WPC  4zmAwAzJ6RÅQH]DPU 'v/B]cބ^?ю7FcڏHaK_|C1ߎrN00mkY3wųNDْ'ge=3t* NR۵bW0miֽ tArǣLu`v\=f4zUɫj]ZoL.|:jFWc˽#:yNCl NAh2 м;';0<*AwWZ 2~b8un!S5xBz(s+#͓% :.M{v_ 0z 9Wd2hϚb.ݾTCW{+.FK]'JUsœ&+ Petitionersindictmentisinsufficient,resultinginavoidconviction.OnFebruary19,2004,thetrial +'', courtissuedanorderdismissingthePetitionersapplicationforhabeascorpusrelief.ThePetitioner ,(- filedhisnoticeofappealinthetrialcourtonMarch15,2004. -(. Ї  Thegroundsuponwhichawritofhabeascorpusmaybeissuedareverynarrow.McLaney  v.Bell,59S.W.3d90,92(Tenn.2001).Awritofhabeascorpusisavailableonlywhenitappears  fromthefaceofthejudgmentorrecordthateithertheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionto  convictorsentencethepetitioner,orthepetitionerssentencehasexpired.Archerv.State,851 k S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993);Pottsv.State,833S.W.2d60,62(Tenn.1992).Inotherwords, T habeascorpusreliefmayonlybesoughtwhenthejudgmentisvoid,notmerelyvoidable.Taylorv. =  State,995S.W.2d78,83(Tenn.1999). & v   ThePetitionerallegesthatthetrialcourtlackedjurisdictiontoconvicthimbecauseofa  H defectiveindictment.Specifically,thePetitionerclaimstheindictmentisdefectivebecauseitfails  1  tosufficientlychargeanoffense.Ifproven,adefectiveindictmentisanappropriateissuetobe    broughtinahabeascorpuspetition.SeeWyattv.State,24S.W.3d319(Tenn.2000).     TheTennesseeSupremeCourthasheldthat,forconstitutionalpurposes, anindictmentis   validifitprovidessufficientinformation(1)toenabletheaccusedtoknowtheaccusationtowhich n  answerisrequired,(2)tofurnishthecourtadequatebasisfortheentryofaproperjudgment,and(3) W  toprotecttheaccusedfromdoublejeopardy.Statev.Hill,954S.W.2d725,727(Tenn.1997). @ Further,theindictmentmustmeetthestatutoryrequirementsofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection )y 4013102,whichprovides: b 8  Theindictmentmuststatethefactsconstitutingtheoffenseinordinaryandconcise 4 language,withoutprolixityorrepetition,insuchamannerastoenableapersonof  commonunderstandingtoknowwhatisintended,andwiththatdegreeofcertainty,  whichwillenablethecourt,onconviction,topronouncetheproperjudgment;andin  nocasearesuchwordsasforceandarmsorcontrarytotheformofthestatute  necessary.q!!   Intheinstantcase,theindictmentaboutwhichthePetitionercomplainsisattachedtothe C appellaterecord.Afterathoroughreviewoftheindictmentinthiscase,wefindthatitmeetsboth ,| theconstitutionalandstatutoryrequirements.EachcountnamesthePetitionerastheaccused,the e dateoftheoffense,theactusreusandmensreaofeachoffense,andeachcountreferencesthestatutes N thatdefinethechargedoffenses.EachcountstatestheaccusationtowhichthePetitionerwas  7 requiredtoansweranddoesthisinordinarylanguagesothatapersonofcommonunderstanding !   knowswhatisintended.TheTennesseeSupremeCourthasheldthatanindictmentmayrefertothe " ! statutethatdefinestheoffenseandthatindictmentissufficientandsatisfiesallconstitutionaland #" statutoryrequirements.SeeStatev.Sledge,15S.W.3d93,95(2000);seealsoRuffv.State,978 $# S.W.2d95,100(Tenn.1998). t% $   ThePetitionerhasfailedtoestablishbyapreponderanceoftheevidencethathisconviction F'"& isvoidorhistermofimprisonmenthasexpired.Accordingly,theStatesmotionisgranted.The /(#' judgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedinaccordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminal )h$( Appeals. *Q%)    `     h     ___________________________________ +#'+    `     h     ROBERTW.WEDEMEYER,JUDGE