ÿWPCq ¸dv”5»¢‹«Jµ†ïýÜnh ©Þ o %hvI¢ú9#“àøÈÚ"ý¹ èß=6â]á0ÍΪ•×WF‹þ*p‚zØÎDK5ýR¶Iz°?-3÷ ¬ë½êAÜb½§ñÉÖ„’[ð–‘þsT¡CiœÇÅ;f¶™²© ß9ÂÓ0»+Ã… +A‚˜wüW}¨pÒÙ%²’ؙҮ'ú/‹ÖÜ«õp‚ƒÂþÎ,ZæÈƒIhutKƒüïVÓ5æŽ:d¹E2ç\%1š®KajqÉ[Á1n=¾% „YóCý±~5Ë®ˆÐ¤†€v› Ì“CVå^µ.¬À Ýü|Npè¶ɪ]ýGä»ôcØ®±Î<¡ÈâÕ¬Ùˆ˜ï–æn•—ô¤§@…¨7(ÑARf‡$G9Í»:±Ë°•¢8pÅ;rÍö§;v7õnȪí#F¤l¡°ÍÀÔÚêÚFÑ›W~k£VâRnÕáܰ×ZÎô§ÿYNmé'HŸdªÂ“ JAžl»Î;!;)>šÐëæ~¤,—¿yH†%ö%"žåËK½ïw˜ì×ÑŽÓÝ »ò[ãûúwPNœ.Í^/‰8‡à†øÐ}YÃCðˆHpû9Ä_œûð"-Ë*# LUNW %¥ 0(«U:Ób w:4Oc 0Ær 0D8ó|Mo¼ ‘Ä ÂU 7NU:V(U:¸¸¸¸¸¸¸¸¸¸ Bò AQÆ` 0D& 0Dj 0D®® D/òò B! D3>˜HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLàÏ(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,“í|AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù- ?@AB eFGEHIJÓ€Wc%3|xU(v(2ˆð$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€X‹úXXXÔÔ€ôtÉôXX‹úÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó éÝ ƒ üÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝPursuant€to€the€policy€of€this€Court,€the€minor€victim€of€sexual€abuse€in€this€case€will€beÐ `  Ðreferred€to€by€her€initials€rather€than€her€full€name. CÝ ƒ ˆð$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€X‹úXXXÔÔ€ôtÉôXX‹úÔà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝPursuant€to€the€policy€of€this€Court,€the€minor€victim€of€sexual€abuse€in€this€case€will€be€referredÐ `  Ðto€by€her€initials€rather€than€her€full€name. þÝ ƒ ‹$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€Xä@XXXÔÔ€ô´ôXXä@Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAccording€to€the€Stateððs€brief,€the€trial€judge€merged€counts€two€and€three€of€the€indictment. ‡Ý ƒ ‹$ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€Xä@XXXÔÔ€ô´ôXXä@Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€trial€court€stated:€ð ð€I€see€this€case€in€that€the€crime€was€committed€under€circumstancesÐ `  Ðunder€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€a€victim€was€great.€I€cannot€imagine€a€situation€in€which€twoÏpeople€are€involved€with€the€rape€of€a€child€in€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€is€not€great.€I€mean€IÏkeep€thinking€of€murdered€children€and€dead€children€who€cannot€testify€against€their€abusers,€and€so€toÏme€this€is€an€enhancing€or€aggravating€factor.ðð ¸Ý ƒ üÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAccording€to€the€Stateððs€brief,€the€trial€judge€merged€counts€two€and€three€of€theÐ `  Ðindictment. -Ý ƒ üÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€trial€court€stated:€ð ð€I€see€this€case€in€that€the€crime€was€committed€underÐ `  Ðcircumstances€under€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€a€victim€was€great.€I€cannot€imagineÏa€situation€in€which€two€people€are€involved€with€the€rape€of€a€child€in€which€the€potential€forÏbodily€injury€is€not€great.€I€mean€I€keep€thinking€of€murdered€children€and€dead€children€whoÏcannot€testify€against€their€abusers,€and€so€to€me€this€is€an€enhancing€or€aggravating€factor.ðð,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ý ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X‹úXXXÔÔ€u XX‹úÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X‹úX uÔÐ  ÐÌò òDecember€1,€1998Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôtÉôXX‹úÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝñJññBñ›ñBññJñÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒ„°ÒÔ€Š’ÁŠXXÔÔ€Š3ŠŠŠ’ÁÔÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€fXXdìXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òñJñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eôf ` ttx$,` ð Úrß›ñJñIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌFEBRUARY€SESSION,€1997ÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à À à)à  àC.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9603„CC„00104Ð ` Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àó ó)Ð ` Ðà ` àAppellee,à  àà h àà À àò ò)Ð Xø  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àMCMINN€COUNTYÐ Xø  ÐVS.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ Xø  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHON.€R.€STEVEN€BEBBó óÐ Xø  Ðò òRAYMOND€GRAY,ó óà h àà À àò ò)à  àJUDGEó óÐ Xø  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò ò)ó óÐ Xø Ðà ` àAppellant.à  àà h àà À àò ò)à  à(Direct€Appeal€„€Aggravated€Sexual€Ð Xø Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àBattery;€Rape€of€a€Child)Ð Xø Ðó óÌÌÓ  ÓÌÌòòÓ  ÓFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à h àà À àà  àòòFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð 8Ø ÐÌTHOMAS€E.€KIMBALLà h àà À àà  àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ (!È Ð110€ñBñ1/2ñBññBñððñBñ€Washington€Avenue,€N.E.à  àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ  "À ÐAthens,€TN€€37303Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àROBIN€L.€HARRISÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€€37243ÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJERRY€N.€ESTESÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àSANDRA€DONAGHYÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€District€AttorneyÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àP.€O.€Box€647Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAthens,€TN€€37303ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JUDGEÐ  x6-.S ÐÓ  ÓÔ€°zj°ŠŠ3Ôò òòòOPINIONóóó óÔ€Š3а°zjÔÐ `  ÐÌÓ  ÓÓÓÌà ` àA€McMinn€County€Criminal€Court€jury€found€Appellant€Raymond€Gray€guiltyÏof€aggravated€sexual€battery€and€rape€of€a€child.€Appellant€was€sentenced€as€aÏRange€one€standard€offender€to€ten€years€for€the€aggravated€sexual€batteryÏconviction€and€to€eighteen€years€for€the€rape€conviction.€In€this€appeal,€AppellantÏpresents€the€following€issues:ÌÌÒ` ÒÒ` „ÒÓÓ€(1)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€sever€theÏtwo€counts€of€the€indictment;€Ì(2)€whether€the€evidence€presented€was€sufficient€toÏsupport€the€verdict€of€the€jury€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt;€Ì(3)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€prohibiting€the€defenseÏfrom€calling€witness€Tommy€Buckner;€and€Ì(4)€whether€the€sentence€imposed€is€excessive.ÌÒ` ÜÒÒ„` êÒÓøÓÌà ` àAfter€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌÓ  Óò òI.€FACTUAL€BACKGROUNDó óÐ V&ö ÐÓüÓÌà ` àAs€accredited€by€the€juryððs€verdict,€the€proof€shows€that€on€July€24,€1993ÏAppellant€and€Imogene€Stansberry€sexually€assaulted€Ms.€Stansberryððs€niece,ÏN.B.ñBñ׃ ×ñBññBñ׃ ×ñBñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×,€age€twelve.€The€victim€testified€that€she€was€sitting€in€the€living€room€whileÐ &.Æ$% ÐAppellant€and€Ms.€Stansberry€were€watching€ð ðdirty€movies.ððò ò€ó óAppellant€and€Ms.Ð 0¶&' ÐStansberry€forced€N.B.€to€watch€the€movie€with€them.€After€the€movie€ended,€N.B.Ïtestified€that€ð ðthey€just€started,€they€just,€Imogene€told€me€to€take€off€my€clothesÏand€I€said€no,€and€so€she€took€off€my€clothes€for€me,€and€then€she€just€startedÐ ö5–,- Ðtouching€me€and€I€told€her€to€stop€and€she€wouldnððt.ðð€While€this€was€occurring,Ïthe€Appellant€held€N.B.ððs€arm€to€keep€her€from€escaping.€The€Appellant€thenÏbegan€to€fondle€the€victim.€ð ð[He]€used€his€hands€and€touched€my€breasts€and€inÏbetween€my€leg,€and€then€he€used€his€tongue€and€touched€my€breasts€and€inÏbetween€my€legs.ðð€Ms.€Stansberry€held€the€victim€down€during€the€assault€byÏAppellant.€After€the€assault,€the€victim€was€too€frightened€to€tell€anyone€what€hadÏhappened,€because€Ms.€Stansberry€and€the€Appellant€threatened€to€hurt€herÏfamily€if€she€told.ÌÌà ` àOn€July€31,€1993,€Ms.€Stansberry€telephoned€the€victim€and€told€her€toÏcome€over€or€else€she€would€be€in€trouble.€ò ò€ó óThe€victim€went€to€Appellant€and€Ms.Ð À` ÐStansberryððs€house€because€she€was€afraid€Ms.€Stansberry€would€hurt€herÏparents.€The€victim€testified€that€while€she€was€in€their€residence,€Ms.€StansberryÏheld€her€down€and€Appellant€again€licked€the€victimððs€breasts€and€in€between€herÏlegs.€According€to€the€victim,€during€this€assault,€the€Appellant€and€Ms.ÏStansberry€were€again€watching€dirty€movies€about€gay€men€and€women.ÌÌà ` àMs.€Stansberry€testified€that€the€victim€asked€her€about€sex€and€how€itÏfeels€for€ð ða€man€to€be€up€inside€you.ðð€According€to€Ms.€Stansberry,€she,€theÏAppellant,€and€N.B.€played€strip€poker€and€ð ðFantasyðð.€During€the€Fantasy€game,Ïboth€N.B.€and€Ms.€Stansberry€had€oral€sex€with€Appellant.€Ms.€Stansberry€alsoÏtestified€to€touching€N.B.ððs€breasts€and€admitted€that€she€and€Appellant€told€theÏvictim€not€to€tell€anyone€and€threatened€that€ð ðthere€would€be€no€place€that€sheÏcould€ever€run€and€hide.ððÌâ âÐ ð7.0 Ðà ` àMs.€Stansberry€also€testified€to€a€second€incident€in€July,€during€which€sheÏâ âthe€Appellant€and€N.B.€watched€a€movie€in€which€a€ð ðbunch€of€men€and€womenÏ[were]€having€sex,€and€then€itððs€women€having€sex€together.ðð€Ms.€StansberryÏtestified€that€on€that€occasion€she€touched€N.B.ððs€breasts€and€that€AppellantÏð ðmore€or€less€run€his€tongue€up€and€down€the€childððs€vagina.ððÌÌÓ  Óò òII.€SEVERANCE€OF€OFFENSESó óÐ    ÐÓÓÌà ` àAppellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€his€motion€for€aÏseverance€of€the€offenses€involved€in€this€case.€Count€one€of€the€indictmentÏcharged€Appellant€with€aggravated€sexual€battery€of€€N.B.€on€July€31,€1993;ÏCount€two€charged€aggravated€sexual€battery€on€July€24,€1993:€and€Count€threeÏcharged€rape€of€a€child,€N.B.,€on€July€31,€1993.ñBñ׃×ñBññBñ׃×ñBñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ° P ÐÌà ` àTennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€Rules€14(b)(1)€provides:Ìñ<ñÒ` Òñ<ññ;ñÒ` „Òñ;ñ(b)€Severance€of€offensesÌÓÓñ=ñà8 ` àà8¸ ` ü!` ü!àñ=ñ(1)€If€two€or€more€offenses€have€been€joined€orÏconsolidated€for€trial€pursuant€to€Rule€8(b),€theÏdefendant€shall€have€a€right€to€severance€of€theÏoffenses€unless€the€offenses€are€part€of€a€commonÏscheme€or€plan€and€the€evidence€of€one€would€haveÏbeen€admissible€upon€the€trial€of€the€others.Ð ¸ ¤¸ ¤ ÐÓþÓÌñ:ñÒ°` Òñ:ñà ` àIn€òòState€v.€Hallockóó,€875€S.W.2d€285,€290€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993)€thisÐ 00Ð&( ÐCourt€held€that€ð ðcommon€scheme€or€planðð€under€Rule€14(b)(1)€can€be€broken€intoÏthree€subcategories:€1)€modis€operandi€or€distinctive€signature;€2)€continuing€planÏor€conspiracy;€or€3)€same€transaction€or€occurrence.€In€this€case,€we€findÏevidence€of€a€distinctive€signature.€In€both€incidents,€Appellant€and€Ms.Ð ð7.0 ÐStansberry€forced€N.B.€to€watch€pornographic€movies€and€them€alternatedÏholding€the€child€down€and€sexually€assaulting€her.€After€each€assault,€AppellantÏand€Ms.€Stansberry€repeated€the€same€threat€to€N.B.,€threatening€to€harm€herÏfamily€if€she€revealed€their€crime.ÌÌà ` àAs€to€the€second€prong€of€14(b)(1),€in€this€record,€Appellant€chose€not€toÏput€on€proof€of€his€defense€at€the€severance€hearing€.€Therefore,€uponÏAppellantððs€not€guilty€plea,€the€State€was€required€to€prove€both€the€identity€andÏthe€intent€of€Appellant€as€the€perpetrator.€This€burden€upon€the€State€clearlyÏwould€make€proof€of€either€crime€relevant€in€the€Stateððs€case„in„chief€upon€theÏtrial€of€the€other.€Therefore,€the€second€prong€of€Rule€14(b)(1)€was€met,€and€theÏseverance€of€offenses€was€not€mandatory.€There€is€no€proof€of€abuse€ofÏdiscretion€in€the€trial€courtððs€refusal€to€grant€a€severance,€therefore€this€issue€isÏwithout€merit.ÌÌÓ  Óò òIII.€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óÐ p& ÐÓ&ÓÌà ` àAppellant€alleges€that€the€Stateððs€proof€at€trial€was€insufficient€to€supportÏthe€juryððs€verdict.€When€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convictingÏevidence,€this€Court€must€review€the€record€to€determine€if€the€proof€adduced€atÏthe€trial€is€sufficient€to€support€the€findings€by€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt.€T.R.A.P.€13€(e).€This€Court€does€not€reweigh€or€re„evaluateÏthe€evidence€and€we€are€required€to€afford€the€State€the€strongest€legitimate€viewÏof€the€proof€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonable€and€legitimateÏinferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,Ð ð7.0 Ð835€(Tenn.€1978).Ð à9€02 Їà ` àAppellant€argues€that€Ms.€Stansberryððs€evidence€is€tainted€by€herÏð ðincredibly€desperateðð€plea€agreement.€However,€the€weight€and€credibility€of€aÏwitnessðð€testimony€are€matters€entrusted€exclusively€to€the€jury€as€triers€of€fact.Ð @ à ÐòòState€v.€Wrightóó,€836€S.W.2d€130,€134€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992);€òòState€v.€Sheffieldóó,Ð 0Ð Ð676€S.W.2d€542,€547€(Tenn.€1984).€Ms.€Stansberry€was€throughly€cross„¼examined€as€to€the€nature€of€her€plea€agreement€with€the€State.€The€jury€wasÏinformed€as€to€any€effect€this€plea€agreement€might€have€had€on€her€testimony.ÏAny€weight€the€jury€may€have€placed€upon€her€testimony€was€entirely€within€theÏprovince€of€their€role€as€trier€of€fact.ÌÌà ` àAppellant€further€argues€that€he€cannot€be€convicted€on€the€basis€of€N.B.ððsÏtestimony,€alleging€that€she€was€an€accomplice€and€that€a€conviction€cannotÏstand€on€the€basis€of€uncorroborated€accomplice€testimony.€Appellant€is€correctÏin€his€contention€that€a€child€who€is€incapable€of€consent€can€still€be€anÏaccomplice.€òòSeeóó€òòHenley€v.€Stateóó,€489€S.W.2d€53€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1972);Ð €$  ÐòòBoulton€v.€Stateóó,€214€Tenn.€94,€377€S.W.2d€936€(Tenn.€1964).€However,€theÐ p& Ðtestimony€accredited€by€the€jury€in€this€trial€is€that€this€victim€did€not€participateÏvoluntarily€in€the€crime,€therefore€she€could€not€have€been€an€accomplice.ÏFurther,€an€accomplice€is€ð ð€a€person€who€knowingly,€voluntarily€and€with€commonÏintent€with€the€principle€offender€unites€with€him€in€the€commission€of€the€crime.ððÏWhartonððs€Criminal€Evidence€(12th€Ed.)€ðð€448€at€pg.229€The€test€of€whetherÏsomeone€is€an€accomplice€is€whether€that€person€could€be€indicted€for€the€sameÏoffense€as€the€principle.€The€precedent€cited€in€Appellantððs€brief€all€involvedÏcrimes€for€which€the€victim€could€be€found€guilty€if€the€victim€performed€the€actsÏâ âvoluntarily€„€ie.€incest,€fellatio.€Here,€the€victim€could€not€be€found€guilty€of€rapingÐ à7€.0 Ðherself€even€if€the€jury€had€found€that€she€participated€voluntarily,€therefore€sheÏcould€not€be€an€accomplice€in€this€crime.€Accordingly,€this€issue€is€without€merit.Ìâ âÌÓ  Óò òIV.€DISALLOWANCE€OF€A€WITNESSó óÐ 0Ð ÐÓÛ1ÓÌà ` àAppellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€granting€the€Stateððs€motion€toÏdisallow€the€testimony€of€defense€witness€T.B.€Appellant€claimed€that€T.B.,€theÏfather€of€the€victim,€would€have€testified€that€he€had€caught€N.B.€in€lies.€However,ÏAppellant€failed€to€make€a€proffer€of€testimony€regarding€N.B.ððs€œñFñalleged€ñFñlies.›ÏTherefore,€this€issue€cannot€be€reviewed.€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Hutchinsonóó,€898€S.W.2dÐ à€ Ð161,€172€(Tenn.€1994).Ìà ` à¹Ó  Óò òV.€PROPRIETY€OF€THE€SENTENCEó óÐ ° P ÐÓ"4ÓÌà ` àAppellant€contends€that€the€trial€court€improperly€imposed€a€sentence€ofÏeighteen€years€for€the€rape€of€a€child€and€ten€years€for€aggravated€sexual€battery.ÏWhen€a€defendant€complains€of€his€or€her€sentence,€we€must€conduct€a€òòde€novoóóÐ €(   Ðreview€with€a€presumption€of€correctness.€T.C.A.€ðð40„35„401(d).€The€burden€ofÏshowing€that€the€sentence€is€improper€is€upon€the€appealing€party.€T.C.A.€ðð€40„¼35„401(d)€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€This€presumption,€however,€isÏconditioned€upon€an€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÏconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.Ð 02Ð(* ÐòòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,169€(Tenn.€1991).Ð  4À*, ÐÌà ` àThe€trial€court€found€Appellantððs€lack€of€a€prior€record€to€be€a€mitigatingÏfactor,€and€found€several€enhancing€factors.€The€court€found€that€1)€this€crimeÐ ð902 Ðwas€committed€in€such€a€way€that€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€to€the€victim€wasÏgreat;€2)€the€defendant€abused€a€position€of€trust;€and€3)€this€crime€involvedÏexceptional€cruelty.€Because€the€trial€court€failed€to€set€out€which€enhancementÏfactor€applied€to€which€crime,€we€review€Appellantððs€sentence€òòde€novoóó.€òòState€v.Ð 0Ð ÐAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166€(Tenn.€1991).Ð  À ÐÌÓ  Óò òA.€à @ àà @` àà @¸ àà @ àà @h àLENGTH€OF€SENTENCEÐ    ÐÓÊ9ÓÓ  Ó1)€Rape€of€a€Childó óÐ    ÐÓO:ÓÌà ` àAppellant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€this€crime€was€committedÏin€a€manner€in€which€the€potential€for€bodily€injury€was€great.€Appellant€arguesÏthat€this€finding€was€not€supported€by€the€evidence€and€that€the€trial€court€foundÏthis€factor€based€upon€other€crimes€unrelated€to€any€acts€of€the€defendant.ñBñ׃×ñBññBñ׃×ñBñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð À ` ÐHowever,€the€record€supports€the€finding€of€this€factor.€According€to€the€victimððsÏtestimony€as€accredited€by€the€jury,€while€the€Appellant€performed€the€sexual€actsÏupon€the€victim€she€was€held€down€by€Ms.€Stansberry.€The€situation€involved€twoÏadults€holding€down€and€engaging€in€sexual€acts€with€a€struggling€child,€aÏsituation€inherently€rife€with€the€danger€of€injury.€In€fact,€Ms.€Stansberry€testifiedÏthat€at€one€point€Appellant€hurt€N.B.€while€performing€a€sexual€act€on€her.ÌÌà ` àSecond€Appellant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€ð ðthe€use€ofÏmultiple€actors€to€accomplish€the€crime€of€rape€of€a€child€is€allowing€the€victim€toÏbe€treated€with€exceptional€cruelty€during€the€commission€of€theÐ  4À*, Ðoffense.ððAppellant€contends€that€this€finding€is€tantamount€to€finding€that€theÏyouth€of€the€victim€and€the€presence€of€a€co„defendant€aggravated€the€crime€ofÏrape€of€a€child.€The€enhancement€factor€of€ð ðexceptional€crueltyðð€requires€a€findingÏof€cruelty€over€and€above€that€inherently€attendant€to€the€crime.€òòState€v.€Embryóó,Ð 0Ð Ð915€S.W.2d€451€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€In€this€crime,€the€victim€was€subjectedÏto€the€cruelty€of€having€unwanted€sex€acts€performed€upon€her€while€anotherÏadult€watched,€she€was€threatened€into€watching€pornographic€movies,€and€sheÏand€her€family€threatened€if€she€reported€the€crime;€certainly€none€of€theseÏundoubtedly€cruel€acts€upon€the€victim€are€intrinsic€to€the€crime€of€œrapeñGñ.ñGñ›œñHñ€of€a€child.ñHñ›ÌÌà ` àFurther,€though€the€trial€court€did€not€so€find,€enhancement€factor€(7),Ïdealing€with€the€commission€of€the€crime€for€pleasure€or€gratification€clearlyÏapplies€to€the€child€rape€conviction.€Though€this€enhancement€factor€cannotÏapply€to€sexual€battery,€since€it€is€intrinsic€to€that€crime,€this€factor€does€apply€toÏrape.€òòState€v.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31€(Tenn.€1993);€òòState€v.€Hoytóó,€928€S.W.2dÐ €$  Ð935€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€Here,€the€evidence€showed€that€Appellant€and€hisÏgirlfriend€watched€pornographic€movies€and€then€fondled€and€raped€N.B.€for€œñIñtheirÏñIñsexual›€pleasure.ÌÌÓ  Óò ò2)€Aggravated€Sexual€Batteryó óÐ 0.Ð$& ÐÌÓÙDÓà ` àFor€the€reasons€stated€above€in€the€discussion€of€enhancement€factors€forÏthe€rape€of€a€child€conviction,€enhancement€factors€involving€the€potential€forÏbodily€injury,€abuse€of€a€position€of€trust,€and€exceptional€cruelty€all€apply€toÏAppellantððs€aggravated€battery€conviction.ÌÓ  ÓÐ à9€02 Їò òB.€CONSECUTIVE€SENTENCINGó óÐ `  ÐÓSFÓÌà ` àAppellant€also€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€mandate€that€he€serve€hisÏsentences€consecutively.€The€trial€judge€found€that€consecutive€sentences€wereÏproper€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„115€(b)(5)€on€the€basis€thatÏdefendant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€and€rape€of€a€child.€TheÏtrial€court€based€the€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€upon€the€AppellantððsÏrelationship€with€the€victim€and€the€nature€and€scope€of€the€sexual€activityÏinvolved.€While€perhaps€the€relationship€between€Appellant€and€this€victim€wasÏnot€the€close€familial€relationship€found€in€other€cases€where€this€factor€hasÏapplied,€Appellant€was€a€close€friend€of€the€victimððs€father€and€was€married€to€theÏvictimððs€aunt.€There€was€a€familial€relationship€between€Appellant€and€the€victim.ÏFurther,€the€trial€courtððs€imposition€of€consecutive€sentences€based€upon€theÏnature€of€Appellantððs€acts€was€entirely€appropriate€considering€the€potential€forÏinjury€to€which€Appellant€subjected€N.B.€and€€the€pain€she€experienced€during€theÏcommission€of€his€crime.ÌÌà ` àHowever,€a€finding€that€T.C.A.ðð€40„35„115(b)(5)€applies€to€Appellantððs€caseÏdoes€not€end€the€inquiry€into€the€validity€of€consecutive€sentencing.€òòState€v.Ð P,ð"$ ÐWoodcockóó,€922€S.W.2d€904€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€We€further€find€thatÐ @.à$& Ðconsecutive€sentences€are€necessary€to€protect€the€public€from€the€defendantððsÏpossible€future€criminal€conduct€and€that€the€aggregate€sentence€is€reasonablyÏrelated€to€the€severity€of€the€despicable€offenses€involved€in€the€instant€case.ÏT.C.A.€ðð€40„35„115€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€òòState€v.€Wilkersonóó,€905Ð 6 ,. ÐS.W.2d€933€(Tenn.€1995);€òòState€v.€Jerniganóó,€929€S.W.2d€391(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ð7.0 Ð1996).Ð à9€02 Їñ>ñÌñ>ñà ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.ÌÌÓÓà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àñ?ñJERRY€L.€SMITHñ?ññ?ñDAVID€H.€WELLESñ?ñ,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ___________________________________Ìñ@ñJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGEñ@ñÌÌÌ___________________________________ÌñAñTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEñAñ