appellant€was€required€to€serve€180€days€in€jailÍfollowed€by€5€months€and€29€days€of€supervised€probation.€€HerÏdriverððs€license€was€revoked€for€three€years€and€a€fine€of€sixÏhundred€dollars€was€imposed.€€The€only€issue€presented€in€thisÏappeal€is€whether€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€isÏappropriate.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àThe€proof€in€the€case€showed€that€on€November€13,€1994,€theÏappellant€was€driving€so€erratically€on€a€public€road€in€HardinÏCounty€that€a€good€citizen€attempted€to€stop€her.€€Her€automobileÏtraveled€into€the€oncoming€lane€of€traffic€as€well€as€off€theÏroadway.€€She€hit€one€automobile€and€then€stopped€in€a€parkingÏlot€where€the€citizen€took€the€keys€from€her€car€to€prevent€herÏdriving€any€further.€€A€sheriff's€deputy€arrived,€found€theÏappellant€to€be€intoxicated,€and€placed€her€under€arrest.€€SheÏwas€transported€to€a€hospital€where€a€sample€of€blood€wasÏobtained,€but€the€results€of€the€laboratory€analysis€of€her€bloodÏwere€suppressed€by€the€trial€court.€€She€was€charged€with€drivingÏunder€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant,€fourth€offense€which€sheÏwaived€to€the€grand€jury.€€The€grand€jury,€however,€indicted€theÏappellant€for€the€offense€of€second€offense€driving€under€theÍinfluence€of€an€intoxicant.€€Ms.€Gallaher€entered€a€plea€ofÏguilty€as€charged€without€a€plea€agreement,€and€the€court€atÏrequest€of€her€counsel€set€a€later€date€for€sentencing€hearing.ÌÌà àAt€sentencing€hearing€the€state€introduced€certified€copiesÏof€three€prior€convictions€for€DUI€as€follows:€€a€conviction€onÏMarch€10,€1989,€in€the€General€Sessions€Court€for€Wayne€CountyÏfor€which€she€served€two€days€in€jail;€a€conviction€on€April€10,Ï1992,€in€the€General€Sessions€Court€for€Hardin€County€showing€aÏblood€alcohol€content€of€.25%€for€which€she€served€45€days€inÏjail;€a€conviction€in€the€Criminal€Court€for€Wayne€County€on€MayÏ12,€1992€for€which€she€received€a€45„day€jail€sentence€concurrentÏwith€Hardin€County.€€The€April€10,€1992,€Hardin€County€convictionÏhad€been€alleged€for€the€purpose€of€enhancement€in€the€indictmentÏand€was€the€basis€for€appellant's€plea€to€a€second€offense€DUI.€ÌÌ€€€€€€€The€appellant€has€the€burden€of€establishing€that€theÏsentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€was€erroneous.€òòState€v.ÏAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991);€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805ÏS.W.2d€785,€786€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€Appellate€review€of€aÍsentence€is€de€novo,€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinationsÏmade€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÏðð40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€of€correctness€is€"conditionedÏupon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÏconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€andÏcircumstances."€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.€€Specifically,€withÏrespect€to€misdemeanor€offenders,€the€trial€court€must€considerÏthe€principles,€purposes,€and€goals€of€the€Sentencing€Act.€€òòStateóóÏòòv.€Palmeróó,€902€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.€1995);€see€also€TennesseeÏCode€Annotated€ðð40„35„302.€€Moreover,€the€court€can€grantÏprobation€immediately€or€after€a€period€of€split€or€continuousÏconfinement.€òòIdóó.€€ÌÌ€€€€€€€The€trial€court's€statements€at€the€sentencing€hearingÏindicate€that€the€court€did€consider€principles,€purposes,€andÏgoals€of€the€Act;€the€appellant's€prior€criminal€history;€and€theÏappellant's€rehabilitative€potential.€See€Tennessee€CodeÏAnnotated€€ðð40„35„103(1)(A),€„103(1)(C),€and€„103(5).€Our€reviewÏis,€therefore,€de€novo€with€a€presumption€of€correctness.€€Also,Ïone€convicted€of€a€misdemeanor,€unlike€one€convicted€of€a€felony,Íis€not€entitled€to€a€presumption€of€a€minimum€sentence.€òòState€v.ÏCreasyóó,€885€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€permission€toÏappeal€denied,€òòidóó.€(Tenn.€1994).€€ÌÌà àThe€trial€court€properly€found€that€the€range€of€punishmentÏfor€the€offense€to€which€the€appellant€pleaded€was€a€not€lessÏthan€forty„five€days€nor€more€than€eleven€months€and€twenty„nineÏdays€in€jail.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€€ðð55„10„403(a)(1).€€TheÏcourt€noted€that€the€appellant's€prior€conviction€on€April€10,Ï1992,€in€Hardin€County€was€used€to€establish€the€range€ofÏpunishment€for€DUI€second€offense,€so€that€it€could€not€be€usedÏto€enhance€the€punishment€within€the€range.€€However,€the€trialÏcourt€did€consider€the€appellant's€two€additional€convictions€forÏDUI€for€the€purpose€of€enhancing€punishment€within€the€range.€ÏThe€trial€court€also€found€that€the€petitioner€had€failed€atÏprevious€attempts€of€rehabilitation.€€The€evidence€supports€thisÏfinding;€the€petitioner€has€continued€to€consume€alcoholicÏbeverages,€even€though€such€consumption€worsens€her€chronic€liverÏdisease€and€may€reduce€her€life€span.€€We€note€that€Ms.€GallaherÏtestified€that€she€had€completely€refrained€from€the€use€ofÍalcohol€since€the€commission€of€this€offense.€€However,€theÏrecord€indicates€that€she€has€persistently€abused€alcohol.€€TheÏproof€supports€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€on€her€potentialÏfor€rehabilitation.ÌÌà àHaving€examined€the€record€in€this€case,€we€conclude€thatÏthe€trial€court€enhanced€the€sentence€appropriately€within€theÏrange€of€punishment€for€this€offense,€upon€consideration€of€theÏsentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€ÏAccordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€trial€court€in€imposing€aÏsentence€of€180€days€confinement.€€ÌÌà àThere€is,€however,€one€matter€regarding€the€judgment€of€theÏtrial€court€which€should€be€corrected€upon€remand.€€The€trialÏcourt€revoked€the€appellant's€drivers€license€for€three€years.€ÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€€ðð55„10„403(a)(1)€provides€that€theÏcourt€shall€prohibit€a€person€convicted€of€DUI€second€offenseÏfrom€driving€a€vehicle€in€the€State€of€Tennessee€for€a€period€ofÏtime€of€two€years.€€The€statute€does€not€allow€a€suspension€ofÏthe€driving€privilege€for€three€years€upon€this€conviction.ÌÌà àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€in€all€other€respectsÏaffirmed.ÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà à__________________________________ÓÓÌà àà àà àà àà àà àLynn€W.€Brown,€Special€JudgeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌDavid€G.€Hayes,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ_______________________________ÌJerry€L.€Smith,€JudgeÌ€›