ÿWPCÀ .R€ø.˜Â•Ó´Ÿ‘&I;Ú¥1×I‘¯/ÀLéÝì Y^QØÕ*ìÑÎMäá‡\¡s¶`¥Ãe§Ц €»ãcu8…Àˆü*ÓûV1‰n‘ÞÀ âŸí}Ï'ƒû#bs®Km=jIÀ—/±àd³«ýþŒáÔ&-a‚'¨±(õ¶aØ'·0{GÞŸöáNéSáSãðeá¥{e2Ù­Bš»bÐu¥ÿÒÁtE  òBàˆì]™Xõ(…ÀÑ•}Ö¨E|%nß::~::a—\±{T‰ÇdÅž‡ÚØš;øvqm}U¤Ù†÷4Áò® LåAÝİëá…z½•þ†O$‘B Pû‹]}¿Ÿª9}Œªý‡€J2 ÿ~»7ö]®ƒ³c“ û@@£ÔbA=×> š“ë”XÙ(õ,tå±" <ó.Mâƒ~è‹Å…°ç‡£#)ÚŠnAòur‰~¦«Ã$¥O½èuz²ò¶Oq²³ÚµnÉaIlöˆ Wx]—èÕb"RZÍ¥Zl±?ø´]&³52OòµûFÔ2 Ë›½À9éXô‡w Iœ¯ºïòܸ²P…«öAÇ¿Z­3D22Ôed[©oáõó‡ëdšüç÷C`ô·M2Ï#§~b %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë ë N±±±E³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³bµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ 0ë½½½½ B¨¨ 0¤Å D3i D-œ 0KÉÉ ASÆg 0¤- 0DÑ A«»e¸f)â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular•jW)opnRDPE3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- ù-(|G2´@$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ë4»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôˆ ò»»Ô d(|3y$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ë4»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3y$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ë4»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ë4»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ë4»»»ÔÑ8€ùXXdð»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î³×ë4ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼ë4»îî³× #ԈРÜ, ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€26,€2000Ð X ÐÔ‡XùX»¼ë4ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ë4»XXù#ÔSTòòATE€OFóó€TENNESSEE€v.€JOHN€CLARK€GARRISONòòóóÔ‡XùX»¼ë4Ôó óÐ  ` ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ  h Ðà@@øøìàNo.€45851,€45852€€€€€€Lynn€W.€Brown,€JudgeÐ  X ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` AßÐ Ø(  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„00121„CCA„R3„CDÐ ×'  ÐNovember€6,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ Ç  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<¶` AßÐ ·  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓOn€August€3,€1992,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€theft€under€Tennessee€CodeÐ ¶ ÐAnnotated€sections€39„14„103,€„105(4)Ô#†¼ë4»XXù™#ÔÔ‡XùX»¼ë4Ô.€€The€defendant€was€sentenced€to€two€consecutive€nine„yearÐ ¦ö Ðsentences€and€ordered€to€pay€restitution€in€the€amount€of€€$51,000.€€On€June€8,€1999,€the€defendantÐ –æ Ðfiled€a€Motion€to€Correct€Illegal€Sentence.€€It€was€denied.€€In€this€appeal,€the€defendant€contends€thatÐ †Ö Ð1)€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€finding€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€of€incarceration€and€restitution€wasÐ vÆ Ðlegal€as€a€matter€of€lawòòóó;€and€2)€the€trial€court€erred€by€finding€that€the€defendant€knowingly€andÐ f¶ Ðvoluntarily€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€involving€an€illegal€sentence.€€After€a€careful€review,€weÐ V¦ Ðfind€no€merit€in€these€issues,€and€find€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€is€legal.€The€defendantððsÐ F– Ðsentence€of€incarceration€and€the€courtððs€imposition€of€restitution€is€affirmed.€Ð 6† Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð &v ÐÓËÓò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óÐ f ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ë4»àXùŒ#ÔÔ‡XùX.¼ë4ÔJohn€Everett€Williams,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòNorma€McGee€Ogleóó€andÐ öF ÐòòRobert€W.€Ô_ÔWedemeyerÔ_Ôóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð æ6 ÐÌGregory€P.€Isaacs,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€John€Clark€Garrison.Ð Æ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€A.€Ô_ÔFulksÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€andÐ ¦"ö! ÐRandall€E.€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð –#æ" ÐÓï ÓÌÌÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ë4»XXù #ÔÔ‡XùX»¼ë4ÔÐ V'¦"& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ë4»XXùë #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XùX»¼ë4Ôà  àThe€defendant,€John€Clark€Garrison,€was€indicted€by€a€Knox€County€Grand€Jury€for€twoÐ 6)†$( Ðcounts€of€theft€and€three€counts€of€forgery.€€On€August€3,€1992,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€twoÐ &*v%) Ðcounts€of€theft€as€a€result€of€a€plea€agreement.€€The€defendantððs€guilty€pleas€were€accepted€by€theÐ +f&* Ðcourt,€and€the€defendant€was€sentenced€to€two€nine„year€sentences€and€ordered€to€pay€restitution.€Ð ,V'+ ÐThe€defendant€appeals€from€the€denial€of€his€Motion€to€Correct€Illegal€Sentence€contending€that€1)Ð ö,F(, Ðthe€trial€court€erred€in€its€finding€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€of€incarceration€and€the€order€imposedÐ æ-6)-ý& ÐÔ_Ôrequiring€him€to€pay€restitution€was€legal€as€a€matter€of€law;€andòòóó€2)€the€trial€court€erred€by€findingÐ ° Ðthat€the€defendant€knowingly€and€voluntarily€entered€into€a€plea€agreement€involving€an€illegalÐ  ð Ðsentence.€€After€a€careful€review€of€the€law€surrounding€these€issues,€we€find€no€merit€in€theseÐ à Ðcontentions.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌÓ  Óòòò òFACTSó óóóÐ ` ° ÐÌÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€€was€indicted€by€a€Knox€County€Grand€Jury€for€two€counts€of€theft€and€threeÐ @  Ðcounts€of€forgery.€€On€August€3,€1992,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€two€counts€of€theft€pursuant€toÐ 0 € Ða€plea€agreement.€€The€trial€court€accepted€the€defendantððs€guilty€pleas,€sentenced€him€to€twoÐ  p  Ðconsecutive€nine„year€sentences,€and€ordered€him€to€pay€restitution.€€In€a€subsequent€appeal,€theÐ `  Ðdefendant€appealed€the€validity€of€his€guilty€plea€and€sentence.€€In€an€opinion€filed€by€this€Court€onÐ P  ÐJune€10,€1998,€we€affirmed€the€defendantððs€guilty€plea€and€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€John€ClarkÐ ð@  ÐGarrisonóó,€Knox€County,€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9601„CR„00050,€4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€filed€€June€10,Ð à0  Ð1998,€at€Knoxville).Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àOn€June€8,€1999,€the€defendant€filed€a€Motion€to€Correct€Illegal€Sentence€claiming€that€hisÐ ° Ðsentence€of€incarceration€and€restitution€was€incorrect.€€The€defendant€requested€that€the€judgmentÐ  ð Ðof€sentence€handed€down€in€his€case€be€declared€void€òòab€initioóó.€€On€September€20,€1999,€a€judgmentÐ à Ðwas€entered€denying€the€defendantððs€Motion€to€Correct€Illegal€Sentence.€€On€September€28,€1999,Ð €Ð Ðthe€defendant€filed€a€Petition€for€Reconsideration.€€The€petition€was€denied€on€October€8,€1999,€andÐ pÀ Ðthis€appeal€followed.€€€€€€€€€€Ð `° ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€was€sentenced€in€September€1995.€€Prior€to€July€1,€1996,€the€general€rule€wasÐ @ Ðthat€a€criminal€defendant€could€not€receive€a€sentence€of€incarceration€and€restitution.€€After€July€1,Ð 0€ Ð1996,€the€rule€was€changed€and€a€defendant€could€receive€a€sentence€of€incarceration€and€restitution.€Ð  p ÐòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„104(c).€€However,€in€existence€at€the€time€the€defendant€pled€guiltyÐ ` Ðwas€a€statute€that€provided€an€exception€to€the€general€rule.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„20„116(a).€ò òó óÐ P ÐÓ  Óò òòòÌANALYSISÐ à0 ÐÌLegality€of€Sentenceó óóóÐ À! ÐÌÓ  Ó€€à  àThe€defendant€first€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€finding€that€his€sentence€ofÐ  #ð! Ðincarceration€and€restitution€was€legal€as€a€matter€of€lawòò.€€óóThe€defendant€argues€that€because€he€wasÐ $à" Ðconvicted€of€the€felonies€prior€to€the€July€1,€1996,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„104(c),Ð €%Ð # Ðas€it€existed€prior€to€July€1,€1996,€controls€the€imposition€of€his€sentence.€€In€its€present€form,Ð p&À!$ ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„104(c)€permits€both€a€sentence€of€incarceration€and€theÐ `'°"% Ðimposition€of€restitution.€€Prior€to€July€1,€1996,€however,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„Ð P( #& Ð104(c)€did€not€allow€for€the€imposition€of€restitution€if€the€defendant€was€sentenced€to€a€period€ofÐ @)$' Ðincarceration.€Therefore,€we€must€determine€whether€any€other€statute€existed€at€the€time€theÐ 0*€%( Ðdefendant€pled€guilty€that€would€allow€for€incarceration€plus€restitution.€€òòóóÐ  +p&) ÐÐ ,`'* Ðà  àThe€defendant€places€great€emphasis€on€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„104(c)(2)Ð ° Ðin€his€argument€that€restitution€may€not€be€ordered€in€conjunction€with€a€period€of€incarceration€forÐ  ð Ðfelonies€committed€prior€to€July€1,€1996.€€In€support€his€argument,€the€defendant€cites€òòState€v.€Davisóó,Ð à Ðarguing€that€the€òòDavisóó€court€clearly€stated€that€ð ðrestitution€may€properly€be€made€a€part€of€a€sentenceÐ €Ð Ðinvolving€probation€but€may€not€be€tied€to€a€sentence€of€incarceration.ðð€€òòState€v.€Davisóó,€940€S.W.2dÐ pÀ Ð558,€561€(Tenn.€1997).òòóóÐ ` ° ÐÌà  àThe€court€in€òòDavisóó€arrived€at€its€conclusion€through€an€analysis€of€Tennessee€CodeÐ @  ÐAnnotated€section€40„35„104(c)(2)€and€by€applying€rules€of€statutory€construction.€€òòDavisóó,€940€S.W.Ð 0 € Ð2d€at€560„62.€€The€court€examined€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€ðð€40„35„104(c)(2)€as€itÐ  p  Ðapplied€prior€to€July€1,€1996,€and€concluded€that€ð ðthe€Legislature€intended€to€limit€restitution€toÐ `  Ðdefendants€placed€on€probation.ðð€€òòIdóó.€at€562.€€Further,€the€court€concluded€that€because€theÐ P  ÐLegislature€ð ðomitted€any€reference€[under€the€earlier€statute]€to€a€sentence€involving€restitution€asÐ ð@  Ðpart€of€a€term€of€confinement,ðð€a€sentence€encompassing€the€two€was€not€permitted.€€òòIdóó.€€€€€€€€€€€Ð à0  ÐÌà  àWhile€the€òòDavisóó€court€set€forth€that€a€sentence€of€confinement€for€vandalism€and€restitutionÐ À Ðis€not€permitted€under€the€earlier€statute,€the€court€did€indicate€that€where€authority€exists€to€imposeÐ ° Ðsuch€a€sentence€it€will€be€affirmed.€€òòIdóó.€at€561.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„20„116(a)€wasÐ  ð Ðin€existence€at€the€time€the€defendant€pled€guilty€and€it€provided:€€€Ð à ÐÌÒ°ÒÒ°Ò[w]henever€a€felon€is€convicted€of€stealing€or€feloniously€taking€or€receivingÐ pÀ Ðproperty,€or€defrauding€another€thereof,€the€jury€shall€ascertain€the€value€of€suchÐ `° Ðproperty,€if€not€previously€restored€to€the€owner,€and€the€court€shall,€thereupon,€orderÐ P  Ðthe€restitution€of€the€property,€and,€in€case€this€cannot€be€done,€that€the€partyÐ @ Ðaggrieved€recover€the€value€assessed€against€the€prisoner,€for€which€execution€mayÐ 0€ Ðissue€as€in€other€cases.€€Ð  p ÐÌÒ°='ÒÒ°K'ÒIt€is€this€type€of€authority€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€indicated€would€permit€a€sentence€ofÐ P Ðincarceration€in€addition€to€the€imposition€of€restitution.€€Ð ð@ ÐÌà  àAs€defined€by€Blackððs€Law€Dictionary,€to€steal€ð ðdenotes€the€commission€of€theft.ðð€€òòBlackððsÐ Ð  ÐLaw€Dictionaryóó€1413€(6òòthóó€ed.€1990).€€Further,€according€to€Blackððs€Law€Dictionary,€the€term€theftòòÐ À! Ðóómeans€ð ðthe€taking€of€property€without€the€ownerððs€consent.ðð€€òòIdóó.€at€1477.òò€€óóClearly,€theft€falls€underÐ °"  Ðthe€parameters€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„20„116(a),€even€though€the€actual€wordÐ  #ð! Ðtheftòò€óóis€not€used€in€the€statute.€€It€is€at€this€juncture€that€we€must€distinguish€òòState€v.€Davisóó€with€theÐ $à" Ðinstant€case.Ð €%Ð # ÐÌà  àòòState€v.€Davisóó€is€a€case€dealing€with€a€sentence€of€incarceration€and€an€order€of€restitutionÐ `'°"% Ðfor€damages€caused€by€vandalism.€€Clearly,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„20„116(a)€doesÐ P( #& Ðnot€provide€for€restitution€for€acts€of€vandalism.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„20„116(a)Ð @)$' Ðdoes,€however,€provide€for€restitution€in€theft€cases.€€In€the€instant€case,€the€defendant€was€convictedÐ 0*€%( Ðof€two€counts€of€theft€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„14„103,€both€of€which€are€ClassÐ  +p&) ÐC€felonies€as€graded€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€39„14„105(4).Ð ,`'* Їà  àIn€examining€this€case,€this€Court€believes€that€it€was€neither€the€Legislatureððs€nor€theÐ ° ÐTennessee€Supreme€Courtððs€intent€to€abolish€sentences€of€incarceration€in€theft€cases.€€This€wouldÐ  ð Ðbe€the€resultant€outcome€in€cases€involving€theft€if€we€are€to€apply€both€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ à Ðsection€40„20„116(a),€as€we€are€mandated€to€do€by€the€Legislature€in€theft€cases,€and€€òòDavisóó,€as€theÐ €Ð ÐTennessee€Supreme€Court€has€directed.€€Instead,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€Tennessee€CodeÐ pÀ ÐAnnotated€section€40„20„116(a)€is€an€exception€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„104(c),Ð ` ° Ðwhich€mandates€the€imposition€of€restitution€in€theft€cases€while€permitting€sentences€ofÐ P   Ðincarceration.€€Put€another€way,€òòState€v.€Davisóó€does€not€apply€in€theft€cases.€òòóóÐ @  ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Lovingoodóó,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€€theft,€and€this€Court€held€that€the€trialÐ  p  Ðcourt€had€appropriate€statutory€authority€to€order€restitution€against€him€in€conjunction€with€hisÐ `  Ðsentence€of€incarceration.€€€òòState€v.€James€R.€Lovingoodóó,€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9902„CC„00056,€2000Ð P  ÐWL€122239,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€filed€February€2,€2000,€at€Knoxville);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.Ð ð@  ÐWilliam€T.€Cozartóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9508„CC„00251,€1996€WL€675542€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð à0  Ðfiled€November€22,€1996,€at€Nashville).€€The€instant€case€presents€essentially€the€same€situation.€Ð Ð  ÐThe€defendantððs€sentence€is€legal€and€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€not€declaring€it€void€òòab€initioóó.€Ð À ÐÌòòÓ  Óò òKnowing€and€Voluntary€Nature€of€Guilty€Plea€to€Illegal€Sentenceó óóóÐ  ð ÐÌÓ  Óòòóóà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€finding€that€the€defendant€knowingly€andÐ €Ð Ðvoluntarily€entered€into€a€guilty€plea€agreement€involving€an€illegal€sentence.€€This€Court€has€alreadyÐ pÀ Ðaddressed€the€knowing€and€voluntary€nature€of€the€defendantððs€guilty€plea.€òòóó€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€John€ClarkÐ `° ÐGarrisonóó,€Knox€County,€C.C.A.€No.€03C01„9601„CR„00050,€1998€WL€300SS7,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð P  ÐApp.,€filed€€June€10,€1998,€at€Knoxville).€However,€the€defendant€would€have€this€Court€re„examineÐ @ Ðthe€knowing€and€voluntary€nature€of€his€guilty€plea€under€the€premise€that€it€was€made€in€the€faceÐ 0€ Ðof€an€illegal€sentence.€€Having€decided€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€is€legal,€this€Court€will€not€re„Ð  p Ðvisit€the€knowing€and€voluntary€nature€of€the€guilty€plea€agreement€entered€into€by€the€defendant.€Ð ` Ѐ€€Ð P ÐÌòòò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONÐ à0 ÐÌÓ  Óóóó óà  àAfter€a€careful€review€of€the€record,€we€find€that€the€defendantððs€sentence€of€incarcerationÐ À! Ðand€the€imposition€of€restitution€on€the€defendant€are€legal.€€The€defendantððs€sentence€and€the€courtððsÐ °"  Ðorder€requiring€the€defendant€to€pay€restitution€are€affirmed.€€Ð  #ð! ÐÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð @)$' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à€€€JOHN€EVERETT€WILLIAMS,€JUDGE