WPC< 9>Lpq'?nT4>]x?> :LZ VӄoL6>y@<[;aʐ/Jl{4q@l=ޘ!vkͱ8rFcXș^쬕akҏ uK^f"6j .fn-=k Q3ҀAx}u+jv\՜UN(+b#\ %% UN+ 0y UN ^ O w[ z_  4   m   s9N 0DE////////////////////////b111111111111111111111111111111111111 09999 B$$ 0A D3 D- 0KEE AS 0 0DM A\\IB01S08T\knoxclerk3,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularn]/  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptb.3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  RT$      1     _Althoughinthiscaseweareabletodiscernfromtherecordthattheappellantwasplacedoncommunity  corrections,theStateastheappelleeincriminalcaseswouldbewelladvised,outofasenseofprudence,toensurein t thefuturethattherecordissufficienttosupporttheappelleespositiononappeal.(#$  0  - -(|G2T$ !.8dd8         0  % d(|3G$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3G$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8mdd8     _   m8\yXXdd8@tt |mINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#m | #Ԉ &    @  @` November26,2002Session L X\yXm #mXX\y#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CHRISTOPHERALLENHARRISX\yXm  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforHamiltonCounty  J @@No.218008RebeccaStern,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E2001_Ԅ02810_CCAR3CD   October29,2003   AV) ` dE<|` A }     XpXXX\yOnOctober29,1997,the_Hamblen_ԀCountyGrandJuryreturnedanindictmentagainsttheappellant, x  ChristopherAllenHarrisforrapeofachildinviolationofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection3913 d 522.OnJanuary19,2000,theappellantenteredaguiltypleatoattemptedrapeofachild.He P receivedasentenceofeightyearstobeservedasaworkreleasesentencefor11monthsand29days < inthecountyworkhousewiththebalanceonintensiveprobation.Theappellantraisesthefollowing (x issuesinthisappeal:(1)whetherhewasproperlysubjecttorevocationofaCommunityCorrections d sentence,and(2)whethertherecordpreponderatesagainstadeterminationthathehadviolatedthe P termsofhisCommunityCorrectionssentence.Afterareviewtherecord,weaffirmthejudgment < ofthetrialcourt.#X\yXXXp##mXX\y#X\yXm (  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtisAffirmed.     #mX\y$ #X\yX.mJerryL.Smith,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichGaryR.Wade,_P.J._,andNorma  McGeeOgle,J.,joined. t JohnG._McDougal_,Chattanooga,Tennessee,fortheappellant,ChristopherAllenHarris. L  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;ThomasE.Williams,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; $"t! BillCox,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andYolandaMitchell,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,for #`" theappellee,StateofTennessee. #L#  @@OO& OPINION #mXX\y #X\yXm %$!% #mXX\y #X\yXm  XpXXX\y@%Background '"'   Fromtherecorditappearsthattheappellantwasoriginallysentencedasnotedabove.On )$) September11,2000,forsomeunknownreason,hewasplacedonCommunityCorrections.A_capias_ p*%* wasissuedfortheappellantonJune6,2001.OnJune20,2001,theappellantwasreassignedtothe \+&+ CommunityCorrectionsprogramfortheremainderofhissentence.OnNovember5,2001, H,', followingarevocationhearing,thetrialcourtrevokedappellantsCommunityCorrectionssentence 4-(- _andorderedtheappellanttoservetheremainderofhissentenceincarcerated.Theappellant  requestedandwasgrantedanevidentiaryhearingonNovember12,2001.Thishearingwastoallow  introductionofevidencefromappellantsfatherandgrandfatherthathehadtroublesubmittingto  authorityorfollowingruleshisentirelife.Defensecounselconcededthattheappellanthadviolated t thetermsofhisCommunityCorrectionsprogram,butmaintainedthathisviolationdidnotwarrant ` arevocation.Thetrialcourtreaffirmeditspriorholdingandrevokedtheappellantscommunity L  correctionssentence. 8  @&Analysis  `   Theappellantarguesthatbasedontheoriginaljudgment,hewasnotservingacommunity  8  correctionssentenceatthetimeofhisrevocation.Theappellantfurthermaintainsthatthecourthad $  noauthoritytorevokehissentencebecausehisviolationoccurredapproximatelyseventeenmonths   afterajudgmentwasenteredsentencinghimtoeightyearsandorderinghimtoserveelevenmonths   andtwentyninedaysinthecountyworkhousefollowedbysevenyearsonprobation.     Becauseitappearstothecourtthattherecordonappealisnotadequatetofacilitatereview, p theappellanthaswaivedthisissue.SeeTenn.R.App.P.24(b)( [T]heappellantshallhave \ preparedatranscriptofsuchpartoftheevidenceorproceedingsasisnecessarytoconveyafair, H accurateandcompleteaccountofwhattranspiredwithrespecttothoseissuesthatarethebasisof 4 appeal.).Inaddition,whenarecordisnotcompleteanddoesnotcontainrelevantinformation,this  p Courtmustpresumethatthetrialcourtwascorrectinitsruling.SeeStatev.Richardson,875  \ S.W.2d671,674(Tenn.Crim.App.1993);#X\yXXXp} #XpXXX\y# XXpR #XpX Statev.Cooper,736S.W.2d125,131(Tenn.Crim. H App.1987). 4   TherecorddoesnotcontainthetranscriptfromtheNovember5,2001hearingwherethe   courtrevokedtheappellantsCommunityCorrectionssentence.Also,theappellantdidnotinclude  ordersandtranscriptsrelatingtoproceedingswhichoccurredbetweentheappellantsoriginal  sentencingandtherevocationhearingraisedinthisappeal.Assuch,wearewithoutanadequate  recordforreview,andaccordingly,thisCourtmustmakethedeterminationthatthetrialcourtis l correct.Therefore,basedontheforegoing,thisissueiswaived. #  1       X    Secondly,theappellantcontendsthatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretioninrevokinghis 0"  communitycorrectionssentence.Atrialcourtsdiscretionisabusedonlyiftherecordcontainsno #l! substantialevidencetosupporttheconclusionofthetrialcourtthataviolationoftheappellants $X" CommunityCorrectionssentencehasoccurred.SeeStatev.Gregory,946S.W.2d829,832(Tenn. $D # Crim.App.1997).BecausetherecordbeforethisCourtdoesnotcontaintheNovember5,2001 %0!$  transcriptoftheStatesevidencewhichledthetrialcourttorevoketheCommunityCorrections &"% sentence,theappellanthaswaivedanyconsiderationofthemeritsofthisissue.SeeTenn.R.App.  P.24(b).   @$$%Conclusion `   Basedontheforegoing,weAFFIRMthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. 8     ` ̀#X\yXXXp##mXX\yJ#X\yXm  `    `     h     ___________________________________      `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE