WPC;1 y>kkJӎO =RwK3sH#RFQ_*'-zeyNЦc٬cg,.0 ͭlDEJibX}ҜC[h;Ov/C/Qey8 L%fj.nz!h+jsS>z&돭g=qer]\@{K%ݜELi|ҾF2Le5‹FNnػ1ZfPN2f-:{7r=sc6tNcadl,+\f|C`Sz`SDmn^e8.?Rw{3WaҔœf L^YGHǬ|Hd987آ,4rG!A;;n~h;dŦxB Ӆ;y&JU> J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0i 0T 0? 0* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0| 0f 0P! 0:" 0<" 0"# 0 L#K$ 0_%_% 0&& 0&~' 0D( 0( 0() D+) AQ*bR*R* 0Z*Z*+ 0+#+U N. %.M.(.N/^ /w/4/(/ m*/*/*/*/*/*/*/A/EU0UN0U>0&1\  `&Times New Roman'  AOCUSER0AOCUSER .   2P+P 0_level1  , 8.` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level2  X 8.` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level3   8.4` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level4   8.` ` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level5   8. ` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level6   8. ` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level7  4 8. ` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level8  ` 8.` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2P+P 0_level9   8.<` hp x (#823  ..  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl1  , 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl2  X 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl3   8.4` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl4   8.` ` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl5   8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl6   8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl7  4 8. ` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl8  ` 8.` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levsl9   8.<` hp x (#823  Ԁ  8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl1  , 8.` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl2  X 8.` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl3   8.4` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl4   8.` ` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl5   8. ` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl6   8. ` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl7  4 8. ` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl8  ` 8.` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  2PP 0_levnl9   8.<` hp x (#823   8.` hp x (#8  64 '4Heading 1XXX       XXX<:Default Para8X[ 6Block Text X X   5+ ` hp x 5     8.` hp x (#86  4Body Text      #L(..      5XFXX5XXFXX5XF  _\@R3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta\&(2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  (2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  (2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  ݃ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  (2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  ($'dxd()*+,C<< c- -(2L$ 3y!..      5X.XX5XX.XX5X.  #|x(ry$..      5X6XX5XX6XX5X6HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular5XP1 h_B0PagesU  #L(..      GX6XX5XHX6XX5X6  _\@R3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta\E ;#55Xd# .  0 (9 Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman  < 3y!..      5XFXX5XXFXX5XF  _      "  0p x (#X0SXXF  F &IQhhʰSINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE    Qgg$ATNASHVILLESʰԈ    H.` hp x (#X(#HOctober12,2004Session > XFXSSXXF STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CHANCECOY_HERRON_XFXS  0  DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforPutnamCounty  " No.020390_Lillie_ԀAnnSells,Judge   ____________________________    {{No.M200400553CCAR3CDFiledDecember1,2004 b  _____________________________ H   !    !   Thedefendantappeals,onacertifiedquestionoflaw,thetrialcourtsfailuretosuppress d  evidenceresultingfromhis_warrantless_Ԁarrestandsearchofhishome.Becausethedefendant J hasfailedtoproperlyreserveacertifiedquestionoflawforappeal,wedismiss.! G݌ 0 Ќ   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;AppealDismissed     JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Wellesand x JerryL.Smith,JJ.,joined. ^ JohnWayneAllen,_Cookeville_,Tennessee,fortheappellant,ChanceCoy_Herron_. *z PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;RichardH._Dunavant_,AssistantAttorney F General;WilliamEdwardGibson,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andAnthonyJ._Craighead_, , AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee.    OPINION t  FactsandProceduralHistory @"!       Thedefendant,ChanceCoy_Herron_,pledguiltytoleavingthesceneofanaccident,  $\# possessionofmarijuana,andpossessionofdrugparaphernalia.PursuanttoTennesseeRuleof $B $ CriminalProcedure37(b)(2)(1),hereservedtherighttoappealacertifiedquestionoflaw %(!% relatingtohis_warrantless_Ԁarrestandthesubsequentseizureofevidencefromhishome.Inthis &"& appeal,thedefendantassertsthatthetrialcourterredinrefusingtosuppresstheevidence '"' obtainedagainsthimasaresultoftheunlawfularrestandsearch.Specifically,thedefendant (#( contendsthattheofficerunlawfullysearchedthe_curtilage_Ԁofhishomewithoutfirstobtaininga p)$) searchwarrant;thatthedefendantsconsenttoa_warrantless_Ԁsearchwasnotgivenfreelyand V*%* voluntarily;andthattheofficerhadnoauthoritytomakea_warrantless_Ԁarrestforamisdemeanor <+&+ offense,therefore,thesearchincidenttoarrestwasalsoillegal. ",r',   -X(- F & F85F5XXdd8. 0 F  _  OntheeveningofMarch21,2003,anautomobileranofftheroadattheintersectionof   WaterPlantRoadandBaxterRoadinPutnamCounty.Thevehiclehitafencepost,andthe | driverfledthesceneoftheaccident.Aneyewitnessobservedtheincidentanddirectedan b officertothehomeofthedefendant.Uponarrival,theofficerobservedavehiclewithapparent H damagetothefrontendandproceededtoapproachthehouse.Whentheofficeradvisedthe .  defendantthathewasinvestigatinganaccident,thedefendantadmittedthatthevehiclewashis  ~ andthathehadwreckeditearlierintheevening.Theofficerthenaskedthedefendantifhe  d couldsearchthevehicle,andthedefendantconsented.  J  XAsaresultofthesearch,theofficerfoundthedamagetothedefendantsvehicletobe    consistentwiththatofhittingafencepost.Moreover,thesearchyieldedtwohypodermic   needlesandapartiallysmokedmarijuanacigarette.Whenquestionedabouttheneedles,the x  defendantinitiallystatedhewasdiabetic,butlateradmittedthathewasnot.Atthatpoint,the ^  defendantwasplacedunderarrest. D   *   X  OnJanuary29,2004,thedefendantpledguiltytothethreecharges.Onthesameday, z  thetrialcourtenteredanordernotingtheguiltypleasandsettingforththedefendantscertified ` questionoflaw.This OrderReserv[ingthe]RighttoAppealexplicitlystatedthatthe F defendantwasreserving,withtheconsentofthecourtandtheState,therighttoappeala , certifiedquestionoflawwhichwasdispositiveofthecase.Specifically,itstated:  !    X XB+ ` hp x X(#B!  Saidquestionoflawiswhetheranofficercanperformavalidwarrantlessarrest  ofanindividualathishomewithoutexigeint[sic]circumstancesandwhetherthis t violatesthefourthamendmentoftheUnitedStatesConstitutionandArticle1, Z Section7oftheTennesseeConstitution.Defendantwasarrestedbydeputy @ sheriffDavidGibbonsonMarch21,2003.OfficerGibbonshadneitherasearch & warrantoranarrestwarrant.Defendantallegesthattheevidenceseizedathis  v home,specificallydrugsandtwohypodermicneedles,such[sic]besuppressed.! ݌ \ Ќ   !    XB+ ` hp x X B!  !݌̌   !    X X!  OnApril8,2004,judgmentswereenteredagainstthedefendant.Thejudgmentforms ( neithermadementionofthecertifiedquestionoflawnormadereferencetotheearlierorder,  whichdidsetforththeissues.!݌   Ќ   X X X  XFXXXF     &    Analysis  Ԍ V"  Ќ  XFXXXF  'V"    TennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure37(b)providesthatanappealliesfromany "$" judgmentofconviction, %r#  X(2)[U]ponapleaofguiltyornolocontendereif: %X $  X E.` ` hp x (#X E(i)0 thedefendantenteredintoapleaagreementunderRule11(e)but &>!% explicitlyreservedwiththeconsentofthestateandofthecourttheright '$"& toappealacertifiedquestionoflawthatisdispositiveofthecase;or( #' (# (# ... )#( (iv)0 thedefendantexplicitlyreservedwiththeconsentofthecourttherightto l*$) appealacertifiedquestionoflawthatisdispositiveofthecase.R+%* (# (#  X E.` hp x (#` X(#E 8,&+0  Instructiveontheissueofappellatereviewofcertifiedquestionsoflawisoursupreme  courtsopinioninStatev.Preston,759S.W.2d647(Tenn.1988).Ingivingguidancetothe  benchandbar,thecourtenunciatedprerequisitestoanappellatecourtsconsiderationofa | certifiedquestionoflawonitsmerits.Specifically,thecourtopined: b   X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  X %  Regardlessofwhathasappearedinpriorpetitions,orders,colloquyinopencourt H orotherwise,thefinalorderorjudgmentfromwhichthetimebeginstorunto . ~ pursueaT.R.A.P.3appealmustcontainastatementofthedispositivecertified  d questionoflawreservedbydefendantforappellatereviewandthequestionof  J lawmustbestatedsoastoclearlyidentifythescopeandthelimitsofthelegal  0 issuereserved....Also,theordermuststatethatthecertifiedquestionwas    expresslyreservedaspartofapleaagreement,thattheStateandthetrialjudge    consentedtothereservationandthattheStateandthetrialjudgeareofthe   opinionthatthequestionisdispositiveofthecase.Ofcourse,theburdenison x  thedefendanttoseethattheseprerequisitesareinthefinalorderandthatthe ^  recordbroughttotheappellatecourtscontainsalloftheproceedingsbelowthat D  bearuponwhetherthecertifiedquestionoflawisdispositiveandthemeritsofthe *z  questioncertified. %&݌ ` Ќ X X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  XB+ ` hp x X B +  Id.at650. +k,݌ F Ќ  X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  XB+ ` hp x X B  -    --݌̌  X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  X XB+ ` hp x X B X .  ThisCourtfurtherclarifiedthelanguage finalorderorjudgmentinStatev.LillieFran  Ferguson,whenitheldthat thejudgmentdocumententeredpursuanttothemandateof  SupremeCourtRule17isclearlythefinalorderofjudgmentfromwhichthetimebeginstorun  topursueaT.R.A.P.3appealasreferencedbyPreston.Statev.LillieFranFerguson,No. t W200001687CCAR3CD,2001Tenn.Crim.App.LEXIS314,at*8(Tenn.Crim.App.,at Z Jackson,April27,2001)(citingPreston,759S.W.2dat650).Therefore,thisCourtexplicitly @ identifiedtheuniformjudgmentformasthepertinentdocumentfordeterminingifthequestion &v presentedhasbeenproperlycertified. .v/݌  \ Ќ    $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B   y3   y33݌ B Ќ X X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  X XB+ ` hp x X B 4  Generally,becausetherequirementslistedinPrestonaremandatory,thedefendants ( failuretocomplyresultsinarequisitedismissaloftheappeal.SeeStatev.Pendergrass,937  S.W.2d834,838(Tenn.1996);Statev.Caldwell,924S.W.2d117,119(Tenn.Crim.App.  1995).However,ifthejudgmentfailstosatisfythemandatesofPreston,butdoesincorporate   byreferenceaseparatedocumentwhichwouldsatisfythoserequirements,thenthecertification p!  ofissueswillbesufficientforappellatereview.SeeStatev.Irwin,962S.W.2d477,479(Tenn. V"! 1998);Pendergrass,937S.W.2dat837.Moreover,inStatev.Armstrong,126S.W.3d908 <#" (Tenn.2003),oursupremecourtgrantedfurtherleniencytothisgenerallystrictrule.Inthat "$r# case,thecourtheldthata [c]orrectivenuncprotuncorderenteredafterthefinaljudgment %X $ whilethetrialcourthadjurisdiction[tocorrectdeficienciesintherecord]andbeforethefilingof %>!% anoticeofappealmettherequirementsofPrestonandproperlyreservedthedefendants &$"& certifiedquestionoflaw.Id.at91213. 45݌ ' #' Ќ    $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B   ;   ;<݌ (#( Ќ X X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  X XB+ ` hp x X B <  Inthepresentcase,thefinaljudgmentsdonotcontainastatementofanydispositive )$) questionoflaw,anexpressreservationofacertifiedquestion,orastatementthattheStateand l*%* trialcourtagreethatthequestionisdispositive;thus,thejudgmentsmeetnoneofthe R+&+ requirementsofPreston.Further,althoughtherecorddoescontainadocumententitled Order 8,', I I < I  Reserv[ing]RighttoAppeal,whichappearstosatisfyPreston,thatorderisnotmentionedin  anyofthejudgments.Finally,therewasnocorrectiveorderfiledsubsequentlythatwould  remedytheomissioninthejudgmentform.Therefore,becausethejudgmentneitherexplicitly | norimplicitlyfulfillstheaforementionedrequirements,appellatereviewofthequestion b presentedisprecluded. <=݌ H Ќ    $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B   /B   /BB݌ . ~ Ќ X X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B  X   WC  Conclusion WCC݌  d Ќ X X  $ X(#X $    X X  B+ ` hp x X(#B   D   D,E݌̌ X X  $ X(#X $  XB+ ` hp x X(#BBasedontheforegoing,andtherecordasawhole,theappellanthasfailedtoproperly  0 reserveacertifiedquestionoflawforappealinaccordancewiththerequirementsofTennessee    RuleofCriminalProcedure37,andthisappealisherebydismissed.     X       `     h     ___________________________________ `    `     h     JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE F T