ÿWPC™ µ8‡"Ü¿®&Ôæ¿¿®ªrÊ+;è¤xg¹Ÿ÷k£¯Æ2 hD`6Äæ¾)Å£»Öeûw­8l¼/¯&ÛËÒ­5#¾šÈ\O;¾#Ìz@»<Æ—šÆ¬É¿2¿€E†ñ·WR51ÆtÌ3 øåègüÎŽºŠÆ¿9Ò AÚšðÙcŒØC";Qû¬Åõ¶ëc)u¿ÿL€(ÛCଂJñUÁ? ã7ƒpò»é–J"þ{ðx ‹[¿¹\µµ ü9ÎÌv®+›Vë#&P“Uð­ËL¯w§½ÛÕô¬7<2Ë£̶ûã Ô<÷l\¤Õïí1œs°­J4Ø›@让ûî Ð\Œù~& ÿ¡Èdm|¹W#ÁÂU Nƒ %Ñ 0:×N 1‡ 72š 1uÌ 72A 0cs ^ Ö wâ 4æ ú  m 1‡" 72© © 1‡Û 72b b 1‡” 72 EM M M 0~O 0DÍ 1‡ 1‡˜ 72 1‡Q 72Ø 1‡  72‘ 1‡Ã 72JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ B|˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0&Öd9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à˜›W-s üPH,ê:i¢×+003|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(EhCEKQW]cioAutoList21.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(uhCEKQW]cioAutoList51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(…hCEKQW]cioAutoList61.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(.(3Ä($¤¤Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ehCEKQW]cioAutoList4a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.(•hCEKQW]cioAutoList7I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.+I.(¥hCEKQW]cioAutoList8I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.-I.(µhCEKQW]cioAutoList9I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I./I.(Õ£EGMSY_ekqAutoList10I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.1I. dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÓ  ÓÑ  ÑÑ8€¹ØXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îùuîXXÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ Ö& Ðà@d d ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€July€16,€2002ˆÐ üL ÐÔ#†X¹ØXîîùu¬#ÔÌò òÔ‡¼ø»XX¹ØÔà@ffìàSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€€v.€€RANDALL€Ô_ÔVERTISÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔGRAINGERÔ_ÔÔ#†X¹ØX»¼ø±#Ôó óˆÐ  ^ ÐÌà@¼ ¼ ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Williamson€CountyˆÐ  ^ Ðà@« « ìàNo.€II„800„260€€€€€€Timothy€L.€Easter,€JudgeˆÐ ú J ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<½` A߈Ð ¾  ÐÌà@¢ ¢ ìàNo.€M2001„02178„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€22,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ԈР¹  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<` AßÐ ‘á  Ðó óÌDefendant€appeals€his€conviction€in€the€Williamson€County€Circuit€Court€for€one€count€ofÐ ŒÜ  Ðaggravated€sexual€battery.€€Defendant€raises€the€following€issues€for€our€review:€1)€whether€theÐ xÈ Ðevidence€was€sufficient€to€support€his€conviction;€2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instructÐ d´ Ðthe€jury€on€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery,€sexual€battery,€attempted€sexual€battery,€orÐ P  Ðattempted€assault;€3)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€approving€and€adopting€the€jury€imposed€fineÐ <Œ Ðof€$10,000;€and€4)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€imposing€a€ten„year€sentence.€€The€judgment€ofÐ (x Ðthe€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð d ÐÌò òà@——ìàTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmed.ó óˆÐ ì< ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€whichòòóó€òòJ.€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€óóandÐ Ä ÐòòAlan€E.€Glenn,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌJohn€H.€Henderson,€District€Public€Defender,€Franklin,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Randall€Ô_ÔVertisÔ_ÔÐ ˆØ ÐÔ_ÔGraingerÔ_Ô.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Helen€Walton€Ô_ÔYarbroughÔ_Ô,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ L!œ  ÐGeneral;€Ronald€L.€Davis,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Sharon€E.€Ô_ÔGuffeeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€DistrictÐ 8"ˆ! ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $#t" ÐÌà@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ü$L $ ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ Ô&$"& ÐÌà  àOn€August€14,€2000,€the€Williamson€County€Grand€Jury€returned€a€one„count€indictmentÐ ¬(ü#( Ðagainst€Defendant,€charging€him€with€aggravated€sexual€battery.€€The€named€victim€is€DefendantððsÐ ˜)è$) Ðniece.€€A€jury€convicted€the€Defendant,€and€he€was€fined€$10,000€and€sentenced€to€ten€years€as€aÐ „*Ô%* ÐRange€I€standard€offender.Ð p+À&+ Ðâ âÐ \,¬',à ÐÔ_Ôà  àThough€evidence€of€more€than€one€incident€between€Defendant€and€his€niece€was€introducedÐ ° Ðâ âat€trial,€at€the€conclusion€of€the€proof,€the€state€elected€to€have€the€jury€consider€only€the€followingÐ œì Ðincident.€€This€incident€occurred€when€B.B.,€the€victim,€was€seven€years€old.€€(We€will€refer€to€theÐ ˆØ Ðminor€victim€by€her€initials.)€€She€was€living€with€her€grandmother€in€Nashville€and€was€visiting€herÐ tÄ Ðaunt€and€uncle,€the€Defendant,€in€Franklin.€€B.B.€testified€that€on€returning€from€a€trip€to€theÐ `° Ðhardware€store€with€the€Defendant,€he€pulled€his€van€over€and€stopped€in€a€field.€€He€told€her€to€pullÐ L œ Ðher€shorts€down€and€she€said€ð ðno.ðð€€He€told€her€again€to€pull€her€shorts€down€and€told€her€not€to€tellÐ 8 ˆ Ðanybody.€€She€further€testified€that€Defendant€ð ðtouched€it,ðð€explaining€that€he€put€one€hand€betweenÐ $ t Ðher€legs€and€touched€her€ð ðprivates.ðð€€The€victim€testified€that€while€Defendant€was€touching€her,€heÐ  ` Ðsaid€that€he€liked€to€touch€his€wifeððs€privates.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àKevin€Teague,€a€Detective€Sergeant€with€the€Franklin€Police€Department,€testified€that€heÐ Ô$  Ðtook€two€statements€from€the€Defendant.€€Teague€testified€that€on€the€first€occasion,€the€DefendantÐ À  Ðspeculated€that€the€meeting€concerned€his€niece,€before€the€detective€made€any€mention€of€theÐ ¬ü  Ðvictimððs€name.€€In€a€written€statement,€Defendant€described€the€incident€that€occurred€on€the€wayÐ ˜è  Ðhome€from€the€hardware€store.€€He€claimed€that€his€niece€pulled€her€shorts€down€and€told€him€thatÐ „Ô  Ðshe€had€hair€on€her€privates€like€her€aunt€Kellie,€the€Defendantððs€wife.€€He€claimed€that€he€told€herÐ pÀ Ðto€pull€her€shorts€back€up€and€did€not€touch€her.€€Also€according€to€Defendantððs€written€statement,Ð \¬ Ðhis€niece€asked€him€if€he€had€ever€ð ðsucked€on€body€parts€like€a€bottle.ððÐ H˜ ÐÌà  àDefendantððs€testimony€at€trial€mirrored€his€written€statement€to€police.€€He€admitted€that€theÐ  p Ðincident€had€occurred,€but€not€as€the€victim€described.€€He€claimed€that€his€niece€had€initiated€theÐ  \ Ðincident,€testifying€that€the€seven€year€old€had€been€sexually€aggressive€toward€him.€€Following€anÐ øH Ðincident€that€occurred€in€Defendantððs€home,€he€told€his€wife€that€he€thought€their€niece€had€beenÐ ä4 Ðmolested€in€the€past€and€to€watch€her.€€His€wife,€the€victimððs€aunt,€testified€at€trial€that€DefendantÐ Ð  Ðnever€told€her€that€B.B.€had€ð ðcome€ontoðð€him,€as€Defendant€claimed.Ð ¼  ÐÌò òSufficiency€of€the€Evidenceó óÐ ”ä ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€address€the€issue€of€whether€the€evidence€at€trial€was€sufficient€to€support€a€findingÐ l¼ Ðof€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€When€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convictingÐ X ¨ Ðevidence,€we€must€determine€whether€ð ðany€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essentialÐ D!” Ðelements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€òòState€v.€Keoughóó,€18€S.W.3d€175,€180„81€(Tenn.Ð 0"€  Ð2000)€(òòquotingóó€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979)).€€In€so€determining,€this€Court€mustÐ #l! Ðreview€the€evidence€in€a€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€affording€it€the€strongest€legitimateÐ $X" Ðview€of€the€evidence€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimate€inferences€which€may€beÐ ô$D # Ðdrawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòKeoughóó,€18€S.W.3d€at€181€(òòcitingóó€òòState€v.€Blandóó,€958€S.W.2d€651,€659Ð à%0!$ Ð(Tenn.€1997)).€€Questions€regarding€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€the€weight€to€be€given€theÐ Ì&"% Ðevidence,€and€any€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€are€resolved€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€thisÐ ¸'#& ÐCourt.€€òòBlandóó,€958€S.W.2d€at€659.€€Furthermore,€a€guilty€verdict€replaces€the€presumption€ofÐ ¤(ô#' Ðinnocence€with€a€presumption€of€guilt,€which€defendant€has€the€burden€of€overcoming€on€appeal.€Ð )à$( ÐòòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àA€conviction€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€requires€proof€of€ð ðunlawful€sexual€contact€withÐ ° Ða€victim...who€is€less€than€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4)€(1997).€Ð œì ÐSexual€contact€is€the€ð ðintentional€touching€of€the€victimððs...€intimate€partsðð€if€the€touching€can€beÐ ˆØ Ðð ðreasonably€construed€as€being€for€the€purpose€of€sexual€arousal€or€gratification.ðð€€òòIdóó.€ðð€39„13„Ð tÄ Ð501(6).€€In€this€case,€the€victimððs€age€is€undisputed.€€According€to€the€victimððs€testimony,€DefendantÐ `° Ðmade€her€pull€her€shorts€down,€put€his€hand€between€her€legs,€and€then€touched€her€privates.€Ð L œ ÐViewing€this€evidence€in€a€light€most€favorable€to€the€State,€this€testimony€is€sufficient€for€the€juryÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€conclude€that€the€Defendant€touched€the€victimððs€intimate€parts.Ð $ t ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Hayesóó,€899€S.W.2d€175€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€this€Court€held€that€one€factorÐ ü L  Ðfrom€which€the€jury€could€infer€that€the€touching€was€for€the€purpose€of€defendantððs€sexualÐ è 8  Ðgratification€was€the€time€and€place€of€the€incident,€when€a€victim€was€alone€with€the€defendant.€Ð Ô$  ÐòòIdóó.€at€179.€€In€a€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution,€the€proof€shows€that€Defendant€and€theÐ À  Ðvictim€were€alone€in€a€van.€€Defendant€drove€the€van€into€a€field€and€stopped€the€vehicle.€€He€madeÐ ¬ü  Ðher€pull€her€shorts€down€and€touched€her€ð ðprivates,ðð€between€her€legs,€and€told€the€victim€not€to€tellÐ ˜è  Ðanybody€about€the€incident.€€Also,€the€victimððs€testimony€that€Defendant€told€her€he€liked€to€touchÐ „Ô  Ðhis€wifeððs€ð ðprivatesðð€supports€the€inference€that€the€touching€was€for€sexual€arousal€or€gratification.€Ð pÀ ÐUnder€all€the€circumstances,€the€jury€could€reasonably€infer€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€theÐ \¬ ÐDefendantððs€acts€were€done€for€the€purposes€of€sexual€arousal€or€gratification.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àDefendant€asserts€that€because€his€testimony€and€that€of€the€victim€conflict,€there€isÐ  p Ðinsufficient€evidence€to€support€a€finding€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€Defendant€deniedÐ  \ Ðhaving€touched€the€victim€and€testified€that€the€victim€pulled€her€shorts€down,€saying€that€she€hadÐ øH Ðhair€on€her€privates€like€her€aunt.€€He€testified€that€he€then€told€her€to€pull€her€shorts€back€up€and€didÐ ä4 Ðnot€touch€her.€€All€conflicts€in€trial€testimony€are€resolved€in€favor€of€the€jury€verdict.€€òòState€v.Ð Ð  ÐTuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€Affording€the€appropriate€weight€to€the€juryððsÐ ¼  Ðaccreditation€of€the€testimony€and€the€inferences€drawn€therefrom,€we€conclude€that€Defendant€isÐ ¨ø Ðnot€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð ”ä ÐÌò òJury€Instructionsó óÐ l¼ ÐÌà  àNext,€we€consider€the€Defendantððs€argument€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€theÐ D!” Ðjury€on€several€lesser„included€offenses.€€Defendant€was€indicted€for€aggravated€sexual€battery.€Ð 0"€  ÐSpecifically,€the€indictment€alleged€that€the€Defendant€ð ðunlawfully,€intentionally€and€feloniously,Ð #l! Ðdid€engage€in€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€a€child€under€the€age€of€thirteen€(13).€.€.€.ðð€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.Ð $X" ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4)€(1997).€€After€the€close€of€all€the€evidence,€the€trial€court€instructedÐ ô$D # Ðthe€jury€on€aggravated€sexual€battery,€a€class€B€felony,€and€the€lesser„included€offense€of€assault,€aÐ à%0!$ Ðclass€B€misdemeanor€as€defined€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„101(a)(3).€€The€Defendant€complainsÐ Ì&"% Ðthat€the€trial€court€also€should€have€instructed€the€jury€on€the€offenses€of€sexual€battery€andÐ ¸'#& Ðattempted€aggravated€sexual€battery,€for€which€the€trial€court€denied€Defendantððs€request€at€the€closeÐ ¤(ô#' Ðof€proof,€as€well€as€attempted€sexual€battery€and€attempted€assault,€which€Defendant€did€not€raiseÐ )à$( Ðat€trial€and€now€alleges€as€plain€error€on€appeal.Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àIt€is€well„established€that€a€trial€court€has€a€duty€to€give€a€complete€charge€of€the€lawÐ ° Ðapplicable€to€the€facts€of€the€case.€òòState€v.€Harbisonóó,€704€S.W.2d€314,€319€(Tenn.€1986).€€As€partÐ œì Ðof€this€duty,€a€trial€court€is€required€by€statute€to€charge€juries€as€to€the€law€of€each€offenseÐ ˆØ Ðð ðincludedðð€in€an€indictment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„18„110(a)€(1997).€This€requirement€extends€toÐ tÄ Ðlesser„included€offenses€and€is€not€contingent€on€specific€requests€for€such€instructions€by€theÐ `° Ðdefendant€or€prosecution.€òòIdóó.;€òòsee€also€State€v.€Fowleróó,€23€S.W.3d€285,€288-89€(Tenn.€2000).€€TheÐ L œ Ðcontrolling€criteria€for€determining€whether€an€offense€is€a€lesser„included€offense€were€establishedÐ 8 ˆ Ðin€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€467€(Tenn.€1999).€€An€offense€is€lesser„included€if:Ð $ t ÐÌÓ ÐÓÓ ÐÓ(a)€all€of€its€statutory€elements€are€included€within€the€statutory€elements€of€theÐ ü L  Ðoffense€charged;€orÐ è 8  ÐÌ(b)€it€fails€to€meet€the€definition€in€part€(a)€only€in€the€respect€that€it€contains€aÐ À  Ðstatutory€element€or€elements€establishingÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà Ø à(1)€a€different€mental€state€indicating€a€lesser€kind€of€culpability;€and/orÐ „Ô  ÐÌà0 Ø à(2)€a€less€serious€harm€or€risk€of€harm€to€the€same€person,€property€orÐ \¬ Ðpublic€interest;€orÐH˜Ø X Ø X  ÐÌ(c)€it€consists€ofÐ  p ÐÌà0 Ø à(1)€facilitation€of€the€offense€charged€or€of€an€offense€that€otherwise€meetsÐ øH Ðthe€definition€of€lesser„included€offense€in€part€(a)€or€(b);€orÐä4Ø X Ø X  ÐÌà0 Ø à(2)€an€attempt€to€commit€the€offense€charged€or€an€offense€that€otherwiseÐ ¼  Ðmeets€the€definition€of€lesser„included€offense€in€part€(a)€or€(b);€orШøØ X Ø X  ÐÌà0 Ø à(3)€solicitation€to€commit€the€offense€charged€or€an€offense€that€otherwiseÐ €Ð Ðmeets€the€definition€of€lesser„included€offense€in€part€(a)€or€(b).Ðl¼Ø X Ø X  ÐÓ Ð-4ÓÓ Ð;4ÓÌòòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€466ð!ð67.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àHere,€the€record€reflects€that€the€trial€court€instructed€the€jury€on€the€offenses€of€aggravatedÐ #l! Ðsexual€battery€and€class€B€misdemeanor€assault.€€The€elements€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€areÐ $X" Ðunlawful€ð ðsexual€contactðð€with€a€victim€less€than€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ô$D # Ððð€39„13„504(4)€(1997).€€As€relevant€here,€ð ðsexual€contactðð€is€defined€as€the€ð ðintentional€touching€ofÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€victimððs...intimate€parts,€or€the€intentional€touching€of€the€clothing€covering€the€immediate€areaÐ Ì&"% Ðof€the€victimððs...intimate€parts,€if€that€intentional€touching€can€be€reasonably€construed€as€being€forÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€purpose€of€sexual€arousal€or€gratification.ðð€€òòIdóó.€ðð€39„13„501(6).€The€trial€court€gave€the€followingÐ ¤(ô#' Ðinstruction€on€the€crime€of€aggravated€sexual€battery:Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà8  àFor€you€to€find€the€defendant€guilty€of€[aggravated€sexual€battery],€the€state€mustÐ ° Ðâ âhave€proven€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€the€existence€of€the€following€essentialÐ œì Ðelements:ЈØÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à(1)€the€defendant€had€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€the€alleged€victim€in€which€theÐ `° Ðdefendant€intentionally€touched€the€alleged€victimððs€intimate€parts,€or€the€clothingÐ L œ Ðcovering€the€immediate€area€of€the€alleged€victimððs€intimate€parts;€andÐ8 ˆÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à(2)€that€the€alleged€victim€was€less€than€thirteen€(13)€years€of€age;€andÐ `Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à(3)€that€the€defendant€acted€either€intentionally,€knowingly€or€recklessly.Ðè 8 Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€also€instructed€the€jury€on€class€B€misdemeanor€assault,€which€the€TennesseeÐ À  ÐSupreme€Court€has€held€to€be€a€lesser„included€offense€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€under€part€(b)(2)Ð ¬ü  Ðof€the€òòBurnsóó€test.€€òòState€v.€Swindleóó,€30€S.W.3d€289,€293€(Tenn.€2000)òòóó€(trial€courtððs€failure€to€instructÐ ˜è  Ðon€misdemeanor€assault€was€harmless€error).€€In€determining€whether€the€trial€court€should€haveÐ „Ô  Ðinstructed€the€jury€as€to€the€additional€ð ðlesser„includedðð€offenses,€as€asserted€by€Defendant,€we€areÐ pÀ Ðguided€by€the€analysis€of€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€in€òòState€v.€Allenóó,€69€S.W.3d€181€(Tenn.Ð \¬ Ð2002).€€Our€inquiry€is:€1)€whether€the€offense€is€a€lesser„included€offense€of€aggravated€sexualÐ H˜ Ðbattery;€2)€whether€the€evidence€supports€an€instruction€on€the€lesser„included€offense;€and€3)Ð 4„ Ðwhether€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€instruct,€if€error,€was€harmless€error.€€òòIdóó.€at€187.Ð  p ÐÌà  àWith€respect€to€the€offenses€of€attempted€sexual€battery€and€attempted€assault,€DefendantÐ øH Ðfailed€to€raise€the€issue€in€his€motion€for€new€trial,€and€therefore,€it€would€normally€be€waived.€€òòSeeóóÐ ä4 ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(e)€(ð ðno€issue€presented€for€review€shall€be€predicated€upon€error€in...juryÐ Ð  Ðinstructions€granted€or€refused...unless€the€same€was€specifically€stated€in€a€motion€for€new€trialðð).€Ð ¼  ÐNevertheless,€in€our€discretion,€we€address€all€of€the€lesser„included€offenses€asserted€by€Defendant.€Ð ¨ø ÐHowever,€our€review€of€the€record€reveals€that€even€if€the€issue€were€properly€before€us,€we€wouldÐ ”ä Ðfind€it€without€merit.Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àWe€begin€our€analysis€with€the€offenses€of€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€and€attemptedÐ X ¨ Ðassault.€€Both€offenses€meet€the€requirements€of€a€lesser„included€offense€under€part€(c)(2)€of€theÐ D!” ÐòòBurnsóó€test.€€Attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€is€an€attempt€of€the€offense€charged,€and€attemptedÐ 0"€  Ðassault€is€an€attempt€of€a€lesser„included€offense€under€part€(b).€€Having€concluded€that€attempt€isÐ #l! Ða€lesser„included€offense,€the€second€component€of€the€òòBurnsóó€test€requires€us€to€determine€whetherÐ $X" Ðthe€lesser„included€offense€should€have€been€submitted€to€the€jury.€òòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€467.€€ð ðFirst,Ð ô$D # Ðthe€trial€court€must€determine€whether€any€evidence€exists€that€reasonable€minds€could€accept€as€toÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€lesser„included€offense....€Second,€the€trial€court€must€determine€if€the€evidence,€viewed€in€thisÐ Ì&"% Ðlight,€is€legally€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction€for€the€lesser-included€offense.ðð€òò€Idóó.€at€469.Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àDefendantððs€argument€with€respect€to€the€offenses€of€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€andÐ )à$( Ðattempted€assault€fails€under€the€first€prong€of€the€analysis.€€To€commit€an€attempt,€a€person€mustÐ |*Ì%) Ðpossess€the€intent€to€commit€the€designated€offense.€€A€person€is€guilty€of€attempt€if€he€ð ð[a]cts€withÐ h+¸&* Ðthe€intent€to€complete€a€course€of€action...that€would€constitute€the€offenseðð€and€his€ð ðconductÐ ° Ðconstituted€a€substantial€step€toward€the€commission€of€the€offense.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„12„101Ð œì Ð(1997).€€An€ð ðattemptðð€necessarily€means€that€the€offense€was€not€completed.€€òòLevasseur€v.€Stateóó,€464Ð ˆØ ÐS.W.2d€315,€319€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1970).€€Without€judging€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,€we€findÐ tÄ Ðthat€the€record€shows€that€either€Defendant€made€the€victim€pull€her€shorts€down€and€touched€herÐ `° Ðbetween€her€legs,€as€she€contends,€or€the€victim€pulled€her€shorts€down€herself€and€Defendant€didÐ L œ Ðnot€touch€her,€as€he€contends.€€Both€witnessesðð€testimony€was€unequivocal€with€regard€to€whetherÐ 8 ˆ Ðor€not€the€touching€occurred.€€There€is€no€proof€in€this€record€that€could€lead€to€even€an€inferenceÐ $ t Ðthat€Defendant€attempted€to€commit€aggravated€sexual€battery€or€class€B€misdemeanor€assault,€butÐ  ` Ðfailed€to€do€so.€€Therefore,€no€reasonable€mind€could€accept€as€to€the€lesser„included€offense€ofÐ ü L  Ðattempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€or€attempted€class€B€misdemeanor€assault.€€While,€as€a€generalÐ è 8  Ðrule,€proof€of€the€greater€offense€will€always€warrant€an€instruction€of€a€part€(a)€lesser„includedÐ Ô$  Ðoffense,€the€supreme€court€in€òòAllenóó€held€that€ð ð[f]or€lesser€offenses€under€part€(c),€proof€of€the€greaterÐ À  Ðoffense€will€not€necessarily€prove€the€lesser€offense.ðð€€òòAllenóó,€69€S.W.3d€at€188.€€We€conclude€thatÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€trial€court€did€not€err€by€not€charging€the€jury€on€the€lesser„included€offenses€of€attemptedÐ ˜è  Ðaggravated€sexual€battery€and€attempted€assault.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àNext,€Defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€request€at€the€close€of€proofÐ \¬ Ðfor€an€instruction€on€sexual€battery,€a€class€E€felony.€€We€disagree,€and€hold€that€sexual€battery€isÐ H˜ Ðnot€a€lesser„included€offense€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€òòas€chargedóó€in€this€case.€€We€begin€byÐ 4„ Ðanalyzing€the€statutory€elements€of€the€two€offenses€under€òòBurnsóó.€€Sexual€battery€is€unlawful€sexualÐ  p Ðcontact€with€a€victim€accomplished€either:€1)€by€force€or€coercion;€2)€without€the€victimððs€consent;Ð  \ Ð3)€when€defendant€knows€the€victim€is€mentally€incapacitated€or€physically€helpless;€or€4)€by€fraud.€Ð øH ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„505€(1997).€€By€comparison,€aggravated€sexual€battery,€as€charged€in€theÐ ä4 Ðindictment€against€Defendant,€is€the€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€a€victim€who€is€less€than€thirteenÐ Ð  Ð(13)€years€of€age.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4).€€In€this€case,€all€of€the€statutory€elements€of€the€offense€ofÐ ¼  Ðsexual€battery€are€not€included€within€the€statutory€elements€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€as€allegedÐ ¨ø Ðin€the€indictment.€€òòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€469.€€Therefore,€sexual€battery€is€not€a€part€(a)€lesser„includedÐ ”ä Ðoffense€under€òòBurnsóó,€in€this€particular€case.Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àWe€recognize,€however,€that€in€some€cases,€sexual€battery€may€be€a€lesser„included€offenseÐ X ¨ Ðof€aggravated€sexual€battery€under€part€(a)€of€the€òòBurnsóó€test.€€For€example,€aggravated€sexual€batteryÐ D!” Ðcommitted€by€force€or€coercion€where€the€defendant€is€armed€with€a€weapon,€in€violation€of€ðð€39„13„Ð 0"€  Ð504(a)(1),€includes€the€lesser€offense€of€sexual€battery€committed€by€force€or€coercion,€in€violationÐ #l! Ðof€€ðð€39„13„505(a)(1).€€In€this€case,€however,€Defendant€was€charged€with€violating€ðð€39„13„Ð $X" Ð504(a)(4)€of€the€Tennessee€Code,€which€prohibits€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€a€victim€less€thanÐ ô$D # Ðthirteen€(13)€years€of€age.€€To€convict€Defendant€of€that€offense,€no€proof€is€required€of€force€orÐ à%0!$ Ðcoercion,€or€any€other€of€the€ð ðadditionalðð€elements€required€to€prove€sexual€battery.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÐ Ì&"% ÐAnn.€ðð€39„13„505.Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àLikewise,€in€this€case,€sexual€battery€is€not€a€lesser„included€offense€under€part€(b)€of€theÐ )à$( ÐòòBurnsóó€test.€€Under€part€(b),€an€offense€is€still€a€lesser„included€offense€if€€ð ðit€fails€to€meet€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðdefinition€in€part€(a)€òòonlyóó€in€the€respect€that€it€òòcontainsóó€a€òòstatutory€elementóó€or€òòelements€establishingóóÐ h+¸&* Ð(1)€a€different€mental€state€indicating€a€lesser€kind€of€culpability;€and/or€(2)€a€less€serious€harm€orÐ ° Ðrisk€of€harm...ðð€€òòBurnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€at€466„467€(emphasis€added).€€In€assessing€the€degree€ofÐ œì Ðculpability,€we€look€at€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€the€severity€of€the€punishment,€and€ð ðthe€overallÐ ˆØ Ðdegree€of€blameworthinessðð€associated€with€each€offense.€€òòState€v.€Bowlesóó,€52€S.W.3d€69,€76„77Ð tÄ Ð(Tenn.€2001);€òòState€v.€Elyóó,€48€S.W.3d€710,€721€(Tenn.€2001).Ð `° ÐÌà  àIn€òòState€v.€Bowlesóó,€our€supreme€court€held€that€sexual€battery€is€a€lesser„included€offense€ofÐ 8 ˆ Ðaggravated€rape€because€of€the€level€of€harm€caused€by€each€offense.€€Aggravated€rape€requiresÐ $ t Ðpenetration€causing€bodily€injury,€which€the€supreme€court€found€to€be€more€intrusive,€and€thus€aÐ  ` Ðmore€serious€harm€to€the€victim,€than€intentional€touching€for€the€purposes€of€sexual€gratification.€Ð ü L  ÐòòBowlesóó,€52€S.W.3d€at€77.€€Here,€the€offenses€of€sexual€battery€and€aggravated€sexual€battery€bothÐ è 8  Ðrequire€ð ðsexual€contactðð€with€a€victim€by€the€defendant.€€As€defined€by€statute,€ð ðsexual€contactððÐ Ô$  Ðestablishes€the€same€required€culpable€mental€state€for€each€offense.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„Ð À  Ð501(6)€(1997);€òòRuff€v.€Stateóó,€978€S.W.2d€95,€97€(Tenn.€1998).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àAgain,€we€emphasize€that€Defendant€was€charged€in€the€indictment€with€aggravated€sexualÐ „Ô  Ðbattery€as€defined€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4),€unlawful€sexual€contact€with€a€victim€lessÐ pÀ Ðthan€13€years€old.€€Each€ð ðtypeðð€of€sexual€battery€requires€proof€of€an€element€or€elements€notÐ \¬ Ðincluded€within€the€elements€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€òòas€definedóó€in€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4).€€SexualÐ H˜ Ðbattery€as€charged€in€ðð€39„13„505(a)(1)€requires€proof€of€force€or€coercion;€ðð€39„13„505(a)(2)Ð 4„ Ðrequires€proof€of€no€consent€by€the€victim€and€that€the€defendant€knew€or€had€reason€to€know€of€theÐ  p Ðlack€of€consent;€ðð€39„13„505(a)(3)€requires€proof€that€the€victim€is€mentally€defective,€mentallyÐ  \ Ðincapacitated,€or€physically€helpless,€and€that€the€defendant€knew€or€had€reason€to€know€of€this;€andÐ øH Ððð€39„13„505(a)(4)€requires€proof€that€the€sexual€contact€was€accomplished€by€fraud.€€AggravatedÐ ä4 Ðsexual€battery€and€sexual€battery€have€the€òòsameóó,€and€not€different,€ð ðmental€stateðð€elements.€€NoneÐ Ð  Ðof€the€above€ð ðadditionalðð€elements€of€sexual€battery€establishes€either€a€different€mental€state,Ð ¼  Ðindicating€a€lesser€culpability,€or€a€less€serious€harm€or€risk€of€harm€to€the€victim.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àTherefore,€while€some€or€all€ð ðtypesðð€of€sexual€battery€contained€in€ðð€39„13„505€may€beÐ €Ð Ðlesser„included€offenses€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€as€defined€in€ðð€39„13„504(a)(1),(2),€or€(3)Ð l¼ Ðunder€part€(a)€or€part€(b)€of€òòBurnsóó,€due€to€the€specific€wording€of€the€statutes,€sexual€battery€is€notÐ X ¨ Ða€lesser„included€offense€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€as€defined€in€ðð€39„13„504(a)(4)€under€eitherÐ D!” Ðpart€(a)€or€(b)€of€òòBurnsóó.€€Finally,€because€sexual€battery€is€not€a€lesser„included€offense€in€this€case,Ð 0"€  Ðattempted€sexual€battery€is€excluded€as€an€attempt€of€a€lesser„included€offense€under€part€(c)€ofÐ #l! ÐòòBurnsóó.€€Even€if€sexual€battery€were€a€lesser„included€offense,€the€proof€does€not€justify€an€instructionÐ $X" Ðon€ð ðattemptðð€under€our€analysis€above.€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð ô$D # ÐÌò òSentence€and€Fineó óÐ Ì&"% ÐÌà  àDefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€approving€the€$10,000€fine€imposed€by€the€juryÐ ¤(ô#' Ðand€imposing€a€ten„year€sentence€for€his€conviction€of€aggravated€sexual€battery.€€When€an€accusedÐ )à$( Ðchallenges€the€length,€range€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€our€review€is€de€novo€with€aÐ |*Ì%) Ðpresumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð h+¸&* Ð401(d)€(1997);€òòState€v.€Imfeldóó,€70€S.W.3d€698,€704€(Tenn.€2002).€€The€burden€is€upon€the€appealingÐ ° Ðparty€to€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€SentencingÐ œì ÐCommission€Comments.€€For€the€presumption€of€correctness€to€apply€to€the€trial€courtððs€actions,Ð ˆØ Ðthere€must€be€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€sentencingÐ tÄ Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543„44€(Tenn.Ð `° Ð1999).Ð L œ ÐÌà  àIn€reviewing€the€record,€this€court€must€consider€(a)€the€evidence€at€the€trial€and€theÐ $ t Ðsentencing€hearing,€(b)€the€presentence€report,€(c)€the€principles€of€sentencing,€(d)€the€arguments€ofÐ  ` Ðcounsel,€(e)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€offenses,€and€(f)€the€appellantððs€potential€forÐ ü L  Ðrehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210;€€òòsee€alsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-102€&€„103.€Ð è 8  ÐIn€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597€(Tenn.€1994),€our€supreme€court€said€that€ð ð[t]o€facilitateÐ Ô$  Ðmeaningful€appellate€review...€the€trial€court€must€place€on€the€record€its€reasons€for€arriving€at€theÐ À  Ðfinal€sentencing€decision,€identify€the€mitigating€and€enhancement€factors€found,€state€the€specificÐ ¬ü  Ðfacts€supporting€each€enhancement€factor€found,€and€articulate€how€the€mitigating€and€enhancementÐ ˜è  Ðfactors€have€been€evaluated€and€balanced€in€determining€the€sentence.ðð€€òòIdóó.€at€599„600.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àWhere€one€or€more€enhancement€factors€apply€but€no€mitigating€factors€exist,€the€trial€courtÐ \¬ Ðmay€sentence€above€the€presumptive€sentence€but€still€within€the€range.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ H˜ Ð40-35-210(d);€òòImfieldóó,€70€S.W.3d€at€704.€€Where€both€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€apply,Ð 4„ Ðthe€trial€court€must€start€at€the€presumptive€sentence,€the€minimum€sentence€in€a€range€for€a€classÐ  p ÐB€felony,€and€enhance€the€sentence€within€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€enhancement€factors€andÐ  \ Ðthen€reduce€the€sentence€within€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð øH Ððððð€40-35-210(c),€„210(e).€€The€weight€afforded€an€enhancement€or€mitigating€factor€is€left€to€theÐ ä4 Ðdiscretion€of€the€trial€court€if€the€trial€court€complies€with€the€purposes€and€principles€of€theÐ Ð  ÐTennessee€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989€and€the€record€supports€its€findings.€€òòState€v.Ð ¼  ÐHayesóó,€899€S.W.2d€175,€185€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995);€òòState€v.€Kelleyóó,€34€S.W.3d€471,€479€(Tenn.Ð ¨ø ÐCrim.€App.€2000).Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àDefendant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€sexual€battery,€a€class€B€felony,€which€carries€aÐ l¼ Ðsentence€of€not€less€than€eight€years€and€no€more€than€twelve€years€for€a€Range€I€standard€offender.€Ð X ¨ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(2).€€The€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€to€ten€years€in€theÐ D!” ÐDepartment€of€Correction.€€The€record€shows€that€the€trial€court€applied€two€enhancing€factors.€Ð 0"€  ÐWhile€Defendant€argues€that€his€sentence€is€excessive,€he€makes€no€argument€that€the€enhancementÐ #l! Ðfactors€applied€by€the€trial€court€were€inappropriate.€€First,€the€trial€court€found€that€Defendant€hadÐ $X" Ða€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€or€criminal€behavior€in€addition€to€those€necessary€toÐ ô$D # Ðestablish€the€appropriate€range.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„114(1).€€In€addition,€the€court€placed€significant€weightÐ à%0!$ Ðon€factor€(15),€which€allows€enhancement€for€abuse€of€a€position€of€private€trust€because€DefendantÐ Ì&"% Ðwas€the€victimððs€uncle,€who€was€charged€with€her€care€during€her€visits€with€him.€€òòIdóó.€ðð€40„35„Ð ¸'#& Ð114(15).€€The€trial€court€acknowledged€proof€of€Defendantððs€good€employment€history,€but€gave€itÐ ¤(ô#' Ðlittle€weight€as€a€mitigating€factor,€stating€ð ðI€donððt€believe€Defendant€should€be€rewarded€forÐ )à$( Ðconducting€himself€the€way€weððre€all€expected€to€conduct€ourselves.ðð€€The€record€shows€that€the€trialÐ |*Ì%) Ðcourt€gave€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principles€set€forth€under€theÐ h+¸&* Ðsentencing€law,€and€the€courtððs€determinations€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record.€€òòState€v.Ð ° ÐHooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€1,€5€(Tenn.€2000).Ð œì ÐÌà  àFinally,€we€address€Defendantððs€argument€that€a€$10,000€fine€is€excessive€in€light€of€hisÐ tÄ Ðindigent€status.€€This€Court€has€authority€to€review€fines€as€part€of€the€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Bryantóó,€805Ð `° ÐS.W.2d€762,€767€(Tenn.€1991).€€While€a€defendantððs€ability€to€pay€is€a€factor€in€assessing€a€fine,€itÐ L œ Ðis€not€controlling€and€proof€of€indigence€alone€does€not€preclude€the€punishment€of€a€fine.€€òòState€v.Ð 8 ˆ ÐMarshallóó,€870€S.W.2d€532,€542€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€The€seriousness€of€the€crime€for€whichÐ $ t Ðthe€defendant€was€convicted€also€deserves€consideration.€€òòIdóó.€€Here,€Defendant€was€convicted€ofÐ  ` Ðaggravated€sexual€battery€of€a€seven€year€old€child.€€The€maximum€fine€authorized€by€statute€for€aÐ ü L  Ðclass€B€felony€is€$25,000.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(2).€€While€we€recognize€that€DefendantÐ è 8  Ðis€indigent€and€the€fine€may€work€a€substantial€hardship€on€him,€we€conclude€that€the€fine€isÐ Ô$  Ðappropriate€and€ð ðjustly€deserved€in€relation€to€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ À  Ð40„35„102(1).€€Defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àAfter€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð \¬ ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  p Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE