WPCu+ "W(v["9~H2Za쫥;v>d@ yS?]lTYpB\uG ,X5ҼqG>DA>2,޳)nbj䫨E!: -D3/+:t:3hQ@ow[6і Α4Db{Q#y0< 4H?^d(&dg q C )23Y 9?B yA[}.SQs50J,Ͳ9)fbQǍg 6%,v1A diDsuodh"\^eЀsvoΏ`m,=¬/.) aqVøI-aNPjV^Z^F4 W [ID-BY̽#8|.J_#KG&XkVno>SWU* 0| 0  0  0  0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0y 0s 0j 0a 0U! 0I" 0:# 0+$U>$ 1e7% 7%% 0%#p&UN9) %)M)()N) 1u) 720*^ b*wn*4r** m**b*UN*E*U4**-++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ BX+%2A`Arial' IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE ib011s240AOCUSER .   2[+X 0_level1   , 8.4 <DL!823  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2X+X 0_level2   X 5+4 44 <DL!523  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2X+X 0_level3    5+` ` ` <DL!523  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2U+X 0_level4    2( <DL!223  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2U+X 0_level5    2( <DL!223  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2R+X 0_level6    /% <DL!/23  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2R+X 0_level7   4 /% <DL!/23  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2O+X 0_level8   ` ,"< <<DL!,23  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2O+X 0_level9    ,"h hhDL!,23  ..   5+ 4 <DL!5  2[X 0_levsl1   , 8.4 <DL!823  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2XX 0_levsl2   X 5+4 44 <DL!523  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2XX 0_levsl3    5+` ` ` <DL!523  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2UX 0_levsl4    2( <DL!223  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2UX 0_levsl5    2( <DL!223  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2RX 0_levsl6    /% <DL!/23  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2RX 0_levsl7   4 /% <DL!/23  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2OX 0_levsl8   ` ,"< <<DL!,23  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2OX 0_levsl9    ,"h hhDL!,23  Ԁ   5+ 4 <DL!5  2[X 0_levnl1   , 8.4 <DL!823     5+ 4 <DL!5  2XX 0_levnl2   X 5+4 44 <DL!523     5+ 4 <DL!5  2XX 0_levnl3    5+` ` ` <DL!523     5+ 4 <DL!5  2UX 0_levnl4    2( <DL!223     5+ 4 <DL!5  2UX 0_levnl5    2( <DL!223     5+ 4 <DL!5  2RX 0_levnl6    /% <DL!/23     5+ 4 <DL!5  2RX 0_levnl7   4 /% <DL!/23     5+ 4 <DL!5  2OX 0_levnl8   ` ,"< <<DL!,23     5+ 4 <DL!5  2OX 0_levnl9    ,"h hhDL!,23     5+ 4 <DL!5  <S?:Default ParaS\  `&Times New RomanS?%2A`Arial?\  `&Times New Roman 35;AGMSY_1A.a.i.1.a.i.1.a. i.#|x(m$..      %X%X@%HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular%X3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)*i)/ lk.:i+00U- -6Times New Roman Regular45 Regular ##3m3Xd# d #m!..      %X%X_%  _          {i_J{i 283J3XXdd8  DJ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  ATNASHVILLE#JD#   January14,2003Session        @ STATEOFTENNESSEEvw J.J wDAVIDD.HARRIS ,   DJ    XXD AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty  B No.98A814@..@..SethNorman, Judge  )  3XJXXX@@*AV4) ` dE<D` A    #XXX3XJf#No.M200200382CCAR3CD3XJXXXԀFiledAugust26,_2003_ u  AV4) ` dE<` A \   #XXX3XJ*#    TheDefendant,DavidD.Harris,pledguiltytosevencountsofaggravatedrobbery,aClassB *z  felony,intheDavidsonCountyCriminalCourtonJune16,1999.Thetrialcourtsentencedthe ` Defendanttothreeeightyearsentences,tobeservedconsecutively.Thetrialcourtsuspended F thesentencesandorderedtheDefendanttoservethreeconsecutiveeightyeartermson , supervisedprobation.TheStateappealed,andthisCourtreversedtheportionofthesentence  thatorderedtheDefendanttoservetwentyfouryearsofprobationonthethreeconsecutive  eightyearsentences,holdingthataprobationarysentenceforaggravatedrobberyiscontraryto  TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035303(a).Accordingly,wereversedthetrialcourts t judgmentandremandedthecaseforresentencing.Uponresentencing,thetrialcourtsentenced Z theDefendanttothreeeightyearprisontermsandorderedthatthesentencesrunconsecutiveto @ eachotherandconsecutivetoasentencethattheDefendantiscurrentlyservinginWilliamson &v County.TheDefendantappealedthetrialcourtsresentencingorderandraisesthefollowing  \ issues:(1)whetherthetrialcourterroneouslydeniedhisrequestforanewsentencinghearing B and;(2)whetherthetrialcourterroneouslydeniedtheDefendantsrequest,pursuantto ( TennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure35,forareducedsentence.Afterathroughexamination  oftherecord,weconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnoterrwhenitdeniedtheDefendantsrequest  foranewsentencinghearing;however,becauseweconcludethatthetrialcourterroneously   believedthatitwaswithouttheauthoritytoimposeconcurrentsentences,wereverseandremand p! forittodeterminewhetherthethreesentencesshouldrunconsecutivelyorconcurrently. V"    <% XX XX <%Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtReversedand 7$" Remanded#<% XX# 2% #     XX <%RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Wellesand ('x"% ThomasT._Woodall_,JJ.,joined. '@#& ($($_Jefre_ԀS._Goldtrap_,NashvilleTennessee(onappeal)andLionelBarrett,Nashville,Tennessee(at )%( trial)fortheAppellant,DavidD.Harris. *%) PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;MichaelMoore,SolicitorGeneral;Christine k,'+ M._Lapps_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;VictorS.Johnson,III,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;Charles V-(, _R.CarpenterandJonSeaborg,AssistantDistrictAttorneysGeneral,fortheAppellee,Stateof  Tennessee.    7bOPINION q I.FactualBackground  \     InOctoberandNovemberof1997,theDefendant,DavidD.Harris,committedseveral ( x robberiesatvariouscommercialestablishmentsinWilliamsonCountyandtheNashville  ^ metropolitanarea.TheDefendantpledguiltytosevencountsofaggravatedrobberyinDavidson  D Countywiththetrialcourttosentencehimfollowingasentencinghearing.Priortohis  *  sentencinghearinginDavidsonCounty,theDefendantwasservingtwoconsecutivetenyear    sentencesforsimilarconvictionsinWilliamsonCounty.     AttheDefendantsDavidsonCountysentencinghearing,thetrialcourtdeterminedthat r  noenhancementormitigatingfactorsappliedandthattheappropriatesentencewaswithinthe X  eighttotwelveyearstatutorysentencingrangepursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection >  3913402.ThetrialjudgesentencedtheDefendanttoeightyearsforeachofthesevencounts $t ofaggravatedrobbery.Onfourofthesevencounts,thetrialcourtorderedthattheDefendants  Z sentencesbeservedinprisonandrunconcurrentlywitheachotherandconcurrentlywiththe @ twentyyearsentenceinWilliamsonCounty.Thetrialcourtthenorderedthattheremaining & threecountsbeservedconsecutively,findingthattheDefendantwasanoffenderwhoserecord   ofcriminalactivitywasextensive.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(2).Thereafter,the  trialcourtsuspendedthethreeconsecutiveeightyearsentencesandorderedtheDefendantto  servethreeconsecutiveeightyeartermsonsupervisedprobation.Insodoing,thetrialcourt n stated: ImnotaddinganytimetoMr.Harrispresent[twentyyear]sentence. T   TheStateappealed,andthisCourtreversedtheportionofthetrialcourtsjudgmentthat  p orderedtheDefendanttoservetwentyfouryearsofprobationonthethreeconsecutiveeight V yearterms.Statev.DavidD.Harris,No.M199902469CCAR3CD,2001Tenn.Crim.App. < LEXIS758,at*2(Tenn.Crim.App.Sept.19,2001).Weheldthataprobationarysentencefor " aggravatedrobberyiscontrarytoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035303(a).Id.  Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtwasreversedandremandedforresentencing.     Onremand,thetrialcourtdeniedtheDefendantsrequestforanewsentencinghearing j"! and,thereafter,enteredanamendedjudgmentthatorderedtheDefendanttoservethree P#" consecutiveeightyearprisontermsforthepreviouslysuspendedsentences,resultinginan 6$# effectivetwentyfouryearprisonterm.Thetrialcourtalsoorderedthatthesentencesrun %l $ consecutivelytotheDefendantsWilliamsonCountysentence.TheDefendantfiledatimely &R!% applicationforareducedsentencepursuanttoTennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure35(b), &8"& whichthetrialcourtdenied. '#'   Inthissecondappeal,theDefendantcontendsthatthetrialcourterredwhenitdeniedhis )$) requestforanewsentencinghearing.Further,theDefendantcontendsthatthetrialcourt *%* erroneouslydeniedtheDefendantsrequestforareducedsentence. f+&+ Ї  II.Analysis     (03* ""   ,B.4 <DL!XB  X,E(4 4 <DL!4X!E#2  A  .3  @..  ݀MotionforaNewSentencingHearing #$݌  Ќ  X! X44X!!       TheDefendantcontendsthatthetrialcourterredwhenitdeniedhimanewsentencing b hearinguponremand.AttheDefendantsinitialsentencinghearing,thetrialjudgeconducteda H lengthyinquiry,hearingtestimonyfromtheDefendantandanumberofcharacterwitnesses. . ~ ThetrialcourtalsoheardargumentsfrombothpartiespriortosentencingtheDefendant.We  d findnoreasonthatthetrialcourtshouldhaveconductedasecondsentencinghearingupon  J remand.Furthermore,wenotethatwhenweremandedthiscasetothetrialcourt,wedidnot  0 orderthetrialcourttoconductanewsentencinghearing,butrather,merelyremandedfor     proceedingsconsistentwith[our]opinion.DavidD.Harris,2001Tenn.Crim.App.LEXIS    758,at*2.Therefore,weconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnotabuseitsdiscretionbydenyingthe   Defendantsrequestforanewsentencinghearinguponremand. x    B.DenialofMotionforReductionofSentence  D      TheDefendantalsoallegesthatthetrialcourterredwhenitdeniedhisMotionFora ` ReducedSentence,whichhefiledpursuanttoRule35(b)oftheTennesseeRulesofCriminal F Procedurestates.Rule35(b)states: , 'S4XLX'8 S Thetrialcourtmayreduceasentenceuponapplicationfiledwithin120days  afterthedatethesentenceisimposedorprobationisrevoked.Noextensions  shallbeallowedonthetimelimitation.Nootheractionsshalltolltherunning t ofthistimelimitation.Amotionforreductionofsentenceunderthisrulemay Z bedeniedbythetrialjudgewithoutahearing.Iftheapplicationisdenied,the @ defendantmayappealbutthedefendantshallnotbeentitledtoreleaseonbond &v unlessthedefendantisalreadyunderbond.Ifthesentenceismodified,the  \ statemayappealasotherwiseprovidedbylaw.Amodificationcanonlybeas B toanysentencethecourtcouldhaveoriginallyimposed.(S S   ,H+ 4 <DL!S4XLH   ,ThepurposeofRule35istoauthorizeatrialjudge toreconsiderapreviouslyimposedsentence  andreduceitifsuchareductionisintheinterestofjustice.Statev.Irick,861S.W.2d375,376   (Tenn.Crim.App.1993);seealsoStatev.Hodges,815S.W.2d151,154(Tenn.1991).We p!  reviewthetrialcourtsdispositionofamotiontomodifyorreduceasentencepursuanttoan V"! abuseofdiscretionstandard.Irick,861S.W.2dat376. <#"   Inthecaseundersubmission,thetrialcourtdidnotabuseitsdiscretionindenyingthe %X $ DefendantsMotionforReducedSentenceifitdeterminedthatthemotionwasbaseduponthe %>!% lengthofeachsentenceimposedforhisaggravatedrobberyconvictions.TheDefendantpled &$"& guiltytoaggravatedrobbery,whichisaClassBfelony.Tenn.CodeAnn.3913402.Asa ' #' rangeonestandardoffender,thestatutoryrangeofpunishmentiseighttotwelveyears.The (#( presumptivesentencetobeimposedbythetrialcourtforaClassBfelonyistheminimum )$) withintheapplicablerangeunlessthereareenhancingormitigatingfactorspresent.Tenn.Code l*%* Ann.4035210(c).Thetrialcourtdetermined,afterhearingevidencepresentedatthe R+&+ Defendantssentencinghearing,thattherewerenoapplicableenhancingormitigatingfactors. 8,', Therecordindicatesthatthetrialcourtadequatelyconsideredtheenhancementandmitigating  factorsaswellastheunderlyingfactsand,therefore,itsfindingsregardingthismannerare  entitledtoapresumptionofcorrectness.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).TheDefendantdoes | notpresent,andwedonotsee,anyreasontodisturbthetrialcourtsfindingsregardingthelack b ofenhancementormitigationfactorsonappeal.Hence,thetrialjudgedidnoterrwhenit H sentencedtheDefendanttotheminimumsentencewithintheapplicablerangeforeachofthe . ~ threecountsofaggravatedrobbery.  d   TheDefendantassertsthatthetrialcourterredindenyinghisMotionforReduced  0 Sentencebaseduponthetrialcourtsimpositionofconsecutivesentences.Itiswithinthesound    discretionofthetrialcourttodeterminewhetheranoffendershouldbesentencedconsecutively    orconcurrently.Statev.James,688S.W.2d463,465(Tenn.Crim.App.1984).Acourtmay   ordermultiplesentencestorunconsecutivelyifitfindsbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethat x  anyoneofthefollowingfactorsapplies: ^  8  (1)Thedefendantisaprofessionalcriminalwhohasknowinglydevotedsuch *z  defendantslifetocriminalactsasamajorsourceoflivelihood;`   8  (2)Thedefendantisanoffenderwhoserecordofcriminalactivityisextensive;F   8  (3)Thedefendantisadangerousmentallyabnormalpersonsodeclaredbya , competentpsychiatristwhoconcludesasaresultofaninvestigationpriorto  sentencingthatthedefendantscriminalconducthasbeencharacterizedbya  patternofrepetitiveorcompulsivebehaviorwithheedlessindifferenceto  consequences;t   8  (4)Thedefendantisadangerousoffenderwhosebehaviorindicateslittleorno Z regardforhumanlife,andnohesitationaboutcommittingacrimeinwhichthe @ risktohumanlifeishigh;&v   8  (5)Thedefendantisconvictedoftwo(2)ormorestatutoryoffensesinvolving  \ sexualabuseofaminorwithconsiderationoftheaggravatingcircumstances B arisingfromtherelationshipbetweenthedefendantandvictimorvictims,the ( timespanofthedefendantsundetectedsexualactivity;thenatureandscopeof  thesexualactsandtheextentoftheresidual,physicalandmentaldamagetothe  victimorvictims;    8  (6)Thedefendantissentencedforanoffensecommittedwhileonprobation;orp!    8  (7)Thedefendantissentencedforcriminalcontempt.V"!   B+4 44 <DL!X!BTenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(1)(7).Ifthetrialcourtfindsthatoneofthesefactorsexist,it "$r# may,butisnotrequiredto,imposeaconsecutivesentence.TheSentencingCommission %X $ CommentstoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035115notethat: %>!% 8  ThisstatuteisessentiallyacodificationoftwoTennesseesupremecourtcases ' #' dealingwithconcurrentandconsecutivesentencing:Grayv.State,538S.W.2d (#( 391(Tenn.1976)andStatev.Taylor,739S.W.2d227(Tenn.1987).InTaylor, )$) thecourtheldthatconsecutivesentencesshouldnotroutinelybeimposedin l*%* criminalcasesandtheaggregatemaximumofconsecutivetermsmustbe R+&+ reasonablelyrelatedtotheseverityoftheoffensesinvolved.Whilethissection 8,', permitsconsecutivesentencing,thetrialjudgehasotheravailableoptions....  However,whereappropriate,consecutivesentencesareauthorizedinthe  discretionofthecourtifthecourtfindsoneormoreofthecriteriaassetforthin | subsection(b)....b   Statev.Wilkerson,905S.W.2d933,936(Tenn.1995)(quotingTenn.Code.Ann.4035115 . ~ SentencingCommissionComments(1990))(emphasisadded).  d E+ 4 <DL!444X!E  ItisapparenttousfromtherecordthatthetrialcourtfeltboundtoordertheDefendants  0 sentencestorunconsecutively.Atthecloseofthesentencinghearing,thetrialcourtfoundthat    theDefendanthadanextensiverecordofcriminalactivitypursuanttoTennesseeCode    Annotatedsection4035115(b)(2).Therecordsupportsthisfindingbythetrialcourt,butthe   trialcourtisnotboundbythisfindingtoorderthatthesentencesrunconsecutively.Thatisa x  decisionstillwithinitsdiscretion. ^    IndenyingtheMotionForaReducedSentence,thefollowingexchangeoccurred *z  betweenthetrialcourtanddefensecounselregardingthemotion: `  X X?(4 44 <DLX!?THECOURT:ItsnotthatIdontagreeandthatImtryingtopunishMr.Harris , further.IthoughtIshowedwhenIenteredmyoriginaljudgmentthatIhad  trustedMr.Harris.  [DEFENSECOUNSEL]:Yes,youdid.  THECOURT:AndIhavenotchangedmypositionthere.MydilemmaiswhatI t cando.Thatsmywholedilemmaandthatwasmydilemmalastweek.Ibelieve Z themanisentitledtocreditforwhathehasdone,butIdontthinkIhave @ authoritytodoit. &v [DEFENSECOUNSEL]:CouldtheCourthaveoriginallyimposedasentence  \ thatwouldhavebeenconcurrent,allconcurrentwiththe20oranycombinationof B ! ( THECOURT:IfyoulookatthefactorsthatIenhancedon,thestatutesaysifI  findthose,Imtorunthemconsecutive.Thatswhatthestatutesays.     [DEFENSECOUNSEL]:Andyouchosetorunthreeofthoseconsecutive.    THECOURT:AndthatswhatImrequiredtodoundertheenhancementand p!  multiplesentencesection.SoIminarealdilemma.AndIdontmindtelling V"! youthat. <#"  XE+4 44 <DL!444XE XFurthermore,thetrialcourtindicatedthat,giventhechoice,hewouldnothavesentencedthe %X $ DefendanttoincarcerationinadditiontohisexistingWilliamsonCountysentence,statingB(4 44 <DL444X!B: I %>!% personallythinkthatMr.Harrisisentitledtosomereward,IguessImgoingtosayfortheway &$"& hehasconductedhimselfsincehegotinallthistrouble.ButIstillhaveaproblemwithwhatI ' #' amabletodo.JustlikeItoldyoulastweek. (#( E+4 44 <DL!444XEE+ 4 <DL!444X!E  Asstatedearlier,itiswithinthesounddiscretionofthetrialcourtwhethertosentencea l*%* defendanttoconsecutiveorconcurrentprisonterms.James,688S.W.2dat465.Becausethe R+&+ trialcourt,uponremand,clearlyfeltboundtosentencetheDefendanttothreeeightyear 8,', 7b 783J3XXd3XXd8 7  consecutiveprisonsentences,andbecausewehaveclarifiedourpreviousholding,weremand  thiscasetothetrialcourt.Thecourtmay,onthisremand,sentencetheDefendanttothree  concurrenteightyearterms,threeconsecutiveeightyearterms,oracombinationofconcurrent | andconsecutivesentences,andthosesentencesmay,inthetrialcourtsdiscretion,run b concurrentlyorconsecutivelywiththeDefendantsWilliamsonCountysentence. H    III.Conclusion   d     WeconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnoterrindenyingtheDefendantsrequestforanew  0 sentencinghearingafterthiscasewasremandedforresentencingbythisCourt.However,    becauseweconcludethatthetrialcourtsentencedthedefendanttothreeconsecutivesentences    underthemistakenbeliefthatconsecutivesentencesweremandatedbylaw,weREVERSEand   REMANDthiscaseforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwiththisopinion. x    _______________________________XX_ ` X PX_XXXX PROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGEXX_ F