WPC |4Ei@Lj =}p"z"MҶA-̏s2}23/ %E &wK.CQA]4h$N%Bqڠdlw.s?خ F)oS{[aٓQ9@Fi= Yb79.%.FJ~jnSTi}>N]Ҹ"ŕОx| =a9L2+ @@qC"9Ȍ5*g]LͺzS}ٔ:}(j0aY%؄c}o]]`@flZ.D=?a2>T[M-m%# QPS nc& .}͑SpG?SD{e XW-w;3aљ>4y[@Ӥɟ\m)s|CM\;wW`܋z\b#\ % UN# 0q UN ^ G wS zW  4   m   k 1NEb 0     B 0 D3 D- 0K ASb 0{ 0D AcHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular3+  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptJ~' k2o3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - -(|G2$ !.8[dd8         0  ] d(|3$ !.8[dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8[dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8[dd8     _    [8 XXdd8@ttU[INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#[U #Ԉ & X X[ #[XX #  STATEOFTENNESSEEv.KELLYANNHANCOCKX X[  8  @_ _  CriminalCourtforWilliamsonCounty  8 @yy#No.I2051197  $ @*AV) ` dE< ` A߈    @ No.M200002436CCAR3CDFiledAugust23,_2001_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<j` A k   #[XX J#X X[@( ORDER #[XX z#X X[Ԉ f  #[XX #X X[#[XX 8#X X[X XXX Theappellant,KellyA.Hancockappealsasamatterofrightfromherconvictionfordrivingunder *z theinfluence.Shecontendstheevidenceisinsufficienttosupportthejurysverdictofguilt.After f areviewoftheevidenceweaffirmtheconvictionpursuanttoRule20oftheRulesoftheCourtof R CriminalAppeals. >   FACTS  * M  OnFebruary20,1997,officerswiththeWilliamsonCountySheriffsDepartmentwerecalled  tothesceneofatwocaraccidentonHillsboroRoad.Uponarrival,officersapproachedthe  appellant,whowasthedriverofoneofthecarsinvolvedintheaccident.Theappellantwasnotthe  driveratfaultintheaccident.Astheofficerswerespeakingwiththeappellant,theyobservedan  odorofalcoholandfoundanemptybottleofZimaintheappellantsvan.Theappellantbecame v argumentativeastheofficersquestionedherabouttheaccident.Theofficersthenrequiredthe b appellanttoperformafieldsobrietytestwhichshefailed.Theappellantwasthenreadastandard N impliedconsentformandagreedtoprovideabloodsample. :   TheappellantsbloodwassenttotheTennesseeBureauofInvestigationfortoxicology & v testing.Thetoxicologytestindicatedthatherbloodalcoholcontentwas0.16percent. !b    OnNovember10,1997,theappellant,KellyA.Hancock,wasindictedbyaWilliamson !N! CountyGrandJuryandchargedwithonecountofDrivingUndertheInfluence(.10percentormore). ":" Followingajurytrial,theappellantwasconvictedandfined$350and,onAugust16,2000,thetrial #&# courtsentencedher11monthsand29dayssuspendedexceptforfortyeighthoursincarcerationin $ $ thecountyjail.AmotionfornewtrialwasdeniedonSeptember29,2000.Onthatsamedate,the % % appellantfiledanoticeofappealtothiscourt. &!&     ANALYSIS  r(#(   Onappeal,theappellantraisesoneissue.Theappellantcontendsthattheevidencepresented ^)$) attrialwasinsufficienttofindherguiltyofdrivingundertheinfluencebeyondareasonabledoubt J*%* becausethetestimonyofOfficerMarshaA.Brolsmanwasinherentlyunreliableandinconsistent. 6+&+   Whenanappellantchallengesthesufficiencyoftheevidence,thisCourtdoesnotreweigh ",r', orreevaluatetheevidence.Statev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,835(Tenn.1978).Ajuryverdict -^(-G approvedbythetrialjudgeaccreditsthestate'switnessesandresolvesallconflictsinfavorofthe  state.Statev.Bigbee,885S.W.2d797,803(Tenn.1994);Statev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,835  (Tenn.1978).Onappeal,thestateisentitledtothestrongestlegitimateviewoftheevidenceandall  legitimateorreasonableinferenceswhichmaybedrawntherefrom.Bigbee,885S.W.2dat803; t Harris,839S.W.2dat75.ThisCourtwillnotdisturbaverdictofguiltduetothesufficiencyofthe ` evidenceunlessthedefendantdemonstratesthatthefactscontainedintherecordandtheinferences L  whichmaybedrawntherefromareinsufficient,asamatteroflaw,forarationaltrieroffacttofind 8  theaccusedguiltybeyondareasonabledoubt.Statev.Brewer,932S.W.2d1,19(Tenn._Crim_.App. $ t 1996).Accordingly,itistheappellatecourt'sdutytoaffirmtheconvictioniftheevidence,viewed  ` underthesestandards,wassufficientforanyrationaltrieroffacttohavefoundtheessentialelements  L  oftheoffensebeyondareasonabledoubt.Tenn.R.App.P.13(e);Statev.Cazes,875S.W.2d253,  8  259(Tenn.1994). $    Onappeal,theappellantbasesherappealonthecredibilityofthearrestingofficer.Asan   appellatecourt,wearenotinapositiontoandwillnotreweighthecredibilityandweightthatajury   givesawitnessoraparticularpieceofevidence.Statev.Cabbage,571S.W.2d832,835   (Tenn.1978);Statev.Bigbee,885S.W.2d797,803(Tenn.1994).Nevertheless,therewasample   evidencepresentedattrialtosupportthejurysverdict.OfficerBrolsmantestifiedthatthedefendant p wasdrivinghervehicleonapublicroadonthenightofherarrest.Upondetectingtheodorof \ alcoholofficersrequestedthattheappellantperformafieldsobrietytestwhichshefailed.Anempty H containerforanalcoholicbeveragewasfoundintheappellantsvehicle.Abloodtestrevealedthat 4 thedefendantsbloodalcoholcontentwas0.16percent.Theevidencesupportsaconvictionfor  p drivingwithabloodalcoholcontentof0.10percentormore.  \   CONCLUSION  4   Accordingly,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule20oftheTennessee   CourtofCriminalAppeals.#X XXX ##[XX {#X X[ԀCostsoftheappealwillbepaidbytheappellant,KellyAnnHancock.      `     h     ____________________________________ X     `     h     JERRYL._SMITH,_ԀJUDGE D!    `     h     ____________________________________ $X"    `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE $D #    `     h     ____________________________________ '#&    `     h     NORMAMCGEEOGLE,JUDGE