WPC = RJU=Du$oa?K4fBp8ަu( RY5_E˲e DE䂰t|Itj9w0 I`Dm|$t%ˊnFV䗒 òr/DWi5:Z`JMfi{tR^a3{R5Vi[2K'>ل;Lr0\bEȋm7 ^K,I]]Tv0X]b@mY*?jynнXwrɇwZjbUN\ % 0^ 8wD4H\ zk m # UN   k 1 0DN;==E                        b 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K"" ASm 0 0D* An(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    Jk>-s Yo)̍3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0    R$      1    _Theviolationsincluded:(1)numerousviolationsofhousearrest;(2)failuretomaintainpermanent  employment;(3)failuretopaycourtcosts;(4)testingpositivefordrugs;(5)failuretoreport;(6)failuretoattend t communityservicework;and(7)failuretopaysupervisionfees.- -(|G2$ !.8%dd8         0   d(|3n$ !.8%dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3n$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8%dd8     _   %8rXXdd8  @tt(%INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#%(#Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsSeptember10,2002 L XrX% #%XXr-#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CORNELIUSDEVONHICKSXrX%  J @@ AppealfromtheHumboldtLawCourtforGibsonCounty  J @@No.H6873_Clayburn_Ԁ_Peeples_,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200200334CCAR3CD_Ԅ_ԀFiledSeptember27,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }      XrXXXrTheAppellant,CorneliusDevonHicks,appealsthesentencingdecisionoftheHumboldtLawCourt x  enlarginghiscommunitycorrectionssentencefollowingrevocation.Hicksarguesonappealthatit d waserrortoincreasehissentencefromeighttotenyears,whennoproofwasintroducedatthe P revocationhearingsupportinganincreasedsentenceandthetrialcourtmadenofindingstojustify < thetenyearsentence.Afterreview,weagree.Accordingly,thetrialcourtsresentencingorderis (x reversed,andthiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforanewsentencinghearing.#XrXX Xr=##%XXr#XrX% d 1 Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheHumboldtLawCourtReversed;RemandedforNew < SentencingHearing.  (   #%XrK#XrX.%DavidG.Hayes,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_andJoeG.  Riley,JJ.,joined.  _Periann_ԀS.Houghton,AssistantPublicDefender,Trenton,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,Cornelius t DevonHicks. ` PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;MichaelMoore,SolicitorGeneral;P.Robin 8!  Dixon,Jr.,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;andGarryBrown,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,forthe $"t! Appellee,StateofTennessee. #`" #%XXrW #XrX%( @@OO& OPINION #%XXr* #XrX% %$!%  FactualBackground  '"' #%XXr #  XrX% XrXXXr  OnNovember11,2000,theAppellantpledguiltyintheHumboldtLawCourtofGibson )$) CountytoonecountofclassBfelonysaleofcocaine.Underthetermsofthepleaagreement,the p*%* Appellantreceivedaneightyearcommunitycorrectionssentence,withthefirstsixmonthsofthe \+&+ sentencetobeservedintheGibsonCountyJail. H,',  4-(-   OnMay15,2001,a_capias_wasissuedfortheAppellantbasedonhisallegedviolationofthe  conditionsofhisbehavioralcontract.AtthehearingonDecember17,2002,thecommunity  correctionscaseofficertestifiedtonumerousviolationsoftheCommunityCorrectionsBehavioral  Contract. #  1      ׀TheAppellantfreelyadmittedthathehadcommittedtheviolations.Hebelieved, t however,thathedeservedasecondchancebecausehewasa changedman.TheAppellant ` explainedthattheviolationsoccurredbecausehewas stressedoutandhad familyproblems. L    Followingthehearing,thetrialcourtrevokedtheAppellantsplacementinthelocal $ t communitycorrectionsprogramandresentencedhimtoatermoftenyears,withserviceofthe  ` sentenceintheDepartmentofCorrection.  L  @& Analysis  $    TheAppellantacknowledgesthat,uponrevocationofhiscommunitycorrectionssentence,   thetrialcourthadtheauthoritytoresentencehim foranyperiodoftimeuptothemaximum   sentenceprovidedfortheoffensecommitted.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(e)(4).Moreover,as   arguedbytheAppellantonappeal,decisionsofthiscourthaveheldthat, [_W]hen_Ԁatrialcourtopts p toimposeasentencewhichexceedsthelengthoftheinitialsentencebasedonabreachoftheterms \ ofthesentence,thetrialcourtmustconductasentencinghearingpursuanttotheTennesseeCriminal H SentencingReformActof1989.Statev._Ervin_,939S.W.2d581,583(Tenn._Crim_.App.1996); 4 seealsoStatev.Cooper,977S.W.2d130,132(Tenn._Crim_.App.1998).Atrialcourtmuststate  p itsreasonsforimposingasentenceontherecord.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c),210(f),(g)  \ (1997andSupp.2001).Tenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c)providesinpartthattherecordofthe H sentencinghearing shallincludespecificfindingsoffactuponwhichapplicationofthesentencing 4 principleswasbased.Theprovisionsofthestatutedonotpermitthetrialcourttoarbitrarily   establishthelengthofthenewsentence.Statev.KeithF.Batts,No.01C019210CR00326   (Tenn._Crim_.App.atNashville,Feb.18,1993).Thestatuteshouldnotbeusedbytrialcourtsfor  thesoleandexclusivepurposeofpunishinganaccusedforviolatingtheprovisionsofacommunity  correctionssentence.Id.  ̀  Inconductingareviewofthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourt,thiscourtisguidedby X  certainwellestablishedprinciples.Ourreviewofthesentenceisdenovowithapresumptionof D! correctness.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thispresumptionisconditioneduponanaffirmative 0"  showingintherecordthatthetrialjudgeconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfacts #l! andcircumstances.Statev._Ashby_,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Ifthetrialcourtfailsto $X" complywiththestatutorydirective,thereisnopresumptionofcorrectnessandourreviewisdenovo. $D # Statev.Poole,945S.W.2d93,96(Tenn.1997).However,anappellatecourtcannotrevieweither %0!$ thelengthormethodofservingasentenceunlessthefindingsofthetrialcourtarecontainedinthe &"% record.Batts,No.01C019210CR00326. '#& Ї  Inthepresentcase,thetrialcourtfailedtoconductasentencinghearingpriortoenlarging  theAppellantssentencefromeighttotenyears.Attheconclusionoftherevocationhearing,the  trialjudgeenteredthefollowingpronouncementwithregardtoresentencing: [_I]n_Ԁviewofthe  numerousandsubstantialviolationswhichyouhaveadmittedto,thatyoursentenceshouldbe t increasedfromeightyearstotenyearsandIorderthatdone.Thetrialcourtfailedtoaddressany ` sentencingconsiderations,includingmitigatingorenhancingfactors,whichmighthavebeen L  applicable.SeeStatev._Mell_ԀThomas_Bruton_,No.M199900956CCAR3CD(Tenn._Crim_.App. 8  atNashville,Apr.7,2000)(forproperapplicationofenhancingfactors).Theabsenceofa $ t sentencinghearingobviouslyprecludesourstatutorilymandateddenovoreviewofthetenyear  ` sentence.Assuch,weremandtothetrialcourtforresentencing.  L  @FF% CONCLUSION $    Fortheabovestatedreasons,wereversethetrialcourtssentencingdecisionenlargingthe   Appellantssentencefromeighttotenyearsandremandthiscasetothetrialcourtforanew   sentencinghearinginaccordancewithstatutorysentencingprinciples.   #XrXX XrT #   `     h     ___________________________________  \    `     h     DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE