WPC  "T #= Qb .LX%;jkD|Z?9нҧ 6gXѻ+RްFCEb=S1]W3:d/k#ۯ `raSOD8[fAT-Vq+.z=`oVX¯jB&ʇbK)7I~g xP?N)<RolzD1cx9hԔKlgoF}FșmP!jԄ10+aWٱr,^ ;+͝1swxvF΂ߋ5,#W#U N % 0: N ^  w' 4+ ? N mP "g b : E B HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,1 h_B0:i+003|xU Timberlake- - 0#Xd#   d !USUS.,  _?XX  @hhּINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#X`X?=#"XX`Ԉ # #X`X"#"XX`@   GDONGALAYP.BERRYv.STATEOFTENNESSEE  V #X`X"g#@  DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty ' w @ No.IF7101&97A196J.RandallWyatt,Jr.,Judge  a @*AV) ` dE< ` A߈    @ No.M200400334CCAR3PCFiledDecember7,_2004_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<` A        GdongalayBerryfiledpetitionsforpostconvictionreliefattackingconvictionsinDavidson }  CountyDocketNos.IF7101and97A196.TheStatehasfiledamotionpursuanttoRule20,Rules f oftheCourtofCriminalAppealsofTennessee,forthisCourttoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrial O courtbymemorandumopinion.Wegrantthemotionandaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. 8 @ Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourt  Z @AffirmedPursuanttoRule20oftheTennesseeCourtofCriminalAppeals D  ThomasT.Woodall,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJerryL.SmithandRobert  W.Wedemeyer,JJ.,joined.  MikeJ.Urquhart,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,GdongalayP.Berry.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;MarkA.Fulks,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; T ElizabethT.Ryan,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;VictorS.Johnson,III.,DistrictAttorneyGeneral; = andKathyMorante,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. & v @! MEMORANDUMOPINION  !H!    `   Pursuanttoapleaagreement,DefendantpledguiltytoaggravatedassaultinDavidson ## CountyDocketNo.IF7101onNovember22,1994.InDocketNo.97A196,hewasconvictedof $ $ twocountsofaggravatedrobberyfollowingajurytrial.Thedateofthefinalactionofthehighest % % stateappellatecourttowhichanappealwastakenintheaggravatedrobberyconvictionswasAugust &!& 31,2000. o'"'   Inseparatepetitionsforpostconvictionrelief,bothfiledonSeptember16,2002,Defendant A)$) attackedtheseconvictions.Thetrialcourtsummarilydismissedthepetitionsbecausetheywere **z%* filedoutsideofthestatuteoflimitationscontainedinTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4030 +c&+ 102(a).Defendantfiledatimelyappealfromthisorderofdismissal. +L',   ,5(- ּ 8`XXdd8      Itappearsfromtherecordthatnoneoftheexceptionstothestatuteoflimitationscontained   inTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4030102(b)wereallegedinthepetitionorareotherwise  applicable.Onappeal,Defendantassertsthatheisentitledtoreliefbecausethetrialcourtentered  theorderdismissingthepetitionsmorethanayearafterthefilingofthepetitionsinSeptember, k 2002,inviolationoftheprovisionsofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4030106(a)statingthat T thetrialcourtshall,withinthirtydaysofthefilingoftheoriginalpetition,enteranorderin =  accordancewiththeprovisionsofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4030106or4030107. & v Defendantalsoarguesthatthetrialcourterredindismissingthepetitionswithoutanevidentiary  _ hearingbecauseacolorableclaimwasalleged.Inhisbriefonappeal,Defendantdoesnotdirectly  H statewhythestatuteoflimitationsisnotapplicable.  1    Thejudgmentofthepostconvictioncourtinthisproceedingwasbeforethetrialjudge   withoutajury,andthejudgmentwasnotadeterminationofguilt,andtheevidencedoesnot   preponderateagainstthefindingofthetrialjudgethatthepetitionsshouldbedismissedbecausethey   werefiledinviolationofthestatuteoflimitations.Noerroroflawrequiringareversalofthe n  judgmentofthetrialcourtisapparentontherecord. W    Accordingly,pursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals,thejudgmentof )y thepostconvictioncourtisaffirmed. b @GG% CONCLUSION     Forthereasonsstated,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtindismissingthepetitionsfor  convictionreliefisaffirmed.     `     h   _________________________________________ D    `     h   THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE