ÿWPC :P6⣙ÇdDÎÆÌÆ8ê¦vL(rºOî@¨ìÒU|eŽÓ@ôÒ¾z!Rò(w_þ×¹eÚBGðÐÅ|’Õ~tÀœ‰V¨o… çkÆŽ®®J%?M^öx úöÙS ý,’sÄÄpªJÑÿy…ÊÓç—¢™eôÅR}/Gƒb¸ˆ…鳫­Múâ›Ï÷Òj®†ûûp«³¨‹‘:ê´`O'ÍúJ#T3i1nB^`7šñ׳èÆÂšêž`ÃÐ6i802ñYNg¢eç¿Øë𭨂©“5Q׸ÐA(ÛÃC¢vîk§âÎ~y”ÞÈ·ìƒYUU(­ö:êX‚¯…*ÆÌ,ê˰l’¸Ïð\‰Ì-,Ü¡%pá ±j~OËŽšRß¿âèk×’à·Ã“ XWÓ§eŠ/J©j{7*ƒ[5¬¥=õaœ·~£A9ñjt1Ùr›/úó.òA4‚EžÍ4éÄ,¸ïV­qB‹âDáá^@`¢pN½n‡Iö‹Oƒâ£|í~‹~YAÐT³t+©Îµ‡n’'ÌAã×,@õøq¨Vše®\ñÆ…ÌxÁ–à¾.ƒçB½1Co&b D¹öð_HŠðžhv÷ð°ìépâ5ŠÍÝ䃩ãb#Á\ % N# 0ˆ% UN­ û û z Ò} zO ÒÉ ^ › w§ Æ« Æq Æ7Æý4ÃN×ÙèEê mìììììììììììììììììììììììb 0ë     Böö 0¤ D3· D-ê 0K ASbƵ 0¤{ 0D A«c˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt {:)â Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5q\;'bk18O¦3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(|G2í$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤<»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÁTò»»Ô d(|3Á$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤<»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Á$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤<»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€¤<»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼¤<»»»ÔÑ8€¹›XXdð»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îêo¤<ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼¤<»îîêo #ԈРÜ, ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAugust€2000€SessionÐ X ÐÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<ÔÌò òÔ#†¼¤<»XX¹›#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JAMES€DOUGLAS€HAMPTONòòóóÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<Ôó óÐ  ` ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Blount€CountyÐ  h Ðà@@øøìàNo.€C„10412€€€€€€D.€Kelly€Thomas,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ  X ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` AßÐ Ø(  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„00115„CCA„R3„CD€Ð ×'  ÐSeptember€26,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ Ç  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<¶` AßÐ ·  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant€appeals€from€the€trial€courtððs€revocation€of€his€probation.€€The€defendant€admits€thatÐ ¶ Ðhe€materially€violated€his€probation,€but€contends€that€the€trial€courtððs€disposition€of€the€case€wasÐ ¦ö Ðimproper.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€Ð –æ ÐÓÀÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Courtó ó€ò òAffirmedó óÐ vÆ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼¤<»àX¹›Ž#ÔÔ‡X¹›X.¼¤<ÔJoseph€M.€Tipton,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€H.€Wellesóó€and€òòRobertÐ V¦ ÐW.€Wedemeyer,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð F– ÐÌRaymond€Mack€Garner,€District€Public€Defender,€and€Shawn€G.€Graham,€Assistant€District€PublicÐ &v ÐDefender,€for€the€appellant,€James€Douglas€Hampton.Ð f ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Peter€M.€Coughlan,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð öF ÐMichael€L.€Flynn,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Tammy€M.€Harrington,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ æ6 ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð Ö& ÐÓ•ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼¤<»XX¹›Ä#ÔÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<ÔÐ ¶!  ÐÓ  ÓÌà  àThe€defendant,€James€Douglas€Hampton,€appeals€as€of€right€from€the€trial€courtððs€revocationÐ –#æ" Ðof€his€probation.€€Although€the€defendant€admits€that€he€violated€his€probation,€he€contends€that€theÐ †$Ö# Ðtrial€courtððs€disposition€of€the€case€was€improper.€€He€argues€that€the€trial€court€should€have€orderedÐ v%Æ $ Ðhim€to€remain€on€supervised€intensive€probation€or,€in€the€alternative,€to€serve€a€period€of€splitÐ f&¶!% Ðconfinement€followed€by€placement€into€a€therapeutic€half„way€house€with€supervision€byÐ V'¦"& ÐCommunity€Corrections.€€Ð F(–#' ÐÌà  àOn€December€22,€1998,€the€defendant€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€assault€and€was€sentencedÐ &*v%) Ðto€six€years€imprisonment.€€He€was,€however,€placed€on€supervised€intensive€probation.€€On€AugustÐ +f&* Ð23,€1999,€Ô#†¼¤<»XX¹›Î #ÔÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<Ôa€hearing€was€held€to€determine€if€the€defendant€had€violated€his€probation.€At€the€hearing,Ð ,V'+ ÐMarcus€Miller,€the€defendantððs€probation€officer,€testified€as€follows:€He€was€assigned€to€theÐ ö,F(, Ðdefendantððs€case€on€December€22,€1998.€€On€January€15,€1999,€he€filed€a€probation€violation€report,Ð æ-6)-ýÿ Ðand€on€January€20,€1999,€a€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued,€alleging€that€the€defendantÐ ° Ðchanged€residences€without€notifying€him,€did€not€report€to€him,€did€not€keep€curfew,€Ô#†¼¤<»XX¹›³ #ÔÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<Ôfailed€to€payÐ  ð Ðcourt€costs,€and€failed€to€enroll€in€an€MRT€program.€€The€defendant€was€arrested€on€January€24,Ð à Ð1999,€and€remained€in€jail€until€June€7,€1999,€when€he€was€released€on€bond.€€Conditions€of€theÐ €Ð Ðdefendantððs€release€were€to€report€to€Miller€twice€a€week€and€to€attend€scheduled€meetings€at€theÐ pÀ ÐOverlook€Center€for€evaluation.€€Ð ` ° ÐÌà  àMiller€testified€that€he€was€out€of€the€office€on€June€9,€1999,€when€the€defendant€left€aÐ @  Ðmessage€that€he€was€residing€at€the€Knoxville€Union€Rescue€Mission.€€Miller€called€the€RescueÐ 0 € ÐMission€on€June€15,€1999,€and€learned€that€the€defendant€was€not€there.€€However,€€Reverend€JoeÐ  p  ÐÔ_ÔColquittÔ_Ô€returned€his€call€and€told€him€that€the€defendant€had€been€arrested.€€Miller€contacted€theÐ `  ÐKnox€County€Jail€and€discovered€that€the€defendant€had€been€arrested€for€public€intoxication.€€OnÐ P  ÐJune€21,€1999,€a€second€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued,€alleging€that€the€defendant€violatedÐ ð@  Ðhis€probation€by€being€arrested€for€public€intoxication,€by€moving€from€his€residence€withoutÐ à0  Ðpermission,€and€by€not€reporting€to€Miller.€€Miller€recommended€that€the€defendantððs€probation€beÐ Ð  Ðrevoked€and€that€the€defendant€be€placed€in€a€special€needs€facility€within€the€Department€ofÐ À ÐCorrection.€€On€cross„examination,€Miller€acknowledged€that€the€defendant€had€alcohol€problemsÐ ° Ðand€mental€health€issues.Ð  ð ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€that€he€did€not€have€a€set€schedule€to€meet€with€Miller€but€that€heÐ €Ð Ðattended€required€meetings€with€him.€€He€also€said€that€he€attended€ð ðalcohol€meetings.ðð€€He€said€thatÐ pÀ Ðafter€being€released€from€custody€in€June€1999,€he€went€to€the€Rescue€Mission€and€was€waiting€toÐ `° Ðregister€when€he€was€arrested€for€public€intoxication.€€He€stated€that€he€was€not€intoxicated€whenÐ P  Ðhe€was€arrested.€€The€defendant€testified€that€he€would€meet€with€his€probation€officer€if€he€wereÐ @ Ðallowed€to€continue€on€probation.€€He€said€that€he€would€participate€in€alcohol„related€programs€andÐ 0€ Ðthat€he€could€stay€at€his€familyððs€residence€instead€of€living€in€several€locations.Ð  p ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€that€the€defendant€had€violated€his€probation.€€It€stated€that€theÐ P Ðdefendant€had€his€own€ideas€about€what€he€should€and€should€not€be€able€to€do€and€that€it€wasÐ ð@ Ðapparent€that€he€could€not€function€on€his€own.€€The€trial€court€noted€that€the€defendant€had€met€withÐ à0 Ðhis€probation€officer€only€one€time.€€Because€the€defendant€did€not€propose€an€alternative€that€wouldÐ Ð  Ðprovide€a€stable,€structured€environment€and€that€would€protect€him€and€the€public,€the€trial€courtÐ À! Ðconcluded€that€the€only€option€was€to€sentence€the€defendant€to€incarceration€in€the€Department€ofÐ °"  ÐCorrection.€€The€trial€court€recommended€that€the€defendant€be€placed€in€the€special€needs€unit.€€OnÐ  #ð! Ðappeal,€the€defendant€does€not€challenge€the€finding€that€he€violated€his€probation.€€Rather,€he€arguesÐ $à" Ðthat€incarceration€was€not€appropriate.Ð €%Ð # ÐÌà  àA€trial€court€may€revoke€probation€upon€finding€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€theÐ `'°"% Ðdefendant€has€violated€a€condition€of€probation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€€40„35„310,€„311(e).€€If€theÐ P( #& Ðtrial€court€revokes€probation,€it€can€ð ð(1)€order€incarceration;€(2)€cause€execution€of€the€judgment€asÐ @)$' Ðit€was€originally€entered;€or€(3)€extend€the€remaining€probationary€period€for€a€period€not€to€exceedÐ 0*€%( Ðtwo€years.ðð€€òòState€v.€Hunteróó,€1€S.W.3d€643,€648€(Tenn.€1999).€€The€decision€to€revoke€probation€isÐ  +p&) Ðwithin€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court,€and€its€judgment€will€be€reversed€only€upon€a€showingÐ ,`'* Ðof€an€abuse€of€discretion,€reflected€in€the€record€by€an€absence€of€substantial€evidence€to€support€theÐ ° Ðtrial€courtððs€findings.€€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€946€S.W.2d€829,€832€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)€(citationÐ  ð Ðomitted).€€Ð à ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€the€defendant€admits€that€he€violated€probation.€€The€trial€court€orderedÐ pÀ Ðincarceration€because€it€found€that€the€defendant€had€his€own€ideas€about€what€he€should€or€shouldÐ ` ° Ðnot€do€and€that€he€could€not€function€on€his€own.€€The€record€contains€substantial€evidence€toÐ P   Ðsupport€these€findings.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€€€€€€€€Ô#†¼¤<»XX¹›$#ÔÔ‡X¹›X»¼¤<ÔÐ @  ÐòòóóÔ#†¼¤<»XX¹›$#ÔÔ€X¹›X»¼¤<ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JUDGE