WPC e@o~^UvE׻ߕ8P"G&1xwMZkgxsP$ؙ_qB$ @!TWv{zFf?F<,A4nRmnāTsC!6}3Vٛ!t.]EZ7zXgH>=rUat_lզ?:pkc)_uec.s TS\9kNuDyE *;cm JDwBiX--XC]2dRAtճpf٧GGa`k_ˀ=0$Rre o=/j}v5;+-'4"Q΃6VErtkyUW q_t2m RsJ_WRG#泋D֙mT}| xح*.A| T @l\`H7xqfb#\ % N# 0% UN U@ UN; z  z O ! ^ ) 5  wMNQ4SgEvx mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzb 0 B 0 D3E D-x 0K ASC 0  0D AHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(hH  Z(Times New Roman (I Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt k) Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Oo):i+003|xU- -(|G2$ !.8T,d d 8         0  9 d(|3$ !.8T,d d 8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8T,d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Sld d8     _   M8%XXdd 8@ttMINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#M #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsNovember8,2000 L X!XM #MXX!#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.BOBBY_HALEY_X!XM  J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforLauderdaleCounty  J @@No.6819JosephH.Walker,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200000860CCAR3CDFiledDecember27,2000   AV) ` dE<|` A }     ThedefendantpledguiltytodeliveryoflessthanonehalfgramofaScheduleII,controlled x  substance,andthetrialcourtsentencedhimasaRangeIII,persistentoffendertotwelveyearsinthe d TennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Onappeal,thedefendantcontendsthathissentenceis P excessive.Weaffirmthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourt. <  TennR.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  d   #MX!#X!X.MJosephM._Tipton_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhich#MX!#X!X.MDavidH.WellesandJames < _Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,JJ.,joined. ( GaryF._Antrican_,DistrictPublicDefender,andJulieK.Pillow,AssistantDistrictPublicDefender,  fortheappellant,Bobby_Haley_.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;KimR.Helper,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; t ElizabethT.Rice,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andTraceyAnneBrewer,AssistantDistrictAttorney ` General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. L  @@OO& OPINION #MXX!#X!XM $"t! #MXX! #  X!XM  ThedefendantpledguiltytodeliveryoflessthanonehalfgramofaScheduleIIcontrolled #L# substance,aClassCfelony,andthetrialcourtsentencedhimasaRangeIII,persistentoffenderto $8 $ twelveyearsintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Thedefendantarguesthathissentenceis %$!% excessivebecausethetrialcourtmisappliedoneenhancementfactorandbecausetheremaining &"& enhancementfactorweighedagainstthemitigatingfactorwouldnotjustifyanincreasedsentence '"' oftwoyears. (#(   Atthesentencinghearing,DarrellSmothers,whopreparedthe_presentence_Ԁreport,testified p*%* thatthedefendanthadbeenpreviouslyconvictedoffivefelonies.Hesaidthedefendantwas \+&+ revokedtwicefromparoleandoncefromprobation,althoughhedidnotbelievethatthedefendant H,', wasonparolewhenhecommittedthepresentoffense. 4-(- Ї  Thedefendantsmotherandbrotherbothtestifiedthatthedefendantwasnotadrugdealer  butjustanaddicteduser.Theystatedthatheneededhelpandthathesincerelywantedhelpin  overcominghisproblem.Thedefendantalsotestifiedandsaidthatheonlysolddrugstogetdrugs  forhimself.Hestatedthathewantedhelpandthathehadbeenacceptedintoadrugtreatment t programattheSynergyFoundation. ` Ѐ0  L (#(#   X%XXX!Whenadefendantappealsthelength,range,ormannerofserviceofasentenceimposedby 8  thetrialcourt,thiscourtconductsadenovoreviewoftherecordwithapresumptionthatthetrial " r courtsdeterminationsarecorrect.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thepresumptionof  \ correctnessis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourtconsidered  F  thesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev._Ashby_,823S.W.2d166,  0  169(Tenn.1991).Theburdenofshowingthatthesentenceisimproperisupontheappealingparty.   Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d),SentencingCommissionComments.However,iftherecord   showsthatthetrialcourtfailedtoconsiderthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsand   circumstances,thenreviewofthesentenceispurelydenovo._Ashby_,823S.W.2dat169.     ThedefendantwassentencedasaRangeIII,persistentoffender,forwhichtheapplicable \ rangeforaClassCfelonyistentofifteenyears.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035112(c)(3).The F presumptivesentenceforaClassCfelonyistheminimumintherangewhennoenhancementor 0 mitigatingfactorsarepresent.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210(c).Procedurally,thetrialcourtisto j increasethesentencewithintherangebasedupontheexistenceofenhancementfactorsandthen T reducethesentenceasappropriateforanymitigatingfactors.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210(e).The > weighttobeaffordedanexistingfactorislefttothetrialcourtsdiscretionsolongasitcomplies ( withthepurposesandprinciplesofthe1989SentencingActanditsfindingsareadequately  supportedbytherecord.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035210,SentencingCommissionComments;_Ashby_,  823S.W.2dat169.    Inthepresentcase,thepresumptionofcorrectnessappliesbecausetherecordrevealsthatthe j trialcourtconsideredalltherelevantfactsandcircumstancesaswellassentencingprinciplesand T compliedwiththeappropriateprocedures.Thetrialcourtreviewedthe_presentence_Ԁreportandheard > thewitnessestestimonyatthesentencinghearing,includingthedefendantstestimony.After ( x findingthatenhancementfactors(1)and(13)andmitigatingfactor(1)applied,thetrialcourt !b increasedthedefendantssentencetotwelveyears.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035113(1),114(1), !L  (13).#X!XXX%%#X%XXX!ԀThedefendantarguesthatthissentenceisexcessivebecausethetrialcourtshouldnothave "6! appliedenhancementfactor(13)andthatweighingenhancementfactor(1)andmitigatingfactor(1) # " doesnotjustifyanincreaseinthesentenceoftwoyears. $ #   Thestateconcedes,andtherecordreveals,thatthetrialcourtshouldnothaveapplied &!% enhancementfactor(13).Mr.Smotherstestifiedthathedidnotbelievethatthedefendantwason x'"& paroleatthetimehecommittedthepresentoffense.The_presentence_Ԁreportdoesnotprovide b(#' informationtothecontrary.Therefore,thetrialcourterredinapplyingenhancementfactor(13). L)$(   Thetrialcourtcorrectlyappliedenhancementfactor(1).The_presentence_Ԁreportrevealsthat  +p&* thedefendanthadsixmisdemeanorconvictions,includingconvictionsfortheft,shoplifting,and  ,Z'+ passingworthlesschecks,inadditiontothefivefelonyconvictionsthatmadehimaRangeIII,  persistentoffender.    Thestatearguesthatenhancementfactor(8)!thatthedefendanthadaprevioushistoryof n unwillingnesstocomplywiththeconditionsofasentenceinvolvingreleaseintothecommunity! X isalsoapplicable.Thisfactorwasincludedinitsnoticeofenhancingfactorsandinthe_presentence_ B  report,butthetrialcourtdidnotmentionitwhensentencingthedefendant.However,thetrialcourt , | didstatethatthedefendantwasnoteligibleforsentencinginthecommunityunderTenn.CodeAnn.  f 4036106becausethedefendanthadpreviouslybeenonothertypesofreleaseintothecommunity  P withoutsuccess.Also,Mr.Smotherstestified,andthe_presentence_Ԁreportreveals,thatthedefendant  :  #X!XXX%z#wasrevokedtwicefromparoleandoncefromprobation.Accordingly,thetrialcourtshouldhave  $  appliedenhancementfactor(8)X%XXX!.     Giventhepresenceoftwoenhancementfactorsandonlyonemitigatingfactor,webelieve   thatthedefendanthasnotcarriedhisburdeninshowingthathistwelveyearsentenceisimproper.   Basedupontheforegoingandtherecordasawhole,weaffirmthedefendantssentence. l  ̀̀#X!XXX%'# *z    `     h     ___________________________________ d    `     h     JOSEPHM._TIPTON_,JUDGE