WPC@ .8ԓvai ʒZލa7]SZvU'DPטEPu D|Ą9R故IgKUW\5oKauSΙ i.S譜\q_awss12=0TrV]oϕ D2%܉e6)y2r:ԾloKm~{55*T]ԑu %fU6l 0UN* U >x U* U@ z  `l  ^ wl24NE m#V 0D 0UY 0 0b} 0 0h 0H 0% 0 0 0C 0 0 0 0i 07! 0" 0" 0# 0@O$ 0$ 0c% 04& 0' 0' 0( 0Z) 0* 00* 0< + 0E+ 0>, 0vA, 0`, 0`- 0`w- 0`- 0`7. 08. 0. 0/ 020 00 B1 0:1 02 D32 D-2 0K3 0Y`3 AS3 4 04 0Dv5 A5 0_e6 0 6 0j7 089 B*: D/: 0; D/< 0< 06= 0= 0:> 0^? 0<l? 0N?????<6X9`(Courier New(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial( Z(Times New Roman  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt V R$      1  }  _TherecordisunclearastopreciselywhathealthproblemstheDefendantexperienced.However,atthe  revocationhearing,theDefendanttestifiedthathehadacolostomywhilehewasoutofjail.  R$      3  }  _Wenotethatinthiscase,thetrialcourtsimplyorderedthattheDefendantservetheremainderofhissentence  injail;itdidnotimposeasentencethatexceededthelengthoftheoriginalsentence.Therefore,thetrialcourtwasunder t nodutytoconductasentencinghearingpursuanttotheTennesseeCriminalSentencingReformActof1989.SeeState 8 v._Ervin_,939S.W.2d581,583(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Tenn.CodeAnn.4035209(a)and210(a)through(e).lQ-s Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Yo) k2tϭ3|xUHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60 L R$      2  }  _WenotethatiftheDefendantwasonprobationratherthanincommunitycorrectionswhileathome,hewould  notbeentitledtohavesentencecreditsforthetimehewas released.(#$  0  *+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  - -*A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address(|G2$ !.8 dXXd8         0  }8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS d42Emphasis(|3L$ !.8 dXXd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  64Hyperlink    ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3L$ !.8 dXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK<:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/K<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7g(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d df)1dxd<:zTop of For7i(X7  ?%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7f)2dxd0KS.SampleK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterK<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  (O$/research/buttonTFLink?_m=7cbc5b154790955ee055814fd0329d3c&_xfercite=%3ccite%20cc%3d%22USA%22%3e%3c%21%5bCDATA%5b2001%20Tenn.%20 !.8 dd8     _    8LXXdd8@tt INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#  #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsOctober1,2002 L XLX  # XXL#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.WILLIAMROYGRAYXLX   J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforMadisonCounty  J @@No.01513DonaldH.Allen,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200200460CCAR3CDFiledOctober14,_2002_Ԁ   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Followingabenchtrial,theDefendant,WilliamRoyGray,wasfoundguiltyofpossessionofdrug x  paraphernalia,aclassAmisdemeanor,andresistingarrest,aclassBmisdemeanor.Hereceived d consecutivesentencesofelevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysandsixmonths,respectively,tobe P servedinjail.However,approximatelytwomonthslater,thetrialcourtenteredanorderallowing < theDefendanttoservehissentencesathomeduetotheDefendantspoorhealth.Thecourtrevoked (x thisorderbasedontheDefendantfailingtocomplywiththeconditionsofhisreleasefromjailand d theDefendantbeingarrestedfortheft.Moreover,thecourtorderedthattheDefendantnotbegiven P creditfortheportionofhissentencesthatheservedathishome.Inthisappealasofright,the < Defendantarguesthattheorderofthetrialcourtdenyinghimcreditforthetimeheservedoutside ( ofjailservestoincreasehissentenceandtoeffectivelypunishhimtwiceforthesameoffensein  violationofthedoublejeopardyclausesoftheUnitedStatesandTennesseeConstitutions.We  disagreeandaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmed  t   # XL#XLX. DavidH.Welles,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJames_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.and L  AlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined. 8!  VanessaD.King,AssistantPublicDefender,Jackson,Tennessee,fortheappellant,WilliamRoy #`" Gray. #L# PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;BradenH._Boucek_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; %$!% Jerry_Woodall_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andShaunA.Brown,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral, &"& fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. '"'    )$) _@@OO& OPINION # XXL #XLX     # XXLN#XLX XLXXXL  FollowingabenchtrialonOctober4,2001,theDefendantwasfoundguiltyofpossession  ofdrugparaphernalia,aclassAmisdemeanor,andresistingarrest,aclassBmisdemeanor.Hewas t sentencedtoelevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysandsixmonths,respectively.Thetrialcourt ` orderedthesentencestorunconsecutively,foraneffectivesentenceofeighteenmonthstobeserved L  inthelocaljail.OnNovember30,2001,thetrialcourtreconsidereditssentencingorderinlightof 8  theDefendantshealthproblems.  *#  1      ׀ThecourtorderedtheDefendanttoservehissentenceathome $ t underthesupervisionofaCommunityCorrectionsofficer.ThecourtalsoorderedtheDefendant  ` towearananklemonitorandnotleavehishomeexceptforhealthrelatedreasons.OnFebruary5,  L  2002,thetrialcourtrevokedthisorder,findingthattheDefendantviolatedthetermsofhisrelease  8  byfailingtoeverreporttotheCommunityCorrectionsoffice,failingtowearananklemonitor,and $  subsequentlybeingarrestedfortheft.ThetrialcourtorderedthattheDefendantreceivecreditfor   timeservedinjailbutnotfortheperiodwhilehewassupposedtobeservinghissentenceathome.   TheDefendantarguesinthisappealasofrightthatbynotcreditinghimforthetimeheservedathis   home,thetrialcourteffectivelypunishedhimtwiceforthesameoffenseinviolationofthedouble   jeopardyclausesoftheUnitedStatesandtheTennesseeConstitutions. p   WenoteattheoutsetthatthereisadiscrepancyintherecordregardingtheDefendantsstatus H whilehewasallegedlyservinghissentenceathishomepursuanttothecourtsorderonNovember 4 30,2001.TherecordisnotclearastowhethertheDefendantwasonprobationorinCommunity  p Corrections.Thedifferenceisnottrivial,foradefendantwhoisservingasentenceonCommunity  \ Correctionsisactuallyservinghissentenceinthecommunity inlieuofincarceration,whilethe H sentenceofadefendantwhoisonprobationissuspended.CompareTenn.CodeAnn.4036 4 106(e)(1),withTenn.CodeAnn.4035303(c).Furthermore,adefendantwhohashisorher   CommunityCorrectionssentencerevokedisincarceratedtoservethetermofhissentence lessany   timeactuallyservedinanycommunitybasedalternativetoincarceration.Tenn.CodeAnn.40  36106(e)(4).Ontheotherhand,adefendantwhoviolatesthetermsofhisorherprobationshall  havethesuspensionrevokedandhisorheroriginalsentenceexecuted.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.40  35310.Therefore,adefendantwhoisonprobationreceivesnocreditfortimeserved,buta l defendantonCommunityCorrectionsdoes. X    Initsorder,thetrialcourtstatesthattheDefendantshall continue[]toservehissentence 0"  athome.Thereisnomentionintheorderofthesentencebeingsuspended.ACommunity #l! CorrectionsofficerwasassignedtomonitortheDefendant,andtheaffidavitinsupportofthearrest $X" warrantfortheDefendantstatesthattheDefendant hasviolatedtheconditionsofhisCommunity $D # Correctionssentence....However,priortothehearingonFebruary4,2002,thetrialjudgestated, %0!$  Werehereonaprobationviolationwarrant.Inhisformalorder,thetrialjudge decreedthatthe &"% defendantsprobationberevoked.Whenthetrialjudgeissuedhisrulingfromthebenchon '#& February4,2002,hefound thatMr.Grayhas,infact,violatedthetermsofhisprobationorreally (#' thetermsofhissentenceinthiscase.Thus,itisunclearfromtherecordwhethertheDefendantwas  onprobationorCommunityCorrections.    However,basedonourreviewoftherecord,weconcludethatthetrialcourtintendedtoplace t theDefendantonCommunityCorrectionsstatus.Thereisnomentionofsuspendinghissentence ` intherecord,theCommunityCorrectionsofficewasgiventheresponsibilityofmonitoringthe L  Defendant,andthetrialjudgeclearlystatesinhisorderonNovember30,2001thattheDefendant 8  wastocontinueservinghissentenceathome.Therefore,wewillconsidertheDefendantsappeal $ t asachallengetotherevocationofhisCommunityCorrectionssentence. *#  2        `   TheDefendantarguesthat,bynotcreditinghimwiththetimethatheservedinhishome,the  8  trialcourteffectivelygavehimanothersentence,and,insodoing,violatedhisprotectionfrom $  doublejeopardyguaranteedbytheUnitedStatesandTennesseeConstitutions.Thedoublejeopardy   clausesoftheFifthAmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitutionandArticleI,section10ofthe   TennesseeConstitutionbothprotectagainstasecondprosecutionforthesameoffenseafter   conviction,asecondprosecutionforthesameoffenseafteranacquittal,andmultiplepunishments   forthesameoffense.SeeStatev.Mounce,859S.W.2d319,321(Tenn.1993).TennesseeCode p Annotatedsection4036106(e)(4)statesthatwhenadefendantsCommunityCorrectionssentence \ isrevoked,heorsheshallreceivecreditfor anytimeactuallyservedinanycommunitybased H alternativetoincarceration.(emphasisadded).Therefore,iftheDefendanthadactuallyservedtime 4 intheCommunityCorrectionsprogram,hewouldbeentitledtocreditforthattimeserved.  p   However,therecordreflectsthattheDefendantneveractuallyservedanytimeinthe H CommunityCorrectionsprogram.ClintMurley,thecaseofficerwiththeCommunityCorrections 4 programwhowasassignedtosupervisetheDefendant,testifiedthattheDefendantnevercontacted   theCommunityCorrectionsoffice.Mr.MurleytriedtocontacttheDefendantathismothers   address,wherehewasorderedtoservehissentence.Mr.Murleyspokewiththreeindividuals,all  ofwhomsaidthattheyhadnotseentheDefendantanddidnotknowwherehewas.Furthermore,  theDefendantwasneverfittedwithananklemonitor,whichthetrialcourtorderedhimtowear  whileheservedhissentenceathome.Finally,theDefendantclearlydidnotremainathome,ashe l wasarrestedonJanuary13,2002,forshopliftingfromagrocerystore.Thefactsdemonstratethat X  theDefendantneverbegantheCommunityCorrections#XLXXXL#Ԁprogramandthereforedidnotactuallyserve D! timeinacommunitybasedalternativetoincarcerationpursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotated 0"  section4036106(e)(4).Inananalogouscase,apanelofthisCourtaffirmedatrialcourtsorder #l! givingthedefendantcreditfordayssuccessfullyservedontheCommunityCorrectionsprogram,but $X" notforthosedayswherethedefendantwasconsideredinviolationstatusbecausehehadabsconded $D # fromsupervision.SeeTrayD.Turnerv.State,No.03C019902CR00088,1999Tenn.Crim.App. %0!$ LEXIS1219,at*3(Knoxville,December1,1999).Whilethereisnoproofintherecordthatthe &"% Defendantinthiscase abscondedfromsupervision,wefindthatbecausehefailedtobeginthe '#& CommunityCorrectionsprogram,didnotcontactitsoffice,didnotwearananklemonitorasordered (#' bythetrialcourt,anddidnotremainathomewherehewastoservehissentence,he actually  servednotimeinCommunityCorrections.Therefore,thetrialcourtdidnoterrbydenyinghim  creditforthetimespentoutofjail,andtheDefendantwasnotpunishedtwiceforthesameoffense  inviolationofthedoublejeopardyclausesoftheUnitedStatesandTennesseeConstitutions.This t issueiswithoutmerit. `   TheDefendantalsopresentsanargumentthattheactionofthetrialcourtinrevokinghis 8  CommunityCorrectionssentenceviolateddueprocess.Hecontendsthatbecauseheviolatedacourt $ t order,hewasentitledtoacontemptofcourthearing,ratherthanwhatthetrialcourtreferredtoas  ` aprobationrevocationhearing.However,theactiontakenbythetrialcourtafterthehearingon  L  February4,2002,operatedtorevoketheDefendantsCommunityCorrectionssentence,nottolevy  8  additionalpunishmentagainsthimforcontemptofcourt.Aswehavealreadydiscussed,thefacts $  indicatethatthetrialcourtorderedtheDefendanttoserveasentenceonCommunityCorrections.   Althoughthetrialjudgecasuallyusedtheterm probationwhendescribingtheDefendantsstatus,   otherfactorssuggestthathewas,infact,toserveaCommunityCorrectionssentence.Whenatrial   courtrevokesaCommunityCorrectionssentence,thecourthasauthoritytoresentencetheaccused.   TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4036106(e)(4)providesinpertinentpart,  SThecourtshallalso p possessthepowertorevokethesentenceimposedatanytimeduetotheconductofthedefendant \ ....  *#  3      ׀BeforethetrialcourtrevokedtheDefendantsCommunityCorrectionssentence,itconducted H ahearingatwhichtheDefendantwasgiventheopportunitytohear,question,andchallengethe 4 circumstancessurroundingtheallegedviolationsofhisCommunityCorrectionssentence,hewas  p allowedtopresentevidenceonhisownbehalf,andhehadtheopportunitytoconfrontandcross  \ examinethewitnesswhotestifiedagainsthim.TheDefendanthasfailedtoshowhowthehearing H heldbythetrialcourtdeniedhimtherighttodueprocess.Accordingly,thisissueiswithoutmerit. 4   Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed. b   XLXXXLԀ  #XLXXXL<#4t pO  5  G  Gr=  \  6&=pO:=  7 h=XLXXXLGr==݌̌  S#XLXXXL4>#XLXXXLԀ  o #XLXXXL>#   `     h     ___________________________________ "3    `     h     DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE