ÿWPC£ òéÁªAÇÿV°ÓÃmÜÊRHóŒ8ZIœ<`Qzaå¬QeöÂÜèËŒôÎH +v° ¯sQ-à@«Ù,Üi½ Ï´mq=PYáï©¶3¹Ý²ˆž¬¤¯› ˈˆP"Op,ÂîKêYfTGæ†Ôè%`þn~ÚwÕ06i1 }û¼Ý~7´Í˜¹€˜„èfÝGªËÊÍé µ½¾à¥ÖTÑdQßšfhîTΜ׿q44»oÁ¾/kcŽ ³øƒíGËËçLJ\U‚”F*_°šh’ ,©&“Úø­Y½} ¯wp%òìØ;ÙÂçøÅVžOq³þ:¤Ì—êa†Q瘨¥M·[¾ )s{ÃŽ{\NÐÃìš"3ìNÿ!æ5Í"Þ’ìL9’N-H4¤ªÃ“kØ›xxJ } µ®¹Õ³>AûèæŸÀ˜=’vñÿ%ÁO¿¥Ç妤¹°(×>?Ä_Ö*û6ös^ÿˆ_µ¨ ü]fsb…åÈŸ™Ï·DQZ“Y,A¹YÎÓ½œ2Dî4ÒºkÁfcÂ%ÚÆ}ô5-xY¼2X…XóµÏ|¬ÒYn$û[ˆõ ˜'æï-“01rß.•i¥œt¸¯/÷s7K”]µ~‘ÿ1# ®UN¹ % 0( L5U :U1:»w@õ45IU=:X’ 0l¨ 0DXU.n AQœníU:[ Æ• *[ … U:£LÝ‹)c´U:U:Q%‹U:° BêU: 0DP 0D” 0DØØ D/ BK D3hhhhhhh›˜HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLÑ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular † ‡ Eˆ ‰ Š ‹ Œ  bŽ b Ó€Ìqæ$ñ 3|xš , øð AZ"Arial Regular Ñ H Ñ((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ñ ° Ñ%ä2¼A`ArialTT"#$&Cþÿ<< Cÿÿ dÒ°ÒÔ€XRXXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThe€three€mitigating€factors€to€which€the€trial€court€referred€are:€€(1)Ð ° Ðthe€defendantððs€criminal€conduct€neither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodilyÏinjury;€(2)€the€defendant€acted€under€strong€provocation;€(3)€substantial€groundsÏexist€tending€to€excuse€or€justify€the€defendantððs€criminal€conduct,€though€failingÏto€establish€a€defense.€Ô‡XRXXXRÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô#†XRXXXRë#Ô€40„35„113€(1),€(2),€(3)€(1997).€€, øð AZ"Arial RegularƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 Ý ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€XþÙXXXÔÔ€”XXþÙÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XþÙX”ÔÐ  ÐÌò òSeptember€10,€1998Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôÛéôXXþÙÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó Ò°ÒÔ€X¢>XXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThe€trial€court€made€an€exception€for€the€defendantððs€place€ofÐ ° Ðemployment,€the€Steak€&€Ale,€where€alcoholic€beverages€are€served., øð AZ"Arial RegularC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT Ò°ÒÔ€X¢>XXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àAn€offender€may€be€required€to€serve€a€portion€of€his€sentence€inÐ ° Ðcontinuous€confinement€with€probation€for€a€period€of€time€up€to€and€includingÏthe€statutory€maximum€for€the€class€of€conviction€offense.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40„35„306(a)€(1997).€The€defendant€in€this€case€was€convicted€of€a€Class€AÏmisdemeanor€for€which€the€statutory€maximum€sentence€is€eleven€months€andÏtwenty„nine€days.€€Ô‡X¢>XXX¢>ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÔ#†X¢>XXX¢>#Ô€40„35„111(e)(1). YÒ°ÒÔ€X¢>XXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àApparently€the€trial€judge€believed€that€the€defendant€did€not€liveÐ ° Ðwith€the€mother€of€his€child€but€lived€instead€with€another€woman.€€Although€theÏrecord€is€not€entirely€clear,€the€defendantððs€testimony€indicates€that€he€and€theÏmother€of€his€child€were€living€together€but€that€another€woman€also€lived€in€theÏhouse.€€He€referred€to€this€woman€as€a€ð ðroommateðð€who€had€not€fulfilled€herÏobligation€to€pay€her€share€of€the€rent€and€the€utilities.€, øð AZ"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ò°ÒÔ€X¢>XXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àWe€note€that€the€conditions€as€written€in€the€probation€order€areÐ ° Ðeven€more€broad€than€the€trial€courtððs€pronouncements€at€the€sentencingÏhearing.€€According€to€the€order,€the€defendant€ð ðwill€not€live€with€anyone€to€whomÏyou€are€not€married,ðð€and€ð ðwill€not€use€intoxicants€of€any€kind,ðð€nor€ð ðuse€or€be€inÏpossession€of€narcotic€drugs,€including€marijuana,ðð€or€€ð ðvisit€places€whereÏintoxicants€or€drugs€are€sold,€dispensed,€or€used.ðð€€€If€this€order€were€takenÏliterally,€the€defendant€would€be€precluded€from€entering€grocery€stores,Ïpharmacies,€doctorsðð€offices,€and€hospitals€and€would€be€forced€to€reside€byÏhimself.€€, øð AZ"Arial Regular d Ò°ÒÔ€!X¢>XXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ýà ¸ àThe€probation€order€states€that€the€defendant€must€pay€restitutionÐ ° Ðthrough€the€court€but€does€not€mention€any€amount., øð AZ"Arial Regular(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýñ ñ›ñ ñÒ°Òò òÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€ X’XXXÔÑ7€¼ŒXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ññ ñßr€)<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` ttx$°ð Õrß›ñ ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° ÐÌ€à@::'àAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ à Ðó óÌò òà@úú$àAPRIL,€1998€SESSIONó óˆÐ pÀ ÐÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À àó ó)à  àÔ‡X’XX X’ÔNo.€03C01„9Ô#† X’XXX’|#Ô704„CR„00154Ð 0 € Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ  p  Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ `  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àWashington€CountyÐ P  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àà p àÐ ð@  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHonorable€Arden€L.€Hill,€€Judgeà Ð àÐ à0  Ðò òDððSHANNON€H.€GOINS,à h àà À àó ó)Ð Ð  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Sentencing)Ð À Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ ° Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à h àà À àà  àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:Ð pÀ ÐÌDEBORAH€HUSKINSà h àà À àà  àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ P  ÐAssistant€Public€Defenderà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ @ ÐFirst€Judicial€DistrictÌP.O.€Box€996à  àà h àà À àà  à€ELIZABETH€B.€MARNEYÐ  p ÐJohnson€City,€TN€€€37605à h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐ ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Ave.€NorthÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àSecond€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à x àÐ Ð  ÐÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€E.€CROCKETTÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àRt.€19,€Box€99Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJohnson€City,€TN€37601ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àKENT€GARLANDÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€Attorney€General¼à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àP.O.€Box€38Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJonesborough,€TN€37659ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMED€IN€PART,Ð °1-0 ÐREVERSED€IN€PART€ÌAND€REMANDEDó óÐ 3à.2 ÐÌÌCURWOOD€WITT€ÌJUDGEÌÌÌÐ   :p59S ÐÓ  Óœñ ñÑ€ ?TÑñ ññ ñ›ñ ññŽ ñÑ€OaÑñŽ ñ›à@qq*àò òOPINIONÓÓÓlX°X°` ¸ hÀpÈ xÐ (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? A°œXlÓó óˆÐ ° ÐÔ‡XþÙXX X’Ôà ¸ àThe€defendant,€DððShannon€H.€Goins,€was€convicted€in€a€jury€trial€inÐ à Ðthe€Washington€County€Criminal€Court€of€simple€assault,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.ÏThe€trial€court€sentenced€him€to€serve€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€with€allÏbut€the€first€sixty€days€of€the€sentence€to€be€served€on€probation.€€The€juryÏassessed€a€fine€of€$2,500,€and€the€trial€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€pay€oneÏhundred€dollars€per€month€toward€the€court€costs€and€as€restitution€to€the€victim.€ÏIn€addition,€the€defendant€must€spend€ten€days€performing€community€service.€€InÏthis€direct€appeal,€€the€defendant€does€not€challenge€the€validity€of€his€convictions.€ÏHe€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€have€suspended€his€entire€sentence€and€thatÏtwo€of€the€probationary€conditions€imposed€by€the€trial€court€are€unreasonable€and€Ïunrelated€to€the€purposes€of€sentencing.ÌÌà ¸ àWe€affirm€the€defendantððs€sentence€as€imposed€by€the€trial€court.€ÏHowever,€we€find€that€the€two€conditions€of€probation€are€not€authorized€by€statuteÏnor€reasonably€related€to€the€purpose€of€the€sentence;€therefore,€we€remand€thisÏcase€so€that€the€trial€judge€may€reconsider€the€conditions€of€probation€as€a€whole.€ÏIn€addition,€we€find€that€the€judgment€form€does€not€accurately€reflect€the€entireÏsentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.€€The€trial€courtððs€order€of€restitution€is€notÏclearly€stated€in€the€transcript,€and€the€judgment€order€makes€no€mention€ofÏrestitution.€€Upon€remand€the€trial€court€shall€enter€a€corrected€judgment€€that€isÏconsistent€with€the€sentence€imposed€at€the€sentencing€hearing€as€corrected€inÏaccordance€with€this€opinion.€€ÌÌà ¸ àThe€charges€in€this€case€arose€out€of€an€incident€that€occurred€in€aÏJohnson€City€establishment€known€as€Gatsbyððs.€€According€to€the€testimony€at€trial,Ïthe€victim€and€several€other€college€students€were€sitting€at€two€tables.€Ô#† X’XXXþÙí#ÔÔ‡X’XX X’ÔTheÐ |3Ì.4 Ðdefendant,€the€victim€and€most€of€the€others€involved€in€this€incident€were€studentsÏat€East€Tennessee€State€University€in€Johnson€City.€Ô#† X’XXX’ž#ÔÔ‡XþÙXX X’Ô€A€couple€of€weeks€earlierÐ @728 Ðsome€of€these€young€men€œhad€had›€a€disagreement€with€Keith€Duncan€over€theÐ $9t4: Ðshuffle€board€game.€€Duncan€felt€that€they€had€continued€to€harass€him.€€On€theÏnight€in€question,€the€defendant,€who€had€just€been€introduced€to€Duncan€by€aÏmutual€friend,€€approached€one€table€and€told€the€young€men€at€that€table€to€leaveÏDuncan€alone.€€When€they€denied€knowing€Duncan,€the€defendant€brought€DuncanÏto€the€table.€€When€they€continued€to€deny€any€knowledge€of€Duncan€or€anyÏharassment,€the€defendant€became€abusive€and€threatening.€€He€struck€AshlyÏDewberry€at€least€twice€in€the€jaw.€€Dewberry€suffered€a€broken€jaw€and€a€severed€Ïnerve.€€The€injury€required€surgery,€and€the€victim€has€two€plates€in€his€jaw€and€aÏscar€on€the€side€of€his€neck.€€In€addition,€one€of€the€victimððs€front€teeth€struckÏsomething€when€he€fell€and€required€a€root€canal.€€The€grand€jury€indicted€theÏdefendant€for€aggravated€assault.€€After€a€two„day€jury€trial,€the€jury€acquitted€himÏof€that€charge€and€found€him€guilty€of€misdemeanor€assault.€€€€ÌÔ#† XRXXXRñ#ÔÌà ¸ àIn€this€appeal,€the€defendant€raises€two€sentencing€issues.€€Ô‡XRXX XRÔWhen€anÐ ð@ Ðaccused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€it€is€theÏduty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ °"  Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40-35-401(d)(1997).€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showingÏin€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevantÏfacts€and€circumstances.ðð€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€€InÐ 0*€%( Ðconducting€our€review,€we€must€consider€all€the€evidence,€the€presentence€report,Ïthe€sentencing€principles,€the€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors,€counselsððÏarguments,€the€appellantððs€statements,€the€nature€and€character€of€the€offense,€andÏthe€appellantððs€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„103(5),€„¼210(b)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€Ô#† XRXXXR­#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXR¨ #ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€at€169.€€The€defendant€has€the€burdenÐ 3à.2 Ðof€demonstrating€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210ÏSentencing€Commððn€Comments.€€If€the€record€fails€to€demonstrate€the€appropriateÏconsideration€by€the€trial€court,€appellate€review€of€the€sentence€is€purely€òòdeóó€òònovoóó.€Ð 09€48 ÐòòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€Ô#† XRXXXRð #ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXR¡"#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€at€169.€€However,€if€our€review€reflects€that€the€trialÐ ° Ðcourt€properly€considered€all€relevant€factors€and€the€record€adequately€supportsÏits€findings€of€fact,€this€court€must€affirm€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€haveÏpreferred€a€different€result.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€Ô#† XRXXXRé"#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXRV$#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€785,€789€Ô#† XRXXXRž$#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ(Tenn.€Crim.Ð P   ÐApp.Ô#† XRXXXRê$#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€19Ô#† XRXXXRQ%#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ91).€€Ð 0 € ÐÌà ¸ àÔ#† XRXXXR–%#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔA€misdemeanant,€unlike€the€felon,€is€not€entitled€to€the€presumptionÐ ð@  Ðof€a€minimum€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Randall€C.€Conneróó,€No.€03C01„9401„CR„00024,Ð Ð  Ðslip€op.€at€6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Aug.€12,€1994);€òòState€v.€Bernell€B.Ð ° ÐLawsonóó,€No.€63,€slip€op.€at€7€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€May€23,€1991).€Ô#† XRXXXR&#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRԀРà ÐMisdemeanor€sentencing€is€controlled€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„¼35„302.€€€The€statue€requires€the€court€to€impose€a€ð ðspecific€number€of€months,Ïdays€or€hours€.€.€.€consistent€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€the€[CriminalÏSentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989],ðð€Ô#† XRXXXR·'#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÔ#† XRXXXR$)#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€40„35„302(b)€(1997),€and€toÐ ` Ðdetermine€a€percentage€of€the€sentence€which€the€misdemeanant€must€serveÏbefore€becoming€eligible€for€work€release,€furlough,€trusty€status,€or€other€ð ðrelatedÏrehabilitation€programs.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302(d)€(1997).€€Ô#† XRXXXRz)#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔIn€determiningÐ °"  Ðthe€percentage,€the€court€must€consider€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€as€wellÏas€the€legislative€purposes€and€principles€related€to€sentencing.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40-35-302(d);€òòState€v.€Palmeróó,€902€S.W.2d€391,€393-94€Ô#† XRXXXRØ*#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ(Tenn.Ô#† XRXXXR#,#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ19Ô#† XRXXXRk,#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ95);€òòState€v.Ð P( #& ÐGilboyóó,€857€S.W.2d€884,€888„889€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€€€Ô#† XRXXXR¯,#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔÐ 0*€%( ÐÌà ¸ àThe€misdemeanor€sentencing€statute€authorizes€the€court€to€place€aÏdefendant€on€probation€immediately€or€after€service€of€a€portion€of€the€sentence.ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„402(e)€(1997).€€Ô#† XRXXXRU-#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔThe€trial€court€maintains€jurisdiction€overÐ °1-0 Ða€defendant€placed€in€jail€and€may€reduce€or€modify€the€sentence€or€place€theÏdefendant€on€probationary€supervision.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€œ40-35-314(c)€(1997).›€ÏThe€statute€is€designed€to€provide€a€trial€court€with€continuing€jurisdiction€inÏmisdemeanor€cases€and€a€wide€latitude€of€flexibility.€€òòState€v.€Dwight€Johnsonóó,€No.Ð 09€48 Ð03C01„9209„CR„00320,€slip€op.€at€7€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€May,€18,€1993),Ð ° Ðòòperm.€to€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1994).Ð à ÐÔ#† XRXXXRy.#ÔÌà ¸ àIn€this€case,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€eleven€monthsÏand€twenty„nine€days€and€set€the€required€percentage€of€service€at€sixty€percent.€ÏThe€defendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€him€to€serve€sixty€daysÏof€his€sentence€in€jail.€€We€disagree.€€ÌÌà ¸ àIn€this€case,€the€trial€court€considered€all€of€the€relevant€facts€andÏcircumstances€and€the€applicable€sentencing€considerations.€€A€presentence€reportÏwas€prepared,€and€the€court€held€a€separate€sentencing€hearing€at€which€theÏdefendant€was€the€only€witness.€€The€trial€judge€found€that€the€defendant€had€aÏhistory€of€previous€criminal€behavior,€that€the€victimððs€personal€injuries€wereÏparticularly€great,€Ô‡XRXX XRÔand€Ô#† XRXXXRÍ3#Ôthat€the€crime€was€committed€under€circumstances€underÐ ` Ðwhich€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€a€victim€was€great.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼114€(1),€(6),€(16)€(1997).€€ÌÌà ¸ àThe€record€supports€the€trial€courtððs€use€of€factors€1€and€6.€€TheÏdefendantððs€record€includes€a€juvenile€assault€conviction€and€an€aggravated€assaultÏcharge€that,€according€to€the€defendant,€was€dropped€when€the€victim€realized€thatÏthe€defendant€was€only€sixteen€years€old.€€As€an€adult,€he€has€been€convicted€ofÏdisorderly€conduct€and€failure€to€appear.€€The€evidence€in€the€record€does€notÏpreponderate€against€the€trial€courtððs€conclusion€that€the€defendant€has€a€history€ofÏprevious€criminal€behavior.€€The€record€also€indicates€that€the€victim€suffered€aÏbroken€jaw,€a€nerve€injury,€and€damage€to€a€tooth.€His€medical€expenses€exceededÏeleven€thousand€dollars.€€He€has€two€plates€in€his€jaw€and€a€scar€on€his€neck.€€ÏUnlike€aggravated€assault,€simple€assault€does€not€require€that€the€jury€find€ð ðseriousÏbodily€injury.ðð€€òòSeeóó€Ô‡XRXX XRÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€Ô#† XRXXXR78#Ô39„13„101(a)(1),€„102(a)(1)(A)€(1997).€Ð P7 26 ÐTherefore,€enhancement€factor€6€may€be€applied€in€cases€of€misdemeanor€assaultÐ 09€48 ÐÑ ?TÑÑH°ÑÑ  ÑñŽ ñÑ ?TÑÑH°ÑÑ  ÑñŽ ñœwhere›€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€indicates€that€the€injuries€were€particularlyÏgreat.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€Ô‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXR:#Ô€597,€603€Ô‡XRXX XRÔ(Tenn.€19Ô#† XRXXXRa:#Ô94)€(serious€bodily€injuryÐ à Ðis€synonymous€with€particularly€great€injury).€€The€trial€court€did€not€err€in€findingÏthat€the€victimððs€injuries€resulting€from€this€assault€were€particularly€great.ÌÌà ¸ àThe€trial€court€did,€however,€err€in€considering€enhancement€factor€16.€ÏBodily€injury€is€an€element€of€the€offense€for€which€the€defendant€was€convicted.€ÏÔ‡XRXX XRÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô#† XRXXXR.<#Ô39„13„101(a)(1)€(1997).€€An€enhancement€factor€may€not€be€anÐ Ð  Ðessential€element€of€the€offense.€€Ô‡XRXX XRÔòòJonesóó,€883€Ô#† XRXXXRù<#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXRL=#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔ€at€603;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô#† XRXXXR”=#Ô40„Ð ° Ð35„114€(1997).€€Every€assault€as€defined€in€section€39„13„101(a)(1)€occurs€inÏcircumstances€where€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€a€victim€is€great.€€òòState€v,Ð pÀ ÐGlenn€David€Jonesóó,€Ô‡XRXX XRÔNo.€03C01„9Ô#† XRXXXRÛ>#Ô302„CR„00057,€Ô‡XRXX XRÔslip€op.€atÔ#† XRXXXR6?#Ô€17€Ô‡XRXX XRÔ(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð P  ÐKnoxville,€Ô#† XRXXXR‡?#ÔNov.€22,€1994),€òòÔ‡XRXX XRÔperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€199Ô#† XRXXXR@#Ô5).€€Ð 0€ ÐÌà ¸ àœThe€ñ… ññ„ ñgñ„ ññ… ññ† ñtrial€court€founñ† ññ‡ ññ† ñ€thñ† ññ‡ ññˆ ñd€thatñˆ ñ›€mitigating€œfactorsñ‰ ñ€exist.€€The€trial€judgeÏspecifically€noted€factors€ñ‰ ññŠ ñ€ñŠ ñ(1),›€(2),€and€œ(3)ñ‹ ñ€existñ‹ ñ›€butÏheld€that€the€enhancement€factors€outweighed€the€mitigating€factors.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€We€œagreeñŒ ñÐ Ð  Ðthat€factors€(2)€and€(3)€apply€and€that€these€enhancement€factors€outweighed€theÏmitigating€factorsñŒ ñ.›€€Even€though€we€have€eliminated€one€enhancement€factor,€theÏtwo€applicable€factors€have€sufficient€weight€to€justify€a€maximum€sentence€with€aÏservice€percentage€of€at€least€60%€and€the€imposition€of€10€days€of€communityÏservice.ÌÌà ¸ àNext€we€consider€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencing€theÏdefendant€to€a€sentence€involving€split€confinement€rather€than€full€probation.€TrialÏcourts€may,€at€their€discretion,€require€a€defendant€receiving€probation€to€serve€aÏportion€of€the€sentence€in€continuous€confinement€coupled€with€probation€for€aÏperiod€of€time€up€to€and€including€the€statutory€maximum€time€for€the€class€of€theÐ p5À04 ÐÑOaÑѰHÑÑ  Ñœconviction›€offense.€€Ô‡XRXX XRÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô#† XRXXXRsE#Ô40„35„306(a)€(1997).€€On€these€facts,€weÐ ° Ðcannot€say€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion.€€The€defendant€has€previouslyÏbeen€convicted€of€assault,€and€although€he€has€several€times€expressed€hisÏremorse€for€the€victimððs€injuries,€he€apparently€does€not€recognize€that€his€actionsÏwere€irresponsible€and€immature€as€well€as€illegal.€€€€He€must€learn€that€he€is€aÏyoung€man€and€a€father€and€not€a€school€boy€at€recess.€€His€previous€brushes€withÏthe€law,€for€which€he€received€probation,€have€not€conveyed€the€messageÏeffectively.€€The€trial€court€did€not€err€in€ordering€a€lengthy€period€of€ð ðshockÏincarcerationðð€in€this€case.€€€€€€ÌÌà ¸ àIn€this€last€issue,€we€must€determine€whether€the€trial€court€erred€inÏimposing€conditions€of€probation€that€require€the€defendant€to€stay€out€of€places€thatÏsell€alcohol,€including€grocery€stores,€and€that€prohibit€him€from€living€with€anyÏwoman€to€whom€he€is€not€married.€€The€resolution€of€this€issue€is€controlled€byÏòòState€v.€Burdinóó,€924€Ô‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXRÎI#Ô€82€Ô‡XRXX XRÔ(Tenn.€19Ô#† XRXXXRJ#Ô96).€€Based€on€our€supreme€courtððsÐ ð@ Ðdecision€€in€òòBurdinóó,€€we€find€that€the€special€conditions€imposed€by€the€trial€court€areÐ Ð  Ðimproper€as€they€are€not€authorized€either€expressly€or€implicitly€by€the€CriminalÏSentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989.€€òòSeeóó€1989€Tenn.€Pub.€Acts,€ch.€591€ðð€6.€€€Ð $à" ÐÌà ¸ àUnder€the€Act,€a€trial€court€has€wide€latitude€in€formulating€specificÏsentences,€including€the€imposition€of€conditions€of€probation.€€òòBurdinóó,€924€Ô‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXRsL#ÔÐ 0*€%( Ðat€85.€€Although€the€Act€encourages€trial€judges€to€be€innovative€in€devisingÏappropriate€sentences,€the€resulting€sentence€must€conform€to€the€principles€ofÏsentencing€and€be€responsive€to€both€the€interests€of€society€and€the€interests€ofÏthe€defendant.€€òòÔ‡XRXX XRÔIdóó.€€Ô#† XRXXXRÔM#ÔÔ‡XRXX XRÔTennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÔ#† XRXXXRN#Ô€40„35„303(d)€authorizes€theÐ °1-0 Ðtrial€court€to€impose€conditions€of€probation€that€our€supreme€court€has€describedÏas€ð ðclosely€related€to€conventional€societal€duties€„€family€support,€productiveÏemployment,€community€service,€personal€health,€vocational€training,€avoidance€ofÏdangerous€instruments,€cooperation€with€supervising€agencies,€and€restitution.ðð€€Ð 09€48 ÐòòBurdinóó,€924€Ô‡XRXX XRÔS.W.2dÔ#† XRXXXR%P#Ô€at€85.€€Subsection€(d)(9)€Ô‡XRXX XRÔallows€the€imposition€of€ð ðany€otherÐ ° Ðconditions€[that€are]€reasonably€related€to€the€purpose€of€the€offenderððs€sentenceÏand€not€unduly€restrictive€of€the€offenderððs€liberty,€or€incompatible€with€the€offenderððsÏfreedom€of€conscience,€or€otherwise€prohibited€by€this€chapter.ððÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>ÔP#Ô€€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.Ð P   Ððð€Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>ŽR#Ô40„35„303(d)(9)€(1997).€€Although€stated€in€general€terms,€subsection€9€offers€noÐ 0 € Ðdramatic€departure€from€traditional€principles€of€rehabilitation.€€òòBurdinóó,€924€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔS.W.2dÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>´S#ÔÐ `  Ðat€85.€€The€primary€goal€of€probation,€both€under€our€sentencing€statutes€and€theÏappellate€decisions€of€the€courts€of€this€state,€is€rehabilitation.€€òòÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔIdóó.€at€86€(citationsÐ Ð  Ðto€other€cases€omitted).€€ñv ñœñv ñAlthoughñv ñ›ñv ñ€the€Act€encourages€innovative€techniques€ofÏprobation€Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>«T#Ôto€promote€rehabilitation€and€to€prevent€recidivism,€section€40„35„Ð à Ð303(d)(9)€should€not€be€read€as€ð ðgranting€unfettered€authorityðð€to€impose€conditionsÏand€punishments€which€extend€beyond€the€scope€of€traditional€notions€ofÏrehabilitation.€€òòÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔBurdinóó,€924€Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>—V#ÔÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔS.W.2dÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>èV#ÔÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>Ô€at€86.Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>0W#ÔÐ 0€ ÐÌà ¸ àIn€this€case,€the€trial€judge€ordered€the€defendant€to€stay€out€of€anyÏestablishment€that€sold€alcoholic€beverages€including€grocery€stores׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€and€forbadeÐ Ð  Ðhim€to€live€with€any€woman€to€whom€he€was€not€married.€€Although€a€prohibitionÏagainst€entering€establishments€such€as€bars€and€night€clubs€that€sell€alcoholicÏbeverages€may€be€within€the€bounds€of€traditional€notions€of€probation€inÏappropriate€cases,€forbidding€one€to€enter€a€grocery€store€that€sells€alcoholicÏbeverages€is€ñv ñœñv ñneedlessly€broad.ñv ñ›ñv ñ€€Tennessee€law€permits€the€sale€of€beer€in€groceryÏstores.€€Many€ñv ñœñv ñgroceryñv ñ›ñv ñ€stores€sell€beer.€€Grocery€stores€also€sell€the€necessities€ofÏlife.€€The€defendant€is€a€father,€and€forbidding€him€to€enter€a€grocery€store€will€haveÏan€adverse€affect€on€his€ability€to€€provide€for€his€child€as€well€as€himself.€€Such€aÏcondition€is€counterproductive€to€the€purposes€of€probation€which€stress€theÏimportance€of€conventional€societal€duties€such€as€family€support.€€€€òòSeeóó€òòBurdinóó,Ð 3à.2 Ð924€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔS.W.2dÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>\#Ô€at€85.€€In€an€appropriate€case,€a€trial€court€may€well€order€an€offenderÐ p5À04 Ðto€abstain€from€the€use€of€alcohol€and€to€refrain€from€entering€certain€kinds€ofÏestablishments,€but€a€condition€of€probation€ñv ñœñv ñshould€notñv ñ›ñv ñ€prevent€the€offender€fromÏpurchasing€for€himself€and€his€family€the€necessities€of€life.€ÌÌà ¸ àThe€second€special€condition,€that€the€defendant€not€reside€with€aÏwoman€to€whom€he€is€not€married,€is€also€drawn€too€ñv ñœñv ñbroadly.ñv ñ›ñv ñ׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Moreover,€it€ñv ñœñv ñisñv ñ›ñv ñ€notÐ `  Ðreasonably€related€to€the€purposes€of€the€sentence.€€€In€essence,€the€trial€courtÏordered€the€defendant€not€to€live€in€the€house€with€his€own€child€unless€he€marriedÏthe€childððs€mother.€€Although€it€may€be€appropriate€under€some€circumstances€toÏrefuse€to€allow€a€defendant€to€live€with€his€family,€òòseeóó€òòe.g.óó,€òòState€v.€McSweeneyóó,Ð à Ð123€Ore.€App.€460,€860€P.2d€305€(Ore.€App.€1993)€(prohibiting€drug€offender€fromÏliving€with€family€is€reasonable),€no€such€circumstances€exist€in€this€case.€€InÏaddition,€the€broad€language€used€by€the€trial€court€forbids€the€defendant€to€live€inÏthe€same€house€with€a€female€relative€such€as€a€sister,€a€grandmother,€or€even€hisÏmother.€€We€fail€to€see€any€relationship€between€the€condition€and€the€defendantððsÏneed€to€exercise€more€control€over€his€aggressive€tendencies.€€ÌÌà ¸ àSince€neither€of€the€two€special€conditions€is€authorized€by€statute,€weÏmust€remand€this€case€to€the€trial€court€for€the€imposition€of€conditions€of€probationÏthat€are€consistent€with€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989.׃0×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€òòSeeóó€òòBurdinóó,Ð P( #& Ð924€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔS.W.2dÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>µc#Ô€at€87.€€€€€€Ð ° ÐÌà ¸ àFinally,€we€must€address€a€matter€unrelated€to€those€raised€by€theÏdefendant.€€In€our€òòde€novoóó€review€of€the€record,€we€noted€that€the€judgment€enteredÐ P   Ðin€this€case€is€deficient.€€The€judgment€indicates€that€the€defendant€was€convictedÏof€assault€as€defined€in€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔTennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>Je#Ô€39„13„101€andÐ `  Ðsentenced€to€serve€60%€of€his€eleven€month€and€twenty„nine€day€sentence€in€theÏcounty€jail€before€being€eligible€for€any€release€programs.€€The€form€also€notes€thatÏthe€jury€imposed€a€fine€of€$2,500.€€The€judgment€does€not€indicate€that€theÏdefendant€is€to€serve€60€days€in€jail€and€the€balance€on€probation.€€It€is€also€silentÏon€the€subject€of€restitution,€costs,€and€community€service.€€€At€the€sentencingÏhearing,€the€trial€judge€ordered€the€defendant€to€pay€both€his€court€costs€as€well€asÏrestitution€to€the€victim€at€the€rate€of€$100.00€per€month.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€However,€it€is€not€clearÐ 0€ Ðfrom€the€transcript€how€the€funds€are€to€be€allocated€between€the€costs€andÏrestitution.€€Facts€in€the€record€indicate€that€the€victimððs€medical€costs€amounted€toÏ$11,967.04.€€The€trial€court€made€no€findings€as€to€the€amount€of€restitution€theÏdefendant€was€required€to€pay€and€the€time€of€payment.ÌÌà ¸ àÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔAccording€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>·i#Ô€40„35„304,€a€trialÐ p&À!$ Ðcourt€must€specify€at€the€sentencing€hearing€the€amount€of€restitution€to€be€paid.€ÏÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€œÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>¢j#Ô40„35„304ñ} ñððñ} ñ›œñ~ ñ(cñ~ ññ ññ€ ñ€ñ€ ññ ññ~ ñ)ñ~ ññ‚ ñ€ñ‚ ññ ñ›€ñ ñ(1997).›€€The€court€may€permit€payment€inÐ 0*€%( Ðinstallments€but€may€not€establish€a€payment€schedule€that€extends€beyond€theÏstatutory€maximum€term€of€probation€supervision€that€may€be€imposed€for€theÏoffense.€€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔòòIdóó.׃p×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€€Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>8l#ÔIn€determining€the€amount€of€restitution€and€the€method€of€payment,Ð Ð/ +. Ðthe€trial€court€shall€consider€the€financial€resources€and€the€future€ability€of€theÏdefendant€to€pay.€Ô‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ô#† X¢>XXX¢>˜m#Ô40„35„304(d)€(1997).€€Ð à ÐÌà ¸ àThe€present€judgment€form€does€not€contain€many€of€the€trial€courtððsÏorders€relevant€to€sentencing,€and€the€transcript€itself€does€not€clarify€the€questionsÏrelevant€to€restitution.€€Upon€remand,€the€trial€court€shall€enter€a€judgment€thatÏaccurately€reflects€the€sentence€imposed€at€the€sentencing€hearing€as€well€as€aÏprobation€order€containing€any€conditions€the€trial€judge€determines€to€beÏreasonably€related€to€the€purposes€of€sentencing€as€defined€in€òòBurdinóó€and€in€theÐ ° Ðbest€interests€of€the€public€and€the€defendant.€€The€trial€court€shall€make€theÏrequired€findings€concerning€the€total€amount€of€restitution€and€the€manner€ofÏpayment€€after€taking€into€consideration€the€defendantððs€financial€resources€and€ÌÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔÓÓfuture€ability€to€pay.Ð 0€ ÐÌÌà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à__________________________Ìà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCURWOOD€WITT,€JudgeÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ______________________________ÌPAUL€G.€SUMMERS,€JudgeÌÌÌÌ______________________________ÌÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>q#ÔÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>ÔJERRY€L.€SMITHÔ#† X¢>XXX¢> r#ÔÔ‡X¢>XX X¢>Ô,€JudgeÔ#† X¢>XXX¢>ðr#Ô