WPC W~}+$|8軐4 _~2&X# ? ڦe Vς‘ $\Bg]9PUrZΖ3YT!WP 1s4_Sj<yMҼA3Da5ƭGVdE3ԫ#E;`Ȫ+0F/^e. Th3Ax6{e%f}Ҝ .P}v@ez.5hIa$Agk]kJP#yfɮ1c aS*l ^0PL  Sm+1e{L0|&6)"86c*E<$4q *\tM_V܎(=sZ}[-aQEaYKC,U_"^Rtߖ\+3X..oyVb#\ % N# 0% U%N UN -I zv  z < ^  w   p46NJL[E] m_U@vU@ 0Db 0 B 0 D5 D- 0K ASR 0k 0D ASHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular ##CXd# C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt5) Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5J~'pn43|xU(9 Z(Times New Roman (uH Z(Times New Roman    RU$      1  '  _Weacknowledgethat,inStatev.Murphy,953S.W.2d200,201and203(Tenn.1997),oursupremecourt  heldthatthehorizontalgazenystagmustestisa scientifictest,andtestimonyconcerningthistestmustsatisfythe n requirementsofTenn.R.Evid.702and703.However,theappellantfailedtoobjecttoTrooperStevenstestimony ,| concerningthistestanddoesnotchallengeitsadmissibilityonappeal.Tenn.R.Evid.103(a)(1);Tenn.R.App.P.36(a). : SeealsoStatev.Smith,No.W199800156SCR11CD,2000WL872830,at*4(Tenn.atJackson,June30,  2000)(publicationpending)( [_w]hen_Ԁapartydoesnotobjecttotheadmissibilityofevidence,...theevidencebecomes f admissiblenotwithstandinganyotherRuleofEvidencetothecontrary...).Moreover,theevidenceadducedattrial $ t isotherwisesufficienttosupportthejurysverdict.(#$  0  - -(|G2U$ !.8Gdd8         0  ' d(|3֋$ !.8Gdd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3֋$ !.8Gdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Gdd8     _   G86XXdd8;D@ttakGINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#Gak#Ԉ   @"July2000Session @ X6XG #GXX6#@  STATEOFTENNESSEEv.JERRYWAYNEHARBINX6XG  4 @M M  AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforFranklinCounty  ( @<<No.12177,J.CurtisSmith,Judge   @*AV) ` dE<o` A߈ p  @2 2 No.M199902581CCAR3CDFiledSeptember20,_2000_Ԉ e  AV) ` dE<0` A 1   X6XXX6OnJuly1,1999,#GXX6ԛ#X6XGtheappellant,JerryWayneHarbin,wasconvictedbyajuryintheFranklinCounty  \ CircuitCourtofdrivingundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant,secondoffense,anddrivingona B revokedlicense.Thetrialcourtimposedasentenceofeleven(11)monthsandtwentynine(29)days ( incarcerationintheFranklinCountyJail,suspendedallbutsixtyfive(65)daysofthesentenceand  orderedtheappellanttopayafineof$750.Fortheoffenseofdrivingonarevokedlicense,thetrial  courtimposedaconcurrentsentenceofsix(6)months,suspendedallbutten(10)daysofthe  sentenceandorderedtheappellanttopayafineof$150.Onappeal,theappellantallegesthatthe p evidencewasnotsufficienttosupporthisconvictionofdrivingundertheinfluence.Followinga V reviewoftherecordandthepartiesbriefs,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.#X6XXX6#X6XXX6#GXX6# < #GGb #X6XG d  ލ11LegalBasisforAppeale  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtisAffirmed.d  ލ12Judgmente   0 d  ލ13e  #GX6 #X6X.GNormaMcGeeOgle,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhich#GXX6 #X6XGDavidG.Hayes#GX6ԁ #X6X.Gd  ލ14OtherJudgese  andThomas L T._Woodall_,_J.J._,d  ލ14OtherJudgese  #GXX6 #X6XGԀjoined. 2 RobertS.Peters,Winchester,Tennessee,fortheappellant,JerryWayneHarbin.    PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter,ElizabethT.Ryan,AssistantAttorneyGeneral, z"" andBillCopeland,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. `##  @55'OPINION ,%| % @'' I.FactualBackground &b!&  X6XXX6   ` Theappellantsconvictionsof#X6XXX6#X6XXX6drivingundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant,second &H"' offense,anddrivingonarevokedlicense#X6XXX6^#X6XXX6Ԁarosefromatrafficstopoftheappellantsvehicleataroad '.#( blockonHighway41AinFranklinCountyonNovember1,1997.Theevidenceadducedatthe ($) appellantstrialrevealedthattheTennesseeHighwayPatrolhadestablishedtheroadblockinorder )$* tocheckdriverslicensesandallmotoristspassingthroughtheroadblockwererequiredtostop *%+ theirvehiclesandsubmittoaninspection.Trooper_Dewayne_ԀStevenstestifiedthat,intheearly v+&, morninghoursofNovember1,theappellantapproachedtheroadblock.TrooperStevensstopped \,'- theappellantsvehicleandaskedfortheappellantsdriverslicense.Simultaneously,hedetected B-(.B _anodorofalcoholemanatingfromtheappellantsperson.Accordingly,hefurtherinstructedthe  appellanttomovehisvehicletothesideoftheroad.     ` TrooperStevensranacomputercheckoftheappellantsdriverslicenseand b discoveredthatthelicensehadbeenrevoked.Thetrooperthenaskedtheappellantifhehadbeen H drinking.Theappellantadmittedthathehadconsumedfive(5)orsix(6)beers.Thetrooperalso . ~ observedanunopenedsixpackofbeerintheappellantscar.  d    ` Thetrooperorderedtheappellanttogetoutofhiscar.Atthispoint,theappellant  0 appeared alittleontheconfusedside.TrooperStevensadministeredthreefieldsobrietytests,    includingthehorizontalgazenystagmussobrietytest,the walkandturntest,andthe fingerto    nosetest.OnthebasisofhistrainingattheTennesseeLawEnforcementAcademy,Trooper   Stevenstestifiedthattheresultsofthehorizontalgazenystagmustestindicatedthattheappellant x  wasintoxicated.Astothe walkandturntest,thetrooperrecountedthatheaskedtheappellant ^  towalkninestepsforward,heeltotoe,beforeturningandwalkinganotherninestepsintheopposite D  direction.Theappellantwalkedtenstepsforwardandwasunabletomaintainhisbalance.The *z  trooperconcludedthattheappellantsperformancewas [v]erypoor.Astothe fingertonose ` test,TrooperStevenstestifiedthatheinstructedtheappellanttoleanhisheadback,closehiseyes, F andtouchtheendofhisnosewithhisindexfinger.Again,theappellantperformedthetestpoorly, , touchinghislipinsteadofhisnose.     ` Afteradministeringthefieldsobrietytests,TrooperStevensaskedtheappellantifhe  wouldbewillingtoundergoabloodalcoholtestandreadtotheappellantan ImpliedConsent t form.Theappellantrefusedtoconsenttoabloodalcoholtestandrefusedtosigntheimplied Z consentform,assertingthatabloodalcoholtestwouldnotservehisbestinterests.Thetrooper @ arrestedtheappellantandtransportedhimtotheFranklinCountyJail. &v    ` DiannaMcKay,theintakeofficerattheFranklinCountyjailatthetimeoftheinstant B offenses,testifiedattheappellantstrialthat,upontheappellantsadmissiontotheFranklinCounty ( Jail,sherecordedontheappellantsintakeformthepresenceorinfluenceofalcohol.Officer  McKayconcededthatshehadnocurrentrecollectionoftheappellantbutexplainedthestandardshe  normallyappliesindecidingwhethertorecordaprospectiveinmatesintoxicationonthejailintake   form: p!  8  8`   Ifsomeonecomesandtheyhavearealstrongodorofalcohol,ifthey V"! areunableto,iftheyneedhelpbecausetheyreunabletowalkdown <#" thehallbythemselves,slurredspeech,andifwearenotsure,Imean, "$r# ifitslikejustalittlebit,thenIdontmarkyes.Ithasto[be]avery %X $ clearcaseofyestheyareundertheinfluence.Iftheysmelllikeit,if %>!% theyreunabletocarrythemselfandthingslikethat.&$"&` x` x OfficerMcKayfurtherclarifiedthat justthesmellofalcoholdoesntdoit.... ' #'    ` Theappellanttestifiedonhisownbehalfathistrial.Theappellantclaimedthat,prior )$) tothetrafficstop,hehaddrunkfour,twelveouncecansofbeerandthathesoinformedatrooper l*%* attheroadblock.Theappellantdeniedthathewasintoxicatedanddeniedanyimpairmentofhis R+&+ drivingskills.Moreover,withrespecttothefieldsobrietytests,theappellantdeniedthatTrooper 8,', ;D 86XXdXXd8   Stevensadministeredahorizontalgazenystagmustestandexplainedthathehaddifficulty  performingthe walkandturntestduetorecentsurgeryonhisback.     ` Attheconclusionoftheappellantstrial,thejuryfoundtheappellantguiltyofboth b drivingundertheinfluenceofanintoxicantanddrivingonarevokedlicense.Uponthedischarge H ofthejury,theappellantfurtherconcededthathehadpreviouslybeenconvictedofdrivingunder . ~ theinfluence.Accordingly,#X6XXX6#X6XXX6fortheoffenseofdrivingundertheinfluence,thetrialcourtsentenced  d theappellantasatwotimeoffendertoeleven(11)monthsandtwentynine(29)daysincarceration,  J suspendedallbutsixtyfive(65)daysofthesentenceandorderedtheappellanttopayafineof$750.  0 Fortheoffenseofdrivingonarevokedlicense,thetrialcourtimposedaconcurrentsentenceofsix    (6)months,suspendedallbutten(10)daysofthesentenceandorderedtheappellanttopayafine    of$150.#X6XXX6((#X6XXX6    @$II.Analysis ^      ` Thesoleissueraisedbytheappellantonappealiswhethertheevidenceadducedat D  trialwassufficienttosupporthisconvictionofdrivingundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant,second *z  offense.#X6XXX6Է*#Inevaluatingachallengetothesufficiencyoftheevidence,thiscourtappliescertainwell ` settledprinciples.X6XXX6Fundamentally,weaccordconsiderableweighttotheverdictofajuryina F criminaltrial.Ajuryconvictionremovesthepresumptionoftheappellantsinnocenceandreplaces , itwithoneofguilt,sothattheappellantcarriestheburdenofdemonstratingtothiscourtwhythe  evidencewillnotsupportthejurysfindings.Statev.Tuggle,639S.W.2d913,914(Tenn.1982).  Theappellantmustestablishthat noreasonabletrieroffactcouldhavefoundtheessential  elementsoftheoffensebeyondareasonabledoubt.Jacksonv.Virginia,443U.S.307,319,99S. t Ct.2781,2789(1979);TennR.App.P.13(e). Z    ` Accordingly,onappeal,theStateisentitledtothestrongestlegitimateviewofthe &v evidenceandallreasonableinferenceswhichmaybedrawntherefrom.Statev.Williams,657  \ S.W.2d405,410(Tenn.1983).Inotherwords,questionsconcerningthecredibilityofwitnessesand B theweightandvaluetobegiventheevidence,aswellasfactualissuesraisedbytheevidence,are ( resolvedbythetrieroffact,andnottheappellatecourts.Statev.Pruett,788S.W.2d559,561  (Tenn.1990).#X6XXX6,#X6XXX6     ` Inordertoconvicttheappellantofdrivingundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant, p!  secondoffense,theStatehadtoprovebeyondareasonabledoubtthattheappellantwasdrivingor V"! wasinphysicalcontrolofanautomobileonapublicroadorhighwaywhileundertheinfluenceof <#" anintoxicant.Tenn.CodeAnn.5510401(a)(1)(1998).Moreover,theStatewasrequiredtoprove "$r# beyondareasonabledoubtthattheappellanthadpreviouslybeenconvictedofdrivingunderthe %X $ influenceofanintoxicant.Tenn.CodeAnn.5510403(a)(1)(1997). %>!%    ` Theappellantconcededtothetrialcourtthathehadpreviouslybeenconvictedof ' #' drivingundertheinfluenceanddoesnotassertotherwiseonappeal.Moreover,theappellant (#( concedesthathewasdrivinganautomobileonapublicroadorhighwayatthetimeofhisoffense. )$) However,hedisputesthejurysfindingthathewasundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant.Inessence, l*%* theappellantchallengesthecredibilityofTrooperStevens,contendingthattheappellantsmemory R+&+ oftheeveningismoreaccurate.Applyingtheaforementionedprinciples,wedeclinetoreevaluate 8,', TrooperStevenscredibilityandfurtherconcludethatareasonabletrieroffactcouldhavefound  beyondareasonabledoubtthattheappellantwasguiltyofdrivingundertheinfluenceofan  intoxicant. #  1       |  @ff#III.Conclusion H    0 ` Fortheforegoingreasons,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.. ~` (#` (#    `     h   GXX6Ԁ  0    `     h   NormaMcGeeOgle,Judge#G.GР2#d  ލ15EnterAppellant'sLawyer(s)e  #X6XG:#  >  d  ލ16EnterAppellee'sLawyer(s)e  d  ލ18Beginopinionheree