WPC <\m )ezԃ Rdq  Y䁣 ݄% H7V&bt¾xazÇ09qf%((/tS㬑Ҏ҈`ȍHE^#q_߻^6 Up\ M};krBn*m9,dj W͂6XOeD1Y|ܻ]Wt?˵3POB9dc.P$dǕ l+MN$1@ݓtiRSoఝ?򙣬HߐPs$5qe*deխ"{ 6CBj ~IF<5čW̡G6j~_]pu"M/[i r BLcEG}Gx$) lDx8|~;H_x1o^ ܷ=9* %Lw@R 0U:n4b- U:5 0 o 0D p {CU:(U:                BZ AQw 0D 0D 0D D/ZZ B D3X EDFHUIUJKLDMNDOӀ(`$TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7GXXdXXd7  ,cAZ"Arial RegulareE%3|xZ X 3XX  TT@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T 33 `   1    Wenotethatthetrialcourts OrderofRevocation...inRoaneCountycase#10712  reflectsthattheappellantwasresentencedtotheCommunityCorrectionsprogram.Obviously,asevidencedbythetranscriptoftherevocationhearingandthefactthatneitherpartydisputestheappellantssentencetotheDepartmentofCorrection,thisismerelyaclericalmistake.SuchclericalerrorsmayberemediedbymotioninthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule36oftheTennesseeRulesofCriminalProcedure.SeeStatev.Pendergrass,937S.W.2d834,837(Tenn.1996).   ,cAZ"Arial Regular((3 $ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7\XXdXXd7    `   0  (#$  0   f3XX  TT@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T33 `   1    Wenotethatthetrialcourts OrderofRevocation...inRoaneCountycase#10712  reflectsthattheappellantwasresentencedtotheCommunityCorrectionsprogram.Obviously,asevidencedbythetranscriptoftherevocationhearingandthefactthatneitherpartydisputestheappellantssentencetotheDepartmentofCorrection,thisismerelyaclericalmistake.SuchclericalerrorsmayberemediedbymotioninthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule36oftheTennesseeRulesofCriminalProcedure.SeeStatev.Pendergrass,937S.W.2d834,837(Tenn.1996).    q   3XX  TT@R[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T33 `   1    Wenotethatthetrialcourts OrderofRevocation...inRoaneCountycase#10712  reflectsthattheappellantwasresentencedtotheCommunityCorrectionsprogram.Obviously,asevidencedbythetranscriptoftherevocationhearingandthefactthatneitherpartydisputestheappellantssentencetotheDepartmentofCorrection,thisismerelyaclericalmistake.SuchclericalerrorsmayberemediedbymotioninthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule36oftheTennesseeRulesofCriminalProcedure.SeeStatev.Pendergrass,937S.W.2d834,837(Tenn.1996). t l ,cAZ"Arial Regular  ""  X\XXXx*XX\   Ad FILEDX\Xx*   October13,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr.XX\AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular d!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxdP Pd'dxd `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7\XXdXXd7   CC  @. . INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @(ATKNOXVILLE@MM#SEPTEMBERSESSION,1998STATEOFTENNESSEE, h   ) | t Or )<,(j 8` `@Em` ttx$h rߛO `     h   )  No.03C0197K08KL12LCR00M358MN540N h`  ` Appellee   h   ) TL   `     h   )  ROANEandMORGANCOUNTIES @8  vs. `     h   )   p  ,$   `     h   )  Hon.E.EugeneEblen,Judge   MARKGRIFFIS,   h   )    `     h   )  (JCommunityCorrectionsJRevocation)    ` Appellant   h   )    FortheAppellant:   h     FortheAppellee: zr  JoeWalker     h     JohnKnoxWalkup  F>  WalterB.Johnson,II  h     AttorneyGeneralandReporter 2* P.O.Box334    Harriman,TN37748  h     ToddR.Kelley    `     h     AssistantAttorneyGeneral  (#    `     h     CriminalJusticeDivision `     h     425FifthAvenueNorth `     h     2dFloor,CordellHullBuilding `     h     Nashville,TN372430493 x   (#  !  `  `     h      `     h     CharlesE.Hawk  :$2   `     h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral  `     h     DennisHumphrey  &#  `     h     Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral `     h     P.O.Box703 `     h     Kingston,TEtEN37763OPINIONFILED:򀀀 (. '+ AFFIRMED DavidG.Hayes  3,1 Judge  x4p-2S Ӏ@+ OPINION    ` Theappellant,MarkGriffis,appealsthejudgmentsoftheCriminalCourtsofRoaneandMorganCountiesrevokinghisplacementinthelocalCommunityCorrectionsprogram.Priortohisrevocation,theappellantwasservinganeightyearCommunityCorrectionssentencefromRoaneCountyandathreeyearCommunityCorrectionssentencefromMorganCounty.Theappellantargues,onappeal,thattheconditions,whichhedoesnotdenyviolating,weremerelytechnicalinnature,thus,thetrialcourtsrevocationofhisCommunityCorrectionssentencesconstitutedanabuseofdiscretion. ` Afterreview,weaffirm.@* Analysis  ph  ` InApril1995,theappellantpledguiltyinRoaneCountytotheclassBfelonysaleofcocaineandreceivedaneightyearCommunityCorrectionssentence.InNovember1995,hewasconvictedofaggravatedburglaryandtheftofpropertyinMorganCountyandreceivedaconcurrentthreeyearCommunityCorrectionssentence. ` InApril1997,awarrantissuedchargingtheappellantwithviolationofRules6,10,16,and21ofhisbehavioralcontract,i.e.,theappellant(6)failedtomake .', scheduledpaymentsonfines,(10)failedtoreporttohisCommunityCorrectionsofficer,(16)failedtoreportchangesinhisresidence,and(21)failedtoreportanarrestforaggravatedburglaryandtheftoveronethousanddollarstohisCommunityCorrectionsofficer.Findingtheallegedviolationssupportedbytheproof,thetrialH t9l28 HcourtrevokedtheappellantsCommunityCorrectionssentencesandorderedthatthebalanceofhissentencesbeservedintheDepartmentofCorrection.CF FF FCCC  #  1      ׀   ` ThelawconcerningrevocationofaCommunityCorrectionssentenceisclear.Thetrialcourthasthediscretiontorevokeacommunitycorrectionssentenceuponafindingthatthedefendanthasviolatedtheconditionsofhisbehavioralcontract.Statev.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).However,beforeadefendant   mayberevoked,therecordmustcontainsufficientevidencetopermitthetrialcourttomakeanintelligentandconscientiousdecision.Id.Onappeal,thetrialcourts h` decisionwillnotbedisturbedabsentafindingthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretion.Harkins,811S.W.2dat82.Tofindanabuseofdiscretion,thereviewing  courtmustconcludethattherecordcontainsnosubstantialevidencetosupporttheconclusionofthetrialcourtthatthedefendantviolatedthetermsofthecommunitycorrectionsprogram.Id. d\  ` Attherevocationhearing,theStatepresentedthetestimonyofFrankTucker,theappellantsCommunityCorrectionsofficer,whorelatedthecircumstancessurroundingtheallegedviolations.Theappellantofferedthetestimonyofhisfiancee,DeanieBrown,nottorefutetheoccurrenceoftheviolations,buttoofferreasonableexplanationsforthem.Accordingly,therecordprovidesampleprooftosupportthetrialcourtsfindingthattheviolationsoccurred. ` Moreover,theappellantsargumentthatrevocationisnotproperbecausetheviolationswereonlytechnicalinnatureisclearlywithoutmerit.ThebehavioralcontractsettingforththeconditionsofhisCommunityCorrectionssentencesmakes (2 +0 nodistinctionbetweenwhattheappellantreferstoasa technicalviolationversusa nontechnicalviolation.Thecontractdoesprovidethat MarkGriffisfurtherunderstandsthatfailuretocomplywithanyportionofthiscontractmayresultina   warrantbeingfiledforimmediatearrest....(Emphasisadded).Inplainlanguage,aviolationirrespectiveofitsnatureremainsaviolation. ` Uponreviewoftherecordbeforeus,weconcludethattherecordcontainsmorethansufficientprooftoenablethetrialcourttomakeanintelligentandconscientiousdecision.Aswefindnoabuseofthetrialcourtsdiscretion,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.̜IIII `     h   ____________________________________ `     h   DAVIDG.HAYES,JudgeCONCUR:________________________________JOHNH.PEAY,Judge________________________________?>josep>?@JOSEPHM.TIPTON,Jud@A@sge@ABgeB