WPC B=4+@Lt s?]KLo9:Y_1i k;a >N*ӚzN"Dm@q5)㷩x&8qn6#q_Iv7LŖ1&$h@)Ha2p,L:W%SF2 0X 0X> 0< 0< 0 8 D+F Aq @  o @ o B-@ Bm  0 #4UN %CMI(MNu^ ww4 mb\  `&Times New Roman'  LA satisfied Microsoft Office UserL0A satisfied Microsoft Office User .   6 4Heading 1  XXX   A7X` hp x (#A       G=X` hp x (#G 6 4Heading 2  XXX   A7X` hp x (#A       G=X` hp x (#G <:Default Para<:Footnote Ref6~ 4Body Text  XXX  A7X` hp x (#A    G=X` hp x (#G'dxd&Draw Object <<=8C HKKKK  WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -  WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -)Hairline d  d#|x(rT$..      o0XXo0o0HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularXȭ-s PH,:i+00U - - T!..      bhXXbhbh  _         0p x (#X0L=bh8!?XXdd8  QhhL=INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  Qgg$ATNASHVILLEL=Ԉ    H.` hp x (#X(#HAssignedonBriefsMay21,2002 > X!?XL=L=XX!? STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CALVINLAMONTHANNAHX!?XL=  0  DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforSumnerCounty  " No.CR2861998Jane_Wheatcraft_,Judge   -  bhXX!?  k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KEj K Kj2 -  X!?Xbh No.M200102717CCAR3CDFiledAugust29,2002 _  -  bhXX!?  k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KEE K KE2 -  X!?Xbh    Thedefendantappealstherevocationofhisprobation.Hearguesthatthetrialcourterredin :  orderinghimtoservehisoriginalsentence.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.  p    Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed  <   N7X` hp x (#X(#NJohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichThomasT._Woodall_  andNormaMcGeeOgle,JJ.,joined.  DavidAllenDoyle,DistrictPublicDefender,andThomasJ.Smith,AssistantPublicDefender, j fortheappellant,CalvinLamontHannah. P PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;HelenaWalton_Yarbrough_,Assistant l AttorneyGeneral;LawrenceRayWhitley,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andDeeD.Gay,Assistant R DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. 8   OPINION    X!?XXX!?  Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z  }       InOctoberof1994,thedefendant,CalvinLamontHannah,pledguiltytotheoffenseof f!! saleofcocaineandwassentencedtoeightyearstobeservedinsplitconfinement.Thetrial L"" courtorderedthedefendanttoserveoneyearinthecountyjailandtoservethebalanceofthe 2## sentenceonsupervisedprobation.Twowarrantsforviolationofprobationwereissuedin1999, $h$ oneinJulyandoneinNovember.However,thedefendantwasnotarresteduntilJulyof2001. $N % Afterahearing,thetrialcourtrevokedthedefendantsprobationandorderedhimtoservethe %4!& remainderofhisoriginalsentence.} M ݌ &"' Ќ    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?    X!?XXX!?  Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z    ݌̌    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?        ProbationofficerKarenSmithtestifiedattherevocationhearingthatshebegan (#) supervisionofthedefendantin1998.ShefiledthefirstprobationviolationwarrantinJulyof |)$* 1999becausethedefendantwasthirteenmonthsbehindonpaymentofhisprobationfeesand b*%+ hadnotobtainedhisGEDorprovidedproofthathewasworkingtowardearninghisGED.A H+&, transcriptoftheoriginalsentencinghearingreflectsthataconditionofthedefendantsprobation .,~'- wasthatheobtainhisGED.InNovemberof1999,Ms.Smithfiledanamendedwarrantto -d(. reflectthatthedefendanthadfailedtoreporttohersinceJuneof1999,hadbeenunemployed -J)/ _sinceFebruaryof1999,andhadnotbeenpayinghismonthlyfines.AccordingtoSmith,the  defendantneverreportedtoheragainafterJuneof1999.      Thedefendanttestifiedthatatthetimeofthehearing,hehadbeenemployedforeighteen b monthsataplumbingservice.Hetestifiedthathewascurrentonhischildsupportpayments, H whichwasaconditionofhisprobation.Thedefendantadmittedthathehadnotreportedtohis . ~ probationofficersinceJuneof1999,overtwoyearsbeforethehearing.Heexplainedthathe  d waslaidofffromhisjobat TheMattressFirminFebruaryof1999andhadnoincome.The  J lasttimehemetwithMs.Smith,sheinformedhimthatsheintendedtofileaprobationviolation  0 warrant.Accordingtothedefendant,hedidnotreportbacktoMs.Smithtoavoidbeing    arrested.Heclaimedthathehadbillstopayandwasafraidofbeingimprisoned.Therefore,he    continuedtolookforanotherjobandstoppedreportingtoMs.Smith.Withregardstothe   requirementthatheobtainaGED,thedefendantexplainedthathehadnothadtimeforit x  becauseofhisworkschedule.Thedefendantassertedthathehadbeenpayingcourtcostsand ^  feessincehisarrestinJulyof2001.Healsoreportedtoaprobationofficer,MikeKeeton,after D  makingbond. *z      Afterreceivingthisevidence,thetrialcourtfoundthattherewasnoexcuseforthe F defendantsfailuretoreportandpayhiscourtorderedfeesforovertwoyears,especiallyinlight , ofthefactthathehadbeenemployedforeighteenmonths.Althoughthetrialcourtrecognized  thattherewerefactorsinthedefendantsfavor,thecourtalsofoundthatitwasapparentthatthe  defendantwouldnotcomplywiththetermsofprobationifgivenanotheropportunity.Thecourt  orderedthatthedefendant'sprobationberevokedandthatheservehissentenceinthe t DepartmentofCorrection.Thedefendantthenfiledthisappeal. Z   X!?XXX!?   Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z      ݀b  8Ԍ @ Ќ    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?      X!?XXX!?   Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z      b   StandardofReviewb N!  !Ԍ &v Ќ    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?  V     Atrialcourtmayrevokeprobationandordertheimpositionoftheoriginalsentenceupon B afindingbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethatthepersonhasviolatedaconditionof ( probation.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035310,311.Thedecisiontorevokeprobationrestswithin  thesounddiscretionofthetrialcourt.Statev.Mitchell,810S.W.2d733,735(Tenn.Crim.App.  1991).Revocationofprobationissubjecttoanabuseofdiscretionstandardofreview,rather   thanadenovostandard.Statev.Harkins,811S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).Discretionis p!  abusedonlyiftherecordcontainsnosubstantialevidencetosupporttheconclusionofthetrial V"! courtthataviolationofprobationhasoccurred.Id.;Statev.Gregory,946S.W.2d829,832 <#" (Tenn.Crim.App.1997).Proofofaviolationneednotbeestablishedbeyondareasonable "$r# doubt.Gregory,946S.W.2dat832;Statev.Leach,914S.W.2d104,106(Tenn.Crim.App. %X $ 1995). %>!%     Afterreviewingtherecord,weconcludethatthereismorethansubstantialevidencethat ' #' thedefendantfailedtoreportasdirected;failedtopaysupervisionfeesandcosts;andfailedto (#( makeagoodfaithefforttoobtainhisGED.Attherevocationhearing,thedefendantofferedno )$) satisfactoryexplanationforhisfailuretoreportforovertwoyearsorobtainaGEDanddidnot l*%* explainwhyhewasunabletopayhisfeesandcostsafterheobtainedregularemployment. R+&+ Additionally,wenotethatthedefendantadmittedthathehadpreviouslyfailedtocomplywith 8,', theconditionsofprobationandwasgivenabreakbythetrialcourtatthattime.Thereisno  abuseofdiscretioninthetrialcourtsdecisiontoorderthedefendanttoservetheremainderof  hisoriginalsentenceintheDepartmentofCorrection. |   X!?XXX!?   Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z    &  1+  Conclusion1+,  +Ԍ H Ќ    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?    X!?XXX!?  Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z  -      --݌̌    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?    X!?XXX!?  Z7X` hp x (#XX(#Z  .    0  Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.'H,./݌ d(#(# Ќ    <XX(#XX(#<X!?XXX!?        ___________________________________ x    JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE ^  N  bhXX!?  Q.` hp x (#XX(#Q