WPC, '.Iq!D @=q!]+IQ07\alw' 2*O{YdfGLWL-}ģ⣶+#0v\>-cZSIS IQ +k(,gAoY糥&ereNQZYFndM"R  yy?_;$u Y lq*tEW?hm~+So# < lw9_^~FaWOن4<ԞL~}ԅk/Z\>y 4mC%;ֿqC ];R6о*<U+Ha\]K}r4Zj7V8\MFZZ_֙i 71 A6v2-׻U%!~{F(+dǂB"6kbm FS+&b#\ %% N+ 0- UN 0D zG  z  ^ w  {A4N,E. m0GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGb 0'''' B 0/ D5 D- 0K55 AS 0 0D= A\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3,,,,0(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#$  0   C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptܡ/ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5b.rtyBarN3|xU WeinmanTiptonT.R.A.P. CrimAdkissonDupreeTHURMANWHITSEYv.Biondich CuppcolorableReTrialSneedBlountAdrianneNolesHaywoodAshbyT.C.A.rebuttableincarcerativecodefendant Bebb- -(|G2$ !.8Gdd8         0   d(|3$ !.8Gdd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8Gdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Gdd8     _   G8 YXXdd8@ttK4GINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#GK4 #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsAugust19,2003 L X YXG #GXX Y#MICHAELJ.GRANTv.STATEOFTENNESSEEX YXG  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforBradleyCounty  J @@No._M_02837R.StevenBebb,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200300637CCAR3PC   December23,_2003_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     #GX Yz#X YX.GJosephM.Tipton,J.,dissenting. d #GXX Y#X YXG  Irespectfullydissent.Themajorityopinionsummarilyconcludesthatthepetitionercould < not reasonablyrelyoncounselsassurancesregardinghisrelease.Inessence,theopinionstands (x forthepropositionthatpostconvictionreliefwillneverbejustifiedbaseduponcounselsassurances d regardingparole.Idonotbelievesuchtobetrue. P   Thetrialcourtsummarilydismissedthepetitionerspostconvictionpetitionstatingthatit ( had reviewedthepetitionforleavetofileanuntimelypostconvictionreliefpetitionandfoundit  tobewithoutmerit.Torulebaseduponthepleadings,thetrialcourtwasobligatedtoacceptthe  allegationsinthepetitionastrue.T.C.A.4030106(f)(2003).Thegistofthepetitioners  complaintisthathiscounselguaranteedthathewouldserve,atmost,onlythirtypercentofhissix  yearsentence.Onlyafterthetimeforhimtofileapostconvictionpetitionhadrundidthepetitioner t receivewordfromtheparoleboardthathewouldnotbereleasedandwouldberequiredtoservehis ` sentence.Thepetitionerallegesthathewas deceivedintoaguiltypleabaseduponcounsels L   falseassertionthatpetitionerwouldbeguaranteedparoleatthecompletionofthirtypercent(30%) 8!  ofhissentence.Givenhisallegations,Ibelievethepetitionershouldbeentitledtoanevidentiary $"t! hearingtodetermine(1)whetherdueprocesstolledthestatuteoflimitationssoastogivehima #`" reasonableopportunitytopresenthisclaiminameaningfultimeandmanner,and,ifso,(2)whether #L# thepetitionersfilingofthepostconvictionpetitionwaswithinthereasonableopportunityafforded $8 $ bydueprocess.SeeWilliamsv.State,44S.W.3d464,471(Tenn.2001).  %$!%    `     h     ____________________________________ )$)    `     h     JOSEPHM.TIPTON,JUDGE p*%* #GXX Y#