ÿWPCÞ ìQÒRi•—¶dQ‚“š){Ngr f¸ç¸GA埗´#‡”‚ŸÆY˜ˆ4ŸœÏîL@šŸ»Tê]šº§àÄ…ìDÚSn­ú´†P8!àÞ~¡äôúGELÉ÷Qš†!_…8ÌZ²1Þ r[DýiÖI| ç©2ÕÄl5ÓÛ”ôã ò=NÅ–‚•±–Vûúòxû"zÂÍÊý\yŽ£MŸÌ1uƶó-ë„ÙÕ;u¶Í/ÍŠÂçhêÁ»æ¡UVÊTKˆ¼SÙx ý4âHäÁFÅN‰4ìa{¤=0ħÁÔ+÷Iž=|pH´—^H ã:™ÔwòbUYsÙ[Ýj¯)aÔ+ðâV)ËàÌÊ¿€žvˆånèé ÷VSH îbkNÁKmLZB2·íæf,ÝCÇG té–±“](¹RMPŠÕýµŒ/,”¤:³‘\Ј‹0aóˆ…'q¬ñcóÄåãÀXIÆI€Gc™^®!¨¨ÿ®O~VAâýyª²Õì´Ô‘•×5Î"›Hçªô…¿Ãš«Œ²ê•¬\ó䟀eÖôm´ûòiÐ0ùtËÌ“Åäéß§À™s­Ã—»QÀ¦‰÷»– fyžõÊÓ¶Þ>b %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ ÐÐ #É  Æi Æ/ÆõÆ»UNNÏÏÏEÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑbÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓÓ 0ëÛÛÛÛ BÆÆ 0¤ã D3‡ D-º 0Kçç AS2Æ… 0¤K 0Dï A«3»=ˆW/Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularlk.i†Ü €ÿÿY3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ ZELLBURGEGLEAVESTiptonDeVasherTurrnerTorryhad hadIngramkidnappingW]hat˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6ÒV,,,,ÒV0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular- ù-(|G2ö$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ûq»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôýò»»Ô d(|3÷$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ûq»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3÷$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ûq»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€Ûq»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼Ûq»»»ÔÑ8€š_XXdé»»d8Ñà@hhìàÔ‡î&ÛqÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@gg$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼Ûq»îî& #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€17,€2003Ð öF ÐÔ‡Xš_X»¼ÛqÔÌò òÔ#†¼Ûq»XXš_##ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€ZELLBURGE€GLEAVESòòóóÔ‡Xš_X»¼ÛqÔó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€2002„A„282€€€€€€Cheryl€Blackburn,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2002„02613„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€23,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡Xe²XXXš_ÔThe€Appellant,€Zellburge€Gleaves,€appeals€the€sentencing€decision€of€the€Davidson€County€CriminalÐ V¦  ÐCourt€following€his€guilty€plea€to€one€count€of€aggravated€assault.€€Under€the€terms€of€the€pleaÐ ? Ðagreement,€Gleaves€agreed€to€an€eight„year€sentence€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender.€€The€pleaÐ (x Ðagreement€further€provided€that€the€manner€of€service€of€the€sentence€was€to€be€determined€by€theÐ a Ðtrial€court.€€Following€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€total€confinement.€€GleavesÐ úJ Ðappeals,€contending€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€grant€a€sentence€of€split€confinement.€€AfterÐ ã3 Ðreview€of€the€record,€we€affirm.Ð Ì ÐÔ#†Xš_XXXe²Î#ÔÔ#†¼Ûq»XXš_œ#ÔÔ‡Xš_X»¼ÛqÔÓÂÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ žî ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼Ûq»àXš_1#ÔÔ‡Xš_X.¼ÛqÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Tiptonóó€and€òòJohnÐ qÁ ÐEverett€Williamsóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð Zª ÐÌRoss€E.€Alderman,€District€Public€Defender;€Jeffrey€A.€DeVasher,€Assistant€Public€Defender,Ð ,| ÐNashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Zellburge€Gleaves.Ð e ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Renee€W.Ð ç 7  ÐTurrner,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€€Victor€S.€(Torry)€Johnson€III,€District€Attorney€General;€andÐ Ð! ! ÐRoger€Moore,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ¹" " ÐÔ#†¼Ûq»XXš_ë#ÔÔ‡Xš_X»¼ÛqÔÌÓ¼ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼Ûq»XXš_ó #ÔÔ‡Xš_X»¼ÛqÔÐ t%Ä % ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ G'—"' ÐòòóóÔ#†¼Ûq»XXš_f #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€Xš_X»¼ÛqÔÌÔ‡Xe²XXXš_Ôà  àOn€February€15,€2002,€the€Appellant€was€indicted€by€a€Davidson€County€grand€jury€for€oneÐ )j$) Ðcount€of€aggravated€assault€and€three€counts€of€aggravated€rape€of€his€former€girlfriend.€€On€JulyÐ *S%* Ð22,€2002,€the€Appellant,€a€Range€II€offender,€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€one€count€of€aggravatedÐ ì*<&+ Ðassault,€a€class€C€felony.€€The€trial€court€accepted€the€terms€of€the€plea€agreement,€which€providedÐ Õ+%', Ðthat€the€Appellant€would€receive€an€eight„year€sentence€and€that€the€manner€of€service€of€theÐ ¾,(- Ðsentence€would€be€submitted€to€the€trial€court.€€The€remaining€charges€were€dismissed.€€At€the€guiltyÐ §-÷(.ýÿ ÐÔ_Ôplea€hearing,€the€State€provided€€the€following€facts€to€support€the€Appellantððs€conviction€forÐ ° Ðaggravated€assault:Ð ™é ÐÌà8  àThe€testimony€would€be€that€on€June€20,€2001,€that€Mr.€Gleaves€came€to€Ms.€AudraÐ k» ÐSmithððs€residence€at€637€South€Seventh€Street.€€The€proof€would€be€that€they€hadÐ T¤ Ðhad€a€previous€relationship;€that€he€entered€the€residence,€according€to€her,€accusingÐ =  Ðher€of€having€someone€else€there.€€There€wasnððt€anyone€else€in€the€residence€andÐ & v Ðultimately€ended€up€striking€her€several€times€in€the€face.€€Later,€she€was€taken,€laterÐ  _ Ðthat€morning,€a€relative€of€Mr.€Gleaves€took€her€to€Baptist€Hospital€EmergencyÐ ø H ÐRoom€where€it€was€determined€that€among€her€other€injuries,€that€both€jaws€wereÐ á 1  Ðbroken€constituting€serious€bodily€injury.€€ÐÊ  Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àA€sentencing€hearing€was€held€on€September€25,€2002.€€Audra€Smith,€the€victim,€testifiedÐ œì  Ðthat€she€was€hospitalized€for€one€day€as€a€result€of€being€assaulted€by€the€Appellant.€€Both€of€herÐ …Õ  Ðjaws€were€broken,€and€she€stated€that€she€still€had€difficulty€talking€and€eating.€€The€victim€alsoÐ n¾  Ðtestified€that€her€jaws€were€wired€for€approximately€six€weeks€after€the€incident€and€that€all€of€theÐ W§  Ðwiring€was€not€removed€until€approximately€four€weeks€later.€€According€to€the€victim,€theÐ @ ÐAppellant€had€not€made€any€attempts€to€contact€her€after€he€was€released€on€bond.€€Ð )y ÐÌà  àThe€thirty„one„year„old€Appellant€testified€that€he€lived€with€his€sister€and€worked€full„timeÐ ûK Ðthrough€a€temporary€service€at€Ingram€Books€as€a€forklift€operator€and€sorter.€€The€Appellant€alsoÐ ä4 Ðtestified€that€he€had€five€children.€€According€to€the€Appellant,€four€of€his€children€were€with€his€ex„Ð Í Ðwife,€and€he€had€weekend€visitation€with€them€and€provided€them€with€support€on€an€as€neededÐ ¶ Ðbasis.€€The€Appellant€also€stated€that€he€had€been€attending€anger€management€classes€twice€weeklyÐ Ÿï Ðat€the€Day€Reporting€Center,€which€benefitted€him€greatly€because€the€classes€helped€himÐ ˆØ Ðunderstand€that€he€needed€to€control€his€temper.€€He€related€that€before€the€classes,€he€believed€thatÐ qÁ Ðmen€normally€hit€the€women€they€love.€€€€€€Ð Zª ÐÌà  àThe€Appellantððs€misdemeanor€criminal€history€included€ten€convictions€for€driving€with€aÐ ,| Ðsuspended€license€and€violation€of€the€driverððs€license€law,€three€convictions€for€criminal€trespass,Ð e Ðtwo€convictions€for€assault,€one€conviction€for€simple€possession,€one€conviction€for€violation€ofÐ þN Ðthe€open€container€law,€one€conviction€for€resisting€arrest,€and€one€conviction€for€violating€an€orderÐ ç 7 Ðof€protection.€€In€1994,€the€Appellant€was€placed€on€probation€for€the€drug€conviction,€which€wasÐ Ð!   Ðlater€revoked,€and€he€was€ordered€to€serve€ninety€days€in€jail.€€The€Appellant€was€also€sentenced€toÐ ¹" ! Ðten€days€in€jail€for€violation€of€the€order€of€protection€obtained€by€his€ex„wife.€€According€to€theÐ ¢#ò" ÐAppellant,€his€two€convictions€for€misdemeanor€assault€involved€a€former€girlfriend.Ð ‹$Û# Ѐ€€€€€€€€Ð t%Ä $ Ðà  àThe€Appellant€has€two€felony€convictions:€(1)€aggravated€assault€of€another€formerÐ ]&­!% Ðgirlfriend,€different€from€the€victim€involved€in€the€misdemeanor€assault€cases,€and€(2)€aggravatedÐ F'–"& Ðkidnapping€of€his€ex„wife.€€The€Appellant€violated€his€probation€on€the€aggravated€assaultÐ /(#' Ðconviction€by€being€arrested€on€the€kidnapping€charge.€€He€ultimately€served€a€five„year€sentenceÐ )h$( Ðfor€the€aggravated€assault€conviction€and€a€three€and€one„half„year€sentence€for€the€kidnappingÐ *Q%) Ðconviction.€Ð ê*:&* ÐÐ Ó+#'+ ЇÌà  àFollowing€the€conclusion€of€all€the€proof€at€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€anyÐ ™é Ðform€of€alternative€sentencing€and€ordered€the€eight„year€sentence€to€be€served€in€total€confinement.€Ð ‚Ò ÐIn€making€this€determination,€the€trial€court€concluded:Ð k» ÐÌà8  àà ` àSentences€involving€confinement€should€be€based€on€the€followingÐ =  Ðconsiderations,€this€is€in€the€statute:€it€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restrainingÐ & v Ða€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct.€€There€is€no€question€thatÐ  _ ÐMr.€Gleaves€falls€within€that€category.€€He€has€an€incredibly€long€history.Ðø HÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àConfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€deprecating€the€seriousness€of€the€offenseÐ Ê   Ðor€it€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others,€and€whereÐ ³  Ðmeasurements€least€restrictive€have€frequently€or€recently€been€appliedÐ œì  Ðunsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€Ð…Õ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.Ð W§  ÐÌà8  àà ` àIt€is€interesting,€and€I€will€say€this€for€the€record,€that€on€July€31,€of€1997,Ð )y ÐMr.€Gleaves,€in€this€court,€entered€a€best€interest€plea€to€aggravated€assault,€receivedÐ b Ða€five„year€sentence.€€He€had€to€serve€120€days,€day„for„day€at€100%.€€He€then€wasÐ ûK Ðplaced€on€probation€where€he€was€ordered€to€stay€away€from€the€victim.€.€.€.€[W]hatÐ ä4 Ðhappened€was€I€gave€the€benefit€and€Iððm€the€one€that€signed€the€judgment€form,€heÐ Í Ðnot€only€gets€rearrested€for€kidnapping€involving€his€wife,€.€.€.€but€in€the€meantime,Ð ¶ Ðhe€also€violates€an€order€of€protection.€.€.€.€€He€violated€the€order€of€protection€onÐ Ÿï ÐDecember€1,€the€arrest€for€that€was€in€1997€while€he€is€on€probation€in€my€court.€Ð ˆØ ÐThat€was€never€brought€to€my€attention.€€It€wasnððt€until€he€was€then€rearrested€forÐ qÁ Ðthe€kidnapping€that€then€the€warrant€is€issued€for€the€violation€of€probation.€.€.€.€€HeÐ Zª Ðthen€is€ordered€to€serve€my€five€years€and€the€three€years„six„months,€and€the€timeÐ C“ Ðis€run€concurrently€because€he€gets€all€the€jail€credit€back€on€both€of€them€if€you€lookÐ ,| Ðat€the€various€files,€so€basically€Mr.€Gleaves€really€sort€of€served€one€sentence€forÐ e Ðall€that,€even€though€he€twice€violated€my€probation.ÐþNÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àAnd€in€addition€to€that,€if€you€look€at€his€prior€record,€he€also€has€two€otherÐ Ð!   Ðassaults€which€he€freely€admits€involves€women.€.€.€.Ó Óй" !Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à.€.€.Ћ$Û#Ð Ð  ÐÓ+Óà8  àà ` à.€.€.€€I€think€given€the€facts€and€circumstances€of€this€case,€Mr.€Gleaves,€IððmÐ ]&­!% Ðglad€you€are€getting€some€help,€but€that€is€not€sufficient€under€the€facts€of€this€case.€Ð F'–"& ÐYou€have,€in€fact,€shown€to€me€personally€that€you€will€not€abide€by€my€orders,€andÐ /(#' Ðtherefore,€your€sentence€is€going€to€be€eight€years€as€Range€II€multiple€offender.€€ItÐ )h$( Ðis€going€to€be€served€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€Iððm€going€to€deny€anyÐ *Q%) Ðalternative€sentence.€Ðê*:&*Ð Ð  ÐÐ Ó+#'+ ЇThe€Appellant€filed€a€motion€to€reconsider€the€denial€of€an€alternative€sentence,€which€was€deniedÐ ° Ðon€October€18,€2002,€following€a€hearing.€€The€Appellant€now€appeals€that€denial,€arguing€that€ð ðtheÐ ™é Ðtrial€court€should€have€placed€him€on€probation€following€a€period€of€confinement.ððÐ ‚Ò ÐÌÓ  Óò òANALYSISó óÐ T¤ ÐÓò/ÓÌà  àWhen€the€sentencing€court€properly€considers€the€relevant€sentencing€considerations,€thisÐ ' w Ðcourt€conducts€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€the€presumption€that€the€determination€made€by€the€trial€courtÐ  ` Ðis€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð ù I Ð1991).€€Although€the€presumption€favoring€alternative€sentencing€applies€to€the€class€C€felonies€forÐ â 2  Ðwhich€the€Appellant€has€been€convicted,€the€presumption€is€not€applicable€to€Range€II€offenders.€Ð Ë   ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6)€(1997).€€Moreover,€the€Appellant€maintains€the€burden€of€showingÐ ´  Ðthat€the€sentence€to€total€confinement€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€improper.€òòóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„Ð í  Ð35„401,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments,€(1997);€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.Ð †Ö  Ѐ€Ð o¿  Ðà  àAlternative€sentencing€options€may€be€denied€if€it€is€shown€that€the€Appellant€has€a€longÐ X¨  Ðhistory€of€criminal€conduct,€that€the€Appellant€has€not€been€rehabilitated€with€less€restrictiveÐ A‘ Ðmethods,€or€that€confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€Ð *z ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C)€(1997).€€Additionally,€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€forÐ c Ðrehabilitation€of€a€defendant€should€be€considered€in€determining€whether€he€or€she€should€beÐ üL Ðgranted€an€alternative€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5).Ð å5 ÐÐ Ðà  àIn€the€present€case,€we€find€that€the€trial€court€considered€all€relevant€evidence€and€so€statedÐ · Ðon€the€record.€Moreover,€as€the€trial€court€found,€the€record€reflects€(1)€an€extensive€history€ofÐ  ð Ðsimilar€criminal€offenses€and€(2)€the€failure€of€previously€imposed€suspended€sentences.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð ‰Ù ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A),€(C).€€The€Appellant€has€not€met€his€burden€of€demonstrating€theÐ r Ðimpropriety€of€the€trial€court's€denial€of€alternative€sentencing.€The€record€fully€supports€the€trialÐ [« Ðcourt's€determination€denying€the€Appellant€a€non„incarcerative€sentence.Ð D” ÐÌò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONó óÐ f ÐÌÓ‰9Óà  àAfter€review€of€the€issues€before€us,€we€conclude€that€the€Appellant€has€failed€to€establishÐ é 9 Ðthat€his€sentence€of€total€confinement€was€improper.€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€DavidsonÐ Ò!"  ÐCounty€Criminal€Court€is€affirmed.€Ð »" ! ÐÔ#†Xš_XXXe² #ÔÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð H'˜"& Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE