ÿWPC2 ËYVlèx,'¢/â¡ ³™®žXÒA‹ Gñ« ÿEÀš6Fr]žM”>.ÿÔz›F y#p€&ú½…ê虫®î»™>>a0G‘»ÿ]®”W.Ì2ÖsN¾7Tkn'4€°vþg¶{ årÿ¹0­©ýê'íì!®ö“ÀO×vÔzáí†f1ãI…gÇ|ºÕé°al¬îʾ™†•ëß'Ú8+P†ì@ƆYŠ4µ˜ n¿Mb‚{Ze ¾‘À7!ðÑË %Ù£í E–§(ÎeUJo涘šåÑkU É7•tœ†@ à¯gEûMuwv£b€[/óÜûœ[÷¤6ÿßCÿà̾­Šƒ†o>åÿóåé 6/äéÝ!ÛÛúeÕ›ÕÚwñM_Ÿ[ü$>¯`òààÐd/y˜©¹NÈ$?ÈFÊz#Æ“ãw¬Íz½»×Õ'9#„ºMæ÷¸>· Ó•ê«£¼’â¤ÜÞg™N)š_º\vóܯgG6•ß*V(fk‘£û…œȸòôš×,CÃã;˜¨á®›âÌå6&P¦¬dl"<(SÌP–òßåÑP—iÇŸj1I~<>5ê„n‘¬Äi¼ˆœ†lÉÂ>ãÝ4Q"¥8`Ž»…pF %¶ U.¼ ê nXú 0PR 4¢ ¶ 0”¾ 0DRw@–U:Ö<U:LʆèPU:8Érœ;è×U:¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ Bùùùùùù D3 0DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AOÆÜÜ 0D¢ D/æ B fÝ ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€ô[»ôX XÔAs€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€robbery€and€was€sentenced€to€incarcerationÐ `  Ðfor€a€previous€offense€and€there€was€no€finding€on€the€record€of€any€special€needs,€he€is€not€an€eligibleÏoffender€as€set€out€in€T.C.A.€ðð€40„36„106(a).€€In€addition,€if€the€defendant€was€sentenced€toÏincarceration€on€the€prior€robbery€conviction,€at€the€time€of€consideration€for€community€corrections€heÏwas€ineligible€for€the€program.€€T.C.A.€ðð€40„36„106(a). X%ä2¼A`ArialTT3|X«<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXxþ6X@ÉJQX@%ä2¼A`ArialTTt10cpiXXXä2¼P±ŠQXP((­À$¡¡ÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓuM%(D(3¾Á$¤¤Ý ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà œ àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó DDD ™ P  EÓ€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular 2Ý ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€ ôëÔôX XÔHill€was€on€post„trial€diversion€in€the€prior€robbery€case€and€this€conviction€for€aggravatedÐ `  Ðrobbery€resulted€in€this€diversion€being€terminated.,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ÀÝ ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€ ô[»ôX XÔWe€are€of€the€opinion€that€if€the€defendant€had€not€yet€started€serving€his€sentence,€the€judgeÐ `  Ðcould€amend€the€sentence€within€thirty€days€of€the€original€sentencing€as€long€as€the€parties€were€givenÏproper€notice.€€òòSeeóó€òòTinker€v.€Stateóó,€579€S.W.2d€905€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1979).€€If€the€defendant€hadÐ  ¤ Ðalready€begun€serving€his€sentence,€the€trial€judge€could€only€have€revoked€the€community€correctionsÏsentence€with€a€proper€revocation€hearing€and€proper€notice.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Worleyóó,€No.€03C01„9608„Ð €  ÐCR„00322,€Sullivan€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€August€29,€1997,€at€Knoxville).€€In€any€case,€theÏdefendant€is€required€to€be€present€at€every€stage€of€the€trial,€including€sentencing.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.Ï43(a).€€Although€the€record€is€not€entirely€clear,€it€appears€that€the€defendant€was€not€present€at€theÏresentencing€hearing€and€there€is€no€indication€in€the€record€that€the€defendant€waived€that€right.€€ThisÏalone€would€deprive€the€court€of€the€authority€to€resentence€the€defendant. ÞÔ€X”ÇXX XÔÔ€IMXX”ÇÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X”ÇXIMÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€30,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ¿Ý ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€ ô[»ôX XÔWe€note€that€this€indictment€was€later€nol„prossed. ’Ý ƒ ¾Á$ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  Óà œ àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€€Ô€ ô[»ôX XÔAs€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€aggravated€robbery€and€was€sentenced€to€incarcerationÐ `  Ðfor€a€previous€offense€and€there€was€no€finding€on€the€record€of€any€special€needs,€he€is€not€an€eligibleÏoffender€as€set€out€in€T.C.A.€ðð€40„36„106(a). ÞÔ€X”ÇXX XÔÔ€IMXX”ÇÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X”ÇXIMÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€19,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAMÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d$$$$'ÿÿdxd(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ­À!ÝÒD°ÒÒ¦°ÒÓ  ÓÝ  Ýññ›ññÑ` °ÑÑX°ÑÑ  ÑÑTR[  AØ'Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÔ€XiÈXX XÔÑ7€ ”Ç XXdædÈ7Ñññññßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@EÒf ` 8ttxP ` ð  rßññññññßr€*<,(j 8` `€€@EÒf ` 8ttxP ` ð  rßññññ›ññà œ àà ô àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌà@cc:;àAT€NASHVILLEˆÌÌà@¿¿7;àAUGUST€1998€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌó óÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ¤ àà ü àà T à)ó óÐ Ðp  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àò ò)ó óà ¬ àò òC.C.A.€NO.€01C01„9708„CC„00344ó óÐ À`  Ðà œ àà ô àAppellee,à ¤ àò ò€€€€€à ü àà T à)Ð °P  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àMONTGOMERY€€COUNTYó óÐ  @  ÐVS.à œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àò ò)Ð 0  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àHON.€JOHN€H.€GASAWAY€III,Ð €  ÐFRANK€WAYNE€HILL,à ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àJUDGEÐ p Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T à)Ìà œ àà ô àó óAppellant.ò òà ¤ àà ü àà T à)à ¬ àœó ó(ñ ñSentencing€›and€›Sufficiency€›of€›Ð ¦ Лà œ à›à ô à›à L à›à ¤ à›à ü à›à T à›à ¬ à›Evidenceñ ñññAggravated€Robberyññ)ò ò›Ð Pð Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANT:óóà ¤ àà ü àà T à€€€€€òòà ¬ àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:óóÐ ° Ðà œ àÌÌò òGREGORY€D.€SMITH€à ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àJOHN€KNOX€WALKUPÐ à€ Ðó óOne€Public€Square,€Suite€321à ü àà T àà ¬ àAttorney€General€&€Reporterò òÐ Ð p Ðó óClarksville,€TN€37040ò òà ¤ àÐ À!` Ðó óà œ à(On€Appeal)à L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àò òDARYL€J.€BRANDó óà ´ àÐ °"P Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àAsst.€Attorney€Generalò òÐ  #@ ÐSTACY€A.€TURNERó óà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ à425€Fifth€Ave.,€NorthÐ $0 Ð105€South€Third€St.à L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àNashville,€TN€€37243Ð €%  ÐClarksville,€TN€€37040à ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àà  àà \ àà ´ àÐ p& Ðà œ à(At€Trial)ò òà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àJOHN€W.€CARNEYó óÐ `'  Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àò òDANIEL€BROLLIERó óÐ 0*Ð # Ðà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ à204€Franklin€St.,€Suite€200Ìà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àClarksville,€TN€€37040ÌÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àà  àÌÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àÌà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àÌOPINION€FILED:òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ  2@), ÐÌÌÌò òCONVICTION€AFFIRMED;Ð `6-0 ÐREMANDED€FOR€RESENTENCINGó óÐ P7ð-1 ÐÌÌò òJOHN€H.€PEAY,ó óÐ  :À04 ÐJudgeÌÐ  < 26¿ ÐÑXÑÓ  Óà@‡‡:;àò òòòÔ‡¼7^¼XXiÈÔO€P€I€N€I€O€NÔ#†XiÈX¼¼7^ô#ԈР`  ÐÌÌó óóóÌÓÓà œ àà ô àThe€Montgomery€County€grand€jury€indicted€the€defendant€on€one€countÏof€aggravated€robbery.€€On€September€18,€1996,€a€jury€found€the€defendant€guilty€of€theÏcharged€offense.€€On€October€18,€1996,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant,€as€aÏRange€I€standard€offender,€to€a€term€of€eight€years,€to€be€served€in€the€communityÏcorrections€program.€€The€court€ordered€this€sentence€to€be€served€consecutively€to€aÏfour€year€sentence€of€incarceration€on€a€prior€robbery€conviction.׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð ¦F  ÐÌà œ àà ô àOn€November€18,€1996,€the€trial€court,€sua€sponte,€held€a€secondÏsentencing€hearing€in€order€to€consider€the€effect€of€another€indictment€against€theÏdefendant€which€the€court€was€made€aware€of€after€the€original€sentencing€hearing.€€TheÏtrial€court€amended€its€original€sentence€and€ordered€that€the€eight€year€sentence€beÏserved€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€rather€than€in€a€communityÏcorrections€program.ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€defendant€appeals,€challenging€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€usedÏto€convict€him€and€the€legality€of€the€sentence€which€was€imposed.€€After€a€review€of€theÏrecord€and€the€applicable€law,€we€find€no€merit€to€the€defendantððs€sufficiency€challenge;Ïhowever,€we€remand€the€case€for€resentencing.ÌÌà œ àà ô àOn€the€evening€of€July€27,€1995,€Eric€Tanner€was€robbed€at€gunpoint€at€aÏconvenience€store.€€He€was€on€his€way€home€from€work€and€stopped€to€buy€gas.€€AfterÏhe€finished€pumping€the€gas,€he€walked€toward€the€convenience€store€and€was€stoppedÐ ¦4F+. Ðby€a€young€male.€€The€man€began€to€talk€to€the€victim€and,€as€the€conversation€went€on,Ð º4Z+0 Ðhe€began€to€back€into€a€darker€area€beside€the€store.€€The€man€then€pulled€out€a€gun,Ïpointed€the€gun€directly€at€the€victimððs€face,€and€ordered€the€victim€to€give€him€all€hisÏmoney.€€When€the€victim€said€he€had€no€money,€the€man€reached€into€the€victimððs€backÏpocket€and€pulled€out€his€wallet.€€The€man€then€ordered€the€victim€to€empty€his€frontÏpockets.€€After€the€victim€complied,€the€man€ordered€the€victim€to€turn€around€and€runÏaway.ÌÌà œ àà ô àDuring€the€defendantððs€trial,€the€victim€positively€identified€the€defendant€asÏthe€robber.€€The€victim€testified€that€at€the€time€of€the€robbery€he€had€vaguely€recognizedÏthe€robber€but€could€not€remember€an€exact€name.€€Approximately€two€months€after€theÏrobbery,€the€victim€returned€to€school€and€began€to€look€through€old€yearbooks€in€anÏeffort€to€find€out€the€robberððs€identity.€€According€to€the€victim,€he€found€the€defendantððsÏpicture€and€then€informed€the€police.€€The€police€then€showed€the€victim€a€photo€line„upÏand€he€again€identified€the€defendant€as€the€robber.€€ÌÌà œ àà ô àAs€the€victimððs€identification€of€the€defendant€was€the€major€proof€againstÏhim€at€the€trial,€the€defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€used€to€convictÏhim.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€victimððs€identification€is€unreliable.€€In€support€ofÏthis€the€defendant€points€to€the€fact€that€there€was€a€six€week€time€lapse€between€theÏrobbery€and€the€defendantððs€arrest.€€The€defendant€also€contends€that€the€victim€foundÏthe€defendantððs€picture€in€the€yearbook€only€after€the€police€had€given€him€theÏdefendantððs€name.€€According€to€the€defendant,€the€victimððs€identification€is€alsoÏunreliable€because€the€defendant€does€not€exactly€match€the€description€of€the€robberÏgiven€by€the€victim€in€the€police€report.ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€defendant€also€contends€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€hisÐ L6ì,2 Ðconviction€because€the€victimððs€testimony€is€in€direct€contravention€with€the€testimony€ofÏthe€defendantððs€witnesses.€€At€the€trial,€the€defendantððs€mother,€father,€sister€andÏgirlfriend€placed€the€defendant€at€home€on€the€evening€of€the€robbery€and€testified€thatÏhe€did€not€leave€the€home€the€entire€evening.€€On€this€basis,€the€defendant€argues€thatÏno€reasonable€jury€could€have€found€him€guilty€of€the€aggravated€robbery€of€Eric€Tanner.ÌÌà œ àà ô àA€defendant€challenging€the€sufficiency€of€the€proof€has€the€burden€ofÏillustrating€to€this€Court€why€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€byÏthe€trier€of€fact€in€his€or€her€case.€€This€Court€will€not€disturb€a€verdict€of€guilt€for€lack€ofÏsufficient€evidence€unless€the€facts€contained€in€the€record€and€any€inferences€whichÏmay€be€drawn€from€the€facts€are€insufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€for€a€rational€trier€of€factÏto€find€the€defendant€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2dÐ $Ä Ð913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).ÌÌà œ àà ô àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence,€weÏmust€review€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€prosecution€in€determiningÏwhether€ð ðany€rational€trier€of€fact€could€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crimeÏbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ðð€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979).€€We€do€notÐ ì'Œ" Ðreweigh€or€re„evaluate€the€evidence€and€are€required€to€afford€the€State€the€strongestÏlegitimate€view€of€the€proof€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonable€andÏlegitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2dÐ P-ð#( Ð832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).ÌÌà œ àà ô àQuestions€concerning€the€credibility€of€witnesses,€the€weight€and€value€toÏbe€given€to€the€evidence,€as€well€as€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence€are€resolvedÏby€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€òòCabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835.€€A€guilty€verdictÐ L6ì,2 Ðrendered€by€the€jury€and€approved€by€the€trial€judge€accredits€the€testimony€of€theÏwitnesses€for€the€State,€and€a€presumption€of€guilt€replaces€the€presumption€ofÏinnocence.€€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).Ð ø ˜ ÐÌà œ àà ô àIn€affording€the€State€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidenceÏcontained€in€the€record,€we€find€that€a€reasonable€jury€could€have€found€the€defendantÏguilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€of€the€aggravated€robbery€of€Eric€Tanner.€€The€victimÏmade€a€positive€identification€of€the€defendant€on€two€separate€occasions,€not€includingÏthe€identification€made€in€the€courtroom€during€the€trial.€€Although€the€defendantððs€familyÏand€girlfriend€placed€the€defendant€elsewhere€on€the€night€of€the€robbery,€the€credibilityÏof€that€testimony€is€determined€by€the€trier€of€fact,€not€this€Court.€€The€jury€in€theÏdefendantððs€case€apparently€determined€that€the€victimððs€testimony€was€reliable€andÏfound€the€defendant€guilty.€€We€find€that€there€is€enough€evidence€on€the€record€toÏsupport€the€guilty€verdict€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.ÌÌà œ àà ô àAs€his€second€issue,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€suaÏsponte€changing€the€defendantððs€sentence€from€participation€in€a€community€correctionsÏprogram€to€a€sentence€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€after€the€defendantÏhad€begun€serving€his€sentence.€ÌÌà œ àà ô àThe€defendant€was€originally€sentenced€on€October€18,€1996,€to€a€term€ofÏeight€years€to€be€served€in€community€corrections.€€On€November€18,€1996,€the€trialÏcourt,€sua€sponte,€held€another€sentencing€hearing€to€amend€the€defendantððs€sentence.€ÏAt€the€second€hearing,€the€defendantððs€sentence€was€changed€to€an€eight€year€sentenceÏto€be€served€in€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€rather€than€in€the€communityÏcorrections€program.€€The€judgeððs€reconsideration€of€the€defendantððs€sentence€wasÐ L6ì,2 Ðbased€on€an€indictment€of€the€defendant€that€was€handed€down€by€the€grand€jury€soonÏafter€the€original€sentencing€hearing.€€The€judge€reasoned:ÌÒô DÒÒܦÒÓÓAs€I€stated€earlier,€the€factors€of€his€age€and€his€Ìapparent€remorse€and€likelihood€of€rehabilitation€prompted€Ìthis€Court€to€order€him€to€serve€that€eight€year€sentence€with€ÌCommunity€Corrections€despite€the€fact€it€was€a€crime€of€viol„Ìence.€€Ìà L àIn€substance€I€said€that€if€Mr.€Hill€ever€came€back€before€Ìthis€Court€on€anything€else€that€I€would€in€all€likelihood€consider€Ìhis€rehabilitation€to€be€nil,€or€the€possibility€of€his€rehabilitation€to€Ìbe€nil.€€And€that€I€would€not€have€any€choice€but€to€send€him€to€Ìthe€Department€of€Corrections.Ìà L àThere€is€no€evidence€here€today,€but€there€is€an€indictment€Ìwhich€was€handed€down€by€a€Grand€Jury€based€on€probable€Ìcause.€€The€Grand€Jury€heard€testimony,€sworn€testimony,€and€Ìbased€upon€what€it€heard€believed€there€was€a€probability€that€aÏcrime€was€committed€and€a€probability€that€this€Defendant€comm„¼ññà L àÌññññà L àà L àññitted€that€crime.Ìññà L àà L àññà L àGiven€the€totality€of€all€the€facts€and€circumstances€the€Ìññà L àà L àññCourt€believes€that€its€sentence€was€just€wrong.€€Therefore€I€amÏññà L àà L àà L àññamending€the€sentence,€and€I€am€ordering€the€eight€yearÏsentence€ññÌà ¤ àà ¤ àññto€be€served€with€the€Department€of€Correction.ÌÓ/ÓÌñ ñÒDô ÒÒ¦ÜÒñ ñà œ àññà ¤ àñññ ñà ô àñ ñGiven€these€statements,€it€is€apparent€the€judge€resentenced€the€defendantÏbased€on€the€new€indictment.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€This€is€in€spite€of€the€fact€that,€as€the€judge€pointed€out,Ð ˆ"( Ðthere€was€no€evidence€of€wrongdoing€by€the€defendant,€only€an€indictment.ÌÌà œ àà ô àThere€are€several€apparent€errors€concerning€the€sentencing€and€theÏresentencing€of€the€defendant.€€It€appears€to€this€Court€that€under€the€statutory€criteriaÏset€out€at€T.€C.€A.€ðð€40„36„106(a),€the€defendant€was€not€eligible€for€a€sentence€in€aÏcommunity€corrections€program.ñ ñœ×ƒv×ñ ññ ñ׃v×ñ ñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€€In€addition,€even€if€the€defendant€had€been€eligible€forÐ P-ð#( Ðâ âa€community€corrections€sentence,€it€is€unclear€whether€the€trial€judge€had€the€authorityÐ /¼%* Ðto€amend€the€defendantððs€sentence.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€In€light€of€the€foregoing,€we€remand€this€case€forÐ `  Ðâ âœresentencing›€in€accordance€with€the€provisions€of€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€ActÏof€1989.ÌÌà œ àà ô àIn€sum,€we€affirm€the€defendantððs€conviction€and€remand€the€case€forÏœresentencing›.ÌÌÓÓœà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ à______________________________›Ìà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü àà T àà ¬ àœJOHN›€H.€PEAY,€JudgeÌÌœÌÌCONCUR:›ÌÌÌÌœ______________________________›ÌœTHOMAS›€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÌÌÌœÌ______________________________ÌL.›€TERRY€œLAFFERTY›,€Special€œJudgeÌ›